Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Marot-Leblond, A. Articles by Robert, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Marot-Leblond, A. Articles by Robert, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2006, p. 138-142, Vol. 44, No. 1
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.1.138-142.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Development and Evaluation of a Rapid Latex Agglutination Test Using a Monoclonal Antibody To Identify Candida dubliniensis Colonies

Agnes Marot-Leblond,^1* Bertrand Beucher,¹ Sandrine David,² Sandrine Nail-Billaud,¹ and Raymond Robert¹

Groupe d'Etude des Interactions Hôte-Parasite, UPRES EA 3142, UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et d'Ingénierie de la Santé, 16 Boulevard Daviers, 49 100 Angers,¹ SR2B, ZI Carrière Beurrière, 49 240 Avrillé, France²

Received 20 July 2005/ Returned for modification 12 September 2005/ Accepted 12 October 2005

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Cell components of the dimorphic pathogenic fungus Candida dubliniensis were used to prepare monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). One MAb, designated 12F7-F2, was shown by indirect immunofluorescence to be specific for a surface antigen of Candida dubliniensis yeast cells. No reactivity was observed with other fungal genera or with other Candida species, including Candida albicans, that share many phenotypic features with C. dubliniensis. The use of different chemical and physical treatments for cell component extraction suggested that the specific epitope probably resides on a protein moiety absent from C. albicans. However, we failed to identify the target protein by Western blotting, owing to its sensitivity to heat and sodium dodecyl sulfate. MAb 12F7-F2 was further used to develop a commercial latex agglutination test to identify C. dubliniensis colonies (Bichro-dubli Fumouze test; Fumouze Diagnostics). The test was validated on yeast strains previously identified by PCR and on fresh clinical isolates; these included 46 C. dubliniensis isolates, 45 C. albicans isolates, and other yeast species. The test had 100% sensitivity and specificity for C. dubliniensis isolated on Sabouraud dextrose, CHROMagar Candida, and CandiSelect media and 97.8% sensitivity for C. dubliniensis grown on Candida ID medium. The test is rapid (5 min) and easy to use and may be recommended for routine use in clinical microbiology laboratories and for epidemiological investigations.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Over the past decade there has been a significant increase in the number of reports of systemic and mucosal Candida infections. The potential clinical importance of species-level identification has been recognized since the discovery that Candida species differ in expression of putative virulence factors and in antifungal susceptibility (7, 22, 23).

Candida dubliniensis is a newly described pathogenic Candida species originally isolated from patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and recurrent oral candidosis. C. dubliniensis is now reported to account for between 3.5% and 34% of all Candida infections (9, 29).

In-depth epidemiological investigations are required to determine the precise clinical significance and incidence of C. dubliniensis infection and the reasons for its recent emergence. However, the development of rapid and simple means of C. dubliniensis identification has been hampered by the very close phenotypic and genotypic relationships between C. dubliniensis and C. albicans, the latter remaining the most common cause of candidosis (22). At present, the most accurate means of differentiating between isolates of these two species is based on molecular biology-based techniques (5, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 30). Several phenotype-based methods for identifying C. dubliniensis and discriminating it from C. albicans have been reported. (i) C. dubliniensis has been shown to produce a distinctive dark green color on CHROMagar Candida medium, and (ii) colonies of C. dubliniensis do not fluoresce on methyl blue-Sabouraud agar under Wood's light (27); however, these two methods are not reproducible after subculture and storage (31). (iii) Unlike Candida albicans, C. dubliniensis does not grow at 45°C (25), but this discrimination based on thermotolerance was not confirmed (17). (iv) C. dubliniensis, unlike C. albicans, is able to reduce 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (32). (v) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis of all cell components present in a cell can phenotypically discriminate these two species (31). More recently, it was reported that the two species could be distinguished by culture on Staib agar, Pal's agar, modified Pal's agar, and casein agar, on which only C. dubliniensis produces abundant chlamydospores and rough colonies (1, 2, 3, 24, 28). We also described an immunochromatographic assay differentiating between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis, but C. dubliniensis was identified only by default, owing to the specificity of the monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (19). The aim of the present study was to produce a monoclonal antibody specific for C. dubliniensis cells and to investigate its potential use in a rapid latex agglutination test for identifying C. dubliniensis colonies.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Strains, media, and growth conditions. Candida dubliniensis strain ATCC MYA-646 was used throughout this work, and Candida albicans strain ATCC 66396 (serotype A) was used for hybridoma screening.

Other strains of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis were obtained from the Dublin Dental School and Hospital Yeast Collection, Dublin, Ireland, and the Bilbao Facultad de Medicina Collection, Bilbao, Spain. All had been identified by a number of techniques, including PCR based on the intron sequence of the ACT1 gene or immunofluorescence with a specific monoclonal antibody (20). Fresh clinical isolates of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis were also investigated, and their identities were confirmed by growth on modified Pal's agar (1, 19).

Clinical isolates of other Candida spp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Cryptococcus neoformans, identified by using the ID 32C system (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Étoile, France), were obtained from the Mycology Laboratory of Angers Medical School, Angers, France.

Cells were first subcultured twice on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 24 h at 37°C. All species studied grew as blastospores on this medium.

Germ tubes were prepared by incubating C. albicans and C. dubliniensis yeast cells for 3 h at 37°C in medium 199 (pH 6.7; Gibco Laboratories, Grand Island, N.Y.) and were recovered by centrifugation.

To evaluate the agglutination test, 36 strains and 9 clinical isolates of C. albicans and 34 strains and 12 clinical isolates of C. dubliniensis were grown for 48 h at 37°C on commercial solid media, such as Sabouraud glucose agar with chloramphenicol and gentamicin, CHROMagar Candida (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, Md.), Candida ID (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France), and Candiselect (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). Three C. albicans serotype B isolates were included in the study.

Preparation of MAbs. (i) Immunogen preparation. C. dubliniensis ATCC MYA-646 was used to prepare the immunogen after growth on SDA slants for 26 h at 37°C. Cell components were extracted by Zymolyase 20T (Arthrobacter luteus; Seikagaku, Kogyo Co., Tokyo, Japan) as previously described by Marot-Leblond et al. (20). Solubilized antigenic components were recovered by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min and were stored at –20°C.

C. dubliniensis and C. albicans yeast cell extracts (45 mg) were fractionated by hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) on a phenyl-Sepharose 6 Fast Flow (low-substitution) column (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Elutions were carried out with a stepwise decrease in the concentration of ammonium sulfate (20). Each fraction was dialyzed against distilled water, freeze-dried, and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and gels were stained for proteins by using Coomassie brilliant blue R250 (18). As very similar protein band patterns were obtained in contiguous tracks, elution fractions were gathered, such as fractions containing 1.9 and 1.8 M, 1.7 and 1.6 M, etc., ammonium sulfate; 0.1 M ammonium sulfate to 50 mM phosphate; and 20% ethanol-distilled water.

(ii) Immunization. Adult 8-week-old female BALB/c mice (Iffa-Credo, L'Arbresle, France) received eight subcutaneous injections (100 µl each) of dialyzed freeze-dried pooled chromatographic fractions at 1-week intervals. The fractions were emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) for the first injection and in incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma) for the subsequent injections. Mice were bled from the tail vein, and blood samples were tested for specific antibodies by immunofluorescent assay (IFA) with C. dubliniensis yeast cells. All animal protocols were conducted according to the recommendations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and performed by appropriately qualified personnel.

(iii) Production and screening of hybridomas. Cell fusion and hybrid selection were performed as described by Dippold et al. (11) with minor modifications (20). Ten days after cell fusion, aliquots of medium from wells with growing hybridomas were screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and IFA for antibodies directed to C. dubliniensis components and cell surface antigens, respectively. Hybrids recognizing epitopes expressed solely on the C. dubliniensis yeast cell surface were immediately subcloned and stored in liquid nitrogen. MAbs were obtained from confluent hybridoma cultures. Isotypes were determined with a homemade ELISA using class-specific antibodies.

IFA using Candida yeast cells and ELISA using C. dubliniensis and C. albicans Zymolyase extracts or Zymolyase solution were performed as previously described by Marot-Leblond et al. (20).

Biochemical characterization of antigen 12F7-F2. The heat and chemical stabilities of the C. dubliniensis epitopes recognized by MAb 12F7-F2 were examined by dot blotting. The C. dubliniensis components released by Zymolyase were boiled for 2 min or diluted 1:2 with 2% SDS (wt/vol). Ten microliters was dropped onto polyvinylidene difluoride sheets and allowed to dry. The filter was blocked with 10% (wt/vol) nonfat dry milk in phosphate-buffered saline at 4°C overnight and probed with hybridoma culture supernatant and goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G1 coupled to horseradish peroxidase (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Bound antibodies were revealed by submersing the sheets in 0.1 M Tris buffer (pH 7.6) containing 0.5 mg · ml^–1 3-3'diaminobenzidine (Sigma) and 0.1% (vol/vol) hydrogen peroxide. The color reaction was arrested by rinsing in 5% acetic acid (vol/vol).

In other experiments, C. dubliniensis and C. albicans cells (10⁹) grown on SDA for 48 h at 37°C were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with 1 ml of 50 mM EDTA, pH 7.5; EDTA-2-mercaptoethanol (50 mM and 0.35 M, respectively; pH 9); or Zymolyase (2 mg/ml) in the presence of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Cell components released by these treatments were tested by ELISA.

MAb 12F7-F2 purification. MAb 12F7-F2 was purified from confluent hybridoma culture supernatants using affinity chromatography on HiTrap Protein G HP columns (5 ml) (Amersham Biosciences Europe, Orsay, France) by the company SR2B (Avrillé, France) and was then used to develop a latex agglutination test. The resulting kit, named Bichro-dubli Fumouze, is distributed by Fumouze Diagnostics, Asnières, France.

Latex agglutination slide test. The Bichro-dubli Fumouze test consists of blue latex particles coated with MAb 12F7-F2, which reacts specifically with an antigen located on the surface of C. dubliniensis yeast cells. The latex particles are in suspension in a dissociating pink dye, giving a purple mixture. We used the test as recommended by the manufacturer. Briefly, two or three isolated colonies of each isolate, grown for 48 h at 37°C on agar media, were emulsified in 20 µl of latex suspension on the card provided. After 3 min of manual rotation or mechanical agitation, the card was examined for agglutination. A positive reaction corresponds to large blue agglutinates on a pink background. The absence of agglutinates or the presence of white aggregates without a pink background corresponds to a negative reaction. All yeasts were tested in a blinded fashion, and the results were compiled when the study had been completed.

Data analysis. The test was evaluated in terms of the numbers of true positives (TP), true negatives (TN), false positives (FP), and false negatives (FN). Sensitivity was calculated as TP/(TP + FN) and specificity as TN/(TN + FP). Sensitivity and specificity of the test performed on yeast grown on different media were compared by using the ² test.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Zymolyase extract composition. The arrays of molecular species obtained by Zymolyase digestion of C. dubliniensis and C. albicans yeasts were compared by means of 5 to 15% linear gradient SDS-PAGE. Both cell extracts yielded a large number of molecular components, ranging from 14 kDa to 94 kDa. Most components had mobilities which were the same for both extracts, but some significant qualitative and quantitative differences in protein composition were noted. For example, the major component of approximately 43 kDa in C. albicans had greater electrophoretic mobility than its counterpart in C. dubliniensis. Three components of 18, 24, and 67 kDa present in C. dubliniensis extract were not seen with the C. albicans extract, which also contained some specific (glyco)proteins (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (123K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Coomassie blue staining of 5 to 15% SDS-PAGE gels loaded with crude Zymolyase extracts (lanes A1 and A2) and 1.7 M (lanes B1 and B2), 1.6 M (lanes B3 and B4), and 1.5 M (lanes B5 and B6) HIC fractions of C. albicans (lanes A1, B1, B3, and B5) and C. dubliniensis (lanes A2, B2, B4, and B6) yeast cells grown at 22°C for 48 h on SDA. The molecular masses of standard proteins are listed on the left of the gels. Relevant components are indicated by arrowheads.

HIC fractionation. In order to separate and identify C. dubliniensis-specific cell surface antigens, C. dubliniensis and C. albicans crude extracts were fractionated by HIC. No significant difference was observed between the two chromatographic profiles (data not shown). However, SDS-PAGE with Coomassie blue staining revealed some qualitative and quantitative differences in the bands within homologous fractions from these two extracts (Fig. 1B, lanes 1 to 6). Fractions, pooled as indicated above, were used for mouse immunization.

Mouse immune serum reactivity by IFA. Reactivity of mouse antiserum boosted with pooled 1.7 to 1.6 M C. dubliniensis HIC fractions was further investigated. By IFA, the fluorescence was homogeneous on the cell wall surface. Some cells were not labeled, while about one-third of cells were intensely labeled. This heterogeneous reactivity may reflect heterogeneous expression or accessibility of the relevant epitopes among yeast cells (Fig. 2A and B).

View larger version (111K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Immunofluorescence (A, C, and E) and phase-contrast (B, D, and F) photomicrographs of the same microscopic fields of C. dubliniensis strain ATCC MYA-646 stained with immune serum from a mouse immunized with the HIC 1.7 to 1.6 M ammonium sulfate fraction (A and B) or stained with MAb 12F7-F2 (C and E), after growth on SDA for 24 h at 22°C (A to D) or in medium 199 for 3 h at 37°C (E and F). Note the heterogeneous fluorescent labeling of yeast cells (arrows) and the lack of germ tube labeling. Bars, 10 µm.

MAb isolation. Hybrids resulting from the fusion of X63/Ag8.653 myeloma cells and lymphocytes from a BALB/c mouse that had been immunized with the pooled 1.7 to 1.6 M HIC fractions resulted in 4,000 hybridomas. Of these, 120 produced antibodies that recognized a C. dubliniensis cell component by ELISA or IFA. One cell line (12F7-F2) reacted exclusively with the C. dubliniensis cell surface and cell extracts by IFA and ELISA, respectively. Hybridoma 12F7-F2 secreted an immunoglobulin G1 and was selected for further studies.

Cell surface antigen expression on C. dubliniensis MYA-646 and C. albicans 66396. In a given microscopic field, the IFA labeling intensity varied among C. dubliniensis yeast cells: some were negative and some were intensely stained (Fig. 2C and D). On germ tubes and pseudohyphae induced at 37°C, antigen expression was limited to the parent portion of the structure, and there was no antigen expression on the apical portion of the elongated structure (Fig. 2E and F). MAb 12F7-F2 showed no fluorescence by IFA with yeast cells and germ tubes of C. albicans strain 66396 (data not shown).

Cell surface antigen expression by other isolates and species. The antigen recognized by MAb 12F7-F2 was not detectable in the Cryptococcus and Saccharomyces genera. In the genus Candida, no binding was noticed for species of yeast other than C. dubliniensis (Table 1). All 22 C. dubliniensis strains tested were positive by IFA, despite slight differences in labeling intensity. These results suggest that MAb 12F7-F2 recognizes an epitope specific to the C. dubliniensis yeast cell surface.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. MAb 12F7-F2 immunofluorescence reactivities of C. dubliniensis and related yeast strains grown on SDA for 24 h at 37°C

Characterization of the antigenic determinant. Yeast cells of C. dubliniensis MYA-646 and C. albicans 66396 grown on SDA (48 h at 37°C) were subjected to several treatments, and the resulting extracted cell components were tested for their antigenicity by ELISA. Serial dilutions of the extracts were tested to avoid ambiguous weak signals due to steric hindrance occurring with highly concentrated solutions. MAb 12F7-F2 did not significantly react with C. albicans extracts, even at high concentrations. EDTA treatment was the best extraction method for the C. dubliniensis antigen recognized by MAb 12F7-F2; Zymolyase treatment was less efficient (Fig. 3).

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. MAb 12F7-F2 reactivity of chemical and enzymatic extracts of C. dubliniensis MYA-646 and C. albicans 66396 grown for 48 h at 37°C. Results are the means of triplicate determinations ± standard deviations for two independent experiments. 2ME, 2-mercaptoethanol.

The sensitivity of the target antigen to heat and SDS was examined by dot blotting. C. dubliniensis Zymolyase extracts lost all their reactivity when boiled for 2 min or diluted with SDS, preventing molecular mass determination of the target antigen by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Latex agglutination test. A latex agglutination test using MAb 12F7-F2 for rapid identification of C. dubliniensis colonies, the Bichro-dubli Fumouze test (Fumouze Diagnostics, Asnières, France), was tested against 45 C. albicans and 46 C. dubliniensis strains and against other genera and species. The influence of the growth medium was studied with four isolation media. Table 2 summarizes the performance of the C. dubliniensis identification test according to the isolation medium. C. albicans and C. dubliniensis strains were tested after subculture on all the media, whereas the other species were tested only after isolation on nonchromogenic media. No false-positive results were obtained with the 45 C. albicans strains. Likewise, all non-C. dubliniensis yeasts were negative, irrespective of the growth medium. The specificity of the test was thus 100%, regardless of the growth medium. Only 1 of the 46 C. dubliniensis strains was negative after growth on Candida ID medium, giving a sensitivity of 97.8%. Sensitivity was 100% for C. dubliniensis grown on Sabouraud glucose agar with chloramphenicol and gentamicin, CandiSelect, and CHROMagar Candida (Table 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Results of the Bichro-dubli Fumouze agglutination test and sensitivity and specificity of the test following isolation on standard media

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
C. dubliniensis infection is a growing cause for concern, especially in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection/AIDS. Currently, accurate differentiation between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis requires the use of molecular technologies in reference laboratories or Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (31). To our knowledge, only one MAb and a single-chain variable fragment have been shown to discriminate these two closely related yeast species on the basis of a peculiar epitope on C. albicans cells (6, 20). Here, we developed and tested a rapid latex agglutination method based on a MAb recognizing an epitope specific to C. dubliniensis. Bikandi et al., using adsorbed antiserum, described a cell surface molecule of 33 kDa capable of distinguishing between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis (4). The immunization strategy that we chose for developing a C. dubliniensis-specific monoclonal antibody consisted in fractionating by HIC a C. dubliniensis yeast cell extract. A mouse immunized with 1.7 to 1.6 M HIC fractions yielded very intense IFA labeling of C. dubliniensis yeast cells. Following hybridization and a two-step screening, hybridoma 12F7-F2 secreting a MAb specific for the C. dubliniensis cell surface was isolated. All other yeast species and genera tested against MAb 12F7-F2, including C. albicans, gave negative results by IFA. Furthermore, C. albicans labeling was always negative whatever the extraction procedure. Several lines of evidence suggest that the antigen recognized by MAb 12F7-F2 is a protein and/or is conformational. Indeed, reactivity was entirely lost when Zymolyase extracts were heated or incubated with SDS and also when 2-mercaptoethanol was present. Unfortunately, this meant that the molecular mass of the target antigen could not be established by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Comparative ELISA studies of C. dubliniensis yeast cell extracts indicated that EDTA treatment was the most efficient and/or least caustic procedure for antigen 12F7-F2 extraction.

As the epitope is located solely at the C. dubliniensis cell surface, no extraction step is necessary for the test procedure based on MAb 12F7-F2. We chose to develop a latex agglutination format that could be directly applied to fresh colonies. A similar rapid colored-latex test (Bichrolatex Albicans; Fumouze Diagnostics) is already commercially available for rapid identification of C. albicans colonies after a 5-minute antigen extraction step (26). However, we have found that this test cross-reacts with C. dubliniensis colonies. The specific test for C. dubliniensis described here (Bichro-dubli Fumouze) is also based on colored latex beads; this avoids the need to check for autoagglutination. We evaluated the Bichro-dubli Fumouze test on colonies grown on four standard media for 48 h at 37°C and obtained perfect specificity and 97.8 to 100% sensitivity; however, these two values are not significantly different. Two or three colonies were used for the test, as recommended by the manufacturer, but we also obtained excellent results with only one-half of a colony grown on SDA medium and with single colonies grown on CHROMagar. At least two colonies had to be used with the other media. The use of 10 colonies did not lead to a zone phenomenon. The following approach for C. dubliniensis colony identification can be suggested. As C. dubliniensis is less prevalent than C. albicans, we recommend testing first for the C. albicans-C. dubliniensis group by isolation on chromogenic media. Specifically colored colonies can then be tested with the rapid Bichro-dubli Fumouze test for C. dubliniensis. A negative result identifies the yeast as C. albicans and a positive result as C. dubliniensis. If yeast colonies are isolated on nonchromogenic media, the C. albicans-C. dubliniensis group can be identified with standard techniques, such as the germ tube test (2 to 4 h) or the more convenient rapid latex agglutination test Bichrolatex Albicans, followed by the Bichro-dubli Fumouze test to discriminate between the two species.

In conclusion, we describe the first MAb specific for C. dubliniensis. The Bichro-dubli Fumouze test based on this MAb is sensitive, specific, rapid (5 min), and simple. The results are easy to read, and the test does not require sophisticated equipment or experienced technicians. Moreover, given the high analytical sensitivity of the test, the prevalence and the real proportion of C. dubliniensis yeast cells in mixed-yeast populations can be evaluated by applying the test to several individual colonies grown on the same primary plates. Work is under way to identify the C. dubliniensis-specific target antigen.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Mycologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, 16 boulevard Daviers, 49 100 Angers, France. Phone: (33) 02 41 22 66 60. Fax: (33) 02 41 48 67 33. E-mail: agnes.marot{at}univ-angers.fr.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Adou-Bryn, K., C. Douchet, A. Ferrer, L. Grimaud, R. Robert, and D. Richard-Lenoble. 2003. Morphological features of Candida dubliniensis on a modified Pal's medium. Preliminary study. J. Mycol. Med. 13:99-103.
2
2. Al Mosaid, A., D. J. Sullivan, and D. C. Coleman. 2003. Differentiation of Candida dubliniensis on Pal's agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4787-4789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Al Mosaid, A., D. Sullivan, I. F. Salkin, D. Shanley, and D. C. Coleman. 2001. Differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans on Staib agar and caffeic acid-ferric citrate agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:323-327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Bikandi, J., R. San Millan, M. D. Moragues, G. Cebas, M. Clarke, D. C. Coleman, D. J. Sullivan, G. Quindos, and J. Ponton. 1998. Rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis by indirect immunofluorescence based on differential localization of antigens on C. dubliniensis blastospores and Candida albicans germ tubes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2428-2433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Biswas, S. K., K. Yokoyama, L. Wang, K. Nishimura, and M. Miyaji. 2001. Identification of. Candida dubliniensis based on the specific amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Nippon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi 42:95-98.
6
6. Bliss, J. M., M. A. Sullivan, J. P. Malone, and C. G. Haidaris. 2003. Differentiation of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis by using recombinant human antibody single-chain variable fragments specific for hyphae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1152-1160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Borg-von Zepelin, M., T. Niederhaus, U. Gros, M. Seibold, M. Monod, and K. Tintelnot. 2002. Adherence of different Candida dubliniensis isolates in the presence of fluconazole. AIDS 16:1237-1243.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Bors, A., B. Theelen, E. Reinders, T. Boekhout, C. Fluit, and P. H. M. Savelkoul. 2003. Use of amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis to identify medically important Candida spp., including C. dubliniensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1357-1362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Coleman, D. C., D. J. Sullivan, D. E. Bennett, G. P. Moran, H. J. Barry, and D. B. Shanley. 1997. Candidiasis: the emergence of a novel species, Candida dubliniensis. AIDS 11:557-567.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Coleman, D. C., D. Sullivan, B. Harrington, K. Haynes, M. Henman, D. Shanley, D. Bennett, G. Moran, C. McCreary, and L. O'Neill. 1997. Molecular and phenotypic analysis of Candida dubliniensis: a recently identified species linked with oral candidosis in HIV-infected and AIDS patients. Oral Dis. 3(Suppl. 1):S96-S101.
11
11. Dippold, W., K. Lloyd, L. Li, H. Ikeda, H. Oettgen, and L. Old. 1980. Cell surface antigens of human malignant melanoma: definition of six antigenic systems with mouse monoclonal antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:6114-6118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Donnelly, S. M., D. J. Sullivan, D. B. Shanley, and D. C. Coleman. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis and rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis based on analysis of ACT1 intron and exon sequences. Microbiology 145:1871-1882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Elie, C. M., T. J. Lott, E. Reiss, and C. J. Morrison. 1998. Rapid identification of Candida species with species-specific DNA probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3260-3265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Ellepola, A. N., S. F. Hurst, C. M. Elie, and C. J. Morrison. 2003. Rapid and unequivocal differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from other Candida species using species-specific DNA probes: comparison with phenotypic identification methods. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 18:379-388.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
15. Graf, B., A. Trost, J. Eucker, U. B. Gobel, and T. Adam. 2004. Rapid and simple differentiation of C. dubliniensis from C. albicans. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 48:149-151.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
16. Joly, S., C. Pujol, M. Rysz, K. Vargas, and D. R. Soll. 1999. Development and characterization of complex DNA fingerprinting probes for the infectious yeast Candida dubliniensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1035-1044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Kurzai, O., W. J. Heinz, D. J. Sullivan, D. C. Coleman, M. Frosch, and F. A. Muhlschlegel. 1999. Rapid PCR test for discriminating between Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis isolates using primers derived from the pH-regulated PHR1 and PHR2 genes of C. albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1587-1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
19. Marot-Leblond, A., L. Grimaud, S. David, D. J. Sullivan, D. C. Coleman, J. Ponton, and R. Robert. 2004. Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic assay for identification of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4956-4960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Marot-Leblond, A., L. Grimaud, S. Nail, S. Bouterige, V. Apaire-Marchais, D. J. Sullivan, and R. Robert. 2000. New monoclonal antibody specific for Candida albicans germ tube. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:61-67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
21. McCullough, M., B. Ross, and P. Reade. 1995. Characterization of genetically distinct subgroup of Candida albicans strains isolated from oral cavities of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:696-700.[Abstract]
22
22. Moran, G., C. Stokes, S. Thewes, B. Hube, D. C. Coleman, and D. Sullivan. 2004. Comparative genomics using Candida albicans DNA microarrays reveals absence and divergence of virulence-associated genes in Candida dubliniensis. Microbiology 150:3363-3382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Moran, G. P., D. J. Sullivan, M. C. Henman, C. E. McCreary, B. J. Harrington, D. B. Shanley, and D. C. Coleman. 1997. Antifungal drug susceptibilities of oral Candida dubliniensis isolates from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and non-HIV-infected subjects and generation of stable fluconazole-resistant derivatives in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:617-623.[Abstract]
24
24. Mosca, C. O., M. D. Moragues, J. Llovo, A. Al Mosail, D. Coleman, and J. Ponton. 2003. Casein agar: a useful medium for differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1259-1262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Pinjon, E., D. Sullivan, I. Salkin, D. Shanley, and D. Coleman. 1998. Simple, inexpensive, reliable method for differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2093-2095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. Quindos, G., R. San Millian, R. Robert, C. Bernard, and J. Ponton. 1997. Evaluation of Bichro-latex albicans, a new method for rapid identification of Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1263-1265.[Abstract]
27
27. Schoofs, A., F. C. Odds, R. Colebunders, M. Ieven, and H. Goossens. 1997. Use of specialised isolation media for recognition and identification of Candida dubliniensis isolates from HIV-infected patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16:296-300.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
28. Staib, P., and J. Morschhäuser. 1999. Chlamydospore formation on Staib agar as a species-specific characteristic of Candida dubliniensis. Mycoses 42:521-524.[CrossRef][Medline]
29
29. Sullivan, D. J., G. Moran, S. Donnelly, S. Gee, E. Pinjon, B. McCartan, D. B. Shanley, and D. C. Coleman. 1999. Candida dubliniensis: an update. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 16:72-76.
30
30. Sullivan, D. J., T. J. Westerneng, K. A. Haynes, D. E. Bennett, and D. C. Coleman. 1995. Candida dubliniensis sp. nov.: phenotypic and molecular characterization of a novel species associated with oral candidosis in HIV-infected individuals. Microbiology 141:1507-1521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
31. Tintelnot, K., G. Haase, M. Seibold, F. Bergmann, M. Staemmler, T. Franz, and D. Naumann. 2000. Evaluation of phenotypic markers for selection and identification of Candida dubliniensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1599-1608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32
32. Velegraki, A., and M. Logotheti. 1998. Presumptive identification of an emerging yeast pathogen: Candida dubliniensis (sp. nov.) reduces 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 20:239-241.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2006, p. 138-142, Vol. 44, No. 1
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.1.138-142.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Baixench, M. T., Viguie, C., Paugam, A. (2008). Isolation of Candida dubliniensis in a French hospital mycology laboratory. J Med Microbiol 57: 258-259 [Full Text]  
• Love, D. C., Sobsey, M. D. (2007). Simple and Rapid F+ Coliphage Culture, Latex Agglutination, and Typing Assay To Detect and Source Track Fecal Contamination. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 4110-4118 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Marot-Leblond, A. Articles by Robert, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Marot-Leblond, A. Articles by Robert, R.