Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2007, p. 3446-3448, Vol. 45, No. 10
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00972-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Bacteremia Due to Clonally Derived Methicillin-Resistant, Gentamicin-Susceptible Isolates and Methicillin-Susceptible, Gentamicin-Resistant Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus
Maria Daskalaki,
Joaquin R. Otero,
Francisca Sanz, and
Fernando Chaves*
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Avenida de Cordoba sn, Madrid 28041, Spain
Received 10 May 2007/
Returned for modification 24 July 2007/
Accepted 6 August 2007

ABSTRACT
We report recurrent bacteremia due to mixed infection with two
clonally derived isolates of
Staphylococcus aureus in a patient
with Sezary syndrome. The two isolates, one gentamicin resistant
and methicillin susceptible and the other gentamicin susceptible
and methicillin resistant, developed by the deletion of the
mecA, ant(4'
)Ia, and
aacA-aphD genes from a common gentamicin-resistant
and methicillin-susceptible ancestor.

CASE REPORT
Here we report a case of bacteremia in a 63-year-old male patient
with a medical history of Sezary syndrome, diagnosed 8 years
previously, who was transferred from another institution to
the Department of Dermatology at Hospital Universitario Doce
de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. At the time of his transfer, the
patient had already undergone several rounds of chemotherapy
because of his underlying lymphoma. At the time of admission,
he demonstrated symptoms of confusion and had chills and fever
to 38°C. Upon physical examination, the patient exhibited
generalized erythroderma with moderate desquamation and chronic
radiodermatitis with multiple surface ulcers. On his right hand,
there were many sanious patches that were difficult to remove.
Computerized tomography scanning and a thoracic X ray revealed
no signs of inflammation or sites of infection. Within the 4
months preceding this presentation, the patient had had two
clinical episodes of methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, both of which were treated with at least
2 weeks of therapy. The first was treated with (intravenous
[i.v.]) vancomycin and (i.v.) levofloxacin for 18 days, and
the second was treated with (i.v.) vancomycin and (i.v.) piperacillin-tazobactam
for 15 days. Because the likelihood of recurrence of his bacteremia
was deemed to be high, upon presentation, the patient was empirically
treated with (i.v.) vancomycin and (i.v.) cefepime. Two sets
of blood cultures were taken an hour apart before the initiation
of this treatment. The blood was drawn from different peripheral
sites, and extensive precautions were taken to avoid contamination
because of the poor condition of his skin. Both cultures yielded
two isolates of
S. aureus with slight differences in colony
morphology. The two isolates from both blood cultures showed
different antibiotic profiles, one being susceptible to oxacillin
and resistant to gentamicin (isolate 7878) (Table
1) and the
other homogeneously resistant to oxacillin but susceptible to
gentamicin (isolate 7879) (Table
1). This clinical episode was
considered to represent bacteremia that probably originated
from the patient's cutaneous lesions. The patient completed
a course of antimicrobial treatment with (i.v.) vancomycin and
(i.v.) cefepime over a period of 14 days and was discharged
in good health without any signs of infection.
In order to understand the origins of the mixed bacteremia involving
both gentamicin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible
S. aureus (GR-MSSA) and gentamicin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant
S. aureus (GS-MRSA), we decided to study the microbiological
and molecular characteristics of these isolates as well as others
obtained during previous episodes of bacteremia in the same
patient (Table
1). All the clinical isolates were subcultured,
and their antimicrobial susceptibilities were retested by the
disk-agar diffusion method to confirm the susceptibility patterns.
In order to determine whether the GR-MSSA and GS-MRSA isolates
and those obtained from the previous episodes of bacteremia
belonged to the same clonal group, all isolates were characterized
by standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with the
restriction endonuclease SmaI. PFGE analysis of the DNA revealed
that the isolates exhibited SmaI macrorestriction patterns that
were indistinguishable except for the loss of a

225-kb SmaI
DNA fragment and the concurrent gain of a smaller fragment of

194 kb in the GR-MSSA variant (Fig.
1A). These data suggested
that the most recent GS-MRSA and GR-MSSA isolates were derived
from the same parental GR-MRSA strain of the organism involved
in the earlier episode of bacteremia. Furthermore, two MRSA
isolates (1336 and 7879) were characterized by multilocus sequence
typing and staphylococcal cassette chromosome
mec typing (
6,
11). The results for both isolates were sequence type 125, type
IV.
To investigate further, we then used PCR to test all the available
isolates for the
mecA gene (
11) as well as the
aacA-aphD and
ant(4'
)-Ia genes that encode aminoglycoside resistance (
12,
13). The PCR results confirmed the phenotypic susceptibility
patterns (Table
1). The three isolates obtained before the last
episode of bacteremia exhibited identical antimicrobial susceptibility
patterns, and all three resistance genes were detected. With
regard to the two isolates obtained from the most recent episode
of bacteremia, the GS-MRSA isolate (7879) possessed both the
mecA and the
ant(4'
)Ia genes but the GR-MSSA isolate (7878)
carried only the
aacA-aphD gene (Table
1).
To understand the evolution of these isolates and to determine the significance of the change in PFGE patterns, we proceeded to conduct Southern blot hybridizations of the PFGE-separated SmaI DNA fragments. The pulsed-field gel was blotted onto a Hybond N+ membrane which was probed with PCR-amplified mecA-, aacA-aphD-, and ant(4')Ia-specific probes (11-13). Hybridization was visualized by exposing the blots to photographic films for various time periods. For all MRSA isolates, the mecA and ant(4')Ia sequences were present on the same
225-kb SmaI macrorestriction fragment that was absent from the GR-MSSA variant (Fig. 1B and D). The aacA-aphD gene probe hybridized to the
339.5-kb fragment from all gentamicin-resistant isolates but not the GS-MRSA strain (Fig. 1C), thus confirming the absence of the bifunctional aacA-aphD modifying enzyme in this organism. As has been reported in other studies, the loss of the aacA-aphD gene did not yield any apparent change in the PFGE patterns (Fig. 1A) because PFGE analysis is not sensitive enough to detect the deletion of small fragments (9). The aacA-aphD gene in gram-positive cocci is known to be flanked by inverted copies of the insertion sequence IS256, forming the 4,566-bp transposon Tn4001 (3). The well-known instability of this element probably provoked a deletion in the genome of the GR-MRSA isolate, giving rise to a new GS-MRSA population (2, 9, 10, 14). Resistance to tobramycin in this new GS-MRSA strain was preserved through the conservation of the ant(4')Ia gene (2, 9, 10, 14). Our results confirmed the simultaneous deletion of a fragment containing the mecA and the ant(4')Ia genes together with the deletion of the aacA-aphD gene, producing two new populations which had originated directly from the same ancestor.
In S. aureus, resistance to methicillin is encoded by the mecA gene, which is carried on a mobile genetic element termed the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec. Different studies have demonstrated that the genetic instability of this element can result not only from the absence of antibiotic pressure (7) but also from vancomycin-induced stress that has been shown in vitro to lead to the deletion of mecA (1).
Although reports of similar cases involving the in vivo deletion of the mecA region have already been published (4, 5, 7, 8), to the best of our knowledge this is the first report of a case of recurrent S. aureus bacteremia in which such a deletion of the mecA, ant(4')Ia, and aacA-aphD genes has taken place to produce two distinct populations of GR-MSSA and GS-MRSA with the same GR-MRSA ancestor. Our patient had received several courses of antimicrobial therapy, including vancomycin, for three clinical episodes of recurrent bacteremia in a 4-month period. In vitro studies have shown that vancomycin-induced stress can lead to the deletion of mecA in some strains of MRSA (1). The protracted duration of antimicrobial therapy in this immunosuppressed patient could therefore have provoked these deletions. The frequency with which simultaneous infections with mixed variants of MRSA and MSSA occur is unknown. The clinical implications of infection with a mixture of susceptible and resistant variants of S. aureus are serious if the condition is not recognized in a timely manner and the appropriate therapy is not provided. The administration of inappropriate treatment may lead to selective growth of the resistant population and severe complications for the patient. Our observations highlight the importance of considering the evolution of S. aureus strains in immunosuppressed patients with recurrent MRSA infections in which the bacteria are under prolonged selective pressure from antimicrobial agents.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Tobin Hellyer for reviewing the manuscript.
This work was supported by Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III—FEDER, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD06/0008), and by Fundación Mutua Madrileña.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Avenida de Cordoba sn, Madrid 28041, Spain. Phone: (34) 91-3908239. Fax: (34) 91-5652765. E-mail:
fchaves.hdoc{at}salud.madrid.org 
Published ahead of print on 15 August 2007. 

REFERENCES
1 - Adhikari, R. P., G. C. Scales, K. Kobayashi, J. M. B. Smith, B. Berger-Bächi, and G. M. Cook. 2004. Vancomycin-induced deletion of the methicillin resistance gene mecA in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 54:360-363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Blanc, D. S., P. Francioli, A. Le Coustumier, L. Gazagne, E. Lecaillon, P. Gueudet, F. Vandenesch, and J. Etienne. 2001. Reemergence of gentamicin-susceptible strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococccus aureus in France: a phylogenetic approach. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2287-2290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Byrne, M. E., D. A. Rouch, and R. A. Skurray. 1989. Nucleotide sequence analysis of IS256 from the Staphylococcus aureus gentamicin-tobramycin-kanamycin-resistance transposon Tn4001. Gene 81:361-367.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Deplano, A., P. T. Tassios, Y. Glupczynski, E. Godfroid, and M. J. Struelens. 2000. In vivo deletion of the methicillin resistance mec region from the chromosome of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:617-619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Donnio, P.-Y., D. C. Oliveira, N. A. Faria, N. Wilhelm, A. Le Coustumier, and H. de Lencastre. 2005. Partial excision of the chromosomal cassette containing the methicillin resistance determinant results in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4191-4193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Enright, M. C., N. P. J. Day, C. E. Davies, S. J. Peacock, and B. G. Sprat. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1008-1015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Inglis, B., W. El-Adhami, and P. R. Stewart. 1993. Methicillin-sensitive and resistant homologues of Staphylococcus aureus occur together among clinical isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 167:323-328.[Medline]
8 - Lawrence, C., M. Cosseron, P. Durand, Y. Costa, and R. Leclercq. 1996. Consecutive isolation of homologous strains of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from a hospitalised child. J. Hosp. Infect. 33:49-53.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Leliévre, H., G. Lina, M. E. Jones, C. Olive, F. Forey, M. Roussel-Delvallez, M.-H. Nicolas-Chanoine, C. M. Bébéar, V. Jarlier, A. Andremont, F. Vandenesch, and J. Etienne. 1999. Emergence and spread in French hospitals of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with increasing susceptibility to gentamicin and other antibiotics. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3452-3457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Mangeney, N., K. Drollee, V. Cloitre, M. Bordes, and E. Faubert. 2002. Comparative pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of gentamicin-resistant and -susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in France between 1991 and 1998. Changes in antibiotic susceptibility. J. Hosp. Infect. 51:262-268.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Oliveira, D. C., and H. de Lencastre. 2002. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2155-2161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Schmitz, F.-J., A. C. Fluit, M. Gondolf, R. Beyrau, E. Lindenlauf, J. Verhoef, H.-P. Heinz, and M. E. Jones. 1999. The prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance and corresponding resistance genes in clinical isolates of staphylococci from 19 European hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43:253-259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Strommenger, B., C. Kettlitz, G. Werner, and W. Witte. 2003. Multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of nine clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4089-4094.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Udou, T. 2004. Dissemination of nosocomial multiple-aminoglycoside-resistant Staphylococcus aureus caused by horizontal transfer of the resistance determinant (aacA/aphD) and clonal spread of resistant strains. Am. J. Infect. Control 32:215-219.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2007, p. 3446-3448, Vol. 45, No. 10
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00972-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Shore, A. C., Rossney, A. S., O'Connell, B., Herra, C. M., Sullivan, D. J., Humphreys, H., Coleman, D. C.
(2008). Detection of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec-Associated DNA Segments in Multiresistant Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis ccrAB4 in both Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus and MSSA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 4407-4419
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Francois, P., Uckay, I., Iten, A., Renzi, G., Dahran, S., Camus, V., Sax, H., Schrenzel, J.
(2008). In Vivo Detection of Clonally Derived Methicillin-Resistant/Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strains Is Not a Rare Event. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 1890-1891
[Full Text]