This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Songer, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Songer, J. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2007, p. 1963-1964, Vol. 45, No. 6
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00224-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Prevalence of PCR Ribotypes among Clostridium difficile Isolates from Pigs, Calves, and Other Species{triangledown}

Kevin Keel,1,{dagger} Jon S. Brazier,2 Karen W. Post,3 Scott Weese,4 and J. Glenn Songer1*

Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721,1 Anaerobe Reference Laboratory, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XW, United Kingdom,2 Rollins Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607,3 Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada4

Received 29 January 2007/ Returned for modification 25 February 2007/ Accepted 28 March 2007


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
PCR ribotypes were obtained for 144 Clostridium difficile isolates from neonatal pigs. Porcine isolates comprised four PCR ribotypes, but one, ribotype 078, predominated (83%). This was also the most common ribotype (94%) among 33 calf isolates but was rarely identified in other species.


arrow
TEXT
 
Numerous epidemiologic investigations of human Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) have employed phenotyping and genotyping to better understand transmission patterns and risk factors (3, 7, 8). In contrast, few studies have typed isolates from animals or environments where they are housed. Most studies attempted to test the hypothesis that humans acquire C. difficile from animals, and the results have varied (1, 9). We know little about the epidemiology of C. difficile within animal populations, and uncertainties persist as to the relationships, if any, of such animal strains to those associated with human CDAD.

CDAD has emerged as a significant economic concern for swine producers, but little is known about transmission patterns in hog operations (11, 14). The objective of this study was to assess the strain types occurring among various species with CDAD. PCR ribotyping was used due to its proven discriminatory power, reproducibility, and relative simplicity (2). Different strains of C. difficile possess different numbers of rRNA genes, and the intergenic sequences vary in size, yielding PCR products of distinct sizes for each designated ribotype. Isolates from five host species were examined, but porcine isolates were the most numerous (Table 1). Neonatal pigs in Iowa, Ohio, Montana, North Carolina, and Utah were sampled. All bovine isolates were collected from male dairy calves (<2 months of age) shipped to Arizona from multiple states (the precise origins were not available). Equine isolates were from Kansas (n = 1), Arizona (n = 1), and Ontario, Canada (n = 17), or an unknown source (n = 1). Canine isolates were from Ontario. Human isolates were from patients in two hospitals in Colorado and one hospital in Louisiana. Ages of dogs, horses, and humans were typically not reported.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. C. difficile PCR ribotype prevalence by species

Primary isolations were made by culturing stool samples or rectal swabs by using standard techniques (5, 15). Colonies were passed through brain heart infusion agar with cysteine (0.05%), yeast extract (0.5%), and defibrinated bovine blood (2%). All isolates were examined for the toxin genes tcdA and tcdB by use of an established multiplex PCR technique (6, 13). PCR ribotyping was performed as previously described (10, 12). Ribotype classifications were based on the typing scheme established at the United Kingdom Anaerobe Reference Unit in Cardiff, Wales (12).

Nineteen PCR ribotypes were identified from the 232 C. difficile isolates examined (Table 1). Bovine and swine isolates were much less diverse than those from dogs, horses, or humans. Three PCR ribotypes were identified from calves, and four were identified from pigs. PCR ribotype 078 (type 078) accounted for 94% of bovine and 83% of swine isolates. This ribotype did not occur among the canine isolates and represented only 5.0% of equine and 4.4% of human isolates.

Canine isolates comprised five ribotypes, and 42% were type 010. Most equine isolates (30%) were type 015. Human isolates included 12 ribotypes. The most common was type 020, with 22% prevalence. Overall, there was a considerable overlap of equine and human ribotypes with those of other species (Table 1). However, 4 of the 12 human-associated ribotypes did not occur in any of the other host species.

Although more isolates from pigs and calves were examined, much less ribotype diversity was observed among these species. The limited diversity among porcine isolates is even more remarkable when we consider that they were collected from a large geographic area. In contrast, the origins of canine, equine, and human isolates lacked significant geographic variability.

Type 078 was predominant in both pigs and calves, although it is almost certain that there was no interspecies contact. The swine operations that were the source of isolates maintained strict biosecurity such that pigs at each location were isolated not only from other species but also from other herds of pigs. Biosecurity associated with the calves was much more relaxed. Nonetheless, dairy calves were typically kept in confinement with no exposure to other species. The only factor common to both species is close contact with human caretakers. However, only one of the human isolates was type 078. This ribotype did not occur among the 13 canine isolates and was represented by only one of the equine isolates. Therefore, it appears that type 078 is the most common PCR ribotype circulating independently among pigs and calves in the United States and among numerous widely separated populations of pigs. An alternative hypothesis is that pigs and calves are exposed to varied C. difficile strains but are both more susceptible to colonization by type 078. It seems unlikely that such different species would share a common susceptibility not seen in the other species examined, but this hypothesis cannot be disproved by our data alone.

Age-specific physiology should also be considered. The calves were functional monogastrics due to their age and, like the pigs, subsisted on milk. Milk, even from two different species, is more similar than the feed rations given to adult hogs and cows. Furthermore, the microbial environment of the two species, as adults, undoubtedly contributes to a great disparity in the normal flora and microbial food chain. It would be interesting to compare ribotypes of C. difficile isolates from adult cows and hogs to those occurring in the neonates.

Even though a single ribotype was predominant in the majority of pigs and calves, it is a mistake to assume that there is no heterogeneity among these isolates. Differences in colony morphology among isolates of type 078 from both species were noted (data not shown) and may reflect some underlying strain differences. PCR ribotyping is a useful technique, but its discriminatory power is not absolute. Type 001, a common ribotype causing human CDAD, can be subtyped using other methods including randomly amplified polymorphic DNA, ribospacer PCR, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (4). It cannot be assumed that isolates of type 078 from pigs and calves are identical, but this technique does demonstrate that they differ significantly from the most common ribotypes occurring in all other species examined.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology, Bldg. 90, Rm. 229, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. Phone: (520) 621-2962. Fax: (520) 621-6366. E-mail: gsonger{at}u.arizona.edu Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 11 April 2007. Back

{dagger} Present address: The Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Arroyo, L. G., S. A. Kruth, B. M. Willey, H. R. Staempfli, D. E. Low, and J. S. Weese. 2005. PCR ribotyping of Clostridium difficile isolates originating from human and animal sources. J. Med. Microbiol. 54:163-166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Bidet, P., V. Lalande, B. Salauze, B. Burghoffer, V. Avesani, M. Delmee, A. Rossier, F. Barbut, and J. C. Petit. 2000. Comparison of PCR-ribotyping, arbitrarily primed PCR, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2484-2487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Brazier, J. S. 2001. Typing of Clostridium difficile. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 7:428-431.[CrossRef][Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Fawley, W. N., J. Freeman, and M. H. Wilcox. 2003. Evidence to support the existence of subgroups within the UK epidemic Clostridium difficile strain (PCR ribotype 1). J. Hosp. Infect. 54:74-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. George, W. L., V. L. Sutter, D. Citron, and S. M. Finegold. 1979. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 9:214-219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Gumerlock, P. H., Y. J. Tang, J. B. Weiss, and J. Silva, Jr. 1993. Specific detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:507-511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Hubert, B., V. G. Loo, A. M. Bourgault, L. Poirier, A. Dascal, E. Fortin, M. Dionne, and M. Lorange. 2007. A portrait of the geographic dissemination of the Clostridium difficile North American pulsed-field type 1 strain and the epidemiology of C. difficile-associated disease in Quebec. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44:238-244.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Kuijper, E. J., B. Coignard, and P. Tull. 2006. Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12(Suppl. 6):2-18.[Medline]
    9. 9
  9. O'Neill, G., J. E. Adams, R. A. Bowman, and T. V. Riley. 1993. A molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile isolates from humans, animals and their environments. Epidemiol. Infect. 111:257-264.[Medline]
    10. 10
  10. O'Neill, G., F. Ogunsola, J. Brazier, and B. Duerden. 1996. Modification of a PCR ribotyping method for application as a routine typing scheme for Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe 2:205-209.[CrossRef]
    11. 11
  11. Songer, J., K. Post, D. Larson, B. Jost, and R. Glock. 2000. Infection of neonatal swine with Clostridium difficile. Swine Health Prod. 8:185-189.
    12. 12
  12. Stubbs, S. L., J. S. Brazier, G. L. O'Neill, and B. I. Duerden. 1999. PCR targeted to the 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer region of Clostridium difficile and construction of a library consisting of 116 different PCR ribotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:461-463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Tang, Y. J., P. H. Gumerlock, J. B. Weiss, and J. Silva, Jr. 1994. Specific detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A gene sequences in clinical isolates. Mol. Cell. Probes 8:463-467.[CrossRef][Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Waters, E. H., J. P. Orr, E. G. Clark, and C. M. Schaufele. 1998. Typhlocolitis caused by Clostridium difficile in suckling piglets. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 10:104-108.[Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Wilson, K. H., M. J. Kennedy, and F. R. Fekety. 1982. Use of sodium taurocholate to enhance spore recovery on a medium selective for Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15:443-446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2007, p. 1963-1964, Vol. 45, No. 6
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00224-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Songer, J. G., Trinh, H.T., Dial, S. M., Brazier, J. S., Glock, R. D. (2009). Equine colitis X associated with infection by Clostridium difficile NAP1/027. jvdi 21: 377-380 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bouvet, P. J. M., Popoff, M. R. (2008). Genetic Relatedness of Clostridium difficile Isolates from Various Origins Determined by Triple-Locus Sequence Analysis Based on Toxin Regulatory Genes tcdC, tcdR, and cdtR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3703-3713 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rupnik, M., Widmer, A., Zimmermann, O., Eckert, C., Barbut, F. (2008). Clostridium difficile Toxinotype V, Ribotype 078, in Animals and Humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2146-2146 [Full Text]  
  • Pirs, T., Ocepek, M., Rupnik, M. (2008). Isolation of Clostridium difficile from food animals in Slovenia. J Med Microbiol 57: 790-792 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Goorhuis, A., Debast, S. B., van Leengoed, L. A. M. G., Harmanus, C., Notermans, D. W., Bergwerff, A. A., Kuijper, E. J., Songer, J. G. (2008). Clostridium difficile PCR Ribotype 078: an Emerging Strain in Humans and in Pigs?. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1157-1158 [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Songer, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Songer, J. G.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»