JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.01974-06v1
45/2/680    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pitt, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dance, D. A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pitt, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dance, D. A. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2007, p. 680-681, Vol. 45, No. 2
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01974-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Recurrent Melioidosis: Possible Role of Infection with Multiple Strains of Burkholderia pseudomallei{triangledown}


    LETTER
 Top
 Letter
 References
 
We were interested to read the paper by Maharjan et al. suggesting that reinfection is more common than previously realized in melioidosis (1). There is one other possibility that they did not consider, which might account for isolates from recurrent melioidosis being genotypically distinct from isolates in primary infection, namely, initial infection with more than one genotype. We report here studies that suggest that this is a not infrequent occurrence.

Eighteen patients with culture-positive melioidosis seen in Ubon Ratchathani, northeastern Thailand, were studied. Fourteen patients yielded the organism from blood, three presented with localized abscesses with no systemic spread, and one had a urinary tract infection. Sets of 10 to 40 colonies (dependent on the total number of colonies per plate) were selected from primary culture plates of specimens from multiple body sites or from subculture of blood culture broths. Isolates were assigned to a BamHI ribotype pattern, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of XbaI DNA digests was used to discriminate further within a ribotype (4). Strains were then allocated a ribotype number or PFGE letter as part of a larger study (3). This showed that 13 of 18 patients were infected with a single strain. In contrast, five patients harbored more than one genotype (Table 1). Four patients had two distinct genotypes detected, while one (A/C 383) had three. Different genotypes were detected both within a single specimen and from the same patient in samples collected on different days. Figure 1 illustrates the DNA profiles of the isolates from patient U1128. All of the 10 colonies from blood cultures were homogeneous, and the same strain was one of two recovered from a swab of a toe wound in this patient.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Variation in genotypes of B. pseudomallei from 5 of 18 patients with melioidosis

 

Figure 1
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. (A) BamHI ribotype patterns of B. pseudomallei isolates. Lanes 1 and 4, toe wound; lanes 2, 3, and 5, blood. (B) XbaI restriction patterns obtained by PFGE.

 
A statistical comparison (chi-square test) of the clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients infected with single versus multiple strains revealed that the latter were more associated with an acute presentation (5/13 versus 4/4), septicemia (5/12 versus 4/5), and a fatal outcome (6/13 versus 4/5) (P < 0.001), suggesting the possibility that this reflected an acute exposure to a large inoculum.

Infection with B. pseudomallei is thought to result from exposure to organisms in the environment. Relatively little is known about the occurrence of different genotypes of B. pseudomallei in the environment, but it is not unreasonable to propose that several different strains may coexist within the complex ecosystem represented by paddy field mud, for example. If so, then concurrent infection with more than one strain might thus be expected to occur on occasion. Infection with multiple strains of the same species is not unknown and was previously described in melioidosis by Sexton et al. (2), who reported the presence of two different ribotypes at different body sites of a single patient. The fact that the proportion of cases of recurrent melioidosis caused by strains with a genotype different from that of the primary isolate increases as the time between episodes increases, as reported by Maharjan et al. (1), does indeed support their suggestion that such cases represent reinfection rather than relapse. However, the finding here that 27% of patients harbored different strains concurrently accords with the frequency of reinfection (25%) reported by Maharjan et al. (1) and might provide an alternative explanation for the appearance of apparently new strains over time.


    FOOTNOTES
 
{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 20 December 2006. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Letter
 References
 

  1. Maharjan, B., N. Chantratita, M. Vesaratchavest, A. Cheng, V. Wuthiekanun, W. Chierakul, W. Chaowagul, N. P. Day, and S. J. Peacock. 2005. Recurrent melioidosis in patients in northeast Thailand is frequently due to reinfection rather than relapse. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:6032-6034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sexton, M. M., L. A. Goebel, A. J. Godfrey, W. Choawagul, N. J. White, and D. E. Woods. 1993. Ribotype analysis of Pseudomonas pseudomallei isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:238-243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Trakulsomboon, S. 1995. Strain identification and clinical epidemiology of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Ph.D. thesis. University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  4. Vadivelu, J., S. D. Puthucheary, A. Mifsud, B. S. Drasar, D. A. Dance, and T. L. Pitt. 1997. Ribotyping and DNA macrorestriction analysis of isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from cases of melioidosis in Malaysia. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 91:358-360.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tyrone L. Pitt*
Laboratory of HealthCare Associated Infection
Centre for Infections
Health Protection Agency
61 Colindale Avenue
London NW9 5HT, United Kingdom

Suwanna Trakulsomboon
Division of Infectious Diseases
Department of Medicine
Siriraj Hospital
Bangkok, Thailand,1

David A. B. Dance
Local and Regional Services (South West)
Health Protection Agency
Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom,2

* Phone: 011 44 0208 327 7224, Fax: 011 44 020 8200 7449, E-mail: tyrone.pitt{at}hpa.org.uk


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2007, p. 680-681, Vol. 45, No. 2
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01974-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.01974-06v1
45/2/680    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pitt, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dance, D. A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pitt, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dance, D. A. B.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS