Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Valenza, G. Articles by Abele-Horn, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Valenza, G. Articles by Abele-Horn, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2007, p. 3493-3497, Vol. 45, No. 11
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00953-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Microbiological Evaluation of the New VITEK 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus Identification Card

Giuseppe Valenza,^* Claudia Ruoff, Ulrich Vogel, Matthias Frosch, and Marianne Abele-Horn

Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

Received 8 May 2007/ Returned for modification 6 August 2007/ Accepted 20 August 2007

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
VITEK 2 is an automated identification system for diverse bacterial and fungal species. A new card (the Neisseria-Haemophilus [NH] card) for the identification of Neisseria spp., Haemophilus spp., and other fastidious gram-negative or gram-variable microorganisms has been developed, but its performance in a routine clinical laboratory has not yet been evaluated. In this study, a total of 188 bacterial strains belonging to the genera Actinobacillus, Campylobacter, Capnocytophaga, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, Gardnerella, Haemophilus, Kingella, Moraxella, and Neisseria were investigated. The NH card was able to identify 171 strains (91%) correctly without the need for extra tests; one strain (0.5%) was misidentified, and five strains (2.7%) could not be classified. Eleven strains (5.8%) were identified with a low level of discrimination, and simple additional tests were required to increase the correct-identification rate to 96.8%. The results were available within 6 h. Based on these results, the new VITEK 2 NH card appears to be a good method for the identification of diverse groups of fastidious organisms, which would otherwise require testing with multiple systems. However, more work is needed to evaluate the performance of VITEK 2 with regard to Haemophilus, Actinobacillus, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, and Kingella bacteria because of the insufficient number of strains tested in this study. Moreover, further reduction of the detection time would be desirable.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Fastidious bacteria are frequently associated with severe infectious diseases. In particular, Neisseria and Haemophilus, Actinobacillus, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, and Kingella (HACEK) organisms are responsible for such serious infectious conditions as sepsis, meningitis, and endocarditis (5, 7, 11, 13, 14, 17, 22, 23, 26). These organisms are sometimes difficult to cultivate and identify. The VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy L'Etoile, France) is used worldwide for the rapid and accurate identification of gram-positive cocci, gram-negative rods, and yeasts (1, 2, 16, 18, 24) in routine clinical microbiology tests. BioMérieux has recently developed a new Neisseria-Haemophilus (NH) identification card in order to identify fastidious gram-negative and gram-variable organisms (HACEK organisms), but its performance under the conditions of a routine laboratory has not yet been evaluated. The new VITEK 2 NH system allows for the identification of 28 taxa belonging to the genera Actinobacillus, Campylobacter, Capnocytophaga, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, Gardnerella, Haemophilus, Kingella, Moraxella, Neisseria, Oligella, and Suttonella. The NH card is based on colorimetric technology and uses dehydrated media containing chromogenic substrates, which are detected by optical heads. A computer-assisted algorithm based on data collected from known strains of the claimed species is used to interpret the data for a final identification. In this study, 188 isolates belonging to the species included in the database of the VITEK 2 system's software were used to evaluate the ability of the new VITEK 2 NH card to identify fastidious gram-negative and gram-variable bacteria.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Bacterial strains. A total of 188 strains belonging to the species listed in the database of the VITEK 2 software were investigated. Twelve strains were reference strains from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC): Campylobacter coli ATCC 43478; Campylobacter jejuni ATCC 33560; Gardnerella vaginalis ATCC 14018; Haemophilus paraphrophilus ATCC 49917; Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 10211, ATCC 49247, and ATCC 49766; Haemophilus parainfluenzae ATCC 33392; Neisseria gonorrhoeae ATCC 49759, ATCC 700825, and ATCC 49226; and Neisseria meningitidis ATCC 13090. Eight strains were obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ): Capnocytophaga ochracea DSM 7271; Cardiobacterium hominis DSM 8339; Haemophilus actinomycetemcomitans (formerly Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans) DSM 8324 and DSM 11122; Neisseria cinerea DSM 4630; Neisseria elongata DSM 17712; Neisseria lactamica DSM 4691; and Neisseria sicca DSM 17713. Fifty strains were selected from the strain collection of the German National Reference Center for Meningococci, i.e., five strains of N. gonorrhoeae, five strains of N. lactamica (3), and 40 genetically diverse strains of N. meningitidis (8, 9). Twenty-six strains of N. meningitidis were serotyped as serogroup B, six as serogroup C, four as serogroup Y, one as serogroup 29E, one as serogroup A, one as serogroup W135, and one as serogroup X. The remaining 118 strains were clinical isolates from unrelated patients belonging to the clinical strain collection of the Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology of the University of Würzburg. The sources of the isolates included blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urogenital, and respiratory samples. For the study, the strains were transferred from storage at –70°C, placed on chocolate agar supplemented with PolyVitex (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany), and subcultured a second time in a CO₂ incubator for 24 h. The clinical isolates were previously identified to the species level by colony morphology, Gram stain, catalase and oxidase testing, and the API NH system (bioMérieux) in the case of Haemophilus, Neisseria, and Moraxella species. G. vaginalis was identified by growth and beta-hemolysis on human blood agar and by API Coryne or API Strep strips (both from bioMérieux). C. jejuni was identified by colony morphology, Gram stain (curved rods), and hydrolysis of hippurate-indoxyl-acetate in addition to susceptibility to nalidixic acid and cephalothin. E. corrodens was identified by growth pattern and by the API E system. C. coli and the HACEK organisms were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The standard identification results were compared with those obtained with the new VITEK 2 NH cards. In the case of low discrimination or misidentification by the VITEK 2 NH card, the 16S rRNA gene sequencing method was used for genetic identification.

VITEK 2 NH card. A bacterial suspension made in 0.45% aqueous NaCl was adjusted to a McFarland standard of 3 with a VITEK 2 DensiCheck instrument (bioMérieux). The time period from preparation of the inoculum to loading of the card was less than 30 min. The card, placed on the tray and applied to the VITEK 2 system, was automatically processed in a vacuum chamber and incubated at 35.5°C. The 64-well NH card contains 30 biochemical tests in the following categories: 11 glycosidase and peptidase tests, 10 acidification tests, 5 alkalinization tests, and 4 miscellaneous tests. An intermittent reading every 15 min allowed for identification after 6 h. The results were generated by a computer-assisted algorithm of the VITEK 2 system.

Interpretation of results. The interpretation was performed on the basis of the provided software. The four categories of results were as follows: (i) correct identification (unambiguous correct identification to the species level), (ii) low level of discrimination (either identification to the genus level or a low level of discrimination between two or more species, including the correct species), (iii) no identification (strains without results), and (iv) misidentification (the species identified with the NH card was different from that identified using the reference method).

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Identification results were obtained after a 6-hour incubation of the NH cards inside the VITEK 2 system. Table 1 lists all strains investigated. The new VITEK 2 NH card correctly identified 184 of 188 (97.8%) strains to the genus level and 171 of 188 (91%) strains to the species level without the need for extra tests (Table 1). Five strains (2.7%) could not be identified. A single N. gonorrhoeae isolate (0.5%) was misidentified as N. cinerea. Eleven strains (5.8%) were identified with low discrimination, but the correct species identification was among the listed choices (Table 1). In detail, the overall correct identification rates were 100% (nine of nine strains) for C. coli and 88.8% (24 of 27 strains) for C. jejuni. The remaining three strains of C. jejuni were identified as C. coli-C. jejuni, because the VITEK 2 NH system was not able to distinguish between the two species. G. vaginalis (18 strains) was identified at a rate of 100%. Furthermore, 21 of the 25 H. influenzae strains (84%) and 25 of the 27 H. parainfluenzae strains (92.5%) were correctly identified to the species level. Two strains of H. influenzae and one strain of H. parainfluenzae could not be identified, and another two strains of H. influenzae and one strain of H. parainfluenzae were identified as H. influenzae-H. haemolyticus and as H. parainfluenzae-H. haemolyticus-H. segnis, respectively. In addition, all strains of M. catarrhalis (five strains) were correctly identified; correct-identification rates were 91.6% (11 of 12 strains) for N. gonorrhoeae, 95.1% (39 of 41 strains) for N. meningitidis, and 73.3% (11 of 15 strains) for the HACEK organisms. As mentioned above, one strain of N. gonorrhoeae was misidentified as N. cinerea, and two strains of meningococci were identified as N. meningitidis-N. sicca and as N. meningitidis-K. denitrificans, respectively. Among the HACEK organisms, 11 isolates were correctly identified (all Eikenella corrodens strains, one Capnocytophaga strain, two H. actinomycetemcomitans strains, and one C. hominis strain), two strains were identified with low discrimination, and two were not detected (Table 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Discrepancies in species identification by the VITEK 2 NH system and reference methods

The identification results were improved when simple additional tests were applied to clarify the results for strains identified with low discrimination (Tables 1 and 2). The application of additional tests increased the number of correctly identified strains to 182 (96.8%) (Table 1). Table 2 lists the strains identified with low discrimination and the simple additional tests used for their correct identification. The discrimination between C. jejuni (hippurate positive) and C. coli (hippurate negative) was readily achieved. Concerning the differentiation between H. influenzae and H. haemolyticus, lack of beta-hemolysis on horse agar excluded the identification of H. haemolyticus and confirmed the identification of H. influenzae. The discrimination between H. parainfluenzae (oxidase positive) and H. segnis (oxidase negative) was also easily obtained. Simple Gram stain and catalase tests led to the differentiation between N. meningitidis (cocci, catalase positive) and K. denitrificans (rods, catalase negative). All other differentiation tests are shown in Table 2. The performance of further tests increased the identification rates of C. jejuni from 88.8% to 100%, of H. influenzae from 84% to 92%, of H. parainfluenzae from 92.5% to 96.2%, of N. meningitidis from 95.1% to 100%, and of the HACEK organisms from 73.2% to 86.6%. Major differences in the identification results were observed when different culture media were used. For unknown reasons, testing on chocolate agar supplemented with PolyVitex from bioMérieux was associated with a high number of correct-identification rates. In contrast, testing on chocolate agar plates from Becton Dickinson led to significantly impaired identification results (data not shown).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Additional tests for correct identification of strains identified with low discrimination by VITEK 2 NH card

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
In this study, the new VITEK 2 NH card was evaluated for its ability to identify fastidious gram-negative bacteria and gram-variable microorganisms. Our data show that the NH card identifies diverse groups of fastidious bacteria that would otherwise require testing with multiple products. Of the 188 strains tested, 91% were correctly identified to the species level without additional tests. Five of 70 reference strains and 6 of 118 clinical isolates were identified with low discrimination (Table 2). Therefore, no significant differences in the performance of the VITEK 2 NH card could be shown between the reference strains and clinical isolates (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.5). The use of additional test procedures led to a better identification rate for the bacteria identified with low discrimination and increased the rate of correctly identified strains to 96.8%. Only five strains (2.7%) could not be identified, and a single strain (0.5%) was misidentified. These results confirm the findings recently presented at the General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology by others: a correct-identification rate between 96% and 98% (8% to 15% with low discrimination), a misidentification rate between 1% and 2.5%, and a rate of unidentified organisms between 0% and 1.2% (6, 10, 19, 20).

In this study, no problems were observed concerning the identification of C. coli (100% identification rate). However, the number of strains tested (nine) was too small for a definitive conclusion, particularly when taking into account that the identification rate of other studies has been lower (between 60% and 89%) (6, 10, 20). On the other hand, the reason for a correct-identification rate of only 88.8% for C. jejuni is that the NH card was not able to distinguish C. jejuni from C. coli in 3 of 27 cases. These results are in accordance with those achieved by others (6, 10, 20). In the study of Funke and coworkers (10), 5 of 67 C. jejuni strains were identified as C. coli-C. jejuni. This may be explained by the fact that except for hippuricase activity, which is lacking in C. coli, C. coli and C. jejuni are biochemically similar. Since the NH card does not contain hippuricase, differentiation between C. coli and C. jejuni may be more difficult. A number of commercial systems have been developed as an additional help to identify Campylobacter species; all systems tested had identification rates of 74% to 100% (12, 21). However, discrimination between the two species can be readily achieved through hippurate hydrolysis, so there is no real advantage to using the NH card for the identification of C. jejuni.

Satisfactory results were achieved in the identification of the Neisseria species. Of the 41 genetically diverse N. meningitidis strains from patients and healthy carriers that were tested, 95% were correctly identified. Two strains were detected with low discrimination, one of them as N. meningitidis-K. denitrificans. This isolate was maltose negative and, therefore, difficult to identify. The other isolate was interpreted as N. meningitidis-N. sicca. Since the correct species was among the listed choices, the final identification was possible by simple additional tests, such as the catalase test (positive for N. meningitidis), the Gram stain (cocci versus rods), or growth on a Martin-Lewis medium. Except for one glucose-negative strain, which was misidentified as N. cinerea, the VITEK 2 NH card correctly classified all gonococci tested. Mills et al. (19) had also observed that 3 of 45 gonococci were misidentified as N. cinerea. This may be explained by the fact that, as in our case, atypical glucose-negative strains might be difficult to identify because N. gonorrhoeae (glucose positive) and N. cinerea (glucose negative) are biochemically similar and differ only in acid production from glucose. For such strains, colistin susceptibility and nitrite reduction assays are suggested. With the exception of a single strain (N. elongata), the NH card correctly identified all other Neisseria species, including the five strains of M. catarrhalis.

Concerning the 15 HACEK organisms, 11 strains were correctly identified, and two strains which were identified with low discrimination could be correctly identified by further testing, resulting in an identification rate of 86.6%. Similar results were obtained by Mills et al. (20), who demonstrated an identification rate of 86.9% for the 434 investigated HACEK organisms using the VITEK 2 NH or reference methods. Overall, the number of HACEK strains tested in this study (i.e., 15) is too low for a definitive conclusion. Moreover, reliable results were achieved for G. vaginalis and most strains of Haemophilus species. Despite two strains of H. influenzae and one strain of H. parainfluenzae being identified with low discrimination as H. influenzae-H. haemolyticus and H. parainfluenzae-H. segnis, respectively, final discrimination of these species could be accomplished with a few simple test procedures, such as oxidase testing or observation of hemolysis on a horse blood medium. The difficulty with the correct identification of H. influenzae has also been observed by others (10, 20). H. influenzae and H. haemolyticus show identical biochemical test reactions (oxidase, catalase, glucose, sucrose, lactose, mannose, and xylose), so that biochemical differentiation might be difficult or even impossible without extra tests.

Compared with published reports on other systems already available for the identification of Neisseria, Moraxella, Gardnerella, and Haemophilus species, the VITEK 2 NH system performed well in our hands. Janda et al. (14) found that the HN ID kit (MicroScan Division, Baxter Diagnostics, Inc., CA) provides reliable results for N. gonorrhoeae and M. catarrhalis but is less efficient for N. meningitidis. Among the automated systems mentioned by Stager and Davis (25), very few were suitable for the identification of these three species. Barb é and coworkers (5) evaluated the API NH system and achieved an identification rate of 90.3% by performing additional tests for H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae. Furthermore, the identification rate for gonococci achieved by Alexander and Ison (4) with various commercial kits ranged between 64% and 100%. Lien and Hillier (15), investigating the enhanced rapid identification method (Austin Biological Laboratories, TX) for the detection of G. vaginalis, had an identification rate of 91.4% compared with standard biochemical methods. An interesting study was performed by Janda et al. (13), who investigated the identification rate for fastidious microorganisms by a former VITEK NHI card (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, MO). The authors found satisfactory results for the identification of N. gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis, and rarely isolated fastidious microorganisms. The identification rates for H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae were 94% and 95.6%, respectively. With regard to the identification of M. catarrhalis, the system was less satisfactory, as no strain could be identified correctly.

The mean time until the identification results for the fastidious organisms were provided was about 6 h. On the one hand, this clearly represents a disadvantage of the VITEK NH card versus the API NH system, which requires only 2 h for the identification of Haemophilus, Moraxella, and Neisseria species. On the other hand, this represents an advantage regarding the identification times required for G. vaginalis by API Coryne strips and for HACEK organisms by API Strep strips, both of which take 16 to 24 h. Nevertheless, a significant reduction in the detection time for Haemophilus and Neisseria species would be desirable.

In conclusion, the data demonstrate that the new VITEK 2 NH card was able to identify Haemophilus and Neisseria species and diverse groups of fastidious gram-negative organisms that otherwise would require testing with multiple products in the routine clinical laboratory. Convincing identification results were obtained for most of the strains tested, and even in cases of low discrimination, final identification of the species could be accomplished with a few simple test procedures. Therefore, the VITEK 2 NH system seems to be an improvement over those conventional methods that are often time-consuming. The versatility of the NH card was evident in its ability to identify most of the HACEK organisms tested. In particular, this is beneficial since these bacteria often present difficulties in recognition and identification in a clinical laboratory. Nevertheless, the identification rate for these organisms is not yet perfect, and more work is needed to finally evaluate the performance of VITEK 2 with regard to HACEK bacteria because of the insufficient number of strains tested in this study. Finally, it is recommended that other studies investigate a larger number of strains to evaluate whether the VITEK 2 NH system provides acceptable results as in the present study.

 
We are grateful to bioMérieux for its support to this study by providing the chocolate agar plates supplemented with PolyVitex and the VITEK NH cards.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2/E1, 97080 Würzburg, Germany. Phone: 49-(0)931-201 46901. Fax: 49-(0)931-201 46445. E-mail: gvalenza{at}hygiene.uni-wuerzburg.de

Published ahead of print on 29 August 2007.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Abele-Horn, M., L. Hommers, R. Trabold, and M. Frosch. 2006. Validation of VITEK 2 version 4.01 software for detection, identification, and classification of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:71-76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Abele-Horn, M., K. Stoy, M. Frosch, and R. R. Reinert. 2006. Comparative evaluation of a new Vitek 2 system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 25:55-57.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Alber, D., M. Oberkötter, S. Suerbaum, H. Claus, M. Frosch, and U. Vogel. 2001. Genetic diversity of Neisseria lactamica strains from epidemiologically defined carriers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1710-1715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Alexander, S., and C. Ison. 2005. Evaluation of commercial kits for the identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Med. Microbiol. 54:827-831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Barbé, G., M. Babolat, J. M. Boeufgras, D. Monget, and J. Freney. 1994. Evaluation of API NH, a new 2-hour system for identification of Neisseria and Haemophilus species and Moraxella catarrhalis in a routine clinical laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:187-189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Brosnikoff, C. L., R. P. Rennie, S. Shokoples, L. B. Reller, S. Mirrett, W. Janda, K. Ristow, and A. Krilcich. 2006. Evaluation of the new Neisseria-Haemophilus (NH) identification card for the VITEK 2, abstr. C-011. Abstr. 106th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
7
7. Cardoso, J. N., M. E. Ochiai, M. T. Oliveira, Jr., P. Morgado, R. Munhoz, F. E. Andretto, A. J. Mansur, and A. C. Barretto. 2005. Eikenella corrodens infective endocarditis. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 85:63-64. (In Portuguese.)[Medline]
8
8. Claus, H., M. C. Maiden, D. J. Wilson, N. D. McCarthy, K. A. Jolley, R. Urwin, F. Hessler, M. Frosch, and U. Vogel. 2005. Genetic analysis of meningococci carried by children and young adults. J. Infect. Dis. 191:1263-1271.[CrossRef][Medline]
9
9. Elias, J., D. Harmsen, H. Claus, W. Hellenbrand, M. Frosch, and U. Vogel. 2006. Spatiotemporal analysis of invasive meningococcal disease, Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:1689-1695.
10
10. Funke, G., M. Desmonceaux, N. Perrot, C. Roger-Dalbert, C. Bourgeois, D. Pincus, and S. Chatellier. 2006. Performance of the new VITEK 2 NH card in a routine clinical laboratory, abstr. C-010. Abstr. 106th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
11
11. Huang, S. T., H. C. Lee, N. Y. Lee, K. H. Liu, and W. C. Ko. 2005. Clinical characteristics of invasive Haemophilus aphrophilus infections. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 38:271-276.[Medline]
12
12. Huysmans, M. B., J. D. Turnidge, and J. H. Williams. 1995. Evaluation of API Campy in comparison with conventional methods for identification of thermophilic campylobacters. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:3345-3346.[Abstract]
13
13. Janda, W. M., P. J. Malloy, and P. C. Schreckenberger. 1987. Clinical evaluation of the VITEK Neisseria-Haemophilus identification card. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:37-41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Janda, W. M., J. J. Bradna, and P. Ruther. 1989. Identification of Neisseria spp., Haemophilus spp., and other fastidious gram-negative bacteria with the MicroScan Haemophilus-Neisseria identification panel. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:869-873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Lien, E. A., and S. L. Hillier. 1989. Evaluation of the enhanced rapid identification method for Gardnerella vaginalis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:566-567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Ligozzi, M., C. Bernini, M. G. Bonora, M. de Fatima, J. Zuliani, and R. Fontana. 2002. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of medically relevant gram-positive cocci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1681-1686.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Malani, A. N., D. M. Aronoff, S. F. Bradley, and C. A. Kauffman. 2006. Cardiobacterium hominis endocarditis: two cases and a review of the literature. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 25:587-595.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
18. Meurman, O., A. Koskensalo, and K. Rantakokko-Jalava. 2006. Evaluation of Vitek 2 for identification of yeasts in the clinical laboratory. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:591-593.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
19. Mills, J., M. Anheuser, C. Beres, N. Moss, R. Rennie, C. Brosnikoff, S. Shokoples, and D. Pincus. 2006. Rapid automated identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae fresh isolates with the new VITEK 2 NH card, abstr. C-012. Abstr. 106th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
20
20. Mills, J., C. Beres, B. Knysak, N. Moss, E. Mathias, E. Fossman, J. Clarridge, B. Limbago, A. McLaughlin, K. Jewell, and D. Pincus. 2005. Rapid automated identification of Neisseria, Haemophilus and other fastidious species with the new VITEK 2 NH card, abstr. C-196. Abstr. 105^th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
21
21. Nachamkin, I., and S. Barbagallo. 1990. Culture confirmation of Campylobacter spp. by latex agglutination. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:817-818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Paturel, L., J. P. Casalta, G. Habib, M. Nezri, and D. Raoult. 2004. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans endocarditis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10:98-118.[CrossRef][Medline]
23
23. Philip, A., and G. C. Garton. 1985. Comparative evaluation of five commercial systems for the rapid identification of pathogenic Neisseria species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22:101-104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Renaud, F. N., E. Bergeron, S. Tigaud, C. Fuhrmann, B. Gravagna, and J. Freney. 2005. Evaluation of the new Vitek 2 GN card for the identification of gram-negative bacilli frequently encountered in clinical laboratories. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 24:671-676.[CrossRef][Medline]
25
25. Stager, C. E., and J. R. Davis. 1992. Automated systems for identification of microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 5:302-327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. Yagupsky, P. 2004. Kingella kingae: from medical rarity to an emerging paediatric pathogen. Lancet Infect. Dis. 4:358-367.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2007, p. 3493-3497, Vol. 45, No. 11
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00953-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Rennie, R. P., Brosnikoff, C., Shokoples, S., Reller, L. B., Mirrett, S., Janda, W., Ristow, K., Krilcich, A. (2008). Multicenter Evaluation of the New Vitek 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus Identification Card. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2681-2685 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Valenza, G. Articles by Abele-Horn, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Valenza, G. Articles by Abele-Horn, M.