Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2006, p. 1453-1458, Vol. 44, No. 4
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.44.4.1453-1458.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo,1 Department of Microbiology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil2
Received 11 November 2005/ Returned for modification 23 December 2005/ Accepted 4 February 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
E. coli is a clonal species, and characterization of the cell surface lipopolysaccharide O antigen and the flagellar H antigen allow the grouping of pathogenic clones within this species. E. coli has 187 O and 53 H antigens defined by serology (4). Although a great variety of O serogroups was identified in ETEC, O6, O8, O78, O128, and O153 are the most common antigens. Considerably fewer H than O antigens are associated with ETEC, and H7, H12, H16, H21, H45, and H49 are the most common. Some of them are strongly associated with an O serogroup, namely, O27:H7, O8:H9, O78:H12, O128:H12, O6:H16, O148:H28, O25:H42, and O153:H45 (16). Because of these associations, determination of the O antigen can be guided by the identification of the flagellar H antigen among ETEC strains. This is important, because identification of a particular H antigen would reduce the amount of time and the number of antisera required to identify the O antigen in ETEC strains.
Analysis of nucleic acid biomarkers for the detection and identification of bacteria has become widespread since the development of the necessary molecular biological tools. In particular, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis has been used for the identification of various infectious bacteria. The structure of the ETEC flagellin (H antigen) gene (fliC), with terminal conserved regions, makes it an ideal candidate for PCR amplification, which can be combined with RFLP to target variation in the central region. The conserved sequences at each end of this gene allow the amplification of a wide range of alleles with a single set of primers (15).
Fields et al. (5) developed a PCR-RFLP test to identify and characterize the fliC gene. They showed that the restriction analysis of this gene can be used to type both O157:H7 and O157:H Shiga toxin-producing E. coli strains. Moreover, they demonstrated that almost all the other 52 flagellar antigens investigated in their study had distinct fliC RFLP patterns after restriction with RsaI. Such distinct patterns could therefore be used to identify the respective H antigens. This method has been shown to be an important tool for the detection of bacteria, for the determination of genetic relationships, and for epidemiological studies (1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 11, 13, 18).
In the present study, we applied the fliC RFLP method to characterize fliC genes from 128 ETEC strains and 53 H antigen E. coli reference strains. We showed that the H antigen of ETEC can be characterized by restriction analysis of the polymorphism of the fliC gene by using the restriction endonuclease RsaI. As a result, an identification scheme is proposed to deduce H antigen groups.
The fliC-RFLP technique proved to be faster than classic serotyping for the deduction of the E. coli H antigen, taking 2 days to complete instead of the 7 or more days when using classic serotyping.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. fliC gene restriction analysis of E. coli reference strains using RsaI
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. fliC gene restriction analysis of motile ETEC strains using RsaI
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. fliC gene restriction analysis of nonmotile ETEC strains using RsaI
|
fliC PCR-RFLP analysis. The PCR-RFLP protocol developed by Fields et al. (5) was performed with slight modifications. We used the same primers (F-FLIC1 and R-FLIC2) as Botelho et al. (2) and Fields et al. (5), who have confirmed (by sequencing and/or hybridization) that the amplified fragments were indeed the fliC gene. PCR was performed in the GeneAmp PCR system 2400 (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in a reaction volume of 100 µl containing approximately 84 ng of DNA, 0.3 M of each primer, 50 M (each) deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate, 10 µl of 10-fold-concentrated polymerase synthesis buffer, 2 mM of MgCl2, and 6.66 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, São Paulo, Brazil). The PCR conditions included denaturation for 30 s at 95°C, annealing for 60 s at 60°C, and extension for 120 s at 72°C for 35 cycles. Fifteen microliters of each PCR product was digested with RsaI restriction enzyme according to the manufacturer's instructions. Digestion with HhaI endonuclease was further employed in cases where no differentiation was obtained with RsaI. Restriction fragments were separated on a 3% (wt/vol) agarose gel for 3 h at 8 V/cm and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide. A 100-bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen, São Paulo, Brazil) was used as an external fragment size standard.
Determination of DNA fragment size and identification of flagellar type. Digitization and interpretation of patterns were done using the Photodocumentation System DP-001.FDC, version 10 (Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Vallée Cedex 1, France), and PhotoCapt MW, version 10.01, for Windows. In pattern comparisons, the base pair-tolerated variation (allowed error) was set to fragments 5 bp in size, meaning that two fragments were considered identical when their sizes did not differ by more than 5 bp.
Serotyping. Serotyping was performed by standard procedures (4). Antisera against E. coli H antigens were obtained from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, and ETEC strains were serotyped at the Federal University of São Paulo. Antisera to E. coli somatic antigens O1 to O170 were obtained from the E. coli Reference Laboratory, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. fliC gene restriction analysis of H1, H3, H5, H11, H12, H16, H27, and H55 reference strains using HhaI
|
RFLP patterns of the fliC gene of motile ETEC serotypes. To investigate the fliC-RFLP patterns of different ETEC isolates, 88 motile strains of 14 different H types (Table 2) were subjected to PCR with primers F-FLIC1 and R-FLIC2 and subsequent restriction with RsaI. Table 2 and Fig. 1 show the RFLP patterns for each H-type studied. The H21 strains showed three different specific patterns (P17, P17a, and P17b). In contrast, all other strains showed a single and specific restriction pattern. The P17 pattern was predominant among the H21 types. The pattern (P15a) observed for the fliC from both H19 ETEC strains was different from the pattern (P15) obtained for the fliC from the H19 reference strain. Using RFLP analysis of the fliC gene from motile ETEC strains, we were able to distinguish all the H antigens studied. We found that different alleles can encode the same H antigen, as was the case for the H21 and H19 antigens. However, most H antigens studied for ETEC presented only one allele.
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Electrophoretic separation (on a 3% agarose gel) of RsaI RFLP fragments of the fliC gene from motile ETEC strains belonging to 16 different H types. All alleles presented distinct electrophoretic profiles. M2, 100-bp ladder (Invitrogen); P2, pattern of allele from serotype H2; P7a, serotype H7; P8, serotype H8; P9, serotype H9; P1, serotype H12; P3, serotype H16; P14, serotype H18; P15a, serotype H19; P17, serotype H21; P17a, serotype H21; P17b, serotype H21; P20, serotype H25; P11, serotype H27; P26, serotype H32; P36, serotype H42; and P39, serotype H45.
|
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Representative RFLP patterns (on a 3% agarose gel) of fliC gene matches of motile ETEC and nonmotile ETEC isolates using RsaI. Unlike serotyping, which only enables characterization of motile strains, the RFLP method allows the characterization of the fliC alleles present but not expressed in nonmotile strains. M2, 100-bp ladder (Invitrogen); NM-I, NT:NM; P1, O128:H12; NM-j, O6:NM and O23:NM; P3, O6:H16; NM-k, O77:NM; P14, NT:H18; NM-l, R:NM; P15, O62:H19; NM-m, O128:NM; P17, O128:H21; NM-n, O88:NM; P20, O88:H25; NM-o, O86:NM; P26, O8:H32.
|
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Two RFLP profiles on a 3% agarose gel that do not match with the RFLP patterns of the fliC of the reference strains. Nevertheless, we were able to characterize two alleles from nine nonmotile ETEC strains which were not previously known. M2, 100-bp ladder (Invitrogen); P47, NM-d (NT:NM, O64:NM, O154:NM); P48, NM-f (NT:NM, O104:NM).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Characteristics of ETEC strains that showed discrepancies between H antigen and fliC RFLP patterns
|
|
|
|---|
The high diversity of restriction profiles was attributed to variability within an internal region of the flagellin genes, whereas regions at the 5' and 3' ends are more conserved (6). Joys (7) suggested that random mutations accumulated in the central region of the fliC gene due to an absence of functional constraints. The alternative view is that selection pressure and lateral gene transfer provide a source of variation (11, 14). The mammalian host immune system is the driving force for continuous selection of new flagellar antigens in E. coli.
In most cases, the diversity highlighted by RFLP of flagellin genes exceeded the diversity present in H antigens. Our finding about the genetic variation of flagellin genes encoding the same H antigen is consistent with observations of populations of other diarrheagenic E. coli strains reported in the past (2, 5, 9). The H21 ETEC isolates presented three different patterns, two of which, designated P17a and P17, are identical, respectively, to patterns P21a and P21b found by Botelho et al. (2) in enteropathogenic E. coli strains. Fields et al. (5) showed the importance of the genetic differences among alleles that encode the same H antigen. Using RsaI as a restriction enzyme, they divided H7 isolates into four groups that allowed the differentiation of Shiga toxin-producing strains (O157:H7, O157:Hund, O157:H, and O55:H7) from most of the other H7 group isolates. In our study, H7 ETEC isolates presented only one RsaI RFLP pattern, which is identical to one of the patterns reported by Fields et al. (5) but different from the one in the reference strain. H19 ETEC isolates showed different RsaI RFLP patterns compared to the respective pattern in the H reference strains. Genetic diversity in the allele that encodes the H19 antigen was also observed by Machado et al. (9), using HhaI as a restriction enzyme. The H molecular typing for members of Enterobacteriaceae may become an important epidemiological tool for the characterization of E. coli pathotypes.
As we mentioned above, H serotyping is the gold standard method for the determination of H antigens. However, it is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Because of these limitations, it is performed by only a few reference laboratories. Moreover, there are additional difficulties associated with conventional H typing. For instance, there is a substantial proportion of nonmotile diarrheagenic E. coli strains as well as cross-reactions between particular H antigens that share common epitopes (4). In fact, we have observed that most nonmotile ETEC strains studied here had their H antigen properly identified by RsaI PCR-RFLP.
The high typeability of fliC PCR-RFLP was demonstrated when this method was applied to previously unknown O:H serotype strains of different diarrheagenic E. coli isolates (data not shown). We were able to characterize the fliC gene from most strains studied, showing the efficacy of this technique for the determination of the H types of E. coli strains. Meanwhile, all ETEC strains that showed discrepant results between the H serotype and the fliC RFLP pattern were confirmed by serotyping to express the expected H antigen by PCR-RFLP.
ETEC belongs to specific serotypes, given by the combination of O and H antigen types. In spite of this serotype diversity, some flagellar antigens are serogroup specific and are often associated with the toxigenic phenotypes LT-I (heat labile toxin I)/ST-I (heat stable toxin I) and ST-I, which are highly associated with diarrhea (10, 12, 16). We performed serotyping of ETEC samples with a previously unknown O:H serotype by fliC RFLP and somatic antigen serotyping (data not shown). Determination of the somatic antigen was guided by the identification of the flagellar antigen of ETEC strains by PCR-RFLP, thus reducing the number of anti-O antigen sera used. PCR-RFLP in conjunction with determination of the O serogroup may become useful in identifying ETEC and related strains that do not express immunoreactive H antigens and could be extended to include other clinically important E. coli strains.
Our results showed that fliC-RFLP analysis is a credible and efficient method for the characterization of the fliC gene from ETEC strains and other pathotypes of E. coli strains. We demonstrated for the first time the molecular patterns of the fliC gene from the most common ETEC serotypes, in addition to the fliC RsaI RFLP patterns from H antigen reference strains. Four different research groups were able to characterize the fliC gene using the same fliC PCR-RFLP method described in this work (personal communication). They were thus capable of typing the fliC gene from E. coli samples belonging to different pathotypes. For wide-scale use of the PCR-RFLP, it is necessary that the fliC molecular patterns obtained by different researchers be compared with previously published molecular patterns. Therefore, our work may aid in the typing of fliC from E. coli, serving as a guide for the typing of fliC and the identification of H antigen from different E. coli pathotypes.
PCR-RFLP proved to be faster than traditional serotyping for the identification of the E. coli H antigens, taking 2 days to complete rather than the 7 or more days necessary for classic H serotyping. For each fliC PCR-RFLP reaction, the basic cost is approximately $9, whereas for H antigen serotyping the cost is approximately $35. A number of concerns could be raised about the fliC-RFLP method. For instance, the fliC gene may not amplify by PCR due to inadequate primer homology. However, we observed that amplification could be obtained in most cases, warranting the use of this technique. Another potential limitation is that, since there are unknown fliC alleles, the profiles from these alleles could not be matched with known fliC-RFLP profiles. However, the molecular profiles of alleles from strains obtained in epidemiological studies may soon be determined and new patterns may be described for the diarrheagenic strains of E. coli, thus permitting widespread use of this technique to characterize the fliC gene and determine the H antigen of E. coli strains. As we discussed above, classic serotyping presents stronger limitations than the fliC-RFLP method. Moreover, the potential limitations of classic serotyping can be bypassed by the fliC-RFLP method. The PCR-RFLP technique is capable of guiding the determination of the O antigen and is an efficient molecular tool for the characterization of the fliC gene from ETEC. Thus, in the future it could replace seroagglutination.
This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) to Marina B. Martinez and Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos/Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia/Programa de Apoio a Núcleos de Excelência (FINEP/MCT/PRONEX) to Beatriz E. C. Guth. Scholarship grants were from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq, Brasilia, Brazil, to A. C. R. Moreno.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»