This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marzocchetti, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marzocchetti, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2005, p. 4175-4177, Vol. 43, No. 8
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.8.4175-4177.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Reduced Rate of Diagnostic Positive Detection of JC Virus DNA in Cerebrospinal Fluid in Cases of Suspected Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in the Era of Potent Antiretroviral Therapy

Angela Marzocchetti,* Simona Di Giambenedetto, Antonella Cingolani, Adriana Ammassari, Roberto Cauda, and Andrea De Luca

Istituto di Clinica delle Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Received 1 July 2004/ Returned for modification 20 September 2004/ Accepted 22 April 2005


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Fifty-nine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with suspected progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and 224 controls were tested for JC virus (JCV) DNA in cerebrospinal fluid by PCR. The diagnostic positive detection rate dropped from 89.5% (95% confidence intervals of 75.5 to 103.5%) in the pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era to 57.5% (95% confidence intervals of 42.1 to 72.9%) in the HAART era; the specificity remained unchanged. Predictors of failure to detect JCV DNA were exposure to HAART at disease onset and higher CD4 counts.


arrow
TEXT
 
JC virus (JCV) is the polyomavirus causing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) (5), a demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) that affects 5 to 8% of AIDS patients (3). The disease is characterized by disseminated development of demyelination plaques in the cerebral white matter and adjacent areas. At the rim of these foci, virus accumulates to high concentrations in oligodendrocytes causing their destruction by cytolysis (6). Before the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), PML was characterized by an extremely poor disease prognosis (10). The definitive diagnosis of PML is based on the concomitant presence of a compatible clinical and neuroimaging picture and characteristic histopathologic features with JC virus detection in the brain tissue (11, 12). However, in vivo brain biopsy is an invasive method with recognized risks and high costs. Therefore, several authors developed and validated less-invasive diagnostic methods based on the amplification of JCV target DNA from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by PCR (9, 16). The different reports showed a variable efficiency of PCR-based assays with diagnostic positive detection rate ranging from 17 to 90% and specificity from 92 to 100% (13, 15). After the introduction of HAART, disease prognosis has improved in association with an induced clearance of JCV DNA from the CSF (8, 9). The aim of the present study was to analyze whether, in the HAART era, the diagnostic positive detection rate of JCV DNA detection in CSF has changed and to investigate predictors of JCV DNA detection in the CSF of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with suspected PML.

We analyzed all HIV type 1-positive patients undergoing lumbar puncture for diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) disorders at the Clinical Infectious Diseases Department of the Catholic University in Rome between January 1992 and December 1995 (pre-HAART era) and between September 1996 and December 2002 (HAART era). Uniform criteria for defining "suspected PML" were used throughout the study; these consisted of the concomitant presence of compatible clinical and brain magnetic resonance imaging features, as well as the exclusion of alternative diagnoses by the search of other agents associated with CNS disorders in the CSF and by clinical follow-up (1, 7). All patients (suspected PML and other disorders) were tested for JCV DNA in CSF prospectively, for diagnostic purposes, by a qualitative nested PCR with a detection limit of 1,600 JCV DNA copies/ml, as previously described (9). In case of negative results, the JCV DNA assay was repeated on a new CSF sample collected after 1 to 4 weeks. A total of 436 CSF samples from 283 patients were analyzed: 184 samples from 102 patients (19 with suspected PML) from the pre-HAART era and 252 samples from 181 patients (40 with suspected PML) belonging to the HAART era. The baseline characteristics of the suspected PML patients are shown in Table 1. The control group included CSF samples from 83 patients of the pre-HAART era and 141 subjects of the HAART era with various disorders: HIV encephalopathy (17 pre-HAART era, 63 HAART era), toxoplasmic encephalitis (16 pre-HAART era, 22 HAART era), primary brain lymphoma (19 pre-HAART era, 6 HAART era), cryptococcal meningitis (12 pre-HAART era, 3 HAART era), systemic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (13 pre-HAART era, 8 HAART era), cytomegalovirus encephalitis (12 HAART era), tubercular meningitis (3 pre-HAART era, 6 HAART era), other CNS diseases (3 pre-HAART era, 14 HAART era), and other systemic diseases (7 HAART era). The proportion of suspected PML cases among all the HIV-infected patients undergoing diagnostic lumbar puncture did not differ significantly between eras (19 of 102 [18.6%] in the pre-HAART era and 40 of 181 [22.1%] in the HAART era; P = 0.54 as determined by the Fisher exact test).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Features of suspected PML patients and controlsa

In the pre-HAART era, 17 of 19 suspected PML and 1 of 83 controls tested positive; in the HAART era, 23 of 40 suspected PML and 0 of 141 controls tested positive. Positive detection rate, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the test in the two eras are summarized in Table 2. In the HAART era, a significant reduction in the diagnostic positive detection rate and in the predictive value of the negative test were observed. At univariate analysis, factors that predicted a failure to detect JCV DNA in CSF in the 59 suspected PML patients (pre-HAART era + HAART era) were: HAART exposure at onset of the disease (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.66; P = 0.008), CD4 counts higher than 100 cells/µl (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.60; P = 0.006), HAART era versus pre-HAART era (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.81; P = 0.024), plasma HIV RNA levels (available in 36 patients of the HAART era only) (for 1-log increases, OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.93; P = 0.026). In a multivariable logistic regression, only CD4 counts above 100 cells/µl were significantly associated with a reduced odds of JCV DNA detection after we adjusted for era and HAART exposure at disease onset.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Diagnostic accuracy of nested PCR detection of JCV DNA on CSF samples of repeated lumbar punctures for diagnosis of PML in HIV-infected patients according to study eraa

Noteworthy, in the subset of patients from the HAART era, the quantitation of CSF JCV DNA (by semiquantitative nested PCR) (9) showed lower concentrations in PML patients treated with HAART before disease onset (mean JCV DNA in CSF 3.26 versus 3.99 log10 copies/ml; P = 0.003).

The results of the present study show that JCV DNA detection in CSF by PCR has reduced its diagnostic positive detection rate during the HAART era. This is in agreement with previous reports showing an increased prevalence of undiagnosed PML cases, even after CSF investigation by multiple lumbar punctures (2). The mechanism through which combination antiretroviral therapy may act on JCV burden is not known. It might be hypothesized that it inhibits the entry into brain of JCV-infected B lymphocytes, usually facilitated during HIV infection, as well as the transactivation of JCV by the HIV tat protein (4). We show that immune reconstitution, represented here by CD4 counts above 100 cells/µl is an independent predictor of failure to detect JCV DNA in CSF of PML patients. Therefore, a larger proportion of suspected PML patients showing higher CD4 counts in the HAART era might be at least a partial explanation for the observed reduction of the diagnostic positive detection rate.

The emergence of an increasing number of patients with undiagnosed PML in the HAART era stresses the need for an improvement of the PCR aiming at a better positive detection rate for the detection of JCV in CSF by keeping specificity unchanged. Indeed, some patients with reduced JC viral replication could have shown a negative result with the PCR assay used in the present study simply because the JC viral DNA copy number in their CSF was below its detection limit. If an improved sensitivity cannot be achieved, brain biopsy should be reconsidered as an option in case of PML suspect and repeatedly negative CSF assays: histological findings may also have an impact on therapeutic decisions (14).


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported by Italian National Institute of Health, IV Progetto Nazionale AIDS-Infezioni Opportunistiche e Tubercolosi grant 50D.7.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Istituto di Clinica delle Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. Phone: 39-0630155366. Fax: 39-063054519. E-mail: angela.marzocchetti{at}tin.it. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Antinori, A., A. Ammassari, A. De Luca, A. Cingolani, R. Murri, G. Scoppettuolo, M. Fortini, T. Tartaglione, L. M. Larocca, G. Zannoni, P. Cattani, R. Grillo, R. Roselli, M. Iacoangeli, M. Scerrati, and L. Ortona. Diagnosis of AIDS-related focal brain lesions: a decision-making analysis based on clinical and neuroradiologic characteristics combined with polymerase chain reaction assays in CSF. Neurology 48:687-694.
    2. 2
  2. Antinori, A., A. Ammassari, M. L. Giancola, A. Cingolani, S. Grisetti, R. Murri, L. Alba, B. Ciancio, F. Soldani, D. Larussa, G. Ippolito, and A. De Luca. 2001. Epidemiology and prognosis of AIDS-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in the HAART era. J. Neurovirol. 7:323-328.[CrossRef][Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Antinori, A., A. Cingolani, P. Lorenzini, M. L. Giancola, I. Uccella, S. Bossolasco, S. Grisetti, F. Moretti, B. Vigo, M. Bongiovanni, B. Del Grosso, M. I. Arcidiacono, G. C. Fibbia, M. Mena, M. G. Finazzi, G. Guaraldi, A. Ammassari, A. d'Arminio Monforte, P. Cinque, A. De Luca, et al. 2003. Clinical epidemiology and survival of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: data from the Italian Registry Investigative Neuro AIDS (IRINA). J. Neurovirol. 9(Suppl. 1):47-54.
    4. 4
  4. Berger, J. R., A. Chauhan, D. Galey, and A. Nath. 2001. Epidemiological evidence and molecular basis of interactions between HIV and JC virus. J. Neurovirol. 7:329-338.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Berger, J. R., and M. Concha. 1995. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: the evolution of a disease once considered rare. J. Neurovirol. 1:5-18.[Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Berger, J. R., and E. O. Major. 1999. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Semin. Neurol. 19:193-200.[Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Cinque, P., I. J. Koralnik, and D. B. Clifford. 2003. The evolving face of human immunodeficiency virus-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: defining a consensus terminology. J. Neurovirol. 9(Suppl. 1):88-92.
    8. 8
  8. De Luca, A., M. L. Giancola, A. Ammassari, S. Grisetti, A. Cingolani, D. Larussa, L. Alba, R. Murri, G. Ippolito, R. Cauda, A. Monforte, and A. Antinori. 2001. Potent Antiretroviral therapy with or without cidofovir for AIDS-associated progressive multifocal leukoencepalophathy: extended follow-up and an observational study. J. Neurovirol. 7:364-368.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 9
  9. De Luca, A., M. L. Giancola, A. Ammassari, S. Grisetti, M. G. Paglia, M. Gentile, A. Cingolani, R. Murri, G. Liuzzi, A. D. Monforte, and A. Antinori. 2000. The effect of potent antiretroviral therapy and JC virus load in cerebrospinal fluid on clinical outcome of patients with AIDS-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1077-1083.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. De Luca, A., M. L. Giancola, A. Cingolani, A. Ammassari, L. Gillini, R. Murri, and A. Antinori. 1999. Clinical and virological monitoring during treatment with intrathecal cytarabine in patients with AIDS associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 28:624-628.[Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Gibson, P. E., S. D. Gardner, and A. M. Field. 1986. Use of a molecular probe for detecting JCV DNA directly in human brain material. J. Medical Virology 18:87-95.
    12. 12
  12. Karahalios, D., R. Breit, M. Dal Canto, and M. Levy. 1992. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy inpatients with HIV infection: lack of impact of early diagnosis by stereotactic brain biopsy. J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr. 5:1030-1038.
    13. 13
  13. McGuire, D., H. Barhite, H. Hollander, and M. Miles. 1995. JC virus DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: predictive value for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Ann. Neurol. 37:395-399.[CrossRef][Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Sadfar, A., R. J. Rubocki, J. A. Horvath, K. K. Narayan, and L. Waldron. 2002. Fatal immune restoration disease in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: impact of antiretroviral therapy-associated immune reconstitution. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:1250-1257.[CrossRef][Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Weber, T., R. W. Turner, S. Frye, W. Luke, H. A. Kretzschmar, W. Luer, and G. Hunsmann. 1994. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy diagnosed by amplification of JC virus-specific DNA from cerebrospinal fluid. AIDS 8:49-57.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Weber, T., R. W. Turner, S. Frye, J. B. Ruf, Haas, E. Schielke, H. D. Pohle, W. Luke, W. Luer, K. Felgenhauer, et al. 1994. Specific diagnosis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy by polymerase chain reaction. J. Infect. Dis. 169:1138-1141.[Medline]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2005, p. 4175-4177, Vol. 43, No. 8
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.8.4175-4177.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tornatore, C., Clifford, D. B (2009). Clinical vigilance for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in the context of natalizumab use. Mult Scler 15: S16-S25 [Abstract]  
  • Linda, H., von Heijne, A., Major, E. O., Ryschkewitsch, C., Berg, J., Olsson, T., Martin, C. (2009). Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy after Natalizumab Monotherapy. NEJM 361: 1081-1087 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yaldizli, O., Putzki, N. (2009). Review: Natalizumab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders 2: 115-128 [Abstract]  
  • Wang, Y., Kirby, J. E., Qian, Q. (2009). Effective use of JC virus PCR for diagnosis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J Med Microbiol 58: 253-255 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith, A. B., Smirniotopoulos, J. G., Rushing, E. J. (2008). From the Archives of the AFIP@;DELIM@;Continuing Medical Education: Central Nervous System Infections Associated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation1. RadioGraphics 28: 2033-2058 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clifford, D. B (2008). Natalizumab and PML: a risky business?. Gut 57: 1347-1349 [Full Text]  
  • Hatfield, M. K., Handrich, S. J., Willis, J. A., Beres, R. A., Zaleski, G. X. (2008). Blood Patch Rates After Lumbar Puncture with Whitacre Versus Quincke 22- and 20-Gauge Spinal Needles. Am. J. Roentgenol. 190: 1686-1689 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marzocchetti, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marzocchetti, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, A.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»