Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2006, p. 909-915, Vol. 44, No. 3
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.44.3.909-915.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Ingo Sobottka,1
Matthias A. Horstkotte,1
Stefanie Scherpe,1
Martin Aepfelbacher,1 and
Susanne Müller2
Institut für Infektionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany,1 SEQUENOM GmbH, Mendelssohnstrasse 15D, 22761 Hamburg, Germany2
Received 11 August 2005/ Returned for modification 3 October 2005/ Accepted 6 January 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A variety of easy-to-carry-out tests, mostly based on synergy testing between clavulanic acid and an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, have been introduced in recent years (6, 9, 15-17, 20, 35). Despite considerable efforts at improvement, phenotypic ESBL tests still remain a problem because of the heterogeneity of the enzymes, their variable activity against potential substrates (31, 33-35), their coexistence with other beta-lactamases (31, 35), and the confounding factors that modify their expression (e.g., the "inoculum effect") (7, 36). Furthermore, phenotype-based resistance tests fail to identify which gene variant is generating the resistance and if it is a single isolated case or the result of a pandemic spread.
Detection of ESBLs at the genetic level represents a promising alternative, which provides all these data. Genotyping is entirely independent of the degree of gene expression and independent of substrate affinity by the strains involved. Sequencing is the most widely accepted post-PCR processing method for genotyping purposes, with the capability of discovering new sequence polymorphisms differing by only a single nucleotide (4). Additionally, a number of competing post-PCR techniques for fast identification have been developed during the past few years. For example, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (2, 18, 23), fluorescence-labeled oligonucleotide probes used on a LightCycler instrument (25), and DNA microarrays (12) have been proposed to identify some of the relevant point mutations. However, the major drawback of all of the current assays is that they are not able to identify previously unknown sequence variations.
An innovative genotyping method is analysis of nucleic acids cleaved at specific bases by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (26, 30). Using the data acquisition speed and the accuracy of current mass spectrometry systems, the new concept is able to detect known and previously unknown sequence variations, thus providing an ideal tool for genotypic characterization of ESBLs. Here we present the application of this new biochemistry for discovering SNPs in the SHV ß-lactamase gene.
For the new assay, two PCRs were performed. One reaction introduced a T7 promoter tag in the forward strand of the amplification product. The other PCR introduced the T7 promoter tag in the reverse strand of the product. PCR amplification was followed by in vitro transcription. Each PCR product was split into two cleavage reactions (T-specific cleavage and C-specific cleavage). Replacement of either CTP or UTP by their analog deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dCTP/dTTP) during transcription enables base-specific cleavage in each of the four reactions during the subsequent RNase A treatment. The base specificity of the cleavage reaction is based on the fact that deoxy bases in the RNA prevent the RNase A from cutting in the respective positions. Thus, the fragments are going to be cleaved only in the non-deoxy C/U position and hence the cleaved fragments will end in C or U. The resulting cleavage products were measured by MALDI-TOF MS, generating a characteristic signal pattern based on the fragment masses (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Overview of the novel assay for comparative sequence analysis by base-specific RNA cleavage reaction. Promoter sequences of T7 RNA polymerase are tagged at the PCR primers adjacent to the target region. For each sequence stretch of interest, two PCRs are performed. One reaction introduces the T7 promoter tag in the forward strand of the PCR product, whereas the other PCR introduces the T7 promoter tag in the reverse strand. (For simplification, only the "forward reactions" are pictured.) For post-PCR processing, each PCR product is split into two transcription reactions (one with dCTP the other with dTTP in the enzyme mix). RNase A normally cleaves after C and U. The replacement of these with dC or dT, respectively, means that cleavage will only happen after the RNA base that has not been replaced. This generates base specificity. Resulting cleavage products are measured by MALDI-TOF MS, generating a characteristic signal pattern based on the fragment masses.
|
|
|
|---|
PCR primer sequences. For analysis of the forward strand, each forward PCR primer carries a T7 promoter site attached to the 5' end of the gene-specific primer sequence (underlined) and each reverse PCR primer carries a 10-mer tag. For analysis of the reverse strand, each forward PCR primer carries a 10-mer tag and each reverse PCR primer carries a T7 promoter site. The sequences of the primers used are as follows: amp01-F-T7, CAGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGAAGGCTCGTAGGCATGATAGAAATGG; amp03-F-T7, CAGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGAAGGCTGAACTGAATGAGGCGCTT; amp01-R-10mer, AGGAAGAGAGTCCCGCAGATAAATCACC; amp02-R-10mer, AGGAAGAGAGAAGCGCCTCATTCAGTTC; amp01-F-10mer, AGGAAGAGAGCGTAGGCATGATAGAAATGG; amp03-F-10mer, AGGAAGAGAGGAACTGAATGAGGCGCTT; amp01-R-T7, CAGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGAAGGCTTCCCGCAGATAAATCACC; amp02-R-T7, CAGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGAAGGCTAAGCGCCTCATTCAGTTC. PCR product of amplicon 1 was generated between primer amp01-F-T7 and amp01-R-10mer for forward strand reactions. Product for reverse strand analysis was amplified with amp01-R-T7 together with amp01-F-10mer. Amplicon 1 was divided into two shorter amplicons (2 and 3) for comparative analysis. Amplicon 2 was amplified with analog combinations of primers of the amp01-F and amp02-R groups. Amplicon 3 was amplified with analog combinations of primers of the amp03-F and amp01-R groups.
Bacterial strains. Clinical strains had been isolated at the Microbiology Laboratory of the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Bacterial strain identification and phenotypic antibiotic resistance testing were performed by standard procedures of the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) (8, 21), with Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 as a reference strain.
DNA preparation/extraction. One loop of bacterial cells was dissolved in 250 µl of buffer P1, and the plasmid DNA was extracted according to the protocol provided with the QIAGEN Plasmid Mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).
PCR. Twenty-five-microliter amplification mixtures contained 1x PCR buffer [Tris-HCl, KCl, (NH4)2SO4, MgCl2 (pH 8.7); final MgCl2 concentration of 1.5 mM], a 200 µM concentration of each desoxynucleoside triphosphate (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany), 0.5 U of HotStar Taq polymerase (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), 10 pmol of each forward and reverse primer (MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany), and 25 ng of bacterial DNA (1-ng/µl final concentration). The temperature profile consisted of 45 cycles of denaturation (94°C, 20 s), annealing (amplicon 1, 52.2°C; amplicon 2, 66.8°C; amplicon 3, 61.5°C; 30 s), and extension (72°C, 60 s) after an initial step of HotStar Taq activation (94°C, 15 min). PCRs were performed in a Thermocycler Mastercycler gradient (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany).
Dephosphorylation. Shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) (0.3 U) (Sequenom, Hamburg, Germany) was added to 5-µl aliquots of each PCR to dephosphorylate unincorporated dNTPs. The samples were incubated for 20 min at 37°C. The enzyme was heat inactivated for 5 min at 85°C.
RNA transcription/RNase A cleavage. Base-specific cleavage is obtained by incorporating either dCTP or dTTP in the transcripts. RNA transcription/RNase A cleavage was performed by incubation of 2.0 µl PCR/SAP product and 5.0 µl of either a C- or a T-specific transcription/cleavage cocktail (Sequenom, Hamburg, Germany), a mixture consisting of 22 U T7 RNA and DNA polymerase, 1 mM ribonucleosides, 2.5 mM of either dCTP or dTTP, 0.09 mg/ml RNase A, 3.14 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.64x T7 polymerase buffer, at 37°C for 3 h.
Sample conditioning and sample transfer. Each sample was diluted by adding 20 µl double-distilled water. Then, using a dimple plate, 6 mg of Clean Resin (Sequenom, Hamburg, Germany) was added to each reaction mixture and the mixture was incubated for 10 min with gentle rotation. After centrifugation (3,200 x g, 5 min) to spin down the resin, sample aliquots of 15 nl were dispensed robotically onto a 384-element silicon chip preloaded with matrix (SpectroCHIP; Sequenom, Hamburg, Germany).
MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Mass spectra were acquired using a MassARRAY mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonic-Sequenom GmbH). Only positive ions were analyzed, and 5 x 20 single-shot spectra were accumulated per sample. Analysis of all mass spectra was performed with the MassARRAY Discovery-RT software version 1.2.3 (Sequenom, Hamburg, Germany). This module collects and summarizes data from all four cleavage reactions. Combinatorial algorithms are used to identify point mutations based on the detection of additional and missing signals in the signal pattern.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Ranking of base-specific blaSHV DNA cleavage mass patternsa according to the number of identical and nonidentical mass peaks relative to the mass spectrum of the blaSHV consensus sequence
|
![]() View larger version (61K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Compilation and comparison of SNPs found in 21 real samples of blaSHV genes. Dashed lines, no mutation detectable; open squares, heterozygously mutant; solid squares, homozygously mutant; a, mutant signal only detectable in the short fragment; b, mutant signal only weakly expressed. Columns representing SNP positions that lead to amino acid changes are highlighted in light gray. An asterisk indicates that definite diagnosis of which SHV variant is present is impossible due to heterozygosity at multiple SNPs. Thus, only the amino acid changes carried by the organism are specified. Eclo, Enterobacter cloacae; Eco, E. coli; Kpn, K. pneumoniae; SEQ, conventional fluorescence-based sequencing using capillaries. A checkmark indicates that the mutation was confirmed.
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. T-specific cleavage reactions applied to a C/T324 polymorphism of the blaSHV gene, analyzed in three different individuals (Kpn68, K. pneumoniae ESBL strain 68; Kpn98, K. pneumoniae ESBL strain 98; and Kpn122, K. pneumoniae ESBL strain 122). Shown is a subview of the full spectrum. The asterisk and arrow mark the wild type (at 2,942.8 Da) and mutant (2,926.8 Da) discriminative mass signals, respectively.
|
Clinical samples frequently contain mixtures of wild-type and mutant DNA. The most common example of such heterozygosis is an ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae strain in which the individual strain contains both the gene blaSHV-1, which may be either chromosomally or plasmid mediated, and a blaSHV ESBL gene that is normally encoded on an uncharacterized low-copy-number plasmid. The potential of the described method for detection of heterozygous samples is shown in Fig. 3. The upper spectrum shows the characteristic pattern of fragment masses for a homozygous C sample. A new, unique signal at m/z = 2,926.8 Da appears due to loss of the cleavage site if a heterozygous sample is analyzed (lower spectrum). The intensity of the unique signal increases if the sample is homozygous T (middle spectrum). Thus, accurate discrimination of coincident blaSHV alleles is possible regardless of the probably variable amounts of template DNA available from clinical isolates.
However, in some special instances MALDI analysis may be a mixed blessing. First, one should bear in mind that MALDI analysis will only allow investigation of SNP alleles. Reconstructing the genotype (alleles for multiple SNPs on the same gene) from a mixture of two DNAs is rarely possible. Thus, for a couple of K. pneumoniae strains, in which there is heterozygosity at multiple SNPs (in Fig. 2 marked with asterisks), MALDI-TOF analysis can only inform you as to which amino acid changes you are dealing with; however, it cannot definitely state which SHV variant is present.
Second, because the amplification does not span the whole length of the blaSHV gene, our protocol cannot always differentiate between all possible SHV variants. For example, the blaSHV-1v5 allele is only one nucleotide different from blaSHV-11v3 (11). This nucleotide change is T/A92 and was missed in our protocol. Other examples are easily predictable: the difference between one possible SHV-2a and one possible SHV-2 variant will be T/A92, and the difference between one possible SHV-5 and one possible SHV-12 variant will be T/A92 too. While such variants have not been reported, it does not mean that they do not exist. Thus, since our protocol does not take into consideration T/A92, it is possible that it will not discriminate between all possible SHV-5/12 and -2/2a pairs.
|
|
|---|
The family of SHV ß-lactamases is continuously evolving, which means new, not yet described variations have to be expected in each analysis. It is important to detect these unknown variations accurately because they may represent newly emerged resistance types. Since currently established molecular detection methods rely on fixed probe/restriction site sequences, it is a challenge to cope with new variations. The hybridization-based approaches and PCR restriction analysis are burdened with the fact that any further mutation of phenotypic relevance must cumbersomely be implemented into the scheme of the method by incorporation of new oligonucleotide probes or by searching for a new restriction site. In contrast, the experimental settings of the MALDI-TOF method are universal enough to detect new single-nucleotide polymorphisms without any adaptation of the protocol (13, 29).
Although previous work suggested that shorter cleavage products should be more amenable to mass spectrometric analysis (10, 29), in our experiments an amplicon of 666 bp could be analyzed by this method, which might reduce the total number of amplicons necessary to analyze a given target sequence. Recently it has been shown that it is even possible to analyze several short amplicons together in one multiplexed reaction (10). In contrast, fluorescent DNA sequencing typically requires DNA stretches no larger than 400 to 500 bp for accurate reads. Moreover, the MALDI-TOF assay is considerably more sensitive than DNA sequencing in the detection of heterozygous samples (3, 29). Therefore, detection of mutations in the mixed samples typical of K. pneumoniae ESBL strains is easily possible with the MALDI-TOF assay, whereas fluorescent sequencing can have variable sensitivity and specificity in detecting heterozygotes because of the inconsistency of base calling at these sites (22).
In summary, the MALDI-TOF assay is a four-step (PCR, transcription, RNA cleavage, and MALDI-TOF MS analysis), single-tube procedure that does not require optimization for different substrates; hence, a single protocol may be used. However, the technology requires special and quite expensive pieces of post-PCR equipment (a 96-head automatic pipettor, a 24-pin nano-dispenser, and a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer), which are not yet part of the standard equipment found in research and diagnostic laboratories at this time. Leaving aside the expense of buying the set of required instruments, the MALDI-TOF method is even cheaper to run than conventional sequencing using both strands: The average cost for MALDI analysis (including the PCRs) is about $3.59 per amplicon.
The procedure is automated, detects mutations in fragments up to 1 kb in length, and, although DNA extraction, PCR amplification, RNA transcription, and RNase A cleavage require similar time frames as processing steps in conventional sequencing, same-day turnaround times can be achieved. The assay is an ideal tool for identifying sequence variations, such as single-base substitutions, insertions, and deletions. The assay offers particularly high sensitivity for detection of mutations in mixed samples. The assay is robust, and the data are highly reproducible.
Present address: BioGlobe GmbH, Grandweg 64, 22529 Hamburg, Germany. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»