This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hryniewicz, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hryniewicz, W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2006, p. 1135-1138, Vol. 44, No. 3
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.3.1135-1138.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Distribution of the Serine-Aspartate Repeat Protein-Encoding sdr Genes among Nasal-Carriage and Invasive Staphylococcus aureus Strains

Artur Sabat,1 Damian C. Melles,2 Gayane Martirosian,3 Hajo Grundmann,4 Alex van Belkum,2 and Waleria Hryniewicz1*

National Institute of Public Health, 00-725 Warsaw, Poland,1 Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands,2 Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland,3 European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System, RijksInstituut voor Volksgezondheid and Milieu (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands4

Received 28 September 2005/ Returned for modification 29 November 2005/ Accepted 6 January 2006


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The sdr locus was found in all 497 investigated Staphylococcus aureus strains, although in 29 strains it contained only the sdrC gene (sdrD negative, sdrE negative). The sdrC-positive, sdrD-negative, sdrE-negative gene profile was exclusive to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains (Fisher's exact test; P = 0.0005) and was not found in the strains collected from bone infections (P = 0.0019). We also found a strong association between the presence of the sdrD gene and methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains (P < 0.0001). Our findings suggest that MSSA strains with the newly uncovered sdrC-positive, sdrD-negative, sdrE-negative gene profile have a substantially decreased potential to establish bone infection.


arrow
TEXT
 
Staphylococcus aureus is an extremely versatile and frequent pathogen of humans both in the community and in hospitals. Infections caused by this organism involve bacterial adhesion to the host extracellular matrix. S. aureus adhesins are mostly cell wall-anchored proteins and are grouped into a single family named microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM).

The Sdr proteins are members of the MSCRAMM family that are encoded by the tandemly arrayed sdrC, sdrD, and sdrE genes, of approximately 2.8, 3.9, and 3.5 kbp, respectively, located in the sdr locus (4). The Sdr proteins are members of a family of surface proteins which are characterized by the presence of an R region containing various numbers of the Ser-Asp dipeptides encoded by DNA repeats in the 3' region of the sdr genes. The Sdr proteins have a comparable structural organization. A signal peptide is followed by an A domain which is similar in size among the different members of the Sdr family. However, they are not closely related, with only 20 to 30% identical amino acid residues. This suggests that different Sdr proteins have different roles in S. aureus pathogenicity. However, a ligand was defined only for Bbp (bone sialo-binding protein), which is an allelic variant of SdrE (12). The Sdr proteins have two, three, or five additional 110- to 113-residue sequences (B motifs) that are tandemly repeated in SdrC, SdrE, and SdrD, respectively. The B repeats bind Ca2+ with high affinity, and their structure unfolds when calcium ions are removed. The function of the B domains remains unknown. The B motifs are followed by segments composed of the SD repeats (R region). The C-terminal end (region M) of the Sdr proteins is involved in anchoring the proteins to the bacterial cell wall.

At least two sdr genes are present in all tested S. aureus strains (4) and always include sdrC (8). Therefore, the lack of sdr genes must be explained by the absence of sdrD or sdrE. Peacock and colleagues (8) demonstrated a strong correlation between S. aureus invasiveness and the presence of one of the allelic variants of the sdrE gene. Moreover, Trad et al. (10) reported a significantly higher prevalence of the sdrD gene in S. aureus strains responsible for bone infections.

S. aureus multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) (7, 9) utilizes polymorphism of seven individual genes (sspA, spa, sdrC, sdrD, sdrE, clfA, and clfB). During MLVA characterization of S. aureus strains, we found several strains possessing only five bands instead of six or seven in a pattern. After analysis using simplex PCRs with primer pairs designed for the MLVA method, we determined that the subset of S. aureus strains had only a single gene in the sdr locus. Similarities in the DNA sequence flanking the SD repeats of the sdr genes allowed for the selection of a single pair of primers for amplification of all three individual genes in the sdr locus. It was not possible to determine which of the sdr genes is present in the sdr locus. Therefore, we designed a novel triplex PCR procedure to examine the distribution of the sdr genes among nasal-carriage and invasive S. aureus strains as well as methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Primers used in this studya

A total of 497 strains (Table 2) were obtained during this study between 1990 and 2005, and these were selected from previously characterized collections (2, 6, 14). Only one isolate per person was tested. In addition, none of these strains were part of an outbreak, and none were determined to be from patients or personnel with obvious cross-infection. All strains in the collections were characterized by at least one genome typing method, including pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing, and MLVA. The strains showed a large degree of diversity, and not a single clonal type was overrepresented (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Distribution of sdrD and sdrE among S. aureus strain collections used in this study

DNA was extracted with the Genomic DNA Prep Plus kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) or the MagnaPure LC DNA system (DNA isolation kit III; Roche, Almere, The Netherlands) as previously described (9, 13). The triplex PCR products specific in size for sdrC (144 bp), for sdrD (272 bp), and for sdrE (433 bp) were analyzed by electrophoresis in 2% agarose SeaKem LE gels (FMC). The two-tailed Fisher exact test was used to analyze the distribution of the sdr genes among S. aureus strains originating from different hosts. P values less than 0.05 were considered a statistically significant difference.

The sdrC gene was present in all investigated strains (n = 497), which was concordant with a previous report (8). However, in 29 MSSA strains (of the total 382 MSSA strains), only the sdrC gene (sdrD negative, sdrE negative) was found in the sdr locus. The result was confirmed by PCR amplification of a sequence covering the sdr locus, using primer pair azoF and glyR (Table 1), targeting the sequences in flanking genes encoding azoreductase (assigned as SACOL0607 in the COL genome) and putative glycosyltransferase (SACOL0611). The amplicon sizes around 3.5 kbp confirmed the presence of only a single sdr gene in the sdr locus (data not shown). Two or three sdr genes were always detected in all MRSA strains (n = 115). A significant association between the sdrC-positive, sdrD-negative, sdrE-negative gene profile and MSSA strains was found (29/353 versus 0/115; Fisher's exact test; P = 0.0005). The strains with only the sdrC gene in the sdr locus represented different sequence types (STs) defined by multilocus sequence typing (Table 3). In the same STs we found strains with different combinations of the genes in the sdr locus, suggesting a high degree of variability. In contrast, the sdrD and sdrE genes were heterogeneously distributed. Among the tested strains, sdrD was significantly associated with MRSA strains (183/199 versus 114/1; Fisher's exact test; P < 0.0001), whereas the sdrE distribution did not differ between the MSSA and MRSA strains (344/38 versus 101/14; Fisher's exact test; P = 0.4898).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Distribution of the sdrC-positive, sdrD-negative, sdrE-negative gene profile among sequence types defined by multilocus sequence typing

We checked the distribution of the sdr genes between the strains collected from nose swabs of asymptomatic carriers (n = 259) and invasive infections, osteomyelitis (n = 89), and blood infections (n = 52). The strains possessing only the sdrC gene in the sdr locus were not found in the strains collected from bone infections (23/236 versus 0/89; Fisher's exact test; P = 0.0019). This indicates strongly that the carriage strains with only the sdrC gene have abolished or substantially decreased the potential to establish bone infection. In contrast to osteomyelitis, the sdrC-positive, sdrD-negative, sdrE-negative gene profile was found in the strains isolated from blood infections (23/236 versus 6/46; Fisher's exact test; P = 0.6001). There was no significant difference between the strains associated with nasal colonization and those associated with both types of infections (P > 0.05). However, the sdrD gene was significantly associated with osteomyelitis (112/147 versus 74/15; Fisher's exact test; P < 0.0001) but not with blood infections (112/147 versus 23/29; Fisher's exact test; P = 1.0). There was no significant correlation of sdrE with blood infections (231/28 versus 44/8; Fisher's exact test; P = 0.3457) and osteomyelitis (231/28 versus 79/10; Fisher's exact test; P = 1.0).

In previous investigations a contribution to the pathogenic process of the allelic variants (sdrE/bbp) of the sdrE gene was explored. Peacock and colleagues (8) have shown a possibility that one (sdrE) of the allelic variants of the sdrE gene is associated with invasive disease while another (bbp) is evenly distributed among isolates recovered from healthy individuals and from patients with invasive S. aureus disease. Tristan and colleagues (11) have investigated only one of the allelic variants of the sdrE gene, and they have revealed that the distribution of bbp is significantly associated with osteomyelitis/arthritis. There was no difference in the incidence of bbp when carriage-associated strains were compared to invasive isolates. During our investigations we designed the primers which had sequences corresponding to regions of both allelic variants of the sdrE gene. Therefore, our results strengthen the observation of Peacock et al. that the allelic variants at a given locus may have different contributions to the pathogenic process. Our data are also concordant with the studies by Trad et al. (10) in which a significantly higher prevalence of only the sdrD gene and not the sdrE gene in bone infections has been found. The sequence alignments of the sdrC and sdrD genes (sequences obtained from the S. aureus genomes for which websites are given in Table 1) show that their polymorphism level is comparable to that of the sdrE gene (data not shown). It is very important to address future studies to determine sequence variability of the sdr genes and on the basis of their polymorphism to investigate the pathogenic potential of allelic variants of the sdrC, sdrD, and sdrE genes.

It is not clear why sdrC alone seems to be limited to MSSA strains only. This might be a reflection of the fact that MRSA primarily consists of a limited number of highly successful pandemic clones. Katayama and colleagues (5) have demonstrated that genetic background profoundly influences the stability of mecA in S. aureus. We can only hypothesize now that the same genetic mechanisms could play a role in acquisition and stability of SCCmec and the sdr genes as well as other genetic elements.

Most infections caused by S. aureus result from the combined action of a variety of factors. However, the contribution of particular virulence factors to S. aureus pathogenicity in humans is poorly understood. The results obtained in experimental models suggest that S. aureus strains producing receptors for bone sialoprotein, collagen, and fibronectin are associated with osteomyelitis and arthritis (1, 3, 12). However, our results show that strains lacking the sdrD and sdrE genes have decreased potential to infect bones. Studies in which strains with knockouts of sdrD and/or sdrE are used in experimental models should be performed to cast light on the role of these genes in osteomyelitis. Furthermore, studies to investigate the differential distribution of genes encoding virulence factors in a larger number of sdrD- and/or sdrE-positive strains and strains lacking both sdrD and sdrE are needed. The understanding of specific pathogenetic mechanisms may have an important prophylactic and therapeutic impact. The results obtained during this study suggest that both sdrD and sdrE may play comparable and important roles in bone infections. Strains lacking the sdrD gene had also potential to give rise to osteomyelitis, but then they always possessed the sdrE gene. These findings show that most strains are capable of bone infections. For adequate and cost-effective infection prevention, it is important to distinguish nasal colonizers which may be more aggressive from those with abolished or substantially decreased potential to establish an invasive infection.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Sabina Grzeszczuk (National Institute of Public Health, Warsaw, Poland) for assistance during the course of this study.

This work was supported by grant 2 P04A 001 27 (to A.S. and W.H.) and Mikrobank (to W.H.) from the Polish Ministry of Scientific Research and Information Technology, State Committee for Scientific Research.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: National Institute of Public Health, 30/34 Chelmska St., 00-725 Warsaw, Poland. Phone: 48 22 841 33 67. Fax: 48 22 841 29 49. E-mail: waleria{at}cls.edu.pl. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Elasri, M. O., J. R. Thomas, R. A. Skinner, J. S. Blevins, K. E. Beenken, C. L. Nelson, and M. S. Smelter. 2002. Staphylococcus aureus collagen adhesin contributes to the pathogenesis of osteomyelitis. Bone 30:275-280.[Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Grundmann, H., S. Hori, M. C. Enright, C. Webster, A. Tami, E. J. Feil, and T. Pitt. 2002. Determining the genetic structure of the natural population of Staphylococcus aureus: a comparison of multilocus sequence typing with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, and phage typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4544-4546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Johansson, A., J. I. Flock, and O. Svensson. 2001. Collagen and fibronectin binding in experimental staphylococcal osteomyelitis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 382:241-246.
    4. 4
  4. Josefsson, E., K. W. McCrea, D. Ni Eidhin, D. O'Connell, J. Cox, M. Hook, and T. J. Foster. 1998. Three new members of the serine-aspartate repeat protein multigene family of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology 144:3387-3395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Katayama, Y., D. A. Robinson, M. C. Enright, and H. F. Chambers. 2005. Genetic background affects stability of mecA in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2380-2383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Krzyszton-Russjan, J., J. Empel, T. Leski, M. Gniadkowski, and W. Hryniewicz. 2005. Clonal structure of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) population in Poland: revision and update. Microb. Drug Resist. 11:127-136.[CrossRef][Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Malachowa, N., A. Sabat, M. Gniadkowski, J. Krzyszton-Russjan, J. Empel, J. Miedzobrodzki, K. Kosowska-Shick, P. C. Appelbaum, and W. Hryniewicz. 2005. Comparison of multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, spa typing, and multilocus sequence typing for clonal characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3095-3100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Peacock, S. J., C. E. Moore, A. Justice, M. Kantzanou, L. Story, K. Mackie, G. O'Neill, and N. P. Day. 2002. Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 70:4987-4996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Sabat, A., J. Krzyszton-Russjan, W. Strzalka, R. Filipek, K. Kosowska, W. Hryniewicz, J. Travis, and J. Potempa. 2003. New method for typing Staphylococcus aureus strains: multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of polymorphism and genetic relationships of clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1801-1804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Trad, S., J. Allignet, L. Frangeul, M. Davi, M. Vergassola, E. Couve, A. Morvan, A. Kechrid, C. Buchrieser, P. Glaser, and N. El Solh. 2004. DNA macroarray for identification and typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2054-2064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Tristan, A., L. Ying, M. Bes, J. Etienne, F. Vandenesch, and G. Lina. 2003. Use of multiplex PCR to identify Staphylococcus aureus adhesins involved in human hematogenous infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4465-4467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Tung, H., B. Guss, U. Hellman, L. Persson, K. Rubin, and C. Ryden. 2000. A bone sialoprotein-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus: a member of the staphylococcal Sdr family. Biochem. J. 345:611-619.
    13. 13
  13. van Leeuwen, W. B., D. C. Melles, A. Alaidan, M. Al-Ahdal, H. A. Boelens, S. V. Snijders, H. Wertheim, E. van Duijkeren, J. K. Peeters, P. J. van der Spek, R. Gorkink, G. Simons, H. A. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum. 2005. Host- and tissue-specific pathogenic traits of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 187:4584-4591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Wertheim, H. F., M. C. Vos, A. Ott, A. Voss, J. A. Kluytmans, C. M. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, M. H. Meester, P. H. van Keulen, and H. A. Verbrugh. 2004. Mupirocin prophylaxis against nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus infections in nonsurgical patients: a randomized study. Ann. Intern. Med. 140:419-425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2006, p. 1135-1138, Vol. 44, No. 3
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.3.1135-1138.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Rasschaert, G., Vanderhaeghen, W., Dewaele, I., Janez, N., Huijsdens, X., Butaye, P., Heyndrickx, M. (2009). Comparison of Fingerprinting Methods for Typing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 398. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3313-3322 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Persson, L., Johansson, C., Ryden, C. (2009). Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus Bone Sialoprotein-Binding Protein Indicate Infectious Osteomyelitis. CVI 16: 949-952 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Collery, M. M., Smyth, D. S., Twohig, J. M., Shore, A. C., Coleman, D. C., Smyth, C. J. (2008). Molecular typing of nasal carriage isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from an Irish university student population based on toxin gene PCR, agr locus types and multiple locus, variable number tandem repeat analysis. J Med Microbiol 57: 348-358 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hryniewicz, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hryniewicz, W.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»