Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2006, p. 4211-4213, Vol. 44, No. 11
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01304-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Cholera Due to Altered El Tor Strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 in Bangladesh
G. Balakrish Nair,1*
Firdausi Qadri,1
Jan Holmgren,2
Ann-Mari Svennerholm,2
Ashrafus Safa,1
Nurul A. Bhuiyan,1
Q. Shafi Ahmad,1
Shah M. Faruque,1
A. S. G. Faruque,1
Yoshifumi Takeda,3 and
David A. Sack1
ICDDR,B: Centre for Health and Population Research, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh,1
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Goteborg University & Gothenburg University Vaccine Research Institute, Goteborg, Sweden,2
Cine-Science Laboratory, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan3
Received 26 June 2006/
Returned for modification 1 August 2006/
Accepted 14 August 2006

ABSTRACT
We determined the types of cholera toxin (CT) produced by a
collection of 185
Vibrio cholerae O1 strains isolated in Bangladesh
over the past 45 years. All of the El Tor strains of
V. cholerae O1 isolated since 2001 produced CT of the classical biotype,
while those isolated before 2001 produced CT of the El Tor biotype.

TEXT
Vibrio cholerae O1 has two biotypes, namely, classical and El
Tor, which are believed to have evolved from separate lineages
(
7,
8), and these biotypes have traditionally been differentiated
by a number of phenotypic traits. Comparative genomic analyses
have recently revealed a high degree of conservation among diverse
strains of
V. cholerae but have also shown genes that differentiate
the classical biotype from the El Tor biotype (
3). Apart from
these phenotypic and genetic differences, there are also dissimilarities
in the infection patterns of disease caused by the two biotypes.
These include the occurrence of more asymptomatic than symptomatic
carriers of El Tor strains, who outnumber active patients by
a ratio of up to 50:1 (
14), better survival of El Tor strains
in the environment and in the human host, and more efficient
host-to-host transmission of El Tor strains than of classical
strains (
5). There is firm evidence that the fifth and sixth
pandemics of cholera were caused by the classical biotype, while
the ongoing seventh pandemic is caused by the El Tor biotype,
which has now globally replaced the classical biotype.
Cholera toxin (CT), the principal toxin produced by V. cholerae O1 and O139, is responsible for most of the manifestations of the disease cholera. Based on the B subunit of CT, two immunologically related but not identical epitypes have been described: CT1 is the prototype elaborated by classical biotype strains and by U.S. Gulf Coast strains, while CT2 is produced by the El Tor biotype and O139 strains (4). Another classification identifies three types of ctxB genes based on three nonrandom base changes resulting in changes in the deduced amino acid sequence. Genotype 1 is found in strains of the classical biotype worldwide and in U.S. Gulf Coast strains, genotype 2 is found in El Tor biotype strains from Australia, and genotype 3 is found in El Tor biotype strains from the seventh pandemic and the Latin American epidemic (12). Thus, the V. cholerae O1 El Tor biotype of the ongoing seventh pandemic produces CT of the CT2 epitype and genotype 3, while the classical biotype CT belongs to the CT1 epitype and genotype 1. In this study, we examined a collection of clinical V. cholerae O1 strains isolated in Bangladesh during the past four and a half decades, using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) produced to classical and El Tor CTs, and found that V. cholerae O1 El Tor strains isolated since 2001 in Bangladesh produce the CT subtype of the classical biotype.
One hundred eighty-five strains of V. cholerae O1, consisting of 31 strains of the classical biotype isolated between 1960 and 1990 and 113 strains of the El Tor biotype and 41 hybrid strains of V. cholerae O1 (strains that could not be biotyped as El Tor or classical by conventional phenotypic tests) isolated between 1960 and 2005, were included in this study. These strains were selected from different months within a year and from different years from the ICDDR,B culture collection. All strains were isolated from cases of acute watery diarrhea in patients admitted to the cholera hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The identities of the strains were reconfirmed by the slide agglutination test using specific antisera (13). For biotype analysis, we used chicken erythrocyte agglutination, sensitivity to polymyxin B, and Mukerjee classical phage IV and Mukerjee El Tor phage 5 tests (11).
The detection of the CT subtype was performed by ganglioside GM1-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (15), using mouse MAbs specific for the CT subtype produced by the El Tor (ETC 31:20; MAb raised against the CT produced by El Tor strain N16961) or the classical (CT 21:15; MAb raised against the CT produced by classical strain 569B) biotype as well as a MAb that reacts with the CT subtypes of both biotypes (LT 39:13:1) (16). V. cholerae O1 was cultured in AKI medium at 37°C overnight (6). Optical densities of 0.4 or more above the background in the ELISA were considered positive. Nucleotide sequencing of the ctxB genes of eight strains of V. cholerae O1 El Tor isolated between 2001 and 2005 that produced the classical subtype of CT and multiple sequence alignment was performed as previously described (10). The nucleotide sequences of the reference strains were compared with the corresponding sequences of El Tor strain N16961 (GenBank accession no. NC-002505) and classical strain 569B (GenBank accession no. U25679), which were retrieved from GenBank by BLAST searches.
The CT subtypes of a total of 185 strains of V. cholerae O1 isolated over a period of 45 years were examined by the CT subtype-specific ELISA. As shown in Table 1, all 31 classical biotype strains produced CT of the classical subtype. All of the El Tor and hybrid strains of V. cholerae O1 isolated between 2001 and 2005 that were included in the study produced CT of the classical subtype. This is in contrast to the El Tor strains isolated from 1971 to 2000, which produced predominantly CT of the El Tor subtype.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Cholera toxin subtypes produced by different biotypes of Vibrio cholerae O1 isolated from 1960 to 2005, based on an ELISA using monoclonal antibodies specific to the El Tor and classical subtypes of CT
|
Nucleotide sequence analysis of the
ctxB genes of eight representative
El Tor strains of
V. cholerae O1 isolated from 2001 to 2005
that produced CT of the classical subtype revealed that the
strains possess DNA sequences identical to that of the classical
type of
ctxB. The deduced amino acid sequences of all eight
representative El Tor O1 strains were aligned with the CtxB
sequences of the reference strains N16961 (El Tor) and 569B
(classical). The deduced amino acid sequences of all eight representative
strains were found to be identical to the deduced amino acid
sequence of the CT of the 569B classical reference strain, with
a histidine at position 39 and a threonine at position 68 (Fig.
1), thereby confirming the results of the CT subtype-specific
ELISA.
The epitype and genotype of the CT of the El Tor strains currently
associated with cholera in Bangladesh have shifted from epitype
CT2 and genotype 3 to epitype CT1 and genotype 1. Thus, in effect,
the present El Tor biotype strains produce CT of the classical
biotype. The production of classical CT by the El Tor biotype
per se is not novel and has been reported infrequently (
1,
11,
17). In fact, U.S. Gulf Coast clones of
V. cholerae O1 are El
Tor strains that possess the classical CT (
12). What is novel
in the present study is that El Tor strains producing classical
CT have completely replaced the prototype seventh pandemic El
Tor strains producing the El Tor CT in Bangladesh. Given that
there are differences between the classical and El Tor biotypes,
the selection of this altered type of strain seems to indicate
an evolutionary optimization of the El Tor biotype and could
represent a new, more efficient emerging form of the El Tor
biotype of
V. cholerae O1.
These altered El Tor biotype strains cannot be differentiated from other El Tor strains by currently used bacteriological methods, and therefore a revision in methods is needed to track the spread of such strains. The implications of the heterogeneity in the B subunit of the CTs of the altered El Tor strains also need to be assessed from a vaccine and diagnostic perspective. It has been shown that various polyclonal antisera raised against CT1 antigens neutralize CT2 considerably less effectively than they neutralize the homologous toxin (9). Vaccines partly based on the B subunit from classical strains have been shown to protect less efficiently against El Tor strains than against classical strains in field trials (2). How the altered El Tor biotype strains will influence the epidemiology of cholera remains to be seen.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide sequences obtained for the ctxB genes of strains MQ1687, AU29037, CIRS098, CIRS101, CIRS164, VC071, VC073, and R001 have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers DQ523204 and DQ523217 to DQ523223.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research study was funded by the ICDDR,B: Centre for Health
and Population Research and its donors, who provide unrestricted
support to the center for its operations and research. Current
donors providing unrestricted support include the Australian
International Development Agency (AusAID), the Government of
Bangladesh, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA),
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the Government of The Netherlands,
the Government of Sri Lanka, the Swedish International Development
Cooperative Agency (Sida-SAREC), the Swiss Development Cooperation
(SDC), and the Department for International Development, (DFID),
United Kingdom. We gratefully acknowledge these donors for their
support and commitment to the center's research efforts.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory Sciences Division, ICDDR,B: Centre for Health and Population Research, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh. Phone: 880-3-9886464. Fax: 880-2-8812529. E-mail:
gbnair{at}icddrb.org.

Published ahead of print on 6 September 2006. 

REFERENCES
1 - Ansaruzzaman, M., N. A. Bhuiyan, G. B. Nair, D. A. Sack, M. Lucas, J. L. Deen, J. Ampuero, C. L. Chaignat, and the Mozambique Cholera Vaccine Demonstration Project Coordination Group. 2004. Cholera in Mozambique, variant of Vibrio cholerae. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10:2057-2059.[Medline]
2 - Clemens, J. D., D. A. Sack, J. R. Harris, F. van Loon, J. Chakraborty, F. Ahmed, M. R. Rao, M. R. Khan, M. Yunus, N. Huda, B. F. Stanton, B. A. Kay, R. Eeckels, J. D. Clemens, M. R. Rao, B. A. Kay, D. A. Sack, J. R. Harris, B. F. Stanton, S. Walter, R. Eeckels, A.-M. Svennerholm, and J. Holmgren. 1990. Field trial of oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh: results from a three-year follow-up. Lancet 335:270-273.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Dziejman, M., E. Balon, D. Boyd, C. M. Fraser, J. F. Heidelberg, and J. J. Mekalanos. 2002. Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio cholerae: genes that correlate with cholera endemic and pandemic disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1556-1561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Finkelstein, R. A., F. Burks, A. Zupan, W. S. Dallas, C. O. Jacob, and D. S. Ludwig. 1987. Epitopes of the cholera family of enterotoxins. Rev. Infect. Dis. 9:544-561.[Medline]
5 - Finkelstein, R. A. 25 February 2006, posting date. Cholera, Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139, and other pathogenic vibrios. [Online.] http://gsbs.utmb.edu/microbook/ch024.htm.
6 - Iwanaga, M., K. Yamamoto, N. Higa, Y. Ichinose, N. Nakasone, and M. Tanabe. 1986. Culture conditions for stimulating cholera toxin production by Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor. Microbiol. Immunol. 30:1075-1083.[Medline]
7 - Kaper, J. B., H. B. Bradford, N. C. Roberts, and S. Falkow. 1982. Molecular epidemiology of Vibrio cholerae in the U.S. Gulf Coast. J. Clin. Microbiol. 16:129-134.
8 - Karaolis, D. K., R. Lan, and P. R. Reeves. 1995. The sixth and seventh cholera pandemics are due to independent clones separately derived from environmental, nontoxigenic, non-O1 Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 177:3191-3198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Marchlewicz, B. A., and R. A. Finkelstein. 1983. Immunological differences among the cholera/coli family of enterotoxins. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1:129-138.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Mitra, R. K., R. K. Nandy, T. Ramamurthy, S. K. Bhattacharya, S. Yamasaki, T. Shimada, S. Toshio, Y. Takeda, and G. B. Nair. 2001. Molecular characterisation of rough variants of Vibrio cholerae isolated from hospitalised patients with diarrhoea. J. Med. Microbiol. 50:268-276.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Nair, G. B., S. M. Faruque, N. A. Bhuiyan, M. Kamruzzaman, A. K. Siddique, and D. A. Sack. 2002. New variants of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor with attributes of the classical biotype from hospitalized patients with acute diarrhea in Bangladesh. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3296-3299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Olsvik, O., J. Wahlberg, B. Petterson, M. Uhlen, T. Popovic, I. K. Wachsmuth, and P. I. Fields. 1993. Use of automated sequencing of polymerase chain reaction-generated amplicons to identify three types of cholera toxin subunit B in Vibrio cholerae O1 strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:22-25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Qadri, F., R. Raqib, F. Ahmed, T. Rahman, C. Wenneras, S. K. Das, N. H. Alam, M. M. Mathan, and A.-M. Svennerholm. 2002. Increased levels of inflammatory mediators in children and adults infected with Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 9:221-229.
14 - Sack, D. A., R. B. Sack, G. B. Nair, and A. K. Siddique. 2005. Cholera. Lancet 63:223-233.[CrossRef]
15 - Svennerholm, A.-M., and J. Holmgren. 1978. Identification of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin by means of a ganglioside immunosorbent assay (GM1-ELISA) procedure. Curr. Microbiol. 1:19-23.[Medline]
16 - Svennerholm, A.-M., M. Wikstrom, M. Lindblad, and J. Holmgren. 1986. Monoclonal antibodies to Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxins: neutralising activity and differentiation of human and porcine LTs and cholera toxin. Med. Biol. 64:23-30.[Medline]
17 - Tamplin, M. L., R. Jalali, M. K. Ahmed, and R. R. Colwell. 1990. Variation in epitopes of the B subunit of Vibrio cholerae non-O1 and Vibrio mimicus cholera toxins. Can. J. Microbiol. 36:409-413.[Medline]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2006, p. 4211-4213, Vol. 44, No. 11
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01304-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nguyen, B. M., Lee, J. H., Cuong, N. T., Choi, S. Y., Hien, N. T., Anh, D. D., Lee, H. R., Ansaruzzaman, M., Endtz, H. P., Chun, J., Lopez, A. L., Czerkinsky, C., Clemens, J. D., Kim, D. W.
(2009). Cholera Outbreaks Caused by an Altered Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor Biotype Strain Producing Classical Cholera Toxin B in Vietnam in 2007 to 2008. J. Clin. Microbiol.
47: 1568-1571
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kumar, P., Jain, M., Goel, A. K., Bhadauria, S., Sharma, S. K., Kamboj, D. V., Singh, L., Ramamurthy, T., Nair, G. B.
(2009). A large cholera outbreak due to a new cholera toxin variant of the Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor biotype in Orissa, Eastern India. J Med Microbiol
58: 234-238
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Udden, S. M. N., Zahid, M. S. H., Biswas, K., Ahmad, Q. S., Cravioto, A., Nair, G. B., Mekalanos, J. J., Faruque, S. M.
(2008). Acquisition of classical CTX prophage from Vibrio cholerae O141 by El Tor strains aided by lytic phages and chitin-induced competence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 11951-11956
[Abstract]
[Full Text]