JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dakic, I.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dakic, I.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2005, p. 4875-4876, Vol. 43, No. 9
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.9.4875-4876.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Survey of Genes Encoding Staphylococcal Enterotoxins, Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1, and Exfoliative Toxins in Members of the Staphylococcus sciuri Group

Ivana Dakic,1 Dragana Vukovic,1 Srdjan Stepanovic,1* Tomasz Hauschild,2 Petr Jezek,3 Petr Petrás,4 and Donald Morrison5

Department of Bacteriology, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia,1 Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, University of Bialystok, 15-950 Bialystok, Poland,2 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Regional Hospital Príbram, CZ-26126 Príbram, Czech Republic,3 Czech National Reference Laboratory for Staphylococci, National Institute of Public Health, CZ-10042 Prague, Czech Republic,4 Scottish MRSA Reference Laboratory, Microbiology Department, Stobhill Hospital, Glasgow G21 3UW, United Kingdom5

Received 3 March 2005/ Returned for modification 18 April 2005/ Accepted 28 June 2005


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
Genes encoding staphylococcal enterotoxins (sea to see, seg, and seh), toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (tst), and exfoliative toxins (eta and etb) were not detected in a large panel of 48 Staphylococcus sciuri group isolates tested. This strongly suggests that production of the staphylococcal exotoxins by these bacteria is highly unlikely.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1), and exfoliative (epidermolytic) toxins (ETs) are staphylococcal exotoxins responsible for the pathogenesis of food poisoning, toxic shock syndrome, and scalded skin syndrome, respectively. The production of these toxins has been extensively studied and well-documented for Staphylococcus aureus. It has also been shown that other coagulase-positive staphylococcal species, such as S. intermedius and S. hyicus, produce similar toxins (1, 2). As far as coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are concerned, although detection of ETs and TSST-1 in different CoNS species has been reported (12-14), a number of studies failed to detect staphylococcal toxins in these bacteria (2, 3, 5, 8). In addition to the five classical antigenic types of SE (SEA to SEE), a number of additional SEs have recently been reported (5, 9, 10). The newly described ETs have been reliably established for S. aureus isolates only.

Members of the S. sciuri group, S. sciuri, S. lentus, and S. vitulinus, are coagulase-negative, novobiocin-resistant, oxidase-positive staphylococci. These bacteria colonize skin and mucosal surfaces of various domestic and wild animals and are frequently isolated from different food products of animal origin. They have also been isolated from soil, sand, and water and from a hospital environment. Members of the S. sciuri group are not considered common human pathogens, but their clinical significance is apparently increasing. A number of recent studies have reported different infections caused by these bacteria, such as endocarditis, peritonitis, septic shock, endophthalmitis, urinary tract infection, pelvic inflammatory disease, and wound infections (see references 6 and 11 and references therein).

Little has been reported on the production of major staphylococcal exotoxins by members of the S. sciuri group; furthermore, a majority of the studies available tested only a few isolates. While a number of the studies showed no toxin production in these bacteria (2, 3, 5, 8), it has been reported that as many as 20% of S. sciuri and 66.6% of S. lentus strains tested were capable of enterotoxin production (12). The presence of the see gene has also been reported for S. lentus (14). Genes encoding more recently described SE types were not detected in S. lentus and S. vitulinus (5), while to date no data are available for S. sciuri.

The 48 S. sciuri group strains we analyzed were reported previously but not investigated for characteristics presented in this study. Twenty-eight strains were recovered from various human clinical samples (11), while the remaining 20 strains were recovered from an inanimate hospital environment (6). All strains were identified by conventional methods, and the identity was confirmed by PCR amplification of the 16S to 23S rRNA intergenic spacer region. Strains isolated from human samples were identified as S. sciuri (23 strains), S. lentus (3 strains), and S. vitulinus (2 strains), while all 20 strains isolated from the hospital environment were identified as S. sciuri. All strains were screened for the presence of genes encoding the five classical enterotoxins A, B, C, D, and E (sea, seb, sec, sed, and see, respectively) and the two more recently described enterotoxins SEG and SEH (seg and seh), TSST-1 (tst), and exfoliative toxins A and B (eta and etb) by using previously described primers (4, 7, 9, 10). All results obtained by PCR methods in laboratories involved in this survey were finally confirmed in the Scottish MRSA Reference Laboratory, Glasgow, Scotland. Detection of seg and seh genes was performed in the Scottish MRSA Reference Laboratory only.

A majority of the studies which established production of staphylococcal exotoxins in CoNS, including the S. sciuri group members, were performed by immunological methods (12-14). On the other hand, a majority of the studies which searched for the presence of genes encoding production of toxins found CoNS isolates tested to be toxin negative (2, 3, 5). Although the number of strains tested was small and thus may present certain limitations for these studies, the results were still largely consistent. As far as S. sciuri group members are concerned, only the see gene responsible for ETE production was found in a single S. lentus strain isolated from goats' milk and cheese (14).

Since false-positive results have been noted with immunoassays (14, 15), we decided on a more reliable approach and searched for the presence of the toxin genes. None of the 48 S. sciuri group isolates harbored the sea, seb, sec, sed, see, seg, or seh gene or the tst, eta, or etb gene. Therefore, the results we obtained are in agreement with the results of other studies based upon toxin gene amplification. We suggest that the relatively high proportions of toxin-producing S. sciuri group strains found in some of the previous studies might have been related to nonspecific immunoassay reaction results.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which searched for the presence of genes encoding all major staphylococcal toxins as well as newly described SEs in all members of the S. sciuri group. The study included the largest series of isolates tested so far for S. sciuri, which is considered the clinically most important species within the group, and for the first time investigated the presence of genes encoding newer SEs in this species. The results presented strongly suggest that production of the major staphylococcal exotoxins, as well as more recently described SEs, by members of the S. sciuri group is highly unlikely.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Dr. Subotica 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. Phone: 381-11-685961. Fax: 381-11-656950. E-mail: stepan{at}afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Ahrens, P., and L. O. Andresen. 2004. Cloning and sequence analysis of genes encoding Staphylococcus hyicus exfoliative toxin types A, B, C, and D. J. Bacteriol. 186:1833-1837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Becker, K., B. Keller, C. von Eiff, M. Brück, G. Lubritz, J. Etienne, and G. Peters. 2001. Enterotoxigenic potential of Staphylococcus intermedius. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5551-5557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Becker, K., G. Haverkamper, C. von Eiff, R. Roth, and G. Peters. 2001. Survey of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes, exfoliative toxin genes, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 gene in non-Staphylococcus aureus species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:407-409.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Becker, K., R. Roth, and G. Peters. 1998. Rapid and specific detection of toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus: use of two multiplex PCR enzyme immunoassays for amplification and hybridization of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes, exfoliative toxin genes, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2548-2553.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Blaiotta, G., D. Ercolini, C. Pennacchia, V. Fusco, A. Casaburi, O. Pepe, and F. Villani. 2004. PCR detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus spp. strains isolated from meat and dairy products. Evidence for new variants of seG and seI in S. aureus AB-8802. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97:719-730.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Dakic, I., D. Morrison, D. Vukovic, B. Savic, A. Shittu, P. Jezek, T. Hauschild, and S. Stepanovic. 2005. Isolation and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus sciuri in the hospital environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2782-2785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Johnson, W. M., S. D. Tyler, E. P. Ewan, F. E. Ashton, D. R. Pollard, and K. R. Rozee. 1991. Detection of genes for enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus by the polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:426-430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kreiswirth, B. N., P. M. Schlievert, and R. P. Novick. 1987. Evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci for ability to produce toxic shock syndrome toxin 1. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:2028-2029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Monday, S. R., and G. A. Bohach. 1999. Use of multiplex PCR to detect classical and newly described pyrogenic toxin genes in staphylococcal isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3411-3414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Omoe, K., M. Ishikawa, Y. Shimoda, D.-L. Hu, S. Ueda, and K. Shinagawa. 2002. Detection of seg, seh, and sei genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates and determination of the enterotoxin productivities of S. aureus isolates harboring seg, seh, or sei genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:857-862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Stepanovic, S., I. Dakic, D. Morrison, T. Hauschild, P. Jezek, P. Petrás, A. Martel, D. Vukovic, A. Shittu, and L. A. Devriese. 2005. Identification and characterization of clinical isolates of members of the Staphylococcus sciuri group. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:956-958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Valle, J., E. Gomez-Lucia, S. Piriz, J. Goyache, J. A. Orden, and S. Vadillo. 1990. Enterotoxin production by staphylococci isolated from healthy goats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:1323-1326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Valle, J., S. Vadillo, S. Piriz, and E. Gomez-Lucia. 1991. Toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) production by staphylococci isolated from goats and presence of specific antibodies to TSST-1 in serum and milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:889-891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Vernozy-Rozand, C., C. Mazuy, G. Prevost, C. Lapeyre, M. Bes, Y. Brun, and J. Fleurette. 1996. Enterotoxin production by coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from goats' milk and cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 30:271-280.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Vernozy-Rozand, C., C. Mazuy-Cruchaudet, C. Bavai, and Y. Richard. 2004. Comparison of three immunological methods for detecting staphylococcal enterotoxins from food. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 39:490-494.[CrossRef][Medline]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2005, p. 4875-4876, Vol. 43, No. 9
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.9.4875-4876.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dakic, I.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dakic, I.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS