Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2007, p. 1618-1620, Vol. 45, No. 5
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01405-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Departments of Laboratory Medicine,1 Epidemiology,2 Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington,3 Programs in Biostatistics,4 Infectious Disease, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington,5 Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington6
Received 7 July 2006/ Returned for modification 4 September 2006/ Accepted 18 February 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Over the last 5 to 6 years, we have accumulated a large number of genital samples in HSV type 2 (HSV-2)-seropositive and HSV-seronegative participants and wanted to use this database to optimize the assay's sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, we have performed a series of dilution experiments to define the sensitivity of the PCR assay at low copy numbers. Using these experiments, we more accurately computed the test sensitivity, specificity, and misclassification rates.
We sought to determine the optimal cutoff for HSV shedding detection by PCR by comparing misclassification rates. A result is misclassified if the participant was shedding but is not detected (false negative) or if the participant was not shedding but tested positive by PCR (false positive). Misclassification rates require estimates of (i) sensitivity, (ii) specificity, (iii) shedding rate, and (iv) shedding quantity. These quantities were obtained as described below. The details of the assay were reported previously (8). Samples from each subject were not run sequentially by collection time.
Determination of sensitivity. Multiple samples at various concentrations of HSV-2 were created by sequentially diluting a single sample of a known amount. The sensitivity of the assay was computed as the proportion of samples with detectable virus at each concentration. Fifteen HSV-2 concentrations were created, and similar concentrations were combined to provide seven ranges of from <1 to >75 copies per 20 µl. At least 38 repetitions in each range were made, with over 500 repetitions in total. Figure 1 shows each dilution and the estimated sensitivity based on the proportion of samples that were PCR positive. As expected, the sensitivity of detection increased at higher copy number.
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Detection probabilities (quantity-specific sensitivity) of HSV-2-positive samples by HSV-2 concentration. The 95% confidence intervals are indicated with error bars, and the numbers of samples used to estimate sensitivity are shown below the horizontal axis.
|
Determination of specificity. We analyzed genital swabs from participants known to be HSV-1 and HSV-2 seronegative by Western blotting. We enrolled both pregnant women at the time of labor and nonpregnant participants who participated in daily home swabbing sessions. Two samples (0.6%) obtained from 350 pregnant HSV-seronegative women were found to be positive by PCR. Among six other HSV-seronegative participants who contributed 915 days during home swabbing sessions, 7 days (0.8%) from three subjects were positive by PCR. Typing results demonstrated HSV-1 in all three subjects. Most of these positive results were of low copy number. Thus, the specificity of the assay was above 99% (95% confidence interval within 98.4% to 100%) for all cutoffs considered.
Computation of misclassification.
We used the following formula, where s is the shedding rate,
is the specificity, and
k and pk are the sensitivity of PCR and the observed frequency of shedding in copy level range k, respectively (both s and the observed pk are estimated from the shedding studies of HSV-2-seropositive participants,
k was from the dilution study, and
was from HSV-seronegative participants): misclassified = false positives + false negatives = (1
) x (1 s) +
(1
k) x pk x s.
Figure 2 depicts the estimated false-positive, false-negative, and total misclassification rates, with shedding rates between 1% and 50%, using three cutoffs:
1,
5, and
10 copies per 20 µl. False-positive results comprised only a minority of misclassified results. At shedding rates greater than 8%, the lowest cutoff resulted in the lowest total misclassification rate.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Misclassification rates by shedding rate and cutoff for determination of positivity. Total bar height indicates overall misclassification, with shading distinguishing false negatives (neg.) and false positives (pos.).
|
Quantitative PCR for HSV DNA appears to be highly accurate. The test probably detects all shedding when the actual quantity is greater than 75 copies per 20 µl (3.75 x 103 copies/ml) (67% of received samples) and correctly identifies more than 99% of negative samples. Given the high specificity of the assay, and the occurrence of low positives in substantial numbers (3% of samples) and in temporal association with episodes and lesions, a detection of even low copy numbers of HSV DNA (1 copy/20 µl or 50 copies/ml) is almost invariably a true positive.
However, a cutoff determination also requires a consideration of the clinical laboratory context. For example, it may be deemed more risky to provide a false-positive diagnosis of genital HSV in an adult, and hence, we would prefer the cutoff with maximum specificity, whereas for detecting HSV encephalitis or neonatal herpes, the consequences of a false-negative assay are high.
Colleagues Ted Gooley and Katherine Guthrie at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center provided valuable advice.
Published ahead of print on 28 February 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»