Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2006, p. 3596-3599, Vol. 44, No. 10
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.02543-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,1 Division of Clinical Genetics and Gene Therapy, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine,2 The Sysmex Corp., Kobe, Japan3
Received 6 December 2005/ Returned for modification 22 January 2006/ Accepted 15 July 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical specimens. Urine specimens were collected from patients attending the outpatient clinics of two university hospitals. Patients with urinary diversions or orthotopic neobladder with bowel segments were excluded. Also excluded were the patients who had fistulas between the urinary tract and bowels.
A sterile plastic container with a wide opening was used to collect midstream urine. Female patients were asked to wipe their external genitalia with a wet tissue before urinating. Ten milliliters of each specimen was used for routine urinalysis, including qualitative measurement of protein and sugar and microscopic examination of centrifuged urinary sediment. The rest of the specimen was processed for assessment of the new urine bacterium analyzer (UBA). All the patients were fully informed of the purpose and study design and consented to provide specimens before starting the study. Approval from the ethical committee and the Institutional Review Board was obtained prior to starting the investigation.
Semiquantitative urine culture.
Semiquantitative urine cultures were performed by procedures based on the recommendation of Cintron (5), with cystine-lactose-electrolyte-deficient (CLED) agar (Nissui Pharmatheutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Most pathogens can grow on CLED agar, and it can inhibit the swarming of Proteus species. For inoculation of urine samples, a 100-µl micropipette (Eppendorf Co., Ltd.) was used. Bacterial concentrations were determined by a single trained technician and expressed as numbers of CFU per ml. Samples were considered positive if they contained
105 or 104 to <105 urinary pathogens/ml of pure culture, if two or more potentially pathological bacterial species were isolated when the individual counts were
104 CFU, or when the count for one organism was
104 CFU/ml and it was clearly predominant (i.e., present in numbers at least 10-fold greater than those for the others). The microorganisms isolated were identified by standard biological procedures (6).
Urine bacterium analyzer. The UBA, a new device that uses flow cytometry technology and a semiconductor laser as the light source, has been developed for measuring bacterial concentration. The UBA can stain, detect, and analyze cellular components and calculate the number of bacteria in a sample fully automatically.
For automated bacterial counts with this device, 200 µl of the sample was automatically diluted with 1,360 µl of our specially developed diluent, which included citrate buffer solution and 0.1% (wt/wt) cationic surfactant. Then, the mixture was automatically supplemented with 40 µl of fluorescent dye which specifically stained nucleic acid in the bacteria (the final concentration of dye was approximately 1 ppm). The mixture was then hydrodynamically focused and passed through a sheath flow cell illuminated with a red semiconductor laser beam (
= 635 nm). With this method, individual cellular components, including bacteria in urine specimens, fluoresce to various degrees. The forward scatter light intensity and the lateral fluorescent intensity of each cellular component in the urine sample are converted into electric signals by a photomultiplier, and those two parameters are measured simultaneously in each sample. By using these two parameters (forward scatter light intensity and lateral fluorescent intensity), the UBA can distinguish bacteria from other cellular and noncellular components in urine (e.g., erythrocytes, leukocytes, epithelial cells, fungi, and crystals) (Fig. 1). After data reduction, the number of bacteria in 1 ml of the sample is recorded on the screen, and a hard copy of the results can be obtained. The sample was assessed as containing a significant number of bacteria if it contained
104 bacterial cells per 1 ml.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. UBA scattergram pattern of E. coli. The bacterial cluster is shown in the middle of its fluorescent intensity. Basically, other particles, such as erythrocyte, leukocyte, epithelial cells, fungi, and crystals, did not interfere with this bacterial cluster. FSC, forward scatter light intensity; FL, lateral fluorescent intensity.
|
Within-run imprecision. To test the consistency of our results, repeated measurements were made using four bacterial strains purchased from ATCC: E. coli ATCC 11775, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, E. faecalis ATCC 29121, and S. aureus ATCC 29213. The concentrations of the bacteria were measured by the UBA or by semiquantitative urine culture. Measurements were repeated 10 times, and the imprecision of each method was assessed via the CVs obtained.
Linearity assessments. Specimens containing E. coli, which were sterilized by the antibiotic minocycline and treated for 1 hour, were prepared by 10-fold dilution with physiological saline. The analytical data were plotted against the theoretical values calculated by the dilution factor from the undiluted sample (2.1 x 107 particles/ml). Linearity was determined by analyzing specimens in triplicate, and the slope and intercept for the expected value were determined.
Analysis of carryover. The urine specimen which included bacteria at a concentration of 4.3 x 107 CFU/ml was used to assess the between-specimen carryover. Each specimen was analyzed in triplicate, followed by three blank specimens of the diluent. The carryover rate for bacteria was calculated by using the following formula: carryover rate (%) = [(B1 B3)/(S3 B3)] x 100, where B1 is the first measured value for physiological saline, B3 is the third measured value for physiological saline, and S3 is the third measured value for the specimen.
Statistical analysis. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between values obtained by the two methods; P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All data were analyzed using Stat View-J5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by the method developed by Ransohoff and Feinstein (10).
|
|
|---|
Linearity of results. The values measured by the UBA (Fig. 2, y axis) showed perfect linearity with the theoretically estimated values (Fig. 2, x axis) for samples with concentrations between 107 and 103 particles/ml. The linear correlation was y = 0.9312x (R2 = 0.9999, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Linearity of UBA. UBA (y axis) showed perfect linearity with the theoretically estimated concentrations (x axis) of E. coli. y = 0.9312x (R2 = 0.9999).
|
Between- and within-run imprecisions. The between-run imprecision of the UBA was analyzed by measuring the quality control specimen on 18 different days. The CV was as low as 1.5%.
Within-run CVs obtained by measuring bacterial strains of E. coli, P. aeruginosa, E. fecalis, and S. aureus at concentrations of 104 CFU/ml ranged between 9.3% and 18.4% for the UBA and between 21.1% and 63.8% for the conventional semiquantitative culture method. When the bacterial concentration was adjusted to 103 CFU/ml, CVs for the UBA ranged between 27.8% and 35.1%, and those for the semiquantitative method ranged between 38.9% and 83.4%. The UBA showed smaller CVs for measurement of bacterial concentration (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Within-run reproducibilitya
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Correlation of the bacterial cell numbers measured by the semiquantitative urine culture method and those measured by the UBA. Bacterial numbers measured by the UBA correlated well with values measured by the semiquantitative method (P < 0.001).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Correlation between significant bacteriuria detection by the UBA and semiquantitative urine culture
|
|
|
|---|
The new device, named the UBA, basically used the same strategy as the former devices, UF-100 and UF-50, for measurement of cellular components in urine. The UBA uses a semiconductor laser instead of an argon laser to reduce the cost of maintenance. Although the UF-100 and UF-50 were originally designed to perform automated urinalysis, this new device is specially designed to perform detection of bacterial cells. We adopted a cutoff value of 104 particles/ml for significant bacteriuria for the UBA.
The UBA showed excellent linearity (R2 = 1) for concentrations between 102 and 108 particles/ml of target objects (data not shown). Also, the UBA showed good linearity (R2 = 0.9999) for concentrations between 103 and 107 CFU/ml of bacterial pure culture. The UBA can perform measurement of urine bacterial cells for 90 s per sample without significant carryover. This allows over 30 consecutive measurements of bacterial cells in urine samples in 1 hour.
A between-run precision assay found that the CVs for results from the UBA were less than 1.5%. In a within-run precision assay, the UBA showed better precision than urine cultures in measuring bacterial cell numbers at concentrations of 103 and 104 CFU/ml. It is noteworthy that the urine culture method, which is used as the gold standard for measurement of bacterial cell number, showed large CVs (38.9% to 83.4%) in the measurement of lower concentrations of bacteria (Table 1). When we repeated the same experiment with other trained technicians, we got the same results.
When clinical specimens were used, the measured results for bacterial cell number obtained by the UBA correlated well with those obtained by the urine culture method. However, in 21 samples, we could detect bacterial cells in urine by the UBA but not by the urine culture method (data not shown). All these samples were from patients who had not received antimicrobial chemotherapy. For these samples, we confirmed the presence of bacteria by microscopic observation after staining. Most bacteria were revealed to be cocci. These bacterial concentrations were estimated to be from 104 to 105 CFU/ml. Since some bacterial cells in urine are very slow to replicate or are dead, not all bacterial cells in urine samples are able to form colonies after incubation. This may explain that phenomenon.
For rapid screening for significant bacteriuria, it is ideal that the method has a low false-negative rate. To date, several rapid screening methods have been reported, including semiautomated microscopy combined with reagent strip chemical determinations (Yellow IRIS) (1), reagent strip chemical determination alone (Clinitek 200) (3), detection of catalase activity (Uriscreen) (9), and microscopic examination of Gram-stained, unspun urine (4).
The false-negative rates obtained by Yellow IRIS, Clinitek 200, Uriscreen, and microscopic examination of Gram-stained unspun urine were 9.9%, 0.7%, 8.0%, and 1.0%, respectively (1, 3-4, 9). The false-negative rate obtained by the UBA was 0.7%, the lowest rate, equal to that for the Clinitek 200.
With these results combined, the UBA is an ideal device for performing accurate enumeration of bacterial cells in urine and for detecting significant bacteriuria in a short period of time. In the near future, the UBA is expected to detect fungi such as Candida albicans.
If we can measure the number of bacterial cells correctly, we can utilize this technique for bacterial susceptibility testing. We are now developing a new device that can perform a rapid, direct antimicrobial susceptibility test to realize an ideal chemotherapeutic strategy in the treatment of urinary tract infections.
This study was partly supported by a grant from Sysmex Corp.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»