Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2007, p. 1022-1023, Vol. 45, No. 3
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.02036-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Identification of Beijing Lineage Mycobacterium tuberculosis with Combined Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Loci 26, 31, and ETR-A
Pei-Ju Chin,
Chen-Che Chiu, and
Ruwen Jou*
Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology, Research and Diagnostic Center, Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health, 161 Kun-Yang St., Nan-Kang, Taipei 115, Taiwan, Republic of China
Received 3 October 2006/
Returned for modification 10 November 2006/
Accepted 11 January 2007

ABSTRACT
A rapid method for identification of Beijing lineage
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is still needed in regions of tuberculosis endemicity,
especially if genotyping methods are not readily accessible.
After analyzing 1,557 clinical isolates, a PCR method with combined
mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit loci 26, 31, and
ETR-A for differentiation of Beijing lineage isolates was established,
the sensitivity and specificity of which are 94.7% and 98.5%,
respectively.

TEXT
Beijing lineage
Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were first
recognized in 1995 (
14). They show closely related IS
6110 restriction
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and identical space oligonucleotide
typing (spoligotyping) patterns and accounted for 86% of tuberculosis
(TB) isolates from Beijing, China (
14), 40.5% of TB isolates
from Taiwan (
4), and a high proportion of TB isolates from the
rest of Asia (
3). In contrast, Beijing lineage isolates are
relatively rare in other regions of the world, such as Finland
(
1) and India (
1). These isolates are associated with transmission
of drug-resistant TB (
9) and might potentially become predominant
once introduced into a new population (
3). Thus, a simple and
rapid method for the identification and differentiation of Beijing
lineage isolates is needed in the regions of TB endemicity,
especially if genotyping methods are not readily available.
Recently, Rao et al. suggested the use of mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit (MIRU) locus 26 as a signature for Beijing genotype isolates (10). In their study, all Beijing genotype isolates carried seven copies of MIRU locus 26, while none of the non-Beijing genotype isolates did. Nevertheless, only 10 Beijing and 70 non-Beijing genotype isolates were evaluated. Here, we analyzed 1,557 clinical M. tuberculosis isolates with broad genetic diversity and found that the combination of MIRU loci 26, 31, and ETR-A is more suitable for Beijing lineage isolate identification than MIRU locus 26 alone.
In our study, each isolate was obtained from an individual patient with pulmonary and/or extrapulmonary TB. These isolates were characterized by IS6110 RFLP following standard protocols (12) and spoligotyping with a commercially available kit (Isogen Bioscience BV, Maarssen, The Netherlands) (6). The characteristic Beijing genotype is defined as isolates hybridized only to the last nine spacer oligonucleotides (spacers 35 to 43), whereas the Beijing-like genotype is hybridized to only some of the last nine spacers. The Beijing lineage group includes all isolates with characteristic Beijing genotype and isolates with possible Beijing-like genotypes. All other spoligotypes are defined as non-Beijing genotypes. Of the 1,557 isolates studied, 37.3% (581/1,557), 3.9% (61/1,557), and 58.8% (915/1,557) belonged to the Beijing, Beijing-like, and non-Beijing genotypes, respectively. Furthermore, a total of 479 RFLP profiles were identified among the 642 Beijing lineage isolates, which indicated that they were highly genetically diversified.
In order to test the suggestions of Rao et al., we performed the MIRU-variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) assay initially based on a modified high-throughput 15-locus MIRU-VNTR typing system developed by us previously (2). The results demonstrated that only 76.6% (445/581), 54.1% (33/61), and 4.5% (41/915) of Beijing, Beijing-like, and non-Beijing genotype isolates, respectively, had seven copies of MIRU locus 26 (Table 1). Since 23.4% (136/581) of Beijing genotype M. tuberculosis isolates did not have seven copies of MIRU locus 26, the application of this locus as the sole specific marker for Beijing genotype isolates needs further assessment and validation. Our previous study revealed that MIRU loci 10, 26, and 31 were highly discriminative; loci 4, 16, 23, 39, 40, ETR-A, and ETR-B were moderately discriminative; and loci 2, 20, 24, 27, and ETR-C were discriminative to a low degree (2). Therefore, we calculated the allelic diversities using the formula h = 1
Xi2 {n/(n 1)}, where n is the number of strains and Xi is the frequency of the ith allele at the locus (2), and evaluated the distribution of copy numbers of other MIRU loci among those isolates with discordant genotypes. The meta-analysis of various locus combinations indicated that inclusion of copy number 5 for both MIRU loci 31 and ETR-A could facilitate the differentiation of Beijing lineage isolates. After applying such a locus combination to the 1,557 M. tuberculosis isolates, the sensitivity and specificity reached 94.7% (608/642) and 98.5% (901/915) for Beijing lineage isolates and 98.5% (901/915) and 94.7% (608/642) for non-Beijing genotype ones (Table 2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Distribution of copy numbers of MIRU locus 26 of 581 Beijing, 61 Beijing-like, and 915 non-Beijing Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates
|
Consequently, a PCR assay using primers designed from MIRU loci
26, 31, and ETR-A is suggested for the initial differentiation
between Beijing lineage and non-Beijing genotype
M. tuberculosis isolates. The primer sequences of loci 26, 31, and ETR-A were
published by Supply et al. previously (
12) as follows: MIRU-26
(forward, TAGGTCTACCGTCGAAATCTGTGAC; reverse, CATAGGCGACCAGGCGAATAG),
MIRU-31 (forward, ACTGATTGGCTTCATACGGCTTTA; reverse, GTGCCGACGTGGTCTTGAT),
and ETR-A (forward, AAATCGGTCCCATCACCTTCTTAT; reverse, CGAAGCCTGGGGTGCCCGCGATTT).
The PCR and gel electrophoresis procedures were performed as
described previously (
11). Briefly, the reactants containing
genomic DNA, primer sets, and PCR premixed reagents were subjected
to a thermal cycling program starting with a denaturing step
of 15 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 1 min at 94°C
and 1 min at 50°C for MIRU locus 26 and 55°C for locus
31 and ETR-A, followed by 1.5 min at 72°C. The reactions
were terminated by incubation at 72°C for 10 min. The amplicons
were separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
The study by Rao et al. reveals the feasibility of using the MIRU locus 26 PCR for rapid identification and differentiation of the Beijing genotype of M. tuberculosis. However, the isolates selected by Rao et al. were based on the AmpliBASE-MT spoligotype database: the sizes and the representative features of the samples studied might not be adequate (8). It is recommended that highly genetically diversified M. tuberculosis isolates be selected for development of diagnostic methods. Thus, appropriate lineage-specific genetic markers for isolates of a certain lineage can be unambiguously suggested.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grant DOH95-DC-2011 from the Taiwan
Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health, and joint
grant 95-0324-19-F-01-00-00-00-35 from the National Science
Council and Department of Health, Taiwan, Republic of China.
We would like to thank Chuen-Sheue Chiang for her suggestions in the course of preparing the manuscript. We also would like to thank nine contract mycobacteriology laboratories across Taiwan for providing Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology, Research and Diagnostic Center, Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health, 161 Kun-Yang St., Nan-Kang, Taipei 115, Taiwan, Republic of China. Phone: (886) 2-26531370. Fax: (886) 2-26531387. E-mail:
rwj{at}cdc.gov.tw.

Published ahead of print on 24 January 2007. 

REFERENCES
1 - Brudey, K., J. Driscoll, L. Rigouts, W. Prodinger, A. Gori, S. Al-Hajoj, C. Allix, L. Aristimuno, J. Arora, V. Baumanis, L. Binder, P. Cafrune, A. Cataldi, S. Cheong, R. Diel, C. Ellermeier, J. Evans, M. Fauville-Dufaux, S. Ferdinand, D. de Viedma, C. Garzelli, L. Gazzola, H. Gomes, M. C. Guttierez, P. Hawkey, P. van Helden, G. Kadival, B. Kreiswirth, K. Kremer, M. Kubin, S. Kulkarni, B. Liens, T. Lillebaek, H. Ly, C. Martin, C. Martin, I. Mokrousov, O. Narvskaia, Y. Ngeow, L. Naumann, S. Niemann, I. Parwati, Z. Rahim, V. Rasolofo-Razanamparany, T. Rasolonavalona, M. L. Rossetti, S. Rusch-Gerdes, A. Sajduda, S. Samper, I. Shemyakin, U. Singh, A. Somoskovi, R. Skuce, D. van Soolingen, E. Streicher, P. Suffys, E. Tortoli, T. Tracevska, V. Vincent, T. Victor, R. Warren, S. Yap, K. Zaman, F. Portaels, N. Rastogi, and C. Sola. 2006. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology. BMC Microbiol. 6:23-39.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Chin, P. J., and R. Jou. 2005. A modified automated high-throughput mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit method for genotyping Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 53:325-327.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Glynn, J. R. 2006. Beijing/W genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:736-743.[Medline]
4 - Jou, R., C.-Y. Chiang, and W.-L. Huang. 2005. Distribution of the Beijing family genotypes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Taiwan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:95-100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Reference deleted.
6 - Kamerbeek, J., L. Schouls, A. Kolk, M. van Agterveld, D. van Soolingen, S. Kuijper, A. Bunschoten, H. Molhuizen, R. Shaw, M. Goyal, and J. van Embden. 1997. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:907-914.[Abstract]
7 - Reference deleted.
8 - Majeed, A. A., N. Ahmed, K. R. Rao, S. Ghousunnissa, F. Kauser, B. Bose, H. A. Nagarajaram, V. M. Katoch, D. V. Cousins, L. A. Sechi, R. H. Gilman, and S. E. Hasnain. 2004. AmpliBASE MTTM: a Mycobacterium tuberculosis diversity knowledgebase. Bioinformatics 20:989-992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Malik, A. N., and P. Godfrey-Faussett. 2005. Effects of genetic variability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains on the presentation of disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 5:174-183.[Medline]
10 - Rao, K. R., N. Ahmed, S. Srinivas, L. A. Sechi, and S. E. Hasnain. 2006. Rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotypes on the basis of the mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit locus 26 signature. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:274-277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Supply, P., E. Mazars, S. Lesjean, V. Vincent, B. Gicquel, and C. Locht. 2000. Variable human minisatellite-like regions in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome. Mol. Microbiol. 36:762-771.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Supply, P., S. Lesjean, E. Savine, K. Kremer, D. van Soolingen, and C. Locht. 2001. Automated high-throughput genotyping for study of global epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3563-3571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - van Embden, J. D. A., M. D. Cave, J. T. Crawford, J. W. Dale, K. D. Eisenach, B. Gicquel, P. Hermans, C. Martin, R. McAdam, T. M. Shinnick, and P. M. Small. 1993. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:406-409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - van Soolingen, D., L. Qian, P. E. W. de Haas, J. T. Douglas, H. Traore, F. Portaels, H. Z. Qing, D. Enkhsaikan, P. Nymadawa, and J. D. A. van Embden. 1995. Predominance of a single genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in countries of east Asia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:3234-3238.[Abstract]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2007, p. 1022-1023, Vol. 45, No. 3
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.02036-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.