This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferroni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Offredo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferroni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Offredo, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2006, p. 2237-2239, Vol. 44, No. 6
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00285-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Value of the Chlorhexidine Decontamination Method for Recovery of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria from Sputum Samples of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Agnès Ferroni,1* Hoang Vu-Thien,2 Philippe Lanotte,3 Muriel Le Bourgeois,4 Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus,5 Brigitte Fauroux,6 Sophie Marchand,7 Françoise Varaigne,8 Patrick Berche,1 Jean-Louis Gaillard,9 and Catherine Offredo1

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris,1 Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Trousseau, AP-HP, Paris,2 Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours,3 Service de Pneumologie-Allergologie Pédiatrique,4 Service de Pédiatrie Générale, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris,5 Service de Pneumologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Trousseau, AP-HP, Paris,6 Service de Pédiatrie, Hôpital Pédiatrique Gatien de Clocheville, Tours,7 Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours,8 Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France9

Received 9 February 2006/ Returned for modification 27 March 2006/ Accepted 5 April 2006


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The chlorhexidine method was compared to the N-acetyl-L-cysteine-NaOH-oxalic acid decontamination method currently recommended for the recovery of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from patients with cystic fibrosis. Sputum samples (n = 827) treated with chlorhexidine yielded twice as many NTM-positive cultures as those treated by the reference method (54 [6.50%] versus 27 [3.25%]; P < 0.0001) despite a higher contamination rate (20% versus 14.2%; P = 0.0017).


arrow
TEXT
 
Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are a growing problem for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) (8, 9). A recent North American multicenter study showed a prevalence (at least one sputum sample positive for NTM) of between 7 to 24% in CF patients, depending on the center (10). Members of the Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC) are the most frequently isolated NTM in CF adults (9), whereas Mycobacterium abscessus, a rapidly growing mycobacterium that is often multidrug resistant, is the most common in children (6, 11, 16).

The recovery of NTM from CF sputum samples is hampered by the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the respiratory tracts of 80% of CF patients. This bacterium rapidly overgrows mycobacterial cultures, so specific decontamination methods are required. The most widely used decontamination method for NTM isolation from CF patients is the two-step N-acetyl-L-cysteine-NaOH-oxalic acid (NALC-NaOH-OxA) method. This method substantially decreases the contamination rate of CF sputum cultures and allows better recovery of NTM than is possible by decontamination with NALC-NaOH alone (1, 17, 18). However, some reports suggest that the NALC-NaOH-OxA method may affect the viability of mycobacteria (2) and consequently lead to false-negative results for samples with low mycobacterial loads (1, 18). Moreover, this double decontamination method has not been extensively validated for M. abscessus, a mycobacterium prevalent in pediatric CF patients. Indeed, different mycobacterial species resist various decontamination agents to different extents (12).

A decontamination method based upon the use of chlorhexidine (CHX) has been proposed for the recovery of mycobacteria. This method is inexpensive, rapid, and easy to perform. Chlorhexidine has a broad spectrum of activity against common contaminating bacteria and seems to have minimal effects on the viability of mycobacteria (3, 4, 13). A study using clinical sputum samples (containing M. tuberculosis) and sputum samples artificially seeded with various mycobacteria reported that the CHX method performed better than other decontamination methods (10). However, clinical samples from CF patients with NTM organisms and, in particular, M. abscessus were not included in this study, and such samples are often heavily contaminated. We therefore compared the CHX method to the NALC-NaOH-OxA reference method to test sputum samples from CF patients.

The chlorhexidine method was performed as follows. Samples were incubated with an equal volume of 0.1% dithiothreitol (Sigma, France) and vortexed for 15 min at room temperature. Three volumes of 1% chlorhexidine digluconate (Sigma, France) were then added, and the mixture was vortexed for 15 min at room temperature. The samples were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 20 min at room temperature. The pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of PBS and cultured. The NALC-NaOH-OxA method was performed as described by Whittier et al. (17). Briefly, specimens were combined with an equal volume of 0.5% NALC-2% NaOH and vortexed for at least 15 min at room temperature. The specimens were centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 20 min at room temperature and washed with PBS and then mixed with an equal volume of 5% oxalic acid. This mixture was vortexed and allowed to incubate at room temperature for 30 min, with vortexing every 10 min. It was made up to 50 ml with PBS and centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 20 min. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of PBS, and aliquots were stained and cultured. Samples obtained by either method were cultured by inoculating four Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) slants (Bio-Rad, Marnes la Coquette, France). Two LJ slants were incubated at 30°C and two at 37°C. The slants were examined twice weekly for 2 weeks and then weekly for a further 10 weeks. Acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smears were stained by the auramine-rhodamine method (Merck).

Preliminary experiments were performed with CF sputum samples negative for NTM and artificially seeded with M. avium Nck2133911 or M. abscessus Nck2136817 (Necker-Enfants Malades Microbiology Laboratory collection). Mycobacteria were collected from LJ slants and resuspended in PBS (MacFarland 1). The mycobacterial suspensions were serially diluted, and dilutions of 1/10, 1/1,000, and 1/10,000 (volume = 0.05 ml) were used to inoculate 1-ml aliquots of mycobacteria-free CF sputum samples. Each seeded sample was divided into two equal aliquots, one decontaminated by the CHX method and the other by the NALC-NaOH-OxA method. Decontaminated aliquots were cultured on LJ slants, and CFU were counted. The CHX method was clearly more sensitive for both organisms tested (Table 1). Samples seeded with the three dilutions of M. avium were all culture positive with both decontamination methods, but samples treated with the CHX method yielded between 10 and 100 times more CFU. The superiority of the CHX method was even more apparent with M. abscessus: samples inoculated with the 1/10,000 dilution were found to be culture positive by this method and culture negative by the NALC-NaOH-OxA method.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Treatment of sputum samples artificially seeded with M. abscessus or M. avium by the NALC-NaOH-OxA or chlorhexidine method

These preliminary results prompted us to compare the CHX and reference methods under conditions of clinical use. The study was performed between January 2004 and January 2005 at the microbiology laboratories of three French CF centers (center I, Necker-Enfants Malades hospital, Paris; center II, Trousseau hospital, Paris; center III, Bretonneau hospital, Tours). The three participating laboratories are experienced in culturing NTM for cases of CF and have collaborated in this field for several years. At each hospital, samples were sent to the microbiology laboratory and stored at –20°C. Within 2 weeks of collection, the samples were rapidly thawed, vortexed, and divided equally into two aliquots (1 to 2 ml in volume). The aliquots were then processed for AFB smears and NTM cultures as described above. NTM were subjected to species identification using the Accuprobe technique (Gen Probe) and hsp65 sequencing (14). Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis.

A total of 827 sputum samples consecutively collected from 289 CF patients were studied. The patients were 149 males and 140 females, aged from 5 months to 42 years (mean age, 12.4 years). Samples were scored as contaminated if there was bacterial overgrowth of the four LJ slants: 166 (20%) specimens were contaminated after being tested by the CHX method, whereas 118 (14.2%) were contaminated after treatment with NALC-NaOH-OxA (P = 0.0017). A total of 55 samples were not interpretable with either method due to massively contaminated cultures. A total of 60 samples (from 32 patients) were found to be NTM positive by one or both decontamination methods. The recovered NTM were 43 (72%) M. abscessus, 7 (11%) M. gordonae, 3 (5%) M. avium, 3 (5%) M. chelonae, 1 M. peregrinum, 1 M. immunogenum, and 2 undefined rapidly growing mycobacteria. Table 2 shows the results obtained with the CHX and NALC-NaOH-OxA methods. Of the 60 positive samples, 33 were positive by the CHX method alone, 6 by the NALC-NaOH-OxA method, and 21 by both methods. Overall, samples treated with the CHX method yielded significantly more positive NTM cultures than those treated with the NALC-NaOH-OxA method (54/827 [6.50%] versus 27/827 [3.25%]; P < 0.05). The rate of false-negative results observed with the NALC-NaOH-OxA method was 55% overall (33/60 versus 6/60 [10%] with the CHX method; P < 0.0001) and exceeded 70% for smear-negative samples (29/41 versus only 6/41 [14.6%] for the CHX method; P < 0.0001). Twenty-two of the 43 samples (39.5%) positive for M. abscessus (from 17 patients) were positive by the CHX method alone (Table 2), and 18 (81.8%) of these were smear negative. All of the 19 AFB smear-positive samples evaluated during this study grew M. abscessus and all were found to be culture positive by the CHX method (versus 15/19 [78.9%] with the NALC-NaOH-OxA method). Finally, the three samples (from 3 patients) found to be positive for M. avium during this study, all smear-negative, were detected by the CHX method and scored negative by the NALC-NaOH-OxA method.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Detection of mycobacteria by the CHX and NALC-NaOH-OxA methods based on the positivity of AFB smears

This study clearly shows that the CHX decontamination method is better than the NALC-NaOH-OxA method for the recovery of NTM in CF samples. This is probably because CHX better preserves the viability of mycobacteria, as has been suggested by several authors (3, 4, 10, 13). However, the rate of contamination is slightly higher with the CHX method than with the reference method. Nevertheless, the advantages of the CHX method seem to outweigh the disadvantages, because more than half of the culture-positive samples appeared falsely negative by the NALC-NaOH-OxA method (versus only 10% with the CHX method). The superiority of the CHX method was also evident for the smear-negative samples, with the rate of false-negative samples exceeding 70% with the NALC-NaOH-OxA method (versus only 15% with the CHX method). Despite several attempts using various approaches (centrifugation-washing, neutralization with lecithin), we were not able to make the CHX method compatible with the Mgit system (Becton Dickinson, Le pont de Claix, France), which could be particularly valuable for the isolation of MAC. Indeed, chlorhexidine needs to be neutralized by an agent like lecithin (Sigma, St. Quentin Fallavier, France) to stop its action before Mgit flasks are inoculated (this step is unnecessary with Löwensten-Jensen medium, which contains high amounts of lecithin). Unfortunately, the addition of lecithin to Mgit medium generates nonspecific fluorescence, making the Mgit system useless. We are thus currently testing other neutralizing agents that would be compatible with the Mgit system.

Consistent with previous studies in pediatric CF centers (11, 16), most NTM-positive samples evaluated during our study were positive for M. abscessus. The number of MAC-positive samples was too small for meaningful statistical analysis of the benefits of the CHX decontamination method with MAC infections. It would be interesting to continue this evaluation with adult CF patients.

In conclusion, the CHX decontamination method is faster and easier to perform than the reference NALC-NaOH-OxA method, has a similar cost, and is much more sensitive for the recovery of M. abscessus from CF patients. The potential severity of M. abscessus infections in patients with CF, particularly in cases of lung transplantation (7, 9, 15), and the therapeutic difficulties caused by the frequent multiresistance of this species (5) have been described recently. Therefore, we recommend this method of decontamination when testing for NTM in children and adolescents with CF and in patients of any age with suspected M. abscessus infections.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work received financial support from the Association Vaincre La Mucoviscidose.

We thank Alex Edelman and associates for careful readings of the manuscript.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Service de Microbiologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France. Phone: 33 1 44 49 49 62. Fax: 33 1 44 49 49 60. E-mail: agnes.ferroni{at}nck.aphp.fr. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Bange, F. C., and E. C. Bottger. 2002. Improved decontamination method for recovering mycobacteria from patients with cystic fibrosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:546-548.[Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Bange, F. C., P. Kirschner, and E. C. Bottger. 1999. Recovery of mycobacteria from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3761-3763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Best, M., S. A. Sattar, V. S. Springthorpe, and M. E. Kennedy. 1990. Efficacies of selected disinfectants against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:2234-2239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Best, M., V. S. Springthorpe, and S. A. Sattar. 1994. Feasibility of a combined carrier test for disinfectants: studies with a mixture of five types of microorganisms. Am. J. Infect. Control 22:152-162.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Brown-Elliott, B. A., and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 2001. Clarithromycin resistance to Mycobacterium abscessus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2745-2746.[Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Ferroni, A., I. Sermet-Gaudelus, M. Le Bourgeois, C. Pierre-Audigier, C. Offredo, M. Rottman, D. Guillemot, C. Bernede, V. Vincent, P. Berche, and J. L. Gaillard. 2005. Measurement of immunoglobulin G against mycobacterial antigen A60 in patients with cystic fibrosis and lung infection due to Mycobacterium abscessus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40:58-66.[Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Griffith, D. E. 2003. Emergence of nontuberculous mycobacteria as pathogens in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 167:810-812.[Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Kilby, J. M., P. H. Gilligan, J. R. Yankaskas, W. E. Highsmith, Jr., L. J. Edwards, and M. R. Knowles. 1992. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in adult patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 102:70-75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Olivier, K. N., D. J. Weber, R. J. Wallace, Jr., A. R. Faiz, J. H. Lee, Y. Zhang, B. A. Brown-Elliot, A. Handler, R. W. Wilson, M. S. Schechter, L. J. Edwards, S. Chakraborti, and M. R. Knowles. 2003. Nontuberculous mycobacteria. I. Multicenter prevalence study in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 167:828-834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Peres, P. J., M. J. Gevaudan, C. Gulian, and P. de Micco. 1988. Une méthode de traitement des produits pathologiques en vue de l'isolement des mycobactéries. Revue Fr. Lab. 173:67-74.
    11. 11
  11. Pierre-Audigier, C., A. Ferroni, I. Sermet-Gaudelus, M. Le Bourgeois, C. Offredo, H. Vu-Thien, B. Fauroux, P. Mariani, A. Munck, E. Bingen, D. Guillemot, G. Quesne, V. Vincent, P. Berche, and J. L. Gaillard. 2005. Age-related prevalence and distribution of nontuberculous mycobacterial species among patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3467-3470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Portaels, F. 1995. Epidemiology of mycobacterial diseases. Clin. Dermatol. 13:207-222.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Rikimaru, T., M. Kondo, S. Kondo, and K. Oizumi. 2000. Efficacy of common antiseptics against mycobacteria. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 4:570-576.[Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Ringuet, H., C. Akoua-Koffi, S. Honore, A. Varnerot, V. Vincent, P. Berche, J. L. Gaillard, and C. Pierre-Audigier. 1999. hsp65 sequencing for identification of rapidly growing mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:852-857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Sanguinetti, M., F. Ardito, E. Fiscarelli, M. La Sorda, P. D'Argenio, G. Ricciotti, and G. Fadda. 2001. Fatal pulmonary infection due to multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus in a patient with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:816-819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Sermet-Gaudelus, I., M. Le Bourgeois, C. Pierre-Audigier, C. Offredo, D. Guillemot, S. Halley, C. Akoua-Koffi, V. Vincent, V. Sivadon-Tardy, A. Ferroni, P. Berche, P. Scheinmann, G. Lenoir, and J. L. Gaillard. 2003. Mycobacterium abscessus and children with cystic fibrosis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9:1587-1591.[Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Whittier, S., R. L. Hopfer, M. R. Knowles, and P. H. Gilligan. 1993. Improved recovery of mycobacteria from respiratory secretions of patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:861-864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Whittier, S., K. Olivier, P. Gilligan, M. Knowles, P. Della-Latta, et al. 1997. Proficiency testing of clinical microbiology laboratories using modified decontamination procedures for detection of nontuberculous mycobacteria in sputum samples from cystic fibrosis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2706-2708.[Abstract]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2006, p. 2237-2239, Vol. 44, No. 6
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00285-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • El Khechine, A., Henry, M., Raoult, D., Drancourt, M. (2009). Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms in the stools of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Microbiology 155: 2384-2389 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferroni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Offredo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferroni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Offredo, C.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»