Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2006, p. 4186-4188, Vol. 44, No. 11
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01085-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,1 Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,2 Department of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands3
Received 25 May 2006/ Returned for modification 26 June 2006/ Accepted 25 July 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several molecular techniques that permit faster identification of microorganisms in growth-positive blood cultures have become available, including fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (8, 9, 14). The standard FISH technique requires approximately 4 h to identification in routine practice (13).
In the present study we evaluated a new, rapid FISH procedure, modified to permit the identification of microorganisms in blood cultures within 1 h after Gram stain results.
Study set-up. We included 100 consecutive growth-positive blood cultures from febrile patients admitted to our academic hospital. The present study was carried out partially in parallel with another study in which the time to identification by standard FISH was evaluated (13). Ninety-four blood cultures were included in both studies; another 6 were included in the present study, resulting in a total of 100 samples.
Blood cultures were included upon detection of growth by the blood culture machine (BACTEC 9240). Gram staining of the blood culture fluid was performed, and only the first positive blood culture from a single patient was included, except when different Gram stain characteristics were observed in subsequent blood cultures. Aliquots of blood culture fluid were used for standard and modified FISH and for routine identification by standard microbiological techniques.
FISH.
The standard and modified FISH assays were performed with the seaFAST Sepsis Kit (SeaPro International B.V., Lelystad, The Netherlands), according the manufacturer's protocols. Blood culture fluid was centrifuged at 1,200 rpm (
450 x g) for 1 min, and the supernatant fraction was applied to a glass slide. Slides with gram-positive microorganisms were incubated in a lysis mixture, followed by an ethanol bath for all slides for permeabilization. Tandem oligonucleotide probes were applied and hybridized to target rRNA (Table 1). Unbound probe was washed off, and the slides were read by fluorescence microscopy (Olympus BX40, 100x).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Tandem probes used for identification of microorganisms in blood cultures
|
Sequence analysis. Sequence analysis of the DNA of microorganisms from all samples with results that were discrepant between FISH and microbiological culturing was performed. After DNA isolation (QIAamp Mini Kit; QIAGEN), 16S rRNA gene amplification was done, followed by sequence determination with an ABI Prism 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Results. The genus of the gram-positive microorganisms tested was identified correctly by modified FISH in 96% of cases, whereas the family name was identified in 69% of gram-negative microorganisms (Table 2). The species name could be attributed to 81% of all microorganisms, and eubacterial and pan-yeast probes were positive for 100% of the relevant samples. There was only one discrepant case between modified and standard FISH. One strain of cultured Staphylococcus aureus (as confirmed by sequence analysis) was identified correctly with modified FISH, but in standard FISH, fluorescence was observed only with the Staphylococcus genus probe.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Numbers of microorganisms with identification of species, genus, and family name by FISHa
|
Identification by FISH was incorrect in two cases: fluorescence was observed with the Klebsiella pneumoniae probe for one isolate of cultured Klebsiella oxytoca, as confirmed by sequence analysis. Alignment of the 23S rRNA sequence of Klebsiella oxytoca with the Klebsiella pneumoniae probe revealed two mismatches. FISH was not performed on the strain isolated in culture. In another sample, fluorescence was observed with the Haemophilus influenzae probe, but only nonfermenting gram-negative rods, which were identified as Roseomonas species by sequence analysis, were cultured (13).
Discussion. We show that a modified FISH assay can identify the vast majority of microorganisms in blood cultures within 1 h. The performance of this assay was similar to the standard FISH technique and even identified Staphylococcus aureus in an extra case. To our knowledge, the use of a microwave oven for hybridization of DNA probes in FISH has been described for chromosome analysis but not for identification of bacteria (3, 5). We observed a subjectively higher intensity of fluorescence with microwave-based FISH, which was also described previously (5).
The diagnostic spectrum of the FISH assay should be further enhanced by the inclusion of more probes; in particular, extra probes targeting gram-negative microorganisms would be very useful. The false-positive FISH result that we observed with the Klebsiella pneumoniae probe for the cultured Klebsiella oxytoca may signal a problem with the specificity of this probe (13). In contrast, in the case of the cultured Roseomonas species and its fluorescence with the Haemophilus influenzae probe, a mixed infection should be considered because of the lack of rRNA homology and on clinical grounds.
The turnaround time of the modified FISH assay was less than 60 min, which is a major time gain compared to standard FISH. This short turnaround time can have great impact on the management of patients with BSI (Fig. 1). Most therapeutic interventions occur after phlebotomy and upon notification of Gram stain results from blood culture fluids (11). With the identification of microorganisms within 1 h of Gram staining, it may become feasible for microbiologists to wait for FISH identification rather than providing the clinician with only Gram stain results.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Fluorescent microscopy (magnification, x100) of microorganisms from blood culture fluids after FISH. Patient A was an 85-year-old man with a history of relapsing urinary tract infections and chronic prostatitis. He presented with fever, pollakisuria, mental status alterations, and a crural wound after collapse. No painful prostate was found upon rectal examination. Leukocyturia was present, but no microorganisms were cultured from urine samples. Ceftriaxone treatment was initiated based on suspicion of urosepsis. Gram-negative rods seen in the Gram stain of the positive blood culture were identified as Pseudomonas aeruginosa by FISH within 1 h, whereas final identification was obtained only the next morning. The figure shows fluorescence of the eubacterial probe with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain, which was identical to the fluorescence observed with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa-specific probe. Patient B was a 71-year-old woman who was admitted for debulking of a lung tumor because of vascular compression. Postoperatively, she developed fever and dyspnea. Empirically, clarithromycin and ceftriaxone therapy was started for possible postobstruction pneumonia. Yeasts seen in a Gram stain of blood culture fluid were identified with the species-specific probe as Candida albicans (shown in the figure) within 1 h by FISH. Culture identification was available late the next day.
|
All FISH materials and the study technician for this study were sponsored by SeaPro International, a division of Fornix Biosciences B.V., Lelystad, The Netherlands. None of the authors have financial interests to declare.
|
|
|---|
-satellite probes: acceleration by microwave activation. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 30:15-23.[Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»