This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romeo, O.
Right arrow Articles by Criseo, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romeo, O.
Right arrow Articles by Criseo, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2006, p. 2590-2592, Vol. 44, No. 7
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00125-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Amplification of the Hyphal Wall Protein 1 Gene To Distinguish Candida albicans from Candida dubliniensis

Orazio Romeo, Cosimo Racco, and Giuseppe Criseo*

Department of Microbiological, Genetic, and Molecular Sciences, University of Messina, Salita Sperone, 31 98166 Messina, Italy

Received 20 January 2006/ Returned for modification 2 March 2006/ Accepted 9 May 2006


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The authors developed a new, simple, and reliable PCR/restriction fragment length polymorphism technique, using amplification of the hyphal wall protein 1 gene of Candida albicans and its gene homologue in Candida dubliniensis, to differentiate the two species of Candida. Performed with a new primer set, CRR-f/CRR-r, PCR produced two different fragments: one of 1,180 bp for C. albicans, and one of 930 bp for C. dubliniensis.


arrow
TEXT
 
In 1995, Sullivan et al. (14) described for the first time a new species of Candida called Candida dubliniensis. Like Candida albicans, C. dubliniensis isolates produce germ tubes and chlamydospores and cannot be differentiated using conventional methods (9, 12, 13). Because phenotypic methods may not unequivocally differentiate C. albicans from C. dubliniensis, more-reliable tests based on molecular techniques such as specific PCR are used for discriminating between these two Candida species (2, 4, 5, 8).

Hyphal wall protein 1 (HWP1) is a gene that is required for virulence in systemic candidiasis (10). This gene encodes a surface protein that has been demonstrated to serve as a substrate for mammalian transglutaminase, which cross-links C. albicans to epithelial cells (10). An HWP1 homologue is also present in C. dubliniensis, as shown in the GenBank database. We decided to compare the nucleotide sequence of the HWP1 gene of C. albicans (GenBank accession number U64206) and its homologue in C. dubliniensis (GenBank accession number AJ632273) to differentiate between these two organisms.

Twenty strains of C. albicans were obtained from various body sites of patients hospitalized at the OORR of Reggio Calabria, Italy. A total of 16 C. dubliniensis strains from the oral cavities of human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals came from different geographic locations. Three strains of C. dubliniensis (V3, V4, and V5) were obtained from the laboratory of José Ponton of the Universidad del Paìs Vasco, Bilbao, Spain; four strains (CD33, CD36, CD519, and CAN6) were kind gifts from Derek J. Sullivan of the Dublin Dental School and Hospital, University of Dublin, Ireland; six strains (05-87 h, 05-110 h, 05-111 h, 05-112 h, 05-131 h, and 05-139 h) were obtained from stock cultures of V. Vidotto of the Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy; and three strains (MAL CD1, MAL CD2, and MAL CD3) were isolated from patients hospitalized at the OORR, Reggio Calabria, Italy. C. albicans ATCC 10231 and C. dubliniensis CBS 7987 were used as reference strains. The identity of all the strains was determined by the ID 32C system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) and other phenotypic (1, 3, 7, 11, 15) and molecular methods (5, 8).

The Vector NTI program (version 9.0.0; Invitrogen, San Giuliano Milanese, Italy) was used for gene alignment and primer design. Using the new primers, we calculated the lengths of the resulting PCR products as 1,180 bp for C. albicans and 930 bp for C. dubliniensis. The 1,180-bp fragment of C. albicans contains a restriction site specific for BamHI, a restriction enzyme which cuts the C. albicans PCR product into two fragments of the expected lengths of 793 and 387 bp. BamHI does not digest the 930-bp PCR product of C. dubliniensis.

DNA was extracted from yeast isolates as described by Hoskins (6), with the following small modifications made to enhance the speed of growth of the yeast strains: the yeast cells were cultured in 10 ml of yeast extract-peptone-dextrose broth and incubated overnight at 37°C under shaking conditions (C25 incubator shaker; New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, N.J.).

The primers used for PCR were CRR-f 5'-GTTTTTGCAACTTCTCTTTGTA-3' and CRR-r 5'-ACAGTTGTATCATGTTCAGT-3'. The PCR mixture (total volume, 100 µl) contained 3 µl of genomic DNA template (2 µg ml–1), 0.2 mM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 100 mM (each) primer, 5 U of EuroTaq polymerase (Euroclone, Pero-Milan, Italy), 1x reaction buffer, and 1.5 mM MgCl2. Amplification was performed after denaturation at 95°C for 5 min followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, primer annealing at 50°C for 60 s, and an extension at 72°C for 90 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min in a GeneAmp PCR 2400 system (Perkin Elmer, Monza-Milan, Italy).

PCR products were separated on a 1.3% (wt/vol) agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and compared to the DNA size marker (2-Log DNA Ladder [0.1-10.0 kb]; BioLabs, Pero-Milan, Italy). The PCR products were digested for 3 h at 37°C with BamHI (MBI Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) (20 U per 10 µl of PCR product). The digested products were run on a 1.3% (wt/vol) agarose gel and analyzed using a transilluminator (Foto/PrepI; Fotodyne-Celbio, Milan, Italy). PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) were repeated three times.

All examined isolates produced chlamydospores on cornmeal agar with 1% Tween 80 and germ tubes in bovine serum (3 h at 37°C). Twenty clinical isolates and C. albicans ATCC 10231 showed a carbohydrate assimilation profile that is typical of C. albicans, whereas 7 of 17 (41.2%) C. dubliniensis strains identified by ID 32C (version 2.0 database) did not correspond to any C. dubliniensis profiles in the database. Four strains showed an identification profile that matched that of C. sake (7142-7100-15 and 7342-7100-15), and three strains showed an unacceptable profile (7145-3004-15, 7147-1006-15, and 7343-7000-15). Excellent identification (99.9%) results were obtained for 10 C. dubliniensis isolates: 6 strains showed a 7042-1000-15 profile, 3 strains a 7142-1000-15 profile, and 1 strain a 7042-1000-11 profile. Further phenotypic and molecular identification results are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Comparison of phenotypic and molecular methods to differentiate C. albicans from C. dubliniensis

A fragment of 1,180 bp identical to that of the reference strain C. albicans ATCC 10231 was detected in all the C. albicans isolates, whereas all the C. dubliniensis strains produced a fragment of 930 bp. In addition, the 1,180-bp fragment of C. albicans produced two fragments (793 and 387 bp) after digestion with the BamHI restriction enzyme for 3 h at 37°C. No restriction fragments were recovered from the 930-bp PCR product of C. dubliniensis (Fig. 1). Unequivocal PCR and RFLP profiles were obtained in all the assayed strains.


Figure 1
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Differentiation of C. dubliniensis and C. albicans by the PCR/RFLP method. Lanes 1 and 4, PCR products of C. dubliniensis CBS 7987; lanes 2 and 3, PCR products of C. albicans ATCC 10231; lane 5, PCR products of C. dubliniensis CBS 7987 digested with the BamHI restriction enzyme; lane 6, PCR products of C. albicans ATCC 10231 digested with the BamHI restriction enzyme; lane M, molecular size marker.

Several research groups have described rapid and reliable PCR for the identification of C. dubliniensis, with specific primers that bind a specific gene and amplify one fragment in one of the two species (2, 8). In addition, Donnelly et al. (4) have developed a discriminative PCR that uses C. dubliniensis-specific primers producing a fragment of 288 bp, but universal fungal primers are also used as an internal positive control. Our method uses only a pair of primers that produces different DNA fragments in the two Candida species. It excludes the possibility of false-negative results, avoiding misidentification due to possible experimentation errors, particularly when many strains have to be examined.

Graf et al. (5) have recently described a simple, rapid, and inexpensive PCR/RFLP method to discriminate between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis. After PCR this method uses digestion with the HpyF10VI restriction enzyme to discriminate between the two species of Candida. In our study, the RFLP method can be omitted because discrimination between C. albicans and C. dubliniensis is already made on analysis of the PCR products. RFLP analysis performed with the BamHI restriction enzyme could represent a useful tool for further confirmation in cases of doubtful PCR results.

To our knowledge, this is the first report that uses the HWP1 gene of C. albicans and its homologue from C. dubliniensis as targets for reliable and unequivocal discrimination between the two Candida species. The present study shows a new, relevant role for the HWP1 gene as an important target in rapid, unequivocal differentiation of C. dubliniensis and C. albicans.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank G. Bolignano and his staff of the OORR, Reggio Calabria, Italy; J. Ponton, Departemento de Microbiologia y Inmunologia Facultad de Medicina y Odontologia, Universidad del Pais Vasco, Bilbao, Spain; V. Vidotto, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy; and D. J. Sullivan, Dublin Dental School and Hospital, University of Dublin, Ireland, for providing C. albicans and C. dubliniensis strains. The authors are also grateful to Derek J. Sullivan for useful comments on the manuscript.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dipartimento di Scienze Microbiologiche, Genetiche e Molecolari, Università degli studi di Messina, Salita Sperone, 31 98166 Messina, Italy. Phone: 39-0906765195. Fax: 39-090392733. E-mail: gcriseo{at}unime.it. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Al Mosaid, A., D. J. Sullivan, and D. C. Coleman. 2003. Differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans on Pal's Agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4787-4789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Biswas, S. K., K. Yokoyama, L. Wang, K. Nishimura, and M. Miyaji. 2001. Identification of Candida dubliniensis based on the specific amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Nippon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi. 42:95-98.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Boerlin, P., F. Boerlin-Petzold, C. Durussel, M. Addo, J. L. Pagani, J. P. Chave, and J. Bille. 1995. Cluster of oral atypical Candida albicans isolates in a group of human immunodeficiency virus-positive drug users. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1129-1135.[Abstract]
    4. 4
  4. Donnelly, S. M., D. J. Sullivan, D. B. Shanley, and D. C. Coleman. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis and rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis based on analysis of ACT1 intron and exon sequences. Microbiology 145:1871-1882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Graf, B., A. Trost, J. Eucker, U. B. Göbel, and T. Adam. 2004. Rapid and simple differentation of C. dubliniensis from C. albicans. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 48:149-151.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Hoskins, L. 16 October 1998. Quick yeast DNA prep: isolation of total DNA (genomic and plasmid). Hahn Laboratory [Online.] http://www.fhcrc.org/labs/hahn/methods/mol_bio_meth/yeast_quick_dna.html.
    7. 7
  7. Kurtzman, C. P., and J. W. Fell. 1998. The yeasts, a taxonomy study, 4th ed., p. 476-479. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    8. 8
  8. Kurzai, O., W. J. Heinz, D. J. Sullivan, D. C. Coleman, M. Frosch, and F. A. Mühlschlegel. 1999. Rapid PCR test for discriminating between Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis isolates using primers derived from the pH-regulated PHR1 and PHR2 genes of C. albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1587-1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Pincus, D. H., D. C. Coleman, W. R. Pruitt, A. A. Padhye, I. F. Salkin, M. Geimer, A. Bassel, D. J. Sullivan, M. Clarke, and V. Hearn. 1999. Rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis with commercial yeast identification systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3533-3539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Staab, J. F., S. D. Bradway, P. L. Fidel, and P. Sundstrom. 1999. Adhesive and mammalian transglutaminase substrate properties of Candida albicans Hwp1. Science 283:1535-1538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Staib, P., and J. Morschhäuser. 1999. Chlamydospore formation on Staib agar as species-specific characteristic of Candida dubliniensis. Mycoses 42:521-524.[CrossRef][Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Sullivan, D., G. P. Moran, and D. C. Coleman. 2005. Candida dubliniensis: ten years on. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 253:9-17.[Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Sullivan, D., and D. Coleman. 1997. Candida dubliniensis: an emerging opportunistic pathogen. Curr. Top. Med. Mycol. 8:15-25.[Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Sullivan, D. J., T. J. Westerneng, K. A. Haynes, D. E. Bennett, and D. C. Coleman. 1995. Candida dubliniensis sp. nov: phenotypic and molecular characterization of a novel species associated with oral candidosis in HIV-infected individuals. Microbiology 141:1507-1521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Velegraki, A., and M. Logotheti. 1998. Presumptive identification of an emerging yeast pathogen, Candida dubliniensis (sp. nov.) reduces 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 20:239-241.[CrossRef][Medline]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2006, p. 2590-2592, Vol. 44, No. 7
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00125-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gasparoto, T. H., Dionisio, T. J., de Oliveira, C. E., Porto, V. C., Gelani, V., Santos, C. F., Campanelli, A. P., Lara, V. S. (2009). Isolation of Candida dubliniensis from denture wearers. J Med Microbiol 58: 959-962 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romeo, O.
Right arrow Articles by Criseo, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romeo, O.
Right arrow Articles by Criseo, G.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»