Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2006, p. 4609-4612, Vol. 44, No. 12
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01308-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Department of Clinical Microbiology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
Received 26 June 2006/ Returned for modification 26 August 2006/ Accepted 7 October 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gram staining of the pus showed gram-positive cocci. The specimens were plated onto sheep blood agar (BioMérieux, Benelux S.A./N.V.) and chocolate agar (BioMérieux), both incubated at 37°C in air supplemented with 5% CO2, and mannitol salt lipovitellinase agar (homemade), MacConkey agar (BioMérieux), and D-Coccosel agar (BioMérieux), all incubated at 37°C in air. In addition, thioglycolate broth (BD, Belgium) was inoculated and incubated at 37°C in air.
After 18 h of incubation, staphylococci with identical phenotypical appearance were isolated from two of the three ICD samples (lead and pus). An overview of the biochemical characteristics is shown in Table 1. Colonies were ß-hemolytic on sheep blood agar; positive for DNase, lipovitellinase, and coagulase (rabbit plasma with EDTA; Remel, Apogent); but negative for clumping factor (rabbit plasma with EDTA), mannitol fermentation, and Pastorex Staph-Plus (Bio-Rad, France) agglutination. Biochemical analyses by Phoenix (software ver-sion V5.10A/V4.11B; BD) and API Staph (BioMérieux) gave a presumptive identification of S. aureus with confidence values of 97% and 88.5%, respectively.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Characteristics that differentiate S. pseudintermedius from other staphylococcia
|
0.25 mg/liter). The MICs of other regularly used test antibiotics were particularly low (data not shown), except for clindamycin and erythromycin, which had MICs of 1 mg/liter and >4 mg/liter, respectively. After undergoing surgical removal of the infected ICD, the patient was treated with flucloxacillin (500 mg four times daily administered orally for 1 week). Because of the inconsistent phenotypical identification and the clinical importance of the sample, further identification was performed at the molecular level. DNA was extracted from fresh colonies by heating at 95°C for 15 min in lysis buffer (0.01 M NaOH-0.25% sodium dodecyl sulfate). Two previously described real-time multiplex PCRs (RT-PCRs) were performed targeting the mecA gene and the nuc gene of S. aureus (1) and the tuf gene of the Staphylococcus genus together with the tuf gene specific for S. aureus (6). In addition, we used the DNA as a template for the detection of the coagulase gene of S. aureus by an in-house PCR. The PCRs for the nuc and coagulase genes and the mecA gene of S. aureus were all negative, but the PCR targeting the tuf gene of S. aureus resulted in a positive amplification. Finally, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis was performed with the DNA extracted from the colonies after PCR amplification, with the primers described by Vaneechoutte et al. (7). The sequences were determined using a CEQ 8000 (Analis S.A./N.V., Belgium) genetic analysis system and aligned with GeneDoc (version 2.6.002). BLAST and phylogenetic analysis (PHYML, version 2.4) resulted in the final identification of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, showing a 16S rRNA gene sequence identical to that previously reported by Devriese et al. (2) (Fig. 1A).
![]() ![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG.1. (A) Maximum likelihood tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Our strain (S. pseudintermedius DQ991031) shows a 16S rRNA gene sequence identical to those previously reported by Devriese et al. (S. pseudintermedius strains AJ780976, AJ780977, AJ780978, and AJ780979). (B) Maximum likelihood tree based on the tuf gene sequences. Our strain (S. pseudintermedius DQ991034) shows 100% sequence similarity with the tuf gene sequences obtained from the S. pseudintermedius strains of Devriese et al. (strains DQ991035, DQ991036, DQ991037, and DQ991038).
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Overview of the mismatches (bases highlighted by black background) between the binding sites of the tuf gene sequences and the FRET probes used in the RT-PCR assay as described by Sakai et al. (6). The fluorescein isothiocyanate label (probe 205) and the LCRED-705 fluorescence dye label (probe 206) are represented by * and °, respectively.
|
Biochemically, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius differs from S. aureus by the lack of pigment and clumping factor activity, a weak and delayed mannitol fermentation, positive reactions for tests for pyrrolidonyl arylamidase and ONPG (ß-galactosidase), and sensitivity to 8 µg/ml acriflavine (see comparisons in Table 1). S. pseudintermedius is readily misidentified as S. aureus by commercial identification systems because S. pseudintermedius is not (yet) included in the databases of these products. In agreement with API Staph and Phoenix identification, Staph-Zym (Rosco Diagnostica, Denmark) identifies the species as S. aureus. Vitek 2 software (version VT2-R04.01; BioMérieux, Benelux S.A./N.V.) analysis suggests the identification of S. intermedius with a confidence value of 98.95%. The fact that molecular analysis is also not always conclusive is shown by the false-positive result of the RT-PCR for the tuf gene of S. aureus. The probe used in the RT-PCR to identify S. aureus therefore requires further optimization. When confronted with an inconsistent phenotypical identification pattern, clinical laboratories should consider the use of 16S rRNA gene or tuf gene sequencing for final confirmation (3).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The GenBank accession numbers for the partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of S. pseudintermedius P13431, S. intermedius G30, and S. schleiferi P15880 are DQ991031, DQ991032, and DQ991033, respectively. The GenBank accession numbers for the partial tuf gene sequences of S. pseudintermedius P13431, S. intermedius G30, S. schleiferi P15880, S. pseudintermedius 780976, S. pseudintermedius 780977, S. pseudintermedius 780978, and S. pseudintermedius 780979 are DQ991034, DQ991039, DQ991040, DQ991035, DQ991036, DQ991037, and DQ991038, respectively.
Published ahead of print on 18 October 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»