Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Munro, S. C. Articles by Rawlinson, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Munro, S. C. Articles by Rawlinson, W. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2005, p. 4713-4718, Vol. 43, No. 9
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.9.4713-4718.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Diagnosis of and Screening for Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pregnant Women

S. C. Munro,^1,2,3* B. Hall,^1,4 L. R. Whybin,⁵ L. Leader,⁴ P. Robertson,⁵ G. T. Maine,⁶ and W. D. Rawlinson^1,2,3

Virology Division,¹ Serology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, SEALS Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia,⁵ School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences,² School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia,³ Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia,⁴ Core Research and Development, Abbott Laboratories Diagnostic Division, Abbott Park, Illinois⁶

Received 2 February 2005/ Returned for modification 14 March 2005/ Accepted 20 June 2005

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
No single diagnostic test for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is currently available for pregnant women at all stages of gestation. Improved accuracy in estimating the timing of primary infections can be used to identify women at higher risk of giving birth to congenitally infected infants. A diagnostic algorithm utilizing immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgG avidity was used to prospectively screen serum from 600 pregnant women enrolled from two groups: 20 weeks gestation (n = 396) or >20 weeks gestation (n = 204). PCR testing of urine and/or blood was performed on all seropositive women (n = 341). The majority (56.8%) of women were CMV IgG seropositive, with 5.5% being also CMV IgM positive. In the IgM-positive women, 1.2% had a low-avidity IgG, indicating a primary CMV infection and a high risk of intrauterine transmission. Two infants with asymptomatic CMV infection were born of mothers who had seroconverted in the second trimester of pregnancy. Baseline, age-stratified CMV serostatus was established from 1,018 blood donors. Baseline seropositivity from a blood donor population increased with age from 34.9% seroprevalence at less than 20 years of age to 72% seroprevalence at 50 years of age. Women at high risk of intrauterine transmission of CMV were identified at all stages of gestation. Women infected with CMV during late gestation may be more likely to transmit the virus, so failure to detect seroconversions in late gestation may result in failure to detect infected neonates.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common cause of congenital malformation resulting from viral intrauterine infection in developed countries (12, 21, 48). Primary CMV infection occurs in 0.15 to 2.0% of all pregnancies and may be transmitted to the fetus in up to 40% of cases (48). Up to 15% of intrauterine CMV infections result in symptomatic congenital disease at birth, and 10 to 15% of those born with asymptomatic congenital CMV will develop significant clinical sequelae in infancy (7, 10, 18). In utero transmission of CMV can occur during primary maternal infection, reactivation, or reinfection of seropositive mothers. Most concern centers on primary maternal infection, due to the potential for significant fetal damage when the infection is acquired and transmitted during the first trimester (30, 48). Perinatal infections can result through virus transmission from many parts of the birth canal (39); however, the majority of these infections are asymptomatic (43).

The usefulness of prenatal testing for CMV has been questioned due to the absence of clearly effective intervention (1, 27) and to evidence for severe congenital malformation resulting from viral reactivation (6, 8, 20). Continuing advancements in technology, however, mean reliable and inexpensive serologic tests are available, prenatal diagnostic procedures with acceptable negative predictive values (NPV) can be performed, and trials of neonatal antiviral treatments are ongoing (25, 34, 37, 50, 52). Proposed diagnostic algorithms have focused on first-trimester screening, since the time of infection can be accurately obtained in the absence of seroconversion data, and the clinical sequelae of congenital CMV is usually more severe if transmission occurs early in gestation (30, 48). A high positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV for clinical disease have been determined for quantitative PCR testing of amniotic fluid (26); however, there is an increased risk of a false-negative result if fewer than 7 weeks have elapsed between the onset of maternal infection and the time of amniocentesis (5, 36). In addition, amniotic fluid testing prior to 21 weeks gestation only has a 30 to 45% sensitivity rate, while testing after 21 weeks gestation increases the sensitivity to 74% (13, 35). Such time constraints are important if termination is considered as a management option, since the gestational age of a viable fetus is currently considered to be ca. 24 weeks (9). Amniocentesis also increases the risk of spontaneous abortion (2, 49), which in some cases may be greater than the risk of intrauterine CMV transmission.

Many parents desire antenatal diagnosis of intrauterine infection so that they are informed of the possible outcomes for their child, as opposed to antenatal testing for selective termination (43). There is therefore a need for a low-risk, noninvasive diagnostic test. Laboratory methods are required to diagnose acute CMV infections since most present nonspecific symptoms. Women are not routinely screened for CMV prior to conception so CMV seroconversion is infrequently documented, making diagnosis of primary CMV infections difficult. The presence of CMV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) may not be indicative of primary infection, since it is also produced during reactivation and reinfection (41). IgG antigen avidity has been used to clarify primary or nonprimary infections by measuring the binding affinity of IgG antibodies. IgG of low avidity are produced at the onset of infections, and subsequent maturation of the antibody increases its avidity over time. The use of IgG testing was pioneered in a large scale study on toxoplasmosis (31) and has more recently been shown to be useful for distinguishing primary and nonprimary CMV infections (3, 24, 33).

Furthermore, since the risk of CMV intrauterine transmission increases with advancing gestation, there is a need for diagnostic tests that can be used at all stages of gestation. In developing an appropriate diagnostic algorithm, test sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV need to be estimated, utilizing known population prevalence. We outline here a noninvasive, diagnostic algorithm for congenital CMV detection at all stages during pregnancy based on initial serological screening with CMV IgG, IgM, and IgG avidity. The diagnosis of asymptomatic neonates is emphasized, since half of the children who suffer from CMV sequelae are asymptomatic at birth (10, 18). Also, knowledge of the risk of conditions such as sensorineural hearing loss in asymptomatic neonates, can allow close monitoring, early diagnosis, and early intervention, whereas failure to detect and follow up asymptomatic neonates may have serious consequences for the development of the child (51).

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patients. Two cohorts were studied. The first cohort consisted of 1,018 de-identified blood donors, who were tested for CMV IgG serostatus between 30 October 2003 and 10 November 2003 as part of routine screening. The second cohort consisted of 600 pregnant women, prospectively screened for CMV by serology from 7 October 2002 to 1 June 2004. The women were presenting for routine antenatal care at a tertiary referral women's hospital (the Royal Hospital for Women), which has ca. 3,500 confinements each year. All subjects gave written consent under the South Eastern Area Health Services ethics approval 02/085 and the University of New South Wales ethics approval 03110.

Specimens. Whole blood and urine samples were collected from all women in the second cohort. Whole blood samples were centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 20 min, and the buffy coat was removed and stored at –20°C. DNA was extracted from urine either on the day of collection or after storage at 4°C for a maximum of 24 h. DNA was extracted from urine and buffy coat by column purification using QIAamp DNA minikits (QIAGEN, GmbH) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

PCR was used to detect the excretion of CMV in the urine samples obtained. Viral isolation was conducted on all CMV-positive urine samples. Virus isolation was performed by using a standard shell-vial assay (22) on MRC5 cells, followed by detection using a Light Diagnostics kit (Chemicon). The direct immunofluorescence technique identifies the immediate-early antigen of human CMV. Women who were CMV IgM positive were also tested by PCR for CMV DNA in their blood.

Serology. CMV IgG and IgM were detected in patient serum by using a commercial microparticle enzyme immunoassay (Abbott AxSYM; Abbott Laboratories). An IgG avidity assay (CMV IgG avidity EIA; Radim, Rome, Italy) was used to distinguish between primary and recurrent CMV infections (32). A second commercially available CMV-IgM enzyme immunoassay (Eti-Cytok IgM; Sorin Biomedica, Vercelli, Italy) was also used on all sera. The procedures and interpretation of results were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions except that specimens with an avidity index of 35% were considered high avidity.

PCR. A solution phase nested PCR was carried out on the DNA extracted from all samples with primers specific to the major immediate-early (MIE) section of the CMV genome. The first round amplified a 416-bp region using the designed primers MIE1517 (sense; 5'-AAGGTTCGAGTGGACATGGT-3') and MIE1932 (antisense; 5'-CAGCCATTGGTGGTCTTAGG-3'). A combination of previously described primers were used for the inner round to amplify a 249-bp product: MIE1661 (sense; 5'-GAGCCTTTCGAGGAGATGAA-3') and MIE1909 (antisense; 5'-GGCTGAGTTCTTGGTAAAGA-3') (28). The cycling conditions for both rounds consisted of denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 50 s. A final incubation at 72°C for 3 min ensured that all amplified products were complete. A DNA positive control amplification was carried out on all samples using a single-round PCR to the GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) gene (14). The GAPDH PCR was performed concurrently with the MIE PCR under the same cycling conditions.

Statistical analysis. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared by using a two-sample Student t test. Cross-tabulation and chi-square (with Yates' continuity correction) or Fisher exacts tests were used to examine the relationship between variables using a 95% confidence interval as a measure of association.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
A baseline rate of CMV IgG seropositivity was obtained by screening 1,018 de-identified blood donors from the Australian Red Cross Blood Service (ARCBS) in Sydney (cohort 1). In subjects younger than 20 years of age, approximately one-third (34.9%) were CMV IgG seropositive. The CMV seropositivity rate steadily increased with age, reaching a plateau at the age of 50, with more than two-thirds (72.4%) of the population infected. There were approximately equal numbers of men (48.5%) and women (51.5%) within the population; however, there were significantly more (P = 0.05) CMV-seropositive women (54.4%) than men (45.6%).

The CMV seropositivity rate for the pregnant women cohort showed that, overall, 56.8% women were CMV IgG positive at pregnancy. The age range of the pregnant women was 19 to 47 years, with no significant difference seen between the mean age of seropositive and seronegative women. Compared to the ARCBS population, the CMV seropositivity rate in the pregnant women cohort was higher at less than 20 years of age (60% compared to 34.9%) and between the ages of 20 to 30 years (66.27% compared to 44.8%) but was similar after the age of 30 years (50% compared to 56.6%).

The diagnostic algorithm used for screening the prospective cohort of 600 pregnant women is shown in Fig. 1. The women were divided into two groups based upon gestation. Group A consisted of 396 patients who consented through the outpatient clinic at 20 weeks or less than 20 weeks of gestation (mean, 15 weeks). Group B consisted of 204 patients who consented at the time of glucose tolerance testing (GTT) for gestational diabetes at over 20 weeks gestation (mean, 28 weeks). All women were screened serologically for CMV IgG and IgM. Women with an equivocal serology result or an IgG-negative and IgM-positive result were screened 3 weeks later to confirm the serostatus of the patient. CMV IgG avidity was determined for all patient specimens that were CMV IgM and IgG positive. First-trimester bleeds from women in group B who were IgM positive were screened retrospectively. No statistical differences (P > 0.05) were seen in the average age, parity, or CMV serostatus of the two groups.

View larger version (36K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Proposed diagnostic algorithm for CMV serology screening in pregnant women.

Of the 600 women tested, 259 (43.2%) had never been infected with CMV and 308 (51.3%) had a past CMV infection (Table 1). The remaining 33 (5.5%) women were CMV IgM positive, 25 (4.2%) of whom were from group A and 8 (1.3%) of whom were from group B. Of the IgM-positive women, five from group A and two from group B had low IgG avidity, a finding consistent with a primary CMV infection and a high risk of intrauterine transmission (Table 2). Retrospective testings of the first-trimester screens from the two women from group B showed that they were CMV seronegative in their first trimester, indicating seroconversions during the second trimester of pregnancy and a high risk of CMV intrauterine transmission.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Serological data collected prospectively between 7 October 2002 and 1 June 2004 for 600 pregnant womena

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Screening data from seven women diagnosed as being at high risk for CMV intrauterine transmissiona

A second commercially available CMV-IgM enzyme immunoassay (Eti-Cytok IgM) was used on all sera, and the results were compared. The CMV IgM reactivity rates for the AxSYM/IMx and the Eti-Cytok IgM levels were 5.7 and 1.8%, respectively. In the seven IgM-positive cases with low-avidity IgG, the Eti-Cytok IgM test failed to detect two cases (Table 2). Another five discordant specimens were CMV IgM negative in the AxSYM/IMx test but positive in the Eti-Cytok IgM test. All of these specimens contained high-avidity IgG.

PCR was used to detect excretion of CMV in urine from mothers and infants. Of the seropositive women, 1.8% (6 of 341) were shown to be shedding CMV at the time of testing with 4 of the women being IgM positive, 3 of whom had a low-avidity IgG level. CMV IgM positive women were also tested for the presence of CMV DNA in their blood. Four of the CMV IgM-positive women were CMV DNA viremic; all of these woman had low-avidity IgG (Table 2).

All IgM-positive mothers and an equal number of control patients were monitored through an infectious disease clinic until birth. Mothers in the control groups were CMV IgG negative and IgM negative or CMV IgG positive and IgM negative. One IgM-positive woman with a low-avidity IgG result had a natural miscarriage at 8 weeks gestation, and the products of conception were not obtained for testing (Table 2, case 2). Samples were obtained from all other infants within 3 days of birth, with neonatal blood and placental DNA tested by PCR and urine specimens tested by PCR and culture. All infants underwent hearing tests prior to their discharge from hospital. None of the infants in the control groups tested positive for CMV. Two cases of intrauterine transmission of CMV were detected from IgM-positive mothers who had low avidity IgG when first tested (Table 2, cases 6 and 7). Both mothers were from group B and had seroconverted during the second trimester of pregnancy. The two neonates were asymptomatic at birth, but were CMV positive in both blood and urine by CMV PCR and were positive for CMV urine culture. Both infants had normal hearing tests prior to discharge from the hospital and have been enrolled for regular follow-up hearing tests.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The base rate of CMV IgG seroprevalence in blood donors was shown to increase with age, from 34.9% at less than 20 years of age to 72.4% after the age of 50 years. These are the first published data of age-related CMV serostatus in an Australian population, and the results are similar to those from populations in Europe and the United States (21). Within the blood donor population significantly more women were infected with CMV than men, a finding in agreement with risk factors for other sexually transmitted viruses, such as human papillomavirus (29) and herpes simplex viruses (23). This increased risk is consistent with a demonstrated higher efficiency of male-to-female transmission (40).

Unlike the blood donor population, the rate of CMV infection in the pregnant-women cohort did not increase with age but instead was consistently high in women of less than 30 years of age (60 to 66%). Risk factors for CMV infection have been correlated with the socioeconomic status within a community (16, 17). The cohort of pregnant women was from the southeastern area of Sydney, which has the second highest socioeconomic status within the state of New South Wales (2a). The Australian data presented therefore differ from published data from the United States and Western Europe, in which women of childbearing age, of middle to upper class socioeconomic status, have a lower seroprevalence rate of CMV (21).

Serological screening was incorporated into already-established procedures, including first-trimester screening and GTT screening for gestational diabetes in order to establish a diagnostic algorithm for CMV in pregnant women. Due to the advanced gestational age of many participants, the cohort was not as restricted as for previously published diagnostic algorithms (37, 43). A new algorithm was therefore designed (Fig. 1) based on initial detection with CMV IgG and IgM serological screening and the analysis of IgG avidity to determine the length of infection. Additional diagnostic tests, including CMV DNA detection in maternal blood and urine samples, were conducted to allow assessment of the serological diagnosis.

CMV IgM has been shown to peak during the first 1 to 3 months after primary infection in pregnant women and then persist at a low level for 18 to 39 weeks, with detection depending upon both the individual patient and the sensitivity of the IgM assay used (11, 43). After the initial onset of infection the rise in IgM titer may occur prior to the rise in IgG titer, making CMV IgG avidity testing reliant on the sensitivity of the CMV IgM test. To ensure that all CMV IgM-positive samples were detected and screened for IgG avidity, the AxSYM/IMx CMV IgM test was used, since it is one of the most sensitive commercial CMV IgM tests available (11, 32, 38). In agreement with published findings, the rate of IgM detection by the AxSYM/IMx was greater (5.7%) than the rate of the Eti-Cytok IgM (1.8%). Sensitive CMV IgM tests may have a high number of false-positive results (11, 38); however, all IgM results were verified by CMV IgG avidity testing, and the use of a sensitive CMV IgM test ensured that all individuals at risk of a primary infection were identified.

CMV IgG avidity has been shown to distinguish primary CMV infections from reactivated infections in pregnant women, and the maturation rate and duration of the antibody has been shown to correlate with patient viremia (4, 24, 33). Low-avidity IgG in pregnant women persists for approximately 17 weeks, with full maturation of the antibody occurring approximately 25 weeks after onset of symptoms (33). Screening in first trimester prior to 17 weeks gestation should therefore detect primary infections during this time. Combining CMV screening with GTT screening at 28 weeks gestation is a viable time to test for CMV infection in the second trimester since IgM from a primary infection will be detectable and IgG avidity can be determined and used in conjunction with retrospective screening of first trimester bleeds to determine the time of infection.

In immunocompetent persons, CMV detection in blood is thought to be indicative of a primary CMV infection (44). In the present study, CMV DNA was detected in blood samples from three women with diagnosed primary CMV infection: one woman from group A (IgM positive with low-avidity IgG) and two women from group B who seroconverted. No correlation has been shown to exist between CMV viremia or CMV DNA detection in blood and intrauterine transmission (44); however, in the present study intrauterine transmission occurred in the two mothers from group B who were viremic at the time of testing.

CMV shedding in urine can occur in both primary and nonprimary infections, and increasing numbers of women shed with advancing gestational age (19, 47). Only a small percentage (1.2%) of CMV seropositive women in the present study were found to be shedding CMV compared to published data (46). Urinary shedding has a poor correlation with intrauterine infection, although it has been identified as a risk factor (15, 42). In the present study one of the women from group B who seroconverted and was viremic at the time of testing was also shedding CMV in her urine and gave birth to a child with asymptomatic congenital CMV infection.

This prospective study provides a screening plan for women who are more advanced in gestation than allowed for by previous diagnostic algorithms. IgG avidity testing is less invasive than amniotic fluid testing and can be conducted during late gestation with no risk to the patient. Women infected with CMV during late gestation are more likely to transmit the virus to their unborn child than women who are infected early in gestation, with both cases of intrauterine transmission detected in the present study resulting from CMV infections in late gestation. Failure to detect seroconversions in late gestation women may result in failure to detect infected, asymptomatic neonates. Noninvasive serological testing with the improved algorithm will benefit such children, who are at a risk of complications, particularly sensorineural hearing loss, which can have a negative impact on the development of the child.

 
Funding was obtained from Abbott Diagnostics and the Australian Research Council.

We thank Wayne Bolton and the ARCBS for data; Maria Craig, SEALS Serology and Virology Diagnostic Laboratories, for technical support; and all participating women and pediatricians.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Virology Division, Department of Microbiology SEALS, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker St., Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia. Phone: 61-2-9562-5032 Fax: 61-2-9562-5094. E-mail: smunro{at}ctc.usyd.edu.au.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Ahlfors, K., S. A. Ivarsson, and S. Harris. 1999. Report on a long-term study of maternal and congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Sweden: review of prospective studies available in the literature. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 31:443-457.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Alfirevic, Z., K. Sundberg, and S. Brigham. 20 January 2003, posting date. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. [Online.] http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD003252/frame.html.
2
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1997. Population profile incorporating demographic and social indicators from the ABS 1996 census of population and housing. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia.
3
4. Bodeus, M., S. Feyder, and P. Goubau. 1998. Avidity of IgG antibodies distinguishes primary from non-primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnant women. Clin. Diagn. Virol. 9:9-16.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
5. Bodeus, M., and P. Goubau. 1999. Predictive value of maternal-IgG avidity for congenital human cytomegalovirus infection. J. Clin. Virol. 12:3-8.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
6. Bodeus, M., C. Hubinont, P. Bernard, A. Bouckaert, K. Thomas, and P. Goubau. 1999. Prenatal diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus by culture and polymerase chain reaction: 98 pregnancies leading to congenital infection. Prenatal Diagn. 19:314-317.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
7. Boppana, S. B., K. B. Fowler, W. J. Britt, S. Stagno, and R. F. Pass. 1999. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection in infants born to mothers with preexisting immunity to cytomegalovirus. Pediatrics 104:55-60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
8. Boppana, S. B., R. F. Pass, W. J. Britt, S. Stagno, and C. A. Alford. 1992. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: neonatal morbidity and mortality. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 11:93-99.[Medline]
8
9. Boppana, S. B., L. B. Rivera, K. B. Fowler, M. Mach, and W. J. Britt. 2001. Intrauterine transmission of cytomegalovirus to infants of women with preconceptional immunity. N. Engl. J. Med. 344:1366-1371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
10. Breborowicz, G. H. 2001. Limits of fetal viability and its enhancement. Early Pregnancy 5:49-50. [Online.] http://www.earlypregnancy.org.
10
11. Dahle, A. J., K. B. Fowler, J. D. Wright, S. B. Boppana, W. J. Britt, and R. F. Pass. 2000. Longitudinal investigation of hearing disorders in children with congenital cytomegalovirus. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 11:283-290.[Medline]
11
12. Daiminger, A., U. Bader, M. Eggers, T. Lazzarotto, and G. Enders. 1999. Evaluation of two novel enzyme immunoassays using recombinant antigens to detect cytomegalovirus-specific immunoglobulin M in sera from pregnant women. J. Clin. Virol. 13:161-171.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
13. Demmler, G. J. 1991. Infectious Diseases Society of America and Centers for Disease Control: summary of a workshop on surveillance for congenital cytomegalovirus disease. Rev. Infect. Dis. 13:315-329.[Medline]
13
14. Donner, C., C. Liesnard, F. Brancart, and F. Rodesch. 1994. Accuracy of amniotic fluid testing before 21 weeks gestation in prenatal diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Prenatal Diagn. 14:1055-1059.[Medline]
14
15. Faedo, M., C. E. Ford, R. Mehta, K. Blazek, and W. D. Rawlinson. 2004. Mouse mammary tumor-like virus is associated with p53 nuclear accumulation and progesterone receptor positivity but not estrogen positivity in human female breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 10:4417-4419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
16. Fernando, S., J. M. Pearce, and J. C. Booth. 1993. Lymphocyte responses and virus excretion as risk factors for intrauterine infection with cytomegalovirus. J. Med. Virol. 41:108-113.[Medline]
16
17. Fowler, K. B., S. Stagno, and R. F. Pass. 1993. Maternal age and congenital cytomegalovirus infection: screening of two diverse newborn populations, 1980-1990. J. Infect. Dis. 168:552-556.[Medline]
17
18. Fowler, K. B., S. Stagno, and R. F. Pass. 2003. Maternal immunity and prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. JAMA 289:1008-1011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
19. Fowler, K. B. D., F. P. E. McCollister, A. J. P. Dahle, S. M. D. Boppana, W. J. M. D. Britt, and R. F. M. D. Pass. 1997. Progressive and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J. Pediatr. 130:624-630.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
20. Fox, J. C., I. M. Kidd, P. D. Griffiths, P. Sweny, and V. C. Emery. 1995. Longitudinal analysis of cytomegalovirus load in renal transplant recipients using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction: correlation with disease. J. Gen. Virol. 76:309-319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
21. Gaytant, M. A., G. I. Rours, E. A. Steegers, J. M. Galama, and B. A. Semmekrot. 2003. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection after recurrent infection: case reports and review of the literature. Eur. J. Pediatr. 162:248-253.[Medline]
21
22. Gaytant, M. A., E. A. Steegers, B. A. Semmekrot, H. M. Merkus, and J. M. Galama. 2002. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: review of the epidemiology and outcome. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 57:245-256.[CrossRef][Medline]
22
23. Gleaves, C. A., T. F. Smith, E. A. Shuster, and G. R. Pearson. 1985. Comparison of standard tube and shell vial cell culture techniques for the detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:217-221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
24. Gottlieb, S. L., J. M. Douglas, Jr., D. S. Schmid, G. Bolan, M. Iatesta, C. K. Malotte, J. Zenilman, M. Foster, A. E. Baron, J. F. Steiner, T. A. Peterman, M. L. Kamb, and R. S. G. Project. 2002. Seroprevalence and correlates of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in five sexually transmitted-disease clinics. J. Infect. Dis. 186:1381-1389.[CrossRef][Medline]
24
25. Grangeot-Keros, L., M. J. Mayaux, P. Lebon, F. Freymuth, G. Eugene, R. Stricker, and E. Dussaix. 1997. Value of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity index for the diagnosis of primary CMV infection in pregnant women. J. Infect. Dis. 175:944-946.[Medline]
25
26. Griffiths, P. D. 2002. Strategies to prevent CMV infection in the neonate. Semin. Neonatol. 7:293-299.[Medline]
26
27. Guerra, B., T. Lazzarotto, S. Quarta, M. Lanari, L. Bovicelli, A. Nicolosi, and M. P. Landini. 2000. Prenatal diagnosis of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 183:476-482.[CrossRef][Medline]
27
28. Hagay, Z. J., G. Biran, A. Ornoy, and E. A. Reece. 1996. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: a long-standing problem still seeking a solution. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 174:241-245.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
29. Halwachs-Baumann, G., M. Wilders-Truschnig, G. Enzinger, M. Eibl, W. Linkesch, H. J. Dornbusch, B. I. Santner, E. Marth, and H. H. Kessler. 2001. Cytomegalovirus diagnosis in renal and bone marrow transplant recipients: the impact of molecular assays. J. Clin. Virol. 20:49-57.[CrossRef][Medline]
29
30. Kreimer, A. R., A. J. Alberg, R. Viscidi, and M. L. Gillison. 2004. Gender differences in sexual biomarkers and behaviors associated with human papillomavirus-16, -18, and -33 seroprevalence. Sex. Transm. Dis. 31:247-256.[Medline]
30
31. Kumar, M. L., and S. L. Prokay. 1983. Experimental primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy: timing and fetal outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 145:56-60.[Medline]
31
32. Lappalainen, M., P. Koskela, M. Koskiniemi, P. Ammala, V. Hiilesmaa, K. Teramo, K. O. Raivio, J. S. Remington, and K. Hedman. 1993. Toxoplasmosis acquired during pregnancy: improved serodiagnosis based on avidity of IgG. J. Infect. Dis. 167:691-697.[Medline]
32
33. Lazzarotto, T., C. Galli, R. Pulvirenti, R. Rescaldani, R. Vezzo, A. La Gioia, C. Martinelli, S. La Rocca, G. Agresti, L. Grillner, M. Nordin, M. van Ranst, B. Combs, G. T. Maine, and M. P. Landini. 2001. Evaluation of the Abbott AxSYM cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) assay in conjunction with other CMV IgM tests and a CMV IgG avidity assay. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8:196-198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33
34. Lazzarotto, T., P. Spezzacatena, P. Pradelli, D. A. Abate, S. Varani, and M. P. Landini. 1997. Avidity of immunoglobulin G directed against human cytomegalovirus during primary and secondary infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised subjects. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 4:469-473.[Abstract]
34
35. Lazzarotto, T., S. Varani, L. Gabrielli, P. Spezzacatena, and M. P. Landini. 1999. New advances in the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Intervirology 42:390-397.[CrossRef][Medline]
35
36. Liesnard, C., C. Donner, F. Brancart, F. Gosselin, M. L. Delforge, and F. Rodesch. 2000. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection: prospective study of 237 pregnancies at risk. Obstet. Gynecol. 95:881-888.[CrossRef][Medline]
36
37. Lipitz, S., S. Yagel, E. Shalev, R. Achiron, S. Mashiach, and E. Schiff. 1997. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal primary cytomegalovirus infection. Obstet. Gynecol. 89:763-767.[CrossRef][Medline]
37
38. Maine, G. T., T. Lazzarotto, and M. P. Landini. 2001. New developments in the diagnosis of maternal and congenital CMV infection. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 1:19-29.[CrossRef][Medline]
38
39. Maine, G. T., R. Stricker, M. Schuler, J. Spesard, S. Brojanac, B. Iriarte, K. Herwig, T. Gramins, B. Combs, J. Wise, H. Simmons, T. Gram, J. Lonze, D. Ruzicki, B. Byrne, J. D. Clifton, L. E. Chovan, D. Wachta, C. Holas, D. Wang, T. Wilson, S. Tomazic-Allen, M. A. Clements, G. L. Wright, T. Lazzarotto, et al. 2000. Development and clinical evaluation of a recombinant-antigen-based cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M automated immunoassay using the Abbott AxSYM analyzer. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1476-1481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39
40. Mathijs, J. M., W. D. Rawlinson, S. Jacobs, A. M. Bilous, J. S. Milliken, D. N. Dowton, and A. L. Cunningham. 1991. Cellular localization of human cytomegalovirus reactivation in the cervix. J. Infect. Dis. 163:921-922.[Medline]
40
41. Mertz, G. J., J. Benedetti, R. Ashley, S. A. Selke, and L. Corey. 1992. Risk factors for the sexual transmission of genital herpes. Ann. Intern. Med. 116:197-202.
41
42. Nielsen, S. L., I. Sorensen, and H. K. Andersen. 1988. Kinetics of specific immunoglobulins M, E, A, and G in congenital, primary, and secondary cytomegalovirus infection studied by antibody-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:654-661.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42
43. Pass, R. F., S. Stagno, M. E. Dworsky, R. J. Smith, and C. A. Alford. 1982. Excretion of cytomegalovirus in mothers: observations after delivery of congenitally infected and normal infants. J. Infect. Dis. 146:1-6.[Medline]
43
44. Revello, M. G., and G. Gerna. 2002. Diagnosis and management of human cytomegalovirus infection in the mother, fetus, and newborn infant. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:680-715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44
45. Revello, M. G., M. Zavattoni, A. Sarasini, E. Percivalle, L. Simoncini, and G. Gerna. 1998. Human cytomegalovirus in blood of immunocompetent persons during primary infection: prognostic implications for pregnancy. J. Infect. Dis. 177:1170-1175.[Medline]
45
46. Reference deleted.
46
47. Shen, C. Y., S. F. Chang, M. F. Chao, S. L. Yang, G. M. Lin, W. W. Chang, C. W. Wu, M. S. Yen, H. T. Ng, J. C. Thomas, et al. 1993. Cytomegalovirus recurrence in seropositive pregnant women attending obstetric clinics. J. Med. Virol. 41:24-29.[Medline]
47
48. Shen, C. Y., S. F. Chang, M. S. Yen, H. T. Ng, E. S. Huang, and C. W. Wu. 1993. Cytomegalovirus excretion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1635-1636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48
49. Stagno, S., R. F. Pass, G. Cloud, W. J. Britt, R. E. Henderson, P. D. Walton, D. A. Veren, F. Page, and C. A. Alford. 1986. Primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy: incidence, transmission to fetus, and clinical outcome. JAMA 256:1904-1908.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49
50. Tabor, A., J. Philip, M. Madsen, J. Bang, E. B. Obel, and B. Norgaard-Pedersen. 1986. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet i:1287-1293.
50
51. Whitley, R. J., and D. W. Kimberlin. 1997. Treatment of viral infections during pregnancy and the neonatal period. Clin. Perinatol. 24:267-283.[Medline]
51
52. Yoshinaga-Itano, C. 2003. Early intervention after universal neonatal hearing screening: impact on outcomes. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Res. Rev. 9:252-266.
52
53. Yow, M. D., and G. J. Demmler. 1992. Congenital cytomegalovirus disease: 20 years is long enough. N. Engl. J. Med. 326:702-703.[Medline]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2005, p. 4713-4718, Vol. 43, No. 9
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.9.4713-4718.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lagrou, K., Bodeus, M., Van Ranst, M., Goubau, P. (2009). Evaluation of the New Architect Cytomegalovirus Immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgG Avidity Assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1695-1699 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Duff, P., Barth, W. H. Jr., Post, M. D. (2009). Case 4-2009 -- A 39-Year-Old Pregnant Woman with Fever after a Trip to Africa. NEJM 360: 508-516 [Full Text]  
• Seale, H., MacIntyre, C. R., Gidding, H. F., Backhouse, J. L., Dwyer, D. E., Gilbert, L. (2006). National Serosurvey of Cytomegalovirus in Australia. CVI 13: 1181-1184 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Munro, S. C. Articles by Rawlinson, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Munro, S. C. Articles by Rawlinson, W. D.