Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2006, p. 1977-1981, Vol. 44, No. 6
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00029-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institute of Medical Microbiology, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo,1 Division of Infectious Disease Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo,2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and Department of Microbiology, St. Olavs Hospital, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim,3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen,4 Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø,5 Department of Microbiology, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo,6 University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway7
Received 6 January 2006/ Returned for modification 17 February 2006/ Accepted 21 March 2006
|
|
|---|
70 years. In patients
80 years of age, the incidence has increased during the last 3 years from an annual average of 6.5 to 15.6 cases/100,000 inhabitants in 2003. Four Candida species (C. albicans [70%], C. glabrata [13%], C. tropicalis [7%], and C. parapsilosis [6%]) accounted for 95.5% of the isolates. The species distribution has been constant during the 13-year study period. The distribution of the most important species varied with the age of the patient. In patients <1 year of age, the majority of episodes were caused by C. albicans (91%). The occurrence of C. glabrata increased with age. In patients
80 years of age, approximately 1/3 of all episodes were due to this species. All C. albicans strains were susceptible to fluconazole. The percentage of yeast isolates with decreased susceptibility to fluconazole (MICs
16 µg/ml) was 10.7% during the first period of this study (1991 to 1996) and 11.7% during the second period (1997 to 2003). |
|
|---|
In Norway, the medical microbiological laboratories have a close connection, which has made a long-term, nationwide prospective candidemia study possible. The study started in 1991 and is the most extensive prospective population-based study ever performed. The specific objectives have been threefold: (i) to define the incidence of fungal bloodstream infections in Norway; (ii) to identify the spectrum of pathogens causing yeast bloodstream infections; and (iii) to obtain antifungal susceptibility data for Norwegian bloodstream isolates. Results for the years 1991 to 1996 have been published previously (20). This report presents the candidemia data from this study for the whole 13-year period from 1991 to 2003.
|
|
|---|
The candidemia strains were immediately sent to the Norwegian Mycological Reference Laboratory for verification of species identification and susceptibility testing. At intervals, the laboratories have additionally been asked to examine their records for candidemia episodes not reported previously and to send such strains to the reference laboratory.
Identification. Species identification was based on germ tube production, microscopic morphology on cornmeal agar, carbohydrate fermentation and assimilation, urease activity, and ATB 32 C (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France).
Susceptibility testing. All isolates were tested for susceptibility to amphotericin B and fluconazole. The majority of strains isolated in the period 1991 to 2001 were also tested for susceptibility to flucytosine. The susceptibility method used has varied throughout this period. From 1991 until the end of 1993, a microdilution method in broth was used for amphotericin B and flucytosine and an agar dilution method for fluconazole (21). Since 1994, a colorimetric microdilution method based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations has been used for the majority of the isolates (20). The Etest method (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) was, however, used for the isolates from 2002 and 2003. Susceptibility results were categorized according to CLSI breakpoints (15).
Yearly population data for all age groups were obtained from Statistics Norway (http://www.ssb.no).
|
|
|---|
60 years (approximately 60% of the patients in these age groups were males). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Annual incidence of candidemia by age group in Norway from 1991 to 2003
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Gender distribution in each age group
|
80 years (Table 1). The incidence in the oldest age group was high for the whole 13-year period, but from 2001, there was a markedly increased incidence from an average of 6.5 for the period 1991 to 2000 to an average of 13.9 for the years 2001 to 2003 (Table 1). Thirty-three patients had two or more episodes of candidemia occurring at least 1 month apart. The majority (27) of these patients had two episodes of candidemia, while 6 patients had three to five episodes. In 24 patients, the new episode(s) occurred within 2 to 10 months of the first episode, and 9 patients had one or more episodes per year or more after the first candidemia episode. The same Candida species were isolated from all patients, except for one patient with three candidemia episodes with three different species. The Candida species isolated from the remaining 32 patients were Candida albicans (22 patients), Candida glabrata (4 patients), Candida parapsilosis (3 patients), Candida tropicalis (2 patients), and Candida dubliniensis (1 patient).
The various species isolated each year and the frequencies at which they occurred are listed in Table 3. The four most frequently isolated species were C. albicans (69.8%), C. glabrata (13.2%), C. tropicalis (6.7%), and C. parapsilosis (5.8%). These four species accounted for 95.5% of the isolates. The yearly incidence of both C. albicans (range, 61.5 to 74.7%) and C. glabrata (range, 9.8 to 16.7%) varied somewhat throughout the study period, but no significant increase or decrease was noted (Table 3). The C. albicans incidence was above 70% for the whole period 1997 to 2003, except for the year 2002.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Yeast species isolated from blood cultures in Norway from 1991 to 2003
|
The distribution of the two most important Candida species, C. albicans and C. glabrata, varied with the age of the patient (Table 4). In patients <1 year of age, nearly all episodes were caused by C. albicans (91%) and C. parapsilosis (8%). The C. albicans proportion varied between 66 and 77% for the age groups 1 to 79 years but decreased to 57% for patients aged
80 years. C. glabrata showed a gradual increase with age. In patients aged
80 years, nearly one-third of all episodes were due to C. glabrata (Table 4). The C. glabrata proportion has been high in this age group during the whole study period (range, 14.3% to 50%; median, 30.8%).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Distribution of the most important Candida species in various age groups
|
A total of 1,348 (95.3%) strains were tested for susceptibility to amphotericin B and fluconazole and 1,065 (75%) were tested for susceptibility to flucytosine (Table 5). Nearly all strains (99.5%) were susceptible to amphotericin B (MIC
1 µg/ml). Most strains (95.8%) were also susceptible to flucytosine. Only 16 (2.2%) C. albicans, 4 (2.9%) C. glabrata, and 2 (2.5%) C. tropicalis isolates had decreased flucytosine susceptibility with MICs of
8 µg/ml.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. In vitro activity of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine against Norwegian candidemia isolates
|
16 µg/ml. All Candida krusei strains had MICs of
32 µg/ml, and the majority of C. glabrata strains (68.7%) had MICs of
16 µg/ml. The percentage of yeast isolates with decreased susceptibility to fluconazole (MICs
16 µg/ml) was 10.7% during the first period of this study (1991 to 1996) and 11.7% during the second period (1997 to 2003). |
|
|---|
The candidemia incidence in Norway is also lower than what has been reported from most other European studies. The only exception is a nationwide study from Finland for the years 1995 to 1999 (yearly average, 1.9 cases/100,000 population) (18). The other European studies all show higher incidences. Two studies, one from Iceland for the period 1995 to 1999 (3) and the other from Barcelona, Spain, for the years 2002 to 2003 (1), reported a similar incidence of 4.9 cases per 100,000 population. A recent seminational study from Denmark (May 2003 to April 2004) reported a high estimated annual fungemia incidence of 11 cases/100,000 population (2).
The low candidemia incidence in Norway and Finland compared to other countries is interesting. The level of medicine is probably equally advanced in all countries, but there might be differences, e.g., in antibiotic use patterns. The antibiotic use policies in Denmark and Norway are, however, usually regarded to be quite similar and equally restrictive (5). The reason for the high candidemia incidence in Denmark compared to Norway must therefore be explained by other factors.
Many studies have shown a higher fungemia incidence in old people. Differences in age distribution in a population might therefore be one reason for differences in candidemia incidences between countries. However, this does not explain the different candidemia incidence in Denmark and Norway since the age distribution in these two countries were quite similar in 2003; 34.2% of the population in Denmark and 32% in Norway were aged
50 years and 10.6% and 11.2% were aged
70 years in Denmark (http://www.dst.dk) and Norway (http://www.ssb.no), respectively.
Most population-based studies report annual incidences for 2 to 3 years. It is therefore not possible to study long-term trends. The only studies covering a more prolonged period are the three studies from the Nordic countries (3, 18). Our study from Norway showed an increase in the average annual candidemia incidence from 2.1 cases/100,000 population for the first 5 years of the study to 2.9 for the last 4 years. Most of the increased incidence in the last part of the study is explained by a markedly increased incidence for patients aged
80 years. In this age group, the annual incidence increased from an average of 6.5 cases/100,000 population for the years 1991 to 2000 to 13.9 for the years 2001 to 2003. The reason for this change is not known.
Surprisingly, many patients (2.4%) in our study were found to have recurrent candidemia episodes with the same Candida species. Approximately half of these recurrences occurred within 2 to 6 months, while 9 patients had new episodes a year or more after the first episode. In one recent study, five patients with recurrent candidemia were described (6), but otherwise, this problem has not attracted much attention. These cases might be difficult to recognize, since patients may be admitted to different hospitals, as was the case with seven of our patients, and also due to the fact that the recurrent episode(s) might occur quite a long time after the first episode. Investigations are currently ongoing to characterize the Candida strains and also to obtain clinical information for these patients.
It is interesting that the species distribution has remained approximately equal for all the years in the study (Table 4). It seems that the impact of an increased use of fluconazole (0.022 defined daily doses [DDD]/1,000 inhabitants/day in 1991 [20] to 0.094 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2003 [http://www.legemiddelforbruk.no]) during this period has been limited. In 2003, C. albicans and C. glabrata accounted for 72% and 16%, respectively, of the Norwegian blood culture isolates. The C. glabrata incidence increased with age. In patients aged
80 years, nearly one-third of all episodes were due to C. glabrata (Table 4). Similar results have been demonstrated in other studies previously (13, 17). The fluconazole-resistant species, C. norvegensis, is isolated quite regularly in Norway (22) and accounts for 0.6% of the candidemia isolates. This species is seldom reported from other countries (16, 19). The reason for this is unknown.
The species distribution in Norway is somewhat different from Denmark, which is 63% C. albicans and 20% C. glabrata (2). Some of this difference may be explained by a marked difference between Denmark and Norway in the use of antimycotics for systemic use (ATCC group J02A). In 2003, the total consumption of fluconazole and itraconazole was 0.4 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in Denmark and 0.1 in Norway. This high level of fluconazole and itraconazole use in Denmark compared to Norway may explain the difference in species distribution between the two countries. It might also be the reason why decreased azole susceptibility in Candida species that are normally susceptible (e.g., C. albicans) to fluconazole occur more frequently in Denmark (2) than in Norway. In the 1-year study from Denmark, 11 isolates with decreased azole susceptibility (MIC
16 µg/ml) were recovered (6 C. albicans, 1 C. tropicalis, 2 C. parapsilosis, and 2 C. guilliermondii isolates) (2), while we only detected seven such strains for the whole 13-year study period in Norway.
It is usually regarded that yeasts grow well in commercially available blood culture broths and do not need special handling (4). The results from our study and also from other studies do, however, indicate that the C. glabrata recovery rate might vary between routine aerobic media. In this study, the average C. glabrata isolation rate was 9% for hospitals using the Bactec blood culture system and 18.1% for the BacT/ALERT users. Our study was not designed to study differences between blood culture systems. The findings must therefore be interpreted with caution. There is, however, some additional evidence supporting the finding from our study. Horvath et al. have shown that the aerobic Bactec medium (Plus Aerobic/F) only detected 6 of 10 C. glabrata isolates in a simulated candidemia study (11). A large clinical study comparing the aerobic Bactec medium (Plus Aerobic/F medium), which is the routine medium used by most laboratories, with the Bactec fungal medium (Mycosis IC/F medium) showed a much higher C. glabrata detection rate using the latter medium (14). The findings from these studies indicate that the detection of C. glabrata is inadequate using the aerobic (Plus Aerobic/F medium) Bactec blood culture medium.
The results of this study provide important information regarding overall long-term candidemia trends and antifungal resistance in Norway. These data should be helpful to physicians and antibiotic use committees in establishing guidelines for the appropriate use of antifungal agents in Norwegian hospitals. Equally important, the results raise some new questions that should be subjected to further studies. The quite marked difference in candidemia incidence between the neighboring countries Denmark and Norway is interesting. It is also important to elucidate the reason why some patients have recurrent candidemia and the increase in candidemia incidence among elderly patients in Norway in recent years.
The Norwegian Yeast Study Group is constituted of one representative from each clinical microbiological laboratory in Norway. The group includes Einar H. Aandahl (Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer), Signe H. Ringertz (Aker University Hospital, Oslo), Hjørdis Iveland (Buskerud Hospital Trust, Drammen), Martin Steinbakk (Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog), Jørgen Lassen (Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo), Reidar Hjetland (Central Hospital, Førde), Liisa Mortensen (Nordland Hospital, Bodø), Pål A. Jenum (Asker and Bærum Hospital, Rud), Olav B. Natås (Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger), Eivind Ragnhildstveit (Østfold Central Hospital, Fredrikstad), Sølvi Noraas (Central Hospital of Vest-Agder, Kristiansand), Thore Thoresen (Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg), Yngvar Tveten (A/S Telelab, Skien), and Einar Vik (Molde County Hospital, Molde).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»