Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2006, p. 3139-3144, Vol. 44, No. 9
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00879-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Microbiology Unit, Alfred Pathology Service, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
Received 26 April 2006/ Returned for modification 6 June 2006/ Accepted 27 June 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
With the worldwide increase in the occurrence, types, and rate of dissemination of MBLs, early detection is critical. The benefits of such include timely implementation of strict infection control practices as well as clinical guidance regarding the potential risks for therapeutic failure. As seen with extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL) and AmpC-type ß-lactamases with cephalosporins (11, 12), MBL-carrying organisms can appear susceptible to carbapenems using current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute or British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy breakpoints (1, 3). For example, at our institution, over 30% of MBL-carrying isolates, predominately Enterobacteriaceae, were found to be susceptible to imipenem (IPM; MIC
4 µg/ml) (14). Yan and colleagues reported an outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates carrying blaIMP-8 and showed that 88% (35/40) were susceptible to carbapenems (24). More recently, clinical isolates of blaVIM-1-producing Escherichia coli from Greece were shown to be below the breakpoint for carbapenem resistance (17). Similar findings have been reported by others (7, 20). As a result of being difficult to detect, such organisms pose significant risks, particularly due to their role in unnoticed spread within institutions and their ability to participate in horizontal MBL gene transfer with other pathogenic hospital-related organisms (14). Also, the clinical outcome of patients infected with organisms carrying these so-called "hidden" MBL genes and treated with carbapenems is unknown. However, given the poor outcomes, such as death, persistent fevers, and infection relapse, seen with cephalosporin treatment for infections caused by organisms with hidden ESBL genes (12), laboratory detection of carbapenem-susceptible MBL-carrying organisms should be considered to be of paramount clinical importance.
Currently, no standardized method for MBL detection has been proposed, and despite PCR being highly accurate and reliable, its accessibility is often limited to reference laboratories. Several nonmolecular techniques have been studied, all taking advantage of the enzyme's zinc dependence by using chelating agents, such as EDTA or 2-mercaptopropionic acid, to inhibit its activity. The commercially available MBL Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), which incorporates an imipenem strip on one end and an imipenem strip with EDTA on the other, is simple to perform but is highly insensitive at detecting carbapenem-susceptible MBL-carrying organisms (MIC
4 µg/ml) and is costly (23, 25). Also, poor specificity has been described with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii carrying blaOXA-23 (18). A double-disk synergy test (DDST) using imipenem (IPM) and 0.5 M EDTA (9, 10) and a combined-disk test using either two IPM disks or two meropenem disks, one containing 930 µg (15) or 750 µg (26) of EDTA, have both been reported as reliable methods for the detection of MBLs in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter strains. When the latter method was studied using carbapenem-susceptible isolates, the sensitivity was poor, ranging from 10% to 86% (25). Thus far, no method has been reported to show adequate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of both carbapenem-susceptible and carbapanem-resistant MBL-positive isolates.
MBL-producing gram-negative organisms have recently been described in Australia (13, 14). Like others, significant proportions of the organisms are carbapenem susceptible. This prompted our laboratory to design a simple and cost-effective phenotypic MBL detection method capable of identifying such organisms. We report the validation of this method using a broad range of bacterial species.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Results of the phenotypic method in the detection of MBL-producing gram-negative bacilli
|
Phenotypic detection of MBLs. An MBL phenotypic detection method was designed using a single agar plate and comprised three components (Fig. 1). (i) In the combined-disk test, two IPM disks (10 µg), one containing 10 µl of 0.1 M (292 µg) anhydrous EDTA (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO), were placed 25 mm apart (center to center). An increase in zone diameter of >4 mm around the IPM-EDTA disk compared to that of the IPM disk alone was considered positive for an MBL. This cutoff was chosen after preliminary research at our institution showed that an IPM (10 µg) disk plus 292 µg EDTA could increase the zone diameter by up to 4 mm compared to that of an IPM disk alone in 50 MBL-negative organisms, but the increase was >4 mm in six MBL-positive organisms (three Serratia marcescens isolates, one Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate, one Escherichia coli isolate, and one Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate). Thus, a change of >4 mm was chosen for further study. Ten microliters of 0.1 M (292 µg) EDTA was chosen, as higher concentrations led to inhibitory effects with the EDTA alone (data not shown). (ii) In the DDST, an IPM (10 µg) disk was placed 20 mm (center to center) from a blank disk containing 10 µl of 0.1 M (292 µg) EDTA. Enhancement of the zone of inhibition in the area between the two disks was considered positive for an MBL (Fig. 1). (iii) The final component was an aztreonam (30 µg) disk. Given the unique sensitivity of MBLs to this antibiotic, we studied the inhibition zone sizes of all isolates to determine the utility of this component in phenotypic MBL detection. Disks were applied to the surface of the inoculated agar as shown in Fig. 1, and plates were incubated overnight at 35°C. All antibiotic disks were obtained from Oxoid.
![]() View larger version (117K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. The phenotypic appearance of an MBL-producing Serratia marcescens isolate carrying the blaIMP-4 gene. (A) Combined-disk test, using two imipenem (10 µg) disks, one with 292 µg EDTA, showing an increase in zone inhibition of >4 mm around the disk with EDTA. (B) Double-disk synergy test, using an IPM (10 µg) disk placed 20 mm (center to center) from a blank filter disk containing 292 µg EDTA. (C) Aztreonam (30 µg) disk with a >30-mm zone of inhibition.
|
PCR amplification and DNA sequencing. PCR analysis was performed on all isolates to confirm the presence of an MBL. The primers used for the blaIMP and blaVIM genes were described previously (19, 21). For each target gene, PCR amplification was carried out in a 50-µl reaction volume using a Thermal Cycler 9600 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, Conn.). The reaction mixture contained 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, a 0.2 mM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, a 0.2 µM concentration of each specific primer, and 1.35 U of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Bioystems). The master mix was spiked with template DNA from one to two colonies of pure culture, prior to amplification. For both PCRs, an initial 10-min denaturation step at 95°C was performed followed by 35 cycles of 45 s of denaturation at 94°C, 45 s of primer annealing at 56°C, and 50 s of primer extension at 72°C for blaIMP detection, or 35 cycles of 30 s of denaturation at 94°C, 40 s of primer annealing at 52°C, and 50 s of primer extension at 72°C for the blaVIM gene detection. Following the last cycle, an additional 7-min extension step was performed at 72°C, and the products were then held at 4°C. After agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide, the PCR products were analyzed under UV light. Nucleotide sequencing confirmed the MBL gene type as described previously (14).
Sensitivity and specificity. The performance of the phenotypic MBL detection method was evaluated using PCR as the gold standard. The sensitivity (the number of MBL-carrying organisms that were correctly differentiated) and specificity (the number of non-MBL-carrying organisms that were correctly differentiated) of the phenotypic method were calculated (6).
|
|
|---|
Carbapenem susceptibilities.
Overall, 51 (61%) MBL-carrying isolates tested sensitive to either imipenem or meropenem. Of these, 31 (37%) had an imipenem MIC of
4 µg/ml, including 10 Klebsiella spp. isolates, 9 S. marcescens isolates, 5 E. coli isolates, 5 E. cloacae isolates, 1 C. koseri isolate, and 1 A. baumannii isolate. Forty-eight (57%) had meropenem MICs of
2 µg/ml. Of the 22 MBL-carrying isolates cultured from blood, 11 (50%) were susceptible to either imipenem or meropenem. Of these carbapenem-susceptible isolates causing bloodstream infection, all were Enterobacteriaceae. The remaining 11 isolates from blood were carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. All MBL-carrying organisms were resistant to ceftazidime (MIC > 8 µg/ml) and ticarcillin/clavulanate (MIC > 16 µg/ml). Of the MBL-negative isolates, 32 (62%) were susceptible to either imipenem or meropenem.
Phenotypic MBL detection method.
The phenotypic MBL detection method identified all isolates that were confirmed to be carrying an MBL by PCR (100% sensitivity), including 81 blaIMP-4-carrying isolates, 1 blaIMP-1-carrying A. baumannii isolate, 1 blaVIM-2-carrying Pseudomonas sp. isolate, and 1 blaVIM-4-carrying Pseudomonas sp. isolate. Of the 84 MBL-carrying isolates, 66 (79%) were found to be positive in both the DDST and the combined-disk test (Table 2). Eighteen isolates (21%), all blaIMP-4-carrying P. aeruginosa isolates, were positive in the combined-disk test only. The increase in zone inhibition with IPM-EDTA compared with IPM alone is shown in Fig. 2. A breakpoint of >4 mm, as determined by our preliminary work, was highly effective at distinguishing between MBL and non-MBL producers. Interestingly, 12 MBL-producing isolates had an increase in zone diameter of <7 mm (
7 mm being the cutoff used by other investigators [15, 25, 26]), 11 (92%) of which were Enterobacteriaceae, including 6 K. pneumoniae isolates, 1 E. coli isolate, 3 E. cloacae isolates, and 1 C. koseri isolate. No difference in zone diameter increase was observed between carbapenem-susceptible and -resistant isolates. Twelve MBL-producing organisms were also tested using a heavier inoculum (0.5 McFarland standard), including two E. cloacae isolates, six S. marcescens isolates, one K. pneumoniae isolate, and three P. aeruginosa isolates. For the combined-disk test, 11 of these isolates had a smaller difference in the zone of inhibition around the IPM-EDTA disk than around the IPM disk alone when a heavier inoculum was used. Two isolates had a zone size difference of
4 mm with the heavier inoculum, a result that is below our definition of phenotypic MBL production. For the DDST, one P. aeruginosa isolate was negative with the heavier inoculum yet positive with the lighter inoculum (1-in-10 dilution of a 0.5 McFarland standard). All other isolates gave similar results, but the synergy enhancement between the IPM and EDTA disks was more pronounced with a lighter inoculum.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Summary of results for the combined-disk test and the double-disk synergy test in the detection of MBL-producing gram-negative bacilli
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Increase (in millimeters) in zone of inhibition around the imipenem-EDTA disk compared with the imipenem disk alone for 52 MBL-negative (MBL -ve) and 54 MBL-positive (MBL +ve) clinical isolates.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Inhibition zone diameters (in millimeters) around the aztreonam disk (30 µg) for the 84 metallo-ß-lactamase-carrying isolates. Asterisks indicate Enterobacteriaceae isolates (n = 8) found to produce an AmpC-type or extended-spectrum ß-lactamase.
|
|
|
|---|
In the current study, we report a phenotypic MBL detection system that is highly sensitive (100%) and specific (98%) at detecting both carbapenem-susceptible (61% of isolates) and carbapenem-resistant MBL-carrying isolates across a wide range of gram-negative genera from clinically important specimens. The method is simple to perform, and the materials used are cheap, nontoxic, and easily accessible, making it highly applicable to routine clinical laboratories. With the emergence of carbapenem-susceptible MBL-carrying organisms, the issue of which isolates to select for phenotypic MBL detection is now more challenging. Clearly, screening only carbapenem-resistant organisms, as is most often performed, is suboptimal. On the other hand, selecting all isolates creates unnecessary work with a lower yield. All MBL-carrying isolates tested in the current study (seven different gram-negative genera), including the carbapenem-susceptible isolates, were resistant to ceftazidime and ticarcillin/clavulanate, and we feel that such a phenotype is an appropriate initial threshold from which to pursue MBL production, especially in Enterobacteriaceae. This threshold may be adjusted according to the prevalence of MBLs at an institution.
Yan and colleagues reported on the laboratory detection of carbapenem-susceptible MBL-carrying organisms and compared three methods (25). The first was a DDST, using a plain filter disk with 2-mercaptopropionic acid and four antibiotic disks (ceftazidime, ceftazidime-clavulanate, cefepime, and cefepime-clavulanate). In order to achieve an adequate level of sensitivity, the investigators needed to combine the DDST results of all four antibiotic disks. In doing so, the specificity was reduced, with 10 of 30 (33.3%) A. baumannii isolates testing falsely positive. The second method was a combined-disk test using imipenem and 10 µl of 0.5 M EDTA, with an increase in zone diameter cutoff of
7 mm with IPM-EDTA compared with IPM alone. The sensitivity varied depending on the bacterial host but was lowest for carbapenem-susceptible isolates (10% for K. pneumoniae). In an attempt to improve sensitivity, the investigators combined the four antibiotic disks mentioned above with EDTA. Highly varied results were achieved, depending on the genera involved and the antibiotic used. No single combination provided adequate results for all organisms tested. The final method was the MBL Etest, and as reported by others (23), this method is not applicable to carbapenem-susceptible MBL-carrying organisms (MIC
4 µg/ml). Thus, no method, apart from the DDST using four different antibiotic disks, which is cumbersome and more costly and has greater risk for subjective errors, was adequate for the detection of carbapenem-susceptible and -resistant MBL-carrying organisms.
In the current study, we utilized several unique methodological techniques in an attempt to maximize the detection of such challenging organisms. Firstly, both a DDST and a combined-disk test were performed concurrently on a single agar plate. As described above, no single method provided ideal results for MBL detection, and therefore we employed both techniques. Despite this, our results showed that the combined-disk test had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98%, whereas the DDST had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 98% (Table 2). Overall, the combined-disk test is the preferred method due to its objective interpretation. Secondly, we used IsoSensitest agar, as our preliminary investigations showed greater increases in zone diameters for the combined-disk test and greater clarity with the DDST compared with tests using Mueller-Hinton agar. Walsh and colleagues, while evaluating the MBL Etest, found that both media had excellent sensitivity (97% for Mueller-Hinton agar, 93% for IsoSensitest agar) (22). Also, Mueller-Hinton agar is known to contain variable concentrations of zinc, and the medium can vary from brand to brand and batch to batch, affecting the potential accuracy of MBL detection (22). Thirdly, for the combined-disk test, we used a lower cutoff (>4 mm) than others (
7 mm) (15, 25, 26) for the increase in zone diameter with IPM-EDTA as opposed to IPM alone. This value provided excellent discriminatory power for detecting MBL-producing isolates (Fig. 2). Interestingly, 12 of our MBL-producing isolates had increases in zone diameter of <7 mm, 11 (92%) of which were Enterobacteriaceae, a group often missed in other investigations (25). Other unique methodological techniques used in the present study were a lighter inoculum (1-in-10 dilution of a 0.5 McFarland standard) and a lower concentration of EDTA (292 µg). We believe that such modifications were helpful for our ability to detect all MBL-producing isolates. Interestingly, we had one false-positive result, a P. aeruginosa isolate from a wound swab. False positives have been reported with EDTA-based methods and may be explained by the effects of EDTA on a zinc-dependent OprD pump responsible for carbapenem entry in P. aeruginosa (4). Also, the isolate may have been carrying an MBL gene type that was not tested in the current study.
MBLs are characterized by their ability to hydrolyze all ß-lactams except for aztreonam (23), and therefore we studied the utility of an aztreonam (30 µg) disk in phenotypic MBL detection. Unfortunately, the results were varied and are best explainned by the presence of other mechanisms for aztreonam resistance, most importantly ESBL or AmpC-type ß-lactamases. The utility of this component was greatest with Enterobacteriaceae, with 87% (53/61) having a large zone of inhibition (>30 mm) (Fig. 3). Of the eight Enterobacteriaceae isolates that showed reduced inhibition zones, all were found to have a coexisting AmpC-type ß-lactamase or ESBL. Thus, a large inhibition zone around the aztreonam disk (>30 mm) was supportive for an MBL but was not necessary. Interestingly, an amoxicillin/clavulanate disk placed 25 mm (center to center) from the aztreonam disk can be utilized to assist in the phenotypic detection of a coexisting ESBL.
The majority of our MBL-producing isolates were carrying the blaIMP-4 gene, but isolates carrying other MBL types, such as blaIMP-1, blaVIM-2, and blaVIM-4, were also detected. Given the small number of the latter types of isolates, our results cannot be extrapolated to other MBL types, and further evaluation using different MBLs, including SPM, GIM, and SIM types, is required.
In conclusion, our study validates a simple and highly sensitive phenotypic method for the detection of MBL production in a broad range of host organisms. Most importantly, the method is highly sensitive at detecting carbapenem-susceptible MBL-producing isolates, a concerning phenotype that is being described with increased frequency. Such organisms, carrying hidden MBL genes, are a threat to infection control efforts and may result in poor clinical outcomes when carbapenems are used for treatment in those with serious infections. Such a hypothesis needs further evaluation. Thus, all diagnostic laboratories must now be on high alert for MBL-producing organisms as early detection is critical to prevent the consequences of this worrying resistance mechanism.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»