Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2007, p. 1374-1375, Vol. 45, No. 4
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00076-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| LETTER TO THE EDITOR |

|
|
|---|
SubAB was first isolated from an Australian non-O157 STEC strain 98NK2, associated with an outbreak of HUS in children (8). In mice, parenteral SubAB causes microangiopathy, suggesting a direct role in endothelial damage (7, 8). An estimated 10% of Australian STEC clinical isolates carry the subAB operon; in these strains, its presence is associated with stx2 and with the ehxA gene (7). Furthermore, these strains lack the eae gene encoding the outer membrane adhesion intimin encoded in the locus of the enterocyte effacement pathogenicity island. The global distribution of SubAB-encoding STEC strains is unknown. Although the epidemiology of D+HUS in Australia differs from that in the United States, with non-O157 STEC implicated more frequently in Australia, we hypothesized that STEC strains from the United States also contain the subAB operon.
STEC strains originating from sources in the United States were selected from two well-characterized, previously described strain collections (2, 9). Previously published multiplex PCR data for stx1, stx2, eae, and ehxA and serogroup/type information were used to select representative strains, allowing assessment of potential associations between the subAB operon and these virulence factors and different O serogroups. Three colonies were assessed in independent PCR runs to ensure correct strain classification, using 98NK2 as a positive control and two nonpathogenic E. coli laboratory strains, HB101 and XLI-Blue, as negative controls.
Table 1 shows that STEC strains of diverse origins from the United States harbor subA, confirming that SubAB-expressing organisms are present on the North American subcontinent. Of 46 isolates tested, 10 strains were subA positive: 6 from cattle, 3 from diarrhea patients, and 1 from an environmental water source. Furthermore, these strains have a virulence gene profile similar to that of subA-positive strains from Australia; 9 of 10 STEC strains from the United States that tested positive for subA had the gene encoding the stx2 toxin variant only, all were eae negative, and all were ehxA positive. Only one subA-positive STEC strain from the United States was positive for both stx1 and stx2. None of the 22 eae-positive strains had subA. Table 2 summarizes these results. Since these strains were specifically selected to represent different serogroups and virulence markers, no conclusions regarding the overall prevalence of SubAB in the United States can be drawn.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Presence of subA and other putative virulence genes in STEC strainsa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Summary of virulence factor coexpression of subA-positive and subA-negative STEC isolates
|
Published ahead of print on 7 February 2007. |
|
|---|
|
A. Khaitan D. M. Jandhyala C. M. Thorpe* TuftsNew England Medical Center 750 Washington Street, Box 041 Boston, Massachusetts 02111
J. M. Ritchie
A. W. Paton
| ||||||
| * Phone: (617) 636-0245, Fax: (617) 636-5292, E-mail: cthorpe{at}tufts-nemc.org |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»