This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milici, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milici, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2007, p. 3529-3533, Vol. 45, No. 11
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00826-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison between Disk Diffusion and Microdilution Methods for Determining Susceptibility of Clinical Fungal Isolates to Caspofungin{triangledown}

Maria Eleonora Milici,1 Carmelo Massimo Maida,1 Elisabetta Spreghini,2 Barbara Ravazzolo,1 Salvatore Oliveri,3 Giorgio Scalise,2 and Francesco Barchiesi2*

Dipartimento di Igiene e Microbiologia D'Alessandro, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo,1 Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina, Pubblica Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona,2 Dipartimento di Scienze Ginecologiche e Microbiologiche, Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy3

Received 18 April 2007/ Returned for modification 18 May 2007/ Accepted 16 August 2007


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
We compared the caspofungin (CAS) susceptibility testing results generated by the disk diffusion (DD) assay with the results of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BD) reference method for 106 yeast isolates. The isolates represented 11 different fungal species, including Candida albicans (n = 50), C. parapsilosis (n = 10), C. glabrata (n = 10), C. tropicalis (n = 10), C. guillermondii (n = 6), C. rugosa (n = 5), C. krusei (n = 5), C. kefyr (n = 2), C. pelliculosa (n = 2), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (n = 3), and Geotrichum candidum (n = 3). The DD assay was performed in supplemented Mueller-Hinton agar with CAS, which was tested at concentrations of 2, 10, and 25 µg per disk. MICs and inhibition zone diameters were evaluated at 24 and 48 h. In general, the results obtained by the DD assay correlated well with those obtained by the BD method. In particular, a significant correlation between methods was observed when CAS was used at concentration of 2 µg/disk at a reading time of either 24 or 48 h.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
The increase in the rates of fungal infections, the changes in their epidemiology, the emergence of resistance, and the toxicities that some of the commercial antifungal drugs display have resulted in the need for an expanded arsenal of antifungal drugs. Echinocandins represent a new class of antifungal agents that act by inhibiting the synthesis of 1,3-ß-D-glucan, a key step in fungal cell wall biosynthesis (10). Caspofungin acetate (CAS) is a water-soluble, potent echinocandin with activity against a number of clinically important fungi. Although many authors investigated the activity of CAS against clinical isolates of fungi (1-3, 16), caution should be used before drawing clinical conclusions about the susceptibility results (5, 9). In addition, the MIC for CAS determined by the reference broth microdilution (BD) method can be altered greatly by changes in assay conditions, including the test format, the time of reading, as well as the definition of the end point (5).

Agar-based antifungal susceptibility testing, such as the disk diffusion (DD) method, can be an alternative that has a lower cost and the need for a reduced amount of labor compared with those required for the reference BD assay, although the results obtained by the DD assay can be plagued by the same variables that alter the MICs obtained by the BD method. In addition, the DD assay does not generate an MIC of the drug but generates only a zone of inhibition. In the last few years, several investigators compared the results of triazole MICs for yeasts and filamentous fungi obtained by the BD and the DD methods (4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 17). Few data are still available for echinocandin drugs. Therefore, in this study we compared the CAS susceptibility results obtained by the DD method with those obtained by the BD method for 106 yeast isolates. Three different concentrations of CAS were investigated to find the best correlation between the two methods.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Organisms. A total of 106 clinical yeast isolates were tested. The collection included Candida albicans (n = 50), C. parapsilosis (n = 10), C. glabrata (n = 10), C. tropicalis (n = 10), C. guillermondii (n = 6), C. rugosa (n = 5), C. krusei (n = 5), C. kefyr (n = 2), C. pelliculosa (n = 2), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (n = 3), and Geotrichum candidum (n = 3). The isolates were recovered from blood; abscesses; and the gastrointestinal, respiratory, and urinary tracts.

Antifungal agents. A standard antifungal powder of CAS (Merck Co., Whitehouse Station, PA) was obtained from the manufacturer. Stock solutions were prepared in water. Serial twofold dilutions were prepared exactly as outlined in CLSI (formerly NCCLS) document M27-A2 (14). Final dilutions were made in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma, Milan, Italy) buffered to pH 7 with 0.165 M morpholinopropanesulfonic acid buffer (Sigma). Aliquots of 0.1 ml of CAS at a 2x concentration were placed into the wells of plastic microdilution trays, which were then sealed and stored at –70°C until they were used, which was within 7 days.

BD method. BD testing was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the CLSI M27-A2 document by using the spectrophotometric method for inoculum preparation, an inoculum concentration of 1.5 (± 1.0) x 103 cells/ml, and RPMI 1640 medium (14). A total of 0.1 ml of fungal inoculum was added to each well of the microdilution trays. The final concentrations of CAS were 0.008 to 4.0 µg/ml. The trays were incubated at 35°C, and MICs were read at 24 and 48 h. Drug-free and fungus-free controls were included. Following incubation, the wells were examined and the growth in each well was compared to that in the growth control well. The MIC of CAS was defined as the minimum concentration (in micrograms per milliliter) of antifungal agent that provided an ~50% reduction in growth compared to the growth in the control well (15, 16).

DD assay. Blank disks of 6.3 mm in diameter (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD) were impregnated with 20 µl of CAS suspensions, resulting in final concentrations of 2, 10, and 25 µg/disk. The disks were allowed to dry at room temperature. Testing was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar plates supplemented with 2% glucose and 0.5 µg of methylene blue per ml. For each isolate, duplicate plates were inoculated by dipping two sterile cotton swabs into a 0.5 McFarland suspension and streaking the plate surface in three directions. After the plate was allowed to dry for 20 min, disks with each concentration were plated in duplicate to test each isolate and the plates were incubated at 35°C. Zone diameters (in millimeters) for the zone of complete inhibition were determined after 24 and 48 h of incubation. The zone edges were easily defined as the point of complete inhibition of growth. To assess the reproducibility of the methodology, the inhibition zone diameters were obtained on two different days for 19 of the 106 fungi evaluated, including 8 isolates (4 C. albicans strains, 3 non-C. albicans strains, and 1 S. cerevisiae strain) with MICs ≥2.0 µg/ml.

QC. Quality control (QC) was performed in accordance with the guidelines in CLSI documents M27-A2 and M44-A by using C. krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 (6, 14). The CLSI QC isolates were tested each time that a set of isolates was evaluated by the two procedures.

Interpretation of results. The degree of correlation between the MICs and the disk diffusion zone diameters was analyzed by use of Pearson's correlation coefficient. A linear relationship was assessed by using least-squares regression, weighted by the number of strains. For comparative evaluation of the BD and DD methods, the arithmetic means (AMs) and the ranges of the MICs and the AMs and the ranges of the inhibition zone diameters were calculated for each species.


arrow
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 
The median CAS MICs for C. kusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were 2.0 µg/ml and 1.0 µg/ml, respectively (18). Table 1 summarizes the results of the BD and DD assays obtained at 24 and 48 h. The CAS MICs for C. albicans isolates ranged from 0.06 to ≥4.0 µg/ml at either 24 or 48 h. The CAS MICs for Candida other than C. albicans and for the other fungal isolates ranged from 0.06 to ≥4.0 µg/ml at 24 h and from 0.125 to ≥4.0 µg/ml at 48 h. In general, the halo diameters obtained with the disks embedded with the highest CAS concentration were larger than those produced with the lower concentrations. A tendency toward slightly larger zones after 48 h of incubation was noted for the majority of the isolates tested. The biggest difference between the first- and second-day readings was observed for C. krusei isolates.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. In vitro activity of CAS against 106 fungal isolates

Table 2 summarizes the correlation between the methodologies. The best correlation between the methods was obtained by the use of CAS at a concentration of 2.0 µg/disk at either 24 h or 48 h of reading for C. albicans (r = –0.383 at 24 h and r = –0.416 at 48 h) and for non-C. albicans species (r = –0.333 at 24 h and r = –0.417 at 48 h). With the exception of susceptibility testing for the isolates belonging to genera other than Candida, the results obtained with CAS at 10 and 25 µg did not correlate significantly with the results obtained by the BD method.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Correlation between BD and DD methods for CAS susceptibility testing

Figures 1 to 4 show the isolate-by-isolate relationship between the log10 MIC and the inhibition zones produced on agar plates by 2-µg disks after 24 and 48 h of incubation. For most organisms tested, the more susceptible that the organism was by the BD method, the greater the inhibition zone that was produced on agar. On the basis of the findings presented in previous reports, we grouped the isolates with MICs of ≤1 µg/ml as being susceptible and those with MICs of ≥2 µg/ml as being resistant (15, 16).


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. Regression analysis for CAS susceptibility values of C. albicans isolates (n = 50) correlating the 24-h zones of inhibition (mm) determined with Mueller-Hinton agar plates with the 24-h MICs determined by the CLSI BD method (µg/ml). The line of best fit is shown, and the regression statistics gave a Pearson's r value of –0.383. The numbers in the figure are the numbers of strains that correlate with each value.


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 4. Regression analysis for CAS susceptibility values of non-Candida albicans isolates (n = 50) correlating the 48-h zones of inhibition (mm) determined with Mueller-Hinton agar plates with the 48-h MICs determined by the CLSI broth dilution method (µg/ml). The line of best fit is shown, and the regression statistics gave a Pearson's r value of –0.417. The numbers in the figure are the numbers of strains that correlate with each value.

Table 3 summarizes the agreement between the two methods. In particular, among the Candida isolates showing CAS MICs ≤1.0 µg/ml at 24 h, 75.2% (76.1% for C. albicans and 74.4% for the other Candida spp.) produced halo diameters that ranged from 12 to 16 mm. Similarly, among those isolates showing CAS MICs ≥2.0 µg/ml, 100% of the strains showed inhibition zone diameters that ranged from 9 to 11 mm. At the second-day reading, the proportions of C. albicans and non-C. albicans isolates with MICs ≤1.0 µg/ml and inhibition zones ≥12 mm increased to 86.4% and 75.7%, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Agreement between BD and DD methods for CAS susceptibility testing

Since the clinical laboratory needs easy, reliable, and non-time-consuming alternative methods for the determination of the MICs of antifungal agents, we investigated a DD procedure as a method for testing the activity of CAS against clinical fungal isolates. We examined three different concentrations of the echinocandin and found that the best correlation with the BD results was obtained by using disks containing 2 µg of CAS. Our data agree with those previously reported by Lozano-Chiu et al. (12). Those authors found that a final CAS concentration of 2.5 µg/disk yielded the best range of zone diameters of all the concentrations tested. Our data seem to indicate a greater correlation between the two methodologies when CAS is used at 2 µg/disk against Candida spp. on either the first- or the second-day reading. Further studies involving clinical isolates obtained from patients with well-known clinical outcomes are warranted to further elucidate this important technical issue. In general, our data show that this agar-based method hold promise as a simple and reliable method for determining the susceptibilities of Candida spp. to CAS.


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. Regression analysis for CAS susceptibility values of C. albicans isolates (n = 50) correlating the 48-h zones of inhibition (mm) determined with Mueller-Hinton agar plates with the 48-h MICs determined by the CLSI broth dilution method (µg/ml). The line of best fit is shown, and the regression statistics gave a Pearson's r value of –0.416. The numbers in the figure are the numbers of strains that correlate with each value.


Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. Regression analysis for CAS susceptibility values of non-Candida albicans isolates (n = 50) correlating the 24-h zones of inhibition (mm) determined with Mueller-Hinton agar plates with the 24-h MICs determined by the CLSI broth dilution method (µg/ml). The line of best fit is shown, and the regression statistics gave a Pearson's r value of –0.333. The numbers in the figure are the numbers of strains that correlate with each value.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca Torrette di Ancona, 60020 Ancona, Italy. Phone: 39 071 5963467. Fax: 39 071 5963468. E-mail: f.barchiesi{at}univpm.it Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 29 August 2007. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Abruzzo, G. K., A. M. Flattery, C. J. Gill, L. Kong, J. G. Smith, V. B. Pikounis, J. M. Balkovec, A. F. Bouffard, J. F. Dropinski, H. Rosen, H. Kropp, and K. Bartizal. 1997. Evaluation of the echinocandin antifungal MK-0991 (L-743,872): efficacies in mouse models of disseminated aspergillosis, candidiasis, and cryptococcosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2333-2338.[Abstract]
    2. 2
  2. Barchiesi, F., A. M. Schimizzi, A. W. Fothergill, G. Scalise, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1999. In vitro activity of the new echinocandin antifungal, MK-0991, against common and uncommon clinical isolates of Candida species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:302-304.[CrossRef][Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, S. D. Brown, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, C. Knapp, R. P. Rennie, J. H. Rex, and M. G. Rinaldi. 2000. Quality control limits for broth microdilution susceptibility tests of ten antifungal agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3457-3459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, R. P. Rennie, P. C. Fuchs, and S. D. Brown. 2002. Precision and accuracy of fluconazole susceptibility testing by broth microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1781-1784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Cada, D. J., T. Levien, and D. E. Baker. 2001. Caspofungin. Hosp. Pharm. 36:522-533.
    6. 6
  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2004. Method for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved guideline. Document M44-A. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    7. 7
  7. Espinel-Ingroff, A., B. Arthington-Skaggs, N. Iqbal, D. Ellis, M. A. Pfaller, S. Messer, M. Rinaldi, A. Fothergill, D. L. Gibbs, and A. Wang. 2007. Multicenter evaluation of a new disk agar diffusion method for susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi with voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1811-1820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Espinel-Ingroff, A., E. Canton, D. Gibbs, and A. Wang. 2007. Correlation of Neo-Sensitabs tablet diffusion assay results on three different agar media with CLSI broth microdilution M27-A2 and disk diffusion M44-A results for testing susceptibilities of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:858-864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Kartsonis, N., J. Killar, L. Mixson, C. Hoe, C. Sable, K. Bartizal, and M. Motyl. 2005. Caspofungin susceptibility testing of isolates from patients with esophageal candidiasis or invasive candidiasis: relationship of MIC to treatment outcome. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3616-3623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Kartsonis, N. A., J. Nielsen, and C. M. Douglas. 2003. Caspofungin: the first in a new class of antifungal agents. Drug Resist. Updates 6:197-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. López-Oviedo, E., A. I. Aller, C. Martín, C. Castro, M. Ramirez, J. M. Pemán, E. Cantón, C. Almeida, and E. Martín-Mazuelos. 2006. Evaluation of disk diffusion method for determining posaconazole susceptibility of filamentous fungi: comparison with CLSI broth microdilution method. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1108-1111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Lozano-Chiu, M., P. W. Nelson, V. L. Paetznick, and J. H. Rex. 1999. Disk diffusion method for determining susceptibilities of Candida spp. to MK-0991. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1625-1627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Matar, M. J., L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, V. L. Paetznick, J. R. Rodriguez, E. Chen, and J. H. Rex. 2003. Correlation between E-test, disk diffusion, and microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole and voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1647-1651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Publication M27-A2: reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast. Approved standards. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
    15. 15
  15. Odds, F., M. Motyl, R. Andrade, J. Bille, E. Canton, M. Cuenca-Estrella, A. Davidson, C. Durussel, D. Ellis, E. Foraker, A. W. Fothergill, M. A. Ghannoum, R. A. Giacobbe, M. Gobernado, R. Handke, M. Laverdiere, W. Lee-Yang, W. G. Merz, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, J. Peman, S. Perea, J. R. Perfect, M. A. Pfaller, L. Proia, J. H. Rex, M. G. Rinaldi, J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela, W. A. Schell, C. Shields, D. A. Sutton, P. E. Verweij, and D. W. Warnock. 2004. Interlaboratory comparison of results of susceptibility testing with caspofungin against Candida and Aspergillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3475-3482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Pfaller, M. A., L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, S. A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, and D. J. Diekema. 2006. In vitro susceptibilities of Candida spp. to caspofungin: four years of global surveillance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:760-763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Pfaller, M. A., L. Boyken, S. A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, R. J. Hollis, and D. J. Diekema. 2005. Comparison of results of voriconazole disk diffusion testing for Candida species with results from a central reference laboratory in the ARTEMIS global antifungal surveillance program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5208-5213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Pfaller, M. A., D. J. Diekema, S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, and R. N. Jones. 2003. In vitro activities of caspofungin compared with those of fluconazole and itraconazole against 3,959 clinical isolates of Candida spp., including 157 fluconazole-resistant isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1068-1071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2007, p. 3529-3533, Vol. 45, No. 11
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00826-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Maida, C. M., Milici, M. E., Trovato, L., Oliveri, S., Amodio, E., Spreghini, E., Scalise, G., Barchiesi, F. (2008). Evaluation of the Disk Diffusion Method Compared to the Microdilution Method in Susceptibility Testing of Anidulafungin against Filamentous Fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 4071-4074 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Chaturvedi, V., Diekema, D. J., Ghannoum, M. A., Holliday, N. M., Killian, S. B., Knapp, C. C., Messer, S. A., Miskov, A., Ramani, R. (2008). Clinical Evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Panel for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the Echinocandins Anidulafungin, Caspofungin, and Micafungin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2155-2159 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milici, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milici, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»