Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Doorn, H. R. Articles by van Gool, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Doorn, H. R. Articles by van Gool, T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2005, p. 4801-4806, Vol. 43, No. 9
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.9.4801-4806.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Use of Rapid Dipstick and Latex Agglutination Tests and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Serodiagnosis of Amebic Liver Abscess, Amebic Colitis, and Entamoeba histolytica Cyst Passage

H. Rogier van Doorn,¹ Henk Hofwegen,³ Rob Koelewijn,³ Henk Gilis,¹ Ron Peek,¹ Jose C. F. M. Wetsteyn,² Perry J. J. van Genderen,³ Tony Vervoort,⁴ and Tom van Gool^1,3*

Section of Parasitology, Department of Medical Microbiology,¹ Section of Infectious Diseases, Tropical Medicine and AIDS, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,² The Harbor Hospital and Institute of Tropical Diseases, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,³ Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine, Central Laboratory of Clinical Biology, Antwerp, Belgium⁴

Received 6 April 2005/ Returned for modification 12 May 2005/ Accepted 21 June 2005

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
A homemade enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a dipstick assay (Dipstick) for the detection of anti-Entamoeba histolytica antibodies in serum were developed and evaluated together with a commercially available latex agglutination test (LAT; Laboratoires Fumouze) for their use in serodiagnosis of amebiasis. The sensitivity of these assays was evaluated with sera from 27 patients with radiologically proven, cellulose acetate precipitation (CAP) test-positive amebic liver abscess, 7 patients with parasitologically and PCR-proven amebic colitis, and 11 patients with parasitologically and PCR-proven E. histolytica cyst passage. The sensitivities of the ELISA, Dipstick, and LAT were all 93.3% (42/45). With a combination of Dipstick and LAT, all abscess and colitis patients had at least one positive result. The specificity was assessed with 238 sera from patients with various parasitic, bacterial, viral, and fungal infectious diseases, sera containing autoimmune antibodies, and sera from healthy blood donors. The specificities of the ELISA, Dipstick, and LAT were 97.1%, 98.1%, and 99.5%, respectively. Of 61 sera from patients with PCR-proven E. dispar infection, 60 (98.4%) were negative in both Dipstick and LAT and 59 (96.7%) were negative in ELISA. Our data suggest that all three assays are sensitive serological tests. The rapid LAT and Dipstick provide fast results and can easily be applied in routine laboratories in order to facilitate the diagnosis of amebiasis.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
With an estimated 40,000 to 100,000 infected people dying annually, amebiasis remains one of the most important parasitic infections worldwide (34). The causative agent of amebiasis, the protozoan Entamoeba histolytica, has a worldwide distribution and is a serious health threat, especially in places where fecal-oral hygiene is low.

Among the 500 million people that pass cysts of Entamoeba spp. in their feces, most (90%) are infected with Entamoeba dispar, a commensal protozoan which causes no disease in humans but which is microscopically indistinguishable from E. histolytica (5). Differentiation of the two species from stool can be performed with specific antigen detection assays or PCR (28). Alternatively, detection of specific antibodies to E. histolytica in blood could be a useful indicator for infection with E. histolytica or E. dispar, assuming specific antibody production in E. histolytica cyst passers and the absence of such production in E. dispar cyst passers. Until now, however, little has been known about antibody production in these two different groups.

Although most infections with E. histolytica are also asymptomatic, 4 to 10% of infected patients develop amebic disease within a year (27), with amebic abscess and colitis being the most important clinical entities. Colitis arises subacutely when trophozoites of E. histolytica invade the colonic epithelium and cause symptoms such as abdominal pain, tenderness, (bloody) diarrhea, and weight loss. The presence of erythrocytes in hematophagous trophozoites of E. histolytica in freshly passed stools is pathognomonic for amebic colitis. An antibody response against E. histolytica arises in a large proportion of these patients (21).

Amebic liver abscess is caused by hematogenous spread of the invasive trophozoites. This complication is seen mainly in young males between 18 and 50 years of age (1). Diagnosis depends on clinical findings, ultrasound or radiographic imaging techniques, and, especially, also on serological studies. Because an amebic liver abscess is potentially life threatening, rapid diagnosis is mandatory. However, there are few serological tests for amebiasis which are both rapid and easy to perform and are well evaluated (28). In general, amebic serology is performed in reference laboratories, with results being available after days to weeks. In patients with known diagnosis of (uncomplicated) amebic abscess, prompt treatment with, e.g., metronidazole or tinidazole will result in rapid clinical recovery (21). However, without precise diagnosis, in clinical practice, broad-spectrum antibiotics are sometimes added to cover a potential bacterial etiology of the abscess. Therefore, rapid serodiagnosis in patients suspected of amebic abscess is often an important tool in clinical decision making and can be of help in the reduction of the costs of additional treatment and prolonged hospital stay.

In this study, we evaluated a rapid and easy-to-perform homemade dipstick assay (Dipstick) and a commercially available latex agglutination test (LAT) for serodiagnosis of amebiasis. In addition, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was studied for which only low quantities of E. histolytica antigen were needed for coating and which provided quantitative information about antibody titers.

All tests were extensively evaluated for sensitivity and specificity in patients with amebic abscess and, in addition, in patients with amebic colitis and E. histolytica and E. dispar cyst passage.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patients and sera. Sera incorporated in this study were collected from patients in the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), the Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine (Antwerp, Belgium), and The Harbor Hospital and Institute of Tropical Diseases (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). A total of 106 sera from patients returning from the tropics infected with E. histolytica or E. dispar were used to evaluate all three tests: 27 with amebic liver abscess, 7 with amebic colitis, 11 cyst passers with E. histolytica, and 61 cyst passers with E. dispar. A patient was regarded as having amebic liver abscess when there was a clinical history suggestive of the disease, a space-occupying lesion in the liver in radiographic or ultrasound imaging, and a positive cellulose acetate precipitation test (CAP) result (see below) on the day of admission or in a later stage of the disease.

Patients with amebic colitis had dysenteric stools with trophozoites of E. histolytica containing erythrocytes. Cyst passers had cysts of Entamoeba spp. in their stool detected with microscopy which were identified as E. histolytica or E. dispar cysts by PCR and stool antigen ELISA. These tests were also used to confirm the presence of E. histolytica in patients with amebic colitis (see below). All tested sera were drawn at the first moment of clinical suspicion. Sera were stored at –20°C until use. Totals of 238, 209, and 213 sera from patients with or without an infectious disease were used for specificity testing of the ELISA, Dipstick, and LAT, respectively (Table 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Patient data

Triple feces test. Parasitological diagnosis of E. histolytica or E. dispar in stools was performed with the triple feces test as described before (31). In short, patients' stools were collected in three tubes, two tubes with sodium acetate acetic acid formalin fixative and one tube without a fixative, on three consecutive days by the patient (day 1 and 3 stools in a fixative, day 2 stool unpreserved) and sent afterwards to the laboratory. The preserved samples were screened with iodine staining for cysts and trophozoites of protozoa and, in case of positive findings, examined by permanent staining with Chlorazol black stain. The unpreserved samples (day 2) were treated with the formalin-ether concentration method according to Ridley (24a) and examined for cysts of protozoa and eggs of helminths. In cases of amebic colitis, stools recently passed (within 1 h after production) were also examined directly for the presence of motile erythrocyte-containing trophozoites of E. histolytica.

Cellulose acetate precipitation test. This test was described before and is regarded a reference test for amebic serology (26, 29). The test is based on the principle of counterimmunoelectrophoresis. On Sepraphore III cellulose-acetate strips (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan), two parallel lines of wells were made. One line was filled with E. histolytica antigen (1.5 mg/ml) in Veronal buffer (Beckmann Chemikalien KG, Bassum, Germany), pH 8.75; in the opposite line, serum was added. Electrophoresis was performed for 30 min at 200 V. Antigen moves toward the anode and antibodies toward the cathode. In case of a positive reaction, a precipitate forms at the place where antibody and antigen meet, which can be visualized by staining with nigrosine (Merck).

Stool antigen ELISA. A TechLab E. histolytica II kit (TechLab, Blacksburg, Virginia) was used for the detection of specific antigen of E. histolytica in stool samples. The ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, diluted stool samples were added to microtiter wells coated with polyclonal anti-E. histolytica adhesin antibodies. Bound activity is detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated monoclonal mouse anti-E. histolytica antibodies and subsequent incubation with tetramethylbenzidine and H₂O₂.

E. histolytica and E. dispar PCR. PCR and subsequent polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were performed as described previously by Gomes et al. (8).

Antigen. Antigen was obtained by culturing E. histolytica HM1:IMSS (ATCC 30459; American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Maryland) on TYI medium with bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri). The trophozoites were collected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sonificated, and pelleted by centrifugation. The amount of antigen was determined by the Lowry method (20). Antigen was stored at –20°C until use.

Specific-antibody ELISA. Flat-bottom polystyrene high-binding microplates with small wells (Coming, Inc., Acton, Massachusetts) were used. Wells were coated overnight at 4°C with E. histolytica antigen in 50 mM carbonate buffer, pH 9.6. Subsequently, the wells were treated with PBS containing 1% (wt/vol) chicken egg white (PBS Egg) at 37°C for 30 min. After three washings with PBS-0.05% Tween 20, serum samples, diluted in PBS Egg, were added for 30 min at 37°C. After five washings, detection of bound antibodies was done with a 1:1,000 dilution of HRP-conjugated goat anti-human immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Nordic Immunological Laboratories, Tilburg, The Netherlands) in PBS Egg for 30 min at 37°C. Subsequently, the wells were washed three times and substrate solution (0.1% 5-amino salicylic acid in phosphate buffer, pH 5.95, with 0.03% H₂0₂ [Merck, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey]) was added for 1 h in the dark at room temperature. The reaction volume of each reagent at each step was 30 µl per well. The optical density (OD) was read at 492 nm on a Multiskan ascent reader (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). A cutoff value of 164 was calculated from the mean OD plus twice the standard deviation of the 238 control serum samples.

Latex agglutination test (LAT). The Bichro-Latex Amibe Fumouze test (Laboratoires Fumouze Diagnostics, Levallois-Perret, France) was carried out according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Briefly, 20 µl of serum was mixed on a slide with colored latex particles coated with total mixed antigen of E. histolytica. The presence of specific antibodies in serum is detected by the formation of a red agglutination.

Dipstick assay. Dipsticks were prepared as described previously (9). Two lines were made on a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher and Schüll BioScience, Dassel, Germany): one with cultured E. histolytica antigen and a positive control consisting of human IgG (Nordic). The dipsticks were incubated for 15 min with diluted serum. After being washed three times with TNT buffer (20 mM Tris, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.2% Tween, pH 7.5), the dipsticks were incubated with 1:200 HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Nordic Immunological Laboratories) and subsequently washed three times and placed in a substrate solution containing 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride and H₂O₂ (ICN Biomedical, Inc., Aurora, Ohio) for 2 min. The reaction was stopped by rinsing with water. A brown line at the position of the positive control indicates successful processing and a brown line at the position of the antigen the presence of E. histolytica-specific antibodies in the tested serum (Fig. 1).

View larger version (43K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Photograph of resultant dipsticks after performance of the Dipstick assay for detection of E. histolytica antibodies in serum. The left dipstick shows a positive result, and the right dipstick shows a negative result. The upper arrow points at the positive control band; the lower arrow points at the antiamebic antibody-specific band.

Setup of ELISA and Dipstick assay. For the ELISA and the Dipstick, the optimal concentration of E. histolytica antigen was determined by making serial dilutions of antigen which were tested with sera from patients with known amebic liver abscess and from healthy blood donors: coating concentrations of 2 µg/ml and 75 µg/ml, respectively, gave the best results. The optimal dilutions of test serum for the two assays were 1:200 and 1:50, respectively (data not shown).

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Cutoff values and specificity and sensitivity of the tests. The specificity of the ELISA was assessed with a total of 238 sera from patients suffering from different parasitological, bacterial, and viral infections, from patients with high titers of antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor in their blood (sera known to cause aspecific reactions in serological tests), and from healthy blood donors. The cutoff value in the ELISA (164) was calculated from the mean OD of the 238 samples plus twice the standard deviation. The specificities of ELISA, Dipstick, and LAT were 97.1% (231/238), 98.1% (205/209), and 99.5% (212/213), respectively. Sera used for the assessment of the specificity for all three tests are depicted in Table 1; results are shown in Fig. 2 and Table 2.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Results of a homemade ELISA for detection of E. histolytica antibodies in serum. Each circle represents one serum. On the x axis the conditions of the patients are displayed; abbreviations are explained in Table 1. On the y axis the optical density measured at 450 nm is displayed. The dotted line represents the cutoff value for a positive result in the ELISA. Abbreviations are defined in column 1 of Table 2.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Assay results

For assessment of the sensitivities of the three assays, 45 sera were used: sera from patients with amebic liver abscess (27 sera), amebic colitis (7 sera), and E. histolytica cyst passage (11 sera) (Table 1). The sensitivities of ELISA, Dipstick, and LAT for amebic liver abscess, amebic colitis, and cyst passage are depicted in Table 2. For the whole group, including all 45 cases, the sensitivity of all three tests was 93.3%. Figure 2 shows the results of the ELISA. The concordance between the ELISA and the Dipstick assay was 100% (45/45) among the samples from patients with E. histolytica disease or cyst passage and 98.5% (266/270) among the negative controls. In total, 308 of 315 results were concordant (97.8%).

Results with sera of E. dispar cyst passers. Among 61 sera from PCR-proven E. dispar cyst passers, the numbers of sera showing seronegativity with ELISA, Dipstick, and LAT were 60 (98.4%), 59 (96.7%), and 60 (98.4%), respectively.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In this study we evaluated a home-made Dipstick, an ELISA, and a commercial rapid latex agglutination test (LAT) for serodiagnosis of E. histolytica disease in a western European hospital setting. All three tests proved to be highly sensitive (93.3%) and specific (97.1 to 99.5%). Furthermore, most (96.7 to 98.4%) E. dispar cyst passers were seronegative with the three serological tests, whereas most (81.8 to 90.9%) E. histolytica cysts passers proved positive.

In patients with a clinical history of a hepatic abscess and space-occupying lesions as revealed by ultrasound or radiographic imaging techniques, the presence of specific antibodies to E. histolytica provides strong evidence for an amebic abscess (21). Several tests, including indirect fluorescent antibody tests (6, 12, 36), ELISA, and agglutination assays (4, 15), have proven useful for this purpose. For this study we defined patients as harboring an amebic liver abscess in cases with a clinically suspect history and with radiological proof of one or more space-occupying lesions in the liver, in combination with a positive cellulose acetate precipitation test result on the day of presentation. The CAP test is a highly sensitive and specific test for serodiagnosis of amebic liver abscess which becomes negative relatively quickly after successful treatment (29). For all 27 patients with amebic liver abscess in this study, both the ELISA and Dipstick were positive in serum samples taken at the first time of clinical suspicion. Two samples were negative in LAT initially but became positive 3 to 6 days later (Table 3). Seronegativity in an early phase of clinical disease is a well-known important pitfall in (sero)diagnosis of hepatic amebiasis (15).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Results of four different assays of serial sera from two patients with amebic liver abscess

For amebic colitis, demonstration of erythrocyte containing amebal trophozoites in freshly passed stools is regarded the gold standard for diagnosis (21). This microscopic technique is rapid, results being available within minutes, and cheap. Although often satisfactory, detecting trophozoites of E. histolytica with ingested erythrocytes can be difficult, as can be the differentiation from motile erythrocyte-containing macrophages (2). When microscopic studies of unpreserved stools are delayed for a prolonged period (>1 h), false-negative results can occur (22). As a result, patients with amebic colitis have been misdiagnosed as suffering from inflammatory bowel disease, often with dramatic consequences after initiating corticosteroid treatment (23, 30). In earlier studies among patients with amebic colitis, specific antibodies were observed with a variety of tests in 70 to 90% of cases (10, 17, 18, 24). In this study, specific antibodies were demonstrated with LAT in seven out of seven cases and with Dipstick and ELISA in six out of seven cases. These findings suggest that, as an additional tool to microscopic examinations, serodiagnosis could be useful for supporting or rejecting diagnosis of E. histolytica infection as the cause of colitis.

Cysts of E. dispar or E. histolytica are frequently observed in stools of travelers returning from the tropics. Recent studies demonstrated that up to 90% of these patients are infected with the nonpathogenic species E. dispar and not E. histolytica (7, 11, 14, 35). Because cysts of E. histolytica are morphologically similar to those of E. dispar, other techniques (e.g., PCR and ELISA for detection of specific antigens) are in use for differentiation of species from stools (8, 32). Although often satisfactory, antigen detection can lack sensitivity, and PCR requires advanced laboratory infrastructure and specific knowledge, especially because commercial PCR tests for amebiasis are not available. Therefore, reliable differentiation of E. histolytica from E. dispar infection often remains difficult in routine practice, especially in smaller laboratories. In the present study results for >95% of cyst passers of E. dispar were negative in all three serological tests, which was in sharp contrast to 9/11 to 10/11 (80 to 90%) positive findings in E. histolytica cyst passers. Earlier studies in which sera of PCR-confirmed cyst passers of E. histolytica/E. dispar were examined demonstrated 91% seropositivity with E. histolytica and 84% negative test results in patients with E. dispar, data which are in agreement with our findings (33). Although erosive bowel lesions have been described, E. dispar is regarded as noninvasive and relatively harmless in contrast to E. histolytica, which could explain the much lower frequency of detectable antibodies in the serological tests (21). Although (indirect) serological tests are no replacement for (direct) PCR or antigen-detecting assays, results of this and previous studies suggest that travelers from western Europe with cyst passage and positive amebic serology might be infected with E. histolytica.

Positive serological test results can be of limited clinical significance for the diagnosis of amebic abscess, amebic colitis, and cyst passage of E. histolytica in patients originating from countries with high endemicity of E. histolytica infection, especially when titers are low. In these cases positive test results can indicate past infection with E. histolytica without being related to the present clinical status. Specific amebic antibodies can persist up to 4 years after infection with E. histolytica (23). In this respect the CAP test, used in this study as a reference test, is valuable for confirmation of positive test results, because after successful treatment of amebic abscess, results of this test in general become negative after 6 months to 1 year (12). The clinical importance of positive findings with amebic serology in general is high in Western countries where the background titer of these antibodies is low or even absent (35).

The specificity of the LAT in this study was 99.5%, and sensitivities for patients with amebic abscess and amebic colitis were 92.6% and 100%, respectively. These findings are in agreement with earlier findings in which, among patients with amebic abscess or colitis, sensitivities of 91 to 98% and specificities of 95 to 96% were observed (16, 25). Use of other agglutination assays in patients with invasive amebiasis demonstrated sensitivities in the range of 90% and specificities of 95% (15, 19).

ELISA is among the most popular serological methods used in diagnostic laboratories worldwide because of its high sensitivity and specificity and the possibility of quantifying the antibody reaction (21). We developed an ELISA in which microtiter wells with a smaller volume (30 µl as opposed to 300 µl) are employed in an effort to minimize the use of amebic antigen, which, in general, is difficult to obtain. In this set up, our ELISA had a specificity of 97.1%. Sensitivities for patients with amebic abscess or amebic colitis and for E. histolytica cyst passers were 100% or 85.7% and 81.8%, respectively. A number of homemade and commercially available ELISAs for demonstration of antibodies against E. histolytica have been described with sensitivities of 80 to 100% and specificities of 95 to 100% in cases with amebic abscess (28). After successful treatment ELISA values decline slowly (21).

Recently, dipstick assays have been introduced for various infectious and noninfectious diseases (3, 9, 13, 37, 39). Dipsticks are easy to use, do not require skilled personnel, and can be read with the naked eye. Our Dipstick could be performed in 45 min and resulted in the unambiguous absence or presence of a line at the site where the amebic antigen was incubated. The agreement between Dipstick and ELISA from this study was very good ( = 0.951). Yamaura et al. described a dot-ELISA with a principle similar to that of our Dipstick (38). In this study with 37 cases with amebic abscess or colitis and 68 negative controls, a sensitivity of 97.3% and specificity of 100% was found, which is comparable to our results. Cyst passers were not studied.

In conclusion, all three tests studied proved to be highly reliable diagnostic tools. Both Dipstick and LAT are rapid and easy to use with a high sensitivity and specificity, and both can easily be applied in routine clinical laboratories. Improvement of sensitivity can be obtained by combining the tests. The ELISA is not as rapid as the other two tests but may provide an excellent tool for follow-up of treated patients, since quantitative results are obtained. Moreover, only a small amount amebic antigen is required for the ELISA compared to the Dipstick (0.12 versus 0.75 µg per patient). For western travelers with cyst passage of E. histolytica or E. dispar in stools and positive amebic serology, infection with E. histolytica is likely and treatment with luminal amebicidal drug should be considered.

 
Leny Nieuwendijk, Carla Wassenaar, and Sophie Greve are gratefully acknowledged for excellent technical assistance.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, Room L1-253, P.O. Box 22660, 1100DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 20 5665731. Fax: 31 20 6979271. E-mail: T.vanGool{at}amc.uva.nl.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Acuna-Soto, R., J. H. Maguire, and D. F. Wirth. 2000. Gender distribution in asymptomatic and invasive amebiasis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95:1277-1283.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Ash, L. R., and T. C. Orihel. 1997. Atlas of human parasitology, 4th ed. ASCP Press, Chicago, Ill.
3
3. Buhrer, S. S., H. L. Smits, G. C. Gussenhoven, C. W. van Ingen, and P. R. Klatser. 1998. A simple dipstick assay for the detection of antibodies to phenolic glycolipid-I of Mycobacterium leprae. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 58:133-136.[Abstract]
4
4. Cummins, A. J., A. H. Moody, K. Lalloo, and P. L. Chiodini. 1994. Rapid latex agglutination test for extraluminal amoebiasis. J. Clin. Pathol. 47:647-648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Diamond, L. S., and C. G. Clark. 1993. A redescription of Entamoeba histolytica Schaudinn, 1903 (Emended Walker, 1911) separating it from Entamoeba dispar Brumpt, 1925. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 40:340-344.[Medline]
6
6. Garcia, L. S., D. A. Bruckner, T. C. Brewer, and R. Y. Shimizu. 1982. Comparison of indirect fluorescent-antibody amoebic serology with counterimmunoelectrophoresis and indirect hemagglutination amoebic serologies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15:603-605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Gathiram, V., and T. F. Jackson. 1987. A longitudinal study of asymptomatic carriers of pathogenic zymodemes of Entamoeba histolytica. S. Afr. Med. J. 72:669-672.[Medline]
8
8. Gomes, M. A., J. B. Pesquero, C. Furst, P. R. Valle, J. L. Pesquero, and E. F. Silva. 1999. An improved method to distinguish Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar. Parasitology 119(Pt. 4):359-362.
9
9. Gussenhoven, G. C., M. A. van der Hoorn, M. G. Goris, W. J. Terpstra, R. A. Hartskeerl, B. W. Mol, C. W. van Ingen, and H. L. Smits. 1997. LEPTO dipstick, a dipstick assay for detection of Leptospira-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies in human sera. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:92-97.[Abstract]
10
10. Haque, R., I. K. Ali, S. Akther, and W. A. Petri, Jr. 1998. Comparison of PCR, isoenzyme analysis, and antigen detection for diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:449-452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Haque, R., I. M. Ali, and W. A. Petri, Jr. 1999. Prevalence and immune response to Entamoeba histolytica infection in preschool children in Bangladesh. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 60:1031-1034.[Abstract]
12
12. Jackson, T. F., C. B. Anderson, and A. E. Simjee. 1984. Serological differentiation between past and present infection in hepatic amoebiasis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 78:342-345.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
13. Jelinek, T., M. P. Grobusch, and H. D. Nothdurft. 2000. Use of dipstick tests for the rapid diagnosis of malaria in nonimmune travelers. J. Travel Med. 7:175-179.[Medline]
14
14. Jelinek, T., G. Peyerl, T. Loscher, and H. D. Nothdurft. 1996. Evaluation of an antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay for detection of Entamoeba histolytica in stool samples. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:752-755.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
15. Knobloch, J., and E. Mannweiler. 1983. Development and persistence of antibodies to Entamoeba histolytica in patients with amebic liver abscess. Analysis of 216 cases. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 32:727-732.
16
16. Kraoul, L., H. Adjmi, V. Lavarde, J. F. Pays, C. Tourte-Schaefer, and C. Hennequin. 1997. Evaluation of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of hepatic amoebiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1530-1532.[Abstract]
17
17. Krogstad, D. J., H. C. Spencer, Jr., G. R. Healy, N. N. Gleason, D. J. Sexton, and C. A. Herron. 1978. Amebiasis: epidemiologic studies in the United States, 1971-1974. Ann. Intern. Med. 88:89-97.
18
18. Krupp, I. M., and S. J. Powell. 1971. Comparative study of the antibody response in amebiasis. Persistence after successful treatment. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 20:421-424.
19
19. Lotter, H., E. Mannweiler, and E. Tannich. 1993. Crude or recombinant proteins applied to latex agglutination, complement fixation and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the serodiagnosis of invasive amebiasis. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 44:277-280.[Medline]
20
20. Lowry, O. H., N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265-275.[Free Full Text]
21
21. Manson, P., G. C. Cook, and A. Zumla. 2003. Manson's tropical diseases, 21st ed. Saunders, London, United Kingdom.
22
22. Markell, E. K., D. T. John, and W. A. Krotoski. 1999. Markell and Voge's medical parasitology, 8th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa.
23
23. Patel, A. S., and P. H. DeRidder. 1989. Amebic colitis masquerading as acute inflammatory bowel disease: the role of serology in its diagnosis. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 11:407-410.[Medline]
24
24. Pillai, D. R., J. S. Keystone, D. C. Sheppard, J. D. MacLean, D. W. MacPherson, and K. C. Kain. 1999. Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar: epidemiology and comparison of diagnostic methods in a setting of nonendemicity. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:1315-1318.[CrossRef][Medline]
24
25. Ridley, D. S., and B. C. Hawgood. 1956. The value of formol-ether concentration of faecal cysts and ova. J. Clin. Pathol. 9:74-76.
25
26. Robert, R., C. Mahaza, C. Bernard, C. Buffard, and J. M. Senet. 1990. Evaluation of a new bicolored latex agglutination test for immunological diagnosis of hepatic amoebiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1422-1424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
27. Stamm, W. P., and E. A. Phillips. 1977. A cellulose acetate membrane precipitin (CAP) test for amoebiasis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 71:490-492.[CrossRef][Medline]
27
28. Stanley, S. L., Jr. 2003. Amoebiasis. Lancet 361:1025-1034.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
29. Tanyuksel, M., and W. A. Petri, Jr. 2003. Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16:713-729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29
30. Tosswill, J. H., D. S. Ridley, and D. C. Warhurst. 1980. Counter immunoelectrophoresis as a rapid screening test for amoebic liver abscess. J. Clin. Pathol. 33:33-35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30
31. Tucker, P. C., P. D. Webster, and Z. M. Kilpatrick. 1975. Amebic colitis mistaken for inflammatory bowel disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 135:681-685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
32. Van Gool, T., R. Weijts, E. Lommerse, and T. G. Mank. 2003. Triple faeces test: an effective tool for detection of intestinal parasites in routine clinical practice. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:284-290.[Medline]
32
33. Verweij, J. J., F. Oostvogel, E. A. Brienen, A. Nang-Beifubah, J. Ziem, and A. M. Polderman. 2003. Prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in northern Ghana. Trop. Med. Int. Health 8:1153-1156.[CrossRef][Medline]
33
34. Verweij, J. J., L. van Lieshout, C. Blotkamp, E. A. Brienen, S. van Duivenvoorden, M. van Esbroeck, and A. M. Polderman. 2000. Differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar using PCR-SHELA and comparison of antibody response. Arch. Med. Res. 31:S44-S46.[CrossRef][Medline]
34
35. Walsh, J. 1988. Prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica infection, p. 93-105. In J. I. Ravdin (ed.), Amebiasis: human infection by Entamoeba histolytica. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
35
36. Weinke, T., B. Friedrich-Janicke, P. Hopp, and K. Janitschke. 1990. Prevalence and clinical importance of Entamoeba histolytica in two high-risk groups: travelers returning from the tropics and male homosexuals. J. Infect. Dis. 161:1029-1031.[Medline]
36
37. Welch, J. S., C. Dobson, and S. Chopra. 1986. Immunodiagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica and Ascaris lumbricoides infections in Caucasian and aboriginal Australians. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 80:240-247.[CrossRef][Medline]
37
38. Wever, P. C., E. P. Yzerman, E. J. Kuijper, P. Speelman, and J. Dankert. 2000. Rapid diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease using an immunochromatographic assay for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in urine during an outbreak in the Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2738-2739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38
39. Yamaura, H., K. Araki, K. Kikuchi, I. Itoda, K. Totsuka, and T. Kobayakawa. 2003. Evaluation of dot-ELISA for serological diagnosis of amebiasis. J. Infect. Chemother. 9:25-29.[CrossRef][Medline]
39
40. Zhu, Y., W. He, Y. Liang, M. Xu, C. Yu, W. Hua, and G. Chao. 2002. Development of a rapid, simple dipstick dye immunoassay for schistosomiasis diagnosis. J. Immunol. Methods 266:1-5.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2005, p. 4801-4806, Vol. 43, No. 9
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.9.4801-4806.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Fotedar, R., Stark, D., Beebe, N., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., Harkness, J. (2007). Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 511-532 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Leo, M., Haque, R., Kabir, M., Roy, S., Lahlou, R. M., Mondal, D., Tannich, E., Petri, W. A. Jr. (2006). Evaluation of Entamoeba histolytica Antigen and Antibody Point-of-Care Tests for the Rapid Diagnosis of Amebiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 4569-4571 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Doorn, H. R. Articles by van Gool, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Doorn, H. R. Articles by van Gool, T.