Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Creti, R. Articles by Orefici, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Creti, R. Articles by Orefici, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2007, p. 2249-2256, Vol. 45, No. 7
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00513-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

emm Types, Virulence Factors, and Antibiotic Resistance of Invasive Streptococcus pyogenes Isolates from Italy: What Has Changed in 11 Years?

Roberta Creti,^* Monica Imperi, Lucilla Baldassarri, Marco Pataracchia, Simona Recchia, Giovanna Alfarone, and Graziella Orefici

Dipartimento di Malattie Infettive, Parassitarie ed Immunomediate, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy

Received 7 March 2007/ Returned for modification 12 April 2007/ Accepted 27 April 2007

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
To investigate the epidemiology and characteristics of invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) disease over 11 years in Italy, this study compared the emm types and the superantigen toxin genes speA and speC as well as the erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline susceptibilities of 207 invasive GAS strains collected during two national enhanced surveillance periods (1994 to 1996 and 2003 to 2005) and the time between each set of surveillance periods. The present study demonstrated that emm1 strains were consistently responsible for about 20% of invasive GAS infections, while variations in the frequencies of the other types were noted, although the causes of most cases of invasive infections were restricted to emm1, emm3, emm4, emm6, emm12, and emm18. During the 1994 to 1996 surveillance period, an emm89 epidemic clone spread across the northern part of Italy. A restricted macrolide resistance phenotype-type distribution of the bacteriophage-encoded speA toxin as well as of macrolide resistance genes was noted over time. Indeed, the recent acquisition of macrolide resistance in previously susceptible emm types was observed.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Streptococcus pyogenes, or group A streptococcus (GAS), is a strictly human pathogen that infects individuals of all ages, with symptoms ranging from a carrier state to mild or acute pharyngotonsillitis and invasive disease. The organism constitutes an important cause of morbidity and mortality all over the world (10, 22, 33).

The epidemiology of severe GAS disease has been changing over the last 20 years: along with the classical suppurative and nonsuppurative forms, new manifestations such as necrotizing fasciitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome were described in the early 1990s, and the implementation of enhanced surveillance programs for invasive GAS infections was urged in many European countries (21).

Italy also launched an enhanced surveillance program for GAS invasive diseases in the years 1994 to 1996 in the wake of the new awareness and attention raised after the reporting of clusters of necrotizing fasciitis in England (11). The surveillance was suspended because the number of cases per year remained constant over the 3-year period (34).

A further nationwide surveillance program for invasive GAS disease was undertaken for a period of 2 years (2003 to 2005) within the Strep-EURO project on severe GAS infection in Europe, funded by the Fifth Framework Program of the European Commission's Directorate-General for Research (21).

The present investigation compared the emm types and the superantigen toxin genes speA and speC and the erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline susceptibilities by phenotypic and molecular methods of 207 invasive GAS strains collected during the two enhanced surveillance periods (1994 to 1996 and 2003 to 2005) and in the time between each set of surveillance periods in order to study the changes in the molecular epidemiology of the strains circulating in Italy over the 11 years.

(This work was presented in part at the XVIth Lancefield International Symposium on Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases, 25 to 29 September 2005, Palm Cove, Australia [R. Creti, M. Imperi, L. Baldassarri, M. Pataracchia, S. Recchia, F. Cardona, G. Alfarone, C. von Hunostein, and G. Orefici, Abstr. XVIth Lancefield Int. Symp. Streptococci Streptococcal Dis., abstr. 84].)

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Strain collections. During a 2-year nationwide enhanced surveillance (from March 2003 to February 2005) as part of the Fifth Framework Strep-EURO project (21), 102 notifications of invasive infections and 89 GAS strains from patients with invasive infections were received. A case of invasive GAS disease was defined as isolation of the bacterium from a site that is normally sterile, like blood, cerebrospinal fluid, joint aspirates, pericardial and peritoneal fluids, bone, deep tissues, or abscesses, at the time of surgery or necropsy. In case of toxic shock-like syndrome, GAS strains isolated from a nonsterile site (such as the skin, throat, or vagina) were also included (1).

The study also included 79 GAS strains from patients with invasive disease received during the enhanced surveillance from 1994 to 1996 (16, 34) and 39 invasive GAS strains collected between the two enhanced surveillance periods (1997 to 2002).

Bacterial identification. The bacteria were grown overnight on 5% defibrinated sheep blood agar plates at 37°C in 5% CO₂. The bacterial strain identification was confirmed by using either the Rapid ID 32 Strep system (bioMérieux, La Balme les Grottes, France) or the Dryspot streptococcal grouping kit (Oxoid Limited, Hampshire, United Kingdom).

DNA isolation and PCR. Total DNA was prepared by a Chelex-based procedure with the InstaGene matrix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The isolates were investigated for the presence of the speA and speC genes by PCR, as described previously (16). A multiplex PCR for the identification of the macrolide resistance determinant mef(A), erm(B), and erm(A) subclass (TR) genes was performed (16). Endonuclease digestion of the mef amplicon with BamHI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) was carried out to ascertain the mef(A) allele identification (27).

The PCR conditions and primers used for the determination of the tetM and tetO genes were described previously (30).

emm typing. Determination of the emm type was performed according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention protocol (7). A sequence was considered to belong to a specific emm gene when, over the first 160 bases of the sequence, it had 95% or greater identity with that of the reference emm gene.

Susceptibility test methods. Resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin was assessed phenotypically both by Etest (BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) for MIC determinations and by the Kirby-Bauer double-disk diffusion method (13) to assign the constitutive, inducible, and macrolide resistance phenotype (19). Only the strains received during the Strep-EURO survey were assayed for resistance to tetracycline, which was determined by Etest.

Statistical inference. The data were analyzed by using the STATISTICA program for Windows (StatSoft). Categorical data were compared by Fisher's exact test. Differences were considered significant when P was <0.05.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Comparison of the 1994 to 1996 and the 2003 to 2005 (Strep-EURO survey) enhanced surveillance programs. Both surveillance programs relied on passive notification of cases of invasive GAS infection. We promoted information about the program among hospital medical staff and through the diffusion of communications in the major national medical journals. During the most recent surveillance, an informative Web page was created at our institutional website, and an agreement was made with the National Surveillance Program on Nosocomial Infections to implement the collection of GAS strains.

The number of reported cases was slightly higher in the Strep-EURO survey than in the previous 3-year surveillance (Table 1). Participation in the survey was also more effective and homogeneous throughout the country in the Strep-EURO survey than in the previous survey. Among the 60 hospitals that adhered to the Strep-EURO initiative, 50% reported cases of severe GAS infections. The mortality rates were comparable between the two surveillance efforts (21 to 24%; P = 0.71). Interestingly, the mean age of the patients was lower in the Strep-EURO program, in which, contrary to the previous surveillance, pediatric cases were reported. Chickenpox was a risk factor for invasive GAS disease in only one pediatric case.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Comparison of selected epidemiological aspects between the two surveillance programs

The most common clinical conditions in the former surveillance effort, such as sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis, and streptococcal shock syndrome, were significantly less represented in the Strep-EURO survey (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

The diverse spectrum of invasive GAS diseases in the Strep-EURO survey, either alone or in association, included abscesses with bacteremia (21%), cellulitis (10%), erysipelas with bacteremia (7%), pneumonia (7%), septic arthritis (3%), and puerperal sepsis (2%).

emm typing data. The distribution of emm types indicated that emm1 strains were consistently responsible for about 20% of invasive GAS infections over the 11 years of observation, while variations in the frequencies of the other types were noted (Fig. 1). The most striking example regarded emm89: 25% of the invasive GAS infections in the 1994 to 1996 survey were caused by this type. Afterward, its prevalence gradually declined over time and it was responsible for only a few cases in the 2003 to 2005 survey.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Distribution of emm types among GAS strains isolated from patients with invasive infections during the 1994 to 1996 enhanced surveillance (top), from 1997 to 2002 (middle), and during the Strep-EURO survey (2003 to 2005) (bottom).

In the Strep-EURO survey, emm1, emm12, emm3, and emm4 accounted for 50% of all cases. Nevertheless, 32 different types were identified in the 11 years, with fluctuations in prevalence over time. Many of the 32 types were responsible for only a few cases but were isolated throughout the study period (e.g., emm5, emm11, emm22, emm24, emm28, emm58, emm77, emm78, and emm118), while others (emm9, emm33, emm53, emm68, emm70, emm76, emm79, emm85, emm87, emm102, emm110, and emm114) were detected only once and have very seldom been reported in the literature to be circulating in Europe and to be involved in invasive GAS infections (35).

Among the most widespread emm types, emm1, emm4, emm12, and emm89 presented the same allele over the entire period of observation, while emm3, emm6, and emm18 presented one or two less frequent allelic variants with respect to the dominant allele (Table 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Description of subtypes among the most common emm type isolates in the 1994 to 1996 surveillance study, from 1997 to 2002, and in the Strep-EURO study

The emm types responsible for fatal cases (34/207) were emm1 (11 cases), emm3 (10 cases), emm4 (2 cases), emm5 (1 case), emm6 (1 case), emm12 (2 cases), emm18 (1 case), emm22 (1 case), emm77 (1 case), emm78 (1 case), emm85 (1 case), and emm89 (2 cases).

Susceptibility testing data. The rates of macrolide resistance of the GAS strains declined over time (26.5% in the years 1994 to 1996, 18.9% in the years 2003 to 2005; P = 0.27) (Fig. 2). While macrolide resistance as a result of methylation of the 23S rRNA gene mediated by the erm(B) gene was the predominant mechanism of resistance in the period from 1994 to 2001, the efflux-mediated mechanism of resistance by the mef(A) gene became prevalent among macrolide-resistant strains after 2002. An association between the emm types and the genetic determinants of macrolide resistance was noted during the entire period of the study, and in view of this, the dynamics of macrolide resistance could partially be explained by the decrease in the number of emm89 strains, which were mostly erm(B) positive, and to the emergence of a limited number of strains with previously susceptible emm types, like emm1 and emm44/61, that possessed the mef(A) gene (Table 3). These emm types were never mef(A) positive in a study of strains isolated from throat swabs from children from 1996 to 2001 (15, 16).

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Incidence of macrolide resistance and erm(B), erm(A) subclass (TR), and mef(A) genes among GAS strains isolated from patients with invasive infections during the 1994 to 1996 enhanced surveillance (left), from 1997 to 2002 (middle), and during the Strep-EURO survey (2003 to 2005) (right).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Association among macrolide resistance genes and the emm types isolated during the 11 years of studya

The distribution of MICs for macrolide resistance among the strains collected during the Strep-EURO survey are represented in Fig. 3A and B and correlated well with the genotypic resistance; i.e., constitutive resistance to both erythromycin and clindamycin (CR phenotype) was associated with higher MICs and was related to the presence of the erm(B) gene, resistance to erythromycin and inducible resistance to clindamycin (IR phenotype) was associated with the presence of the erm(A) subclass (TR) gene, resistance to erythromycin was associated with lower MICs, and susceptibility to clindamycin (macrolide resistance [M] phenotype) was associated with the presence of the mef(A) gene.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Distribution of invasive GAS isolates collected during the Strep-EURO survey according to the MICs of erythromycin (A) and clindamycin (B). M, IR (inducible resistance), and CR (constitutive resistance) indicate the phenotype.

Tetracycline resistance was assessed only for GAS strains received during the Strep-EURO survey and presented a bimodal distribution. Unlike macrolide resistance, tetracycline resistance was not found to be associated with particular emm types; all resistant strains (11 [12.3%] strains) possessed the tetM gene; in 3 strains it was associated both with the tetO gene and with macrolide resistance genetic determinants, suggesting the presence of different elements (Table 4).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 4. Characteristics of tetracycline-resistant invasive GAS strains isolated during the Strep-EURO survey

Erythrogenic toxin gene distribution. The incidences of the speA gene were 25.3% in the 1994 to 1996 survey and 40% during the Strep-EURO study; the speC gene was detected in 29.1% of the isolates in the 1994 to 1996 survey and 47.2% of the isolates in the 2003 to 2005 survey, therefore showing an increasing prevalence over time. The incidences of the speA and speC genes among the invasive GAS strains collected in the period between the surveys were 46.1% and 33.3%, respectively (Fig. 4). As for the macrolide resistance genes, a restricted M phenotype-type distribution of the bacteriophage-encoded speA toxin was noted (emm1, emm3, emm18, emm22, emm24, emm76), while the distribution of the speC toxin gene was more random (data not shown).

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. Incidence of speA (dark gray) and speC (light gray) genes of invasive GAS strains isolated during the three indicated periods.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
In Italy, except for scarlet fever, severe GAS infection is not a notifiable disease. In both surveys described here, therefore, the data were collected on a voluntary basis and it was not possible to know the total number of invasive GAS infections in Italy in each year.

Considering that in the 6-year period separating the surveillance studies many fewer cases were identified and many fewer strains were collected, the ability to launch enhanced nationwide surveillance studies, even if they were based on voluntary notification, was extremely useful for the study of the dynamics of circulating strains.

The present study is the first to consider such a large number of invasive GAS strains isolated in Italy during an extended period of observation. A few studies on the prevalence over time of M-protein serotypes among invasive GAS strains in Italy are available, but only small collections of isolates were analyzed. In those studies, the majority of strains belonged to emm types 1, 4, and 12, followed by types 28 and 77, with emm1 and emm12 declining over time and types 3, 22, and 77 appearing more recently (25, 26).

Recent European studies that have considered a congruous number of invasive GAS isolates over a large span of time reported that similar emm types are involved more frequently in severe GAS disease. Given the fluctuations in the serotype distribution over time, emm1 isolates were the most prevalent in The Netherlands from 1994 to 2003, followed by emm3, emm89, emm28, emm12, and emm6 (37), as well as in Denmark, where a trend for increasing numbers of emm1 isolates in the years from 1999 to 2002 was noted (17, 18). An increasing number of M-nontypeable GAS isolates from patients with invasive diseases observed during the years from 2000 to 2002 in the United Kingdom belonged to higher M phenotype-type numbers, including emm89 and the newly designated emm types (35). A high frequency of emm28 and emm89 isolates has also been noted in recent years in other northern European countries where active nationwide surveillance programs are in place (32), and this trend has been confirmed by preliminary analysis of the data from the Strep-EURO project (20). Outside Europe, the most common emm types recovered from large studies of only invasive GAS infections were the M1, M3 and MPT2967 types in Canada (36); emm1, emm3, emm12, emm28, and emm89 in the United States (data from the Active Bacterial Core Surveillance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention); and M3 and M28 in Israel, where an unusually low incidence of M1 strains (1.2%) was noted (28, 29). The present investigation demonstrated that in 11 years, the causes of most cases of invasive infections in Italy were restricted to emm1, emm3, emm4, emm6, emm12, and emm18. The number of invasive infections caused by emm1, emm3, and emm6 was quite stable in the two surveillance periods, while the number due to emm12, emm4, and emm18 strains increased. The most striking differences from the data from the northern European countries were the paucity of emm28 strains during the entire period of observation and of emm89 strains in the last 7 years. It is noteworthy that during the 1994 to 1996 surveillance period, an emm89 epidemic clone [speA and speC negative, erm(B) positive] spread across the northern part of Italy and persisted until 1998. Its peak incidence was in the years 1996 and 1997.

The increased intrinsic virulence of some GAS types, particularly types M1 and M3, has been reported. The acquisition of prophages is considered the major source of genetic diversity within GAS isolates (5, 9); for example, the acquisition of speA appears to give to M3 isolates a selective advantage over speA-negative isolates (8).

A sudden increase in the numbers of invasive emm1 isolates with a contemporary change in the superantigen-associated repertoire (decrease of emm1-speA strains and increase of emm1-speC strains) has been interpreted to result from the possible introduction of a new emm1 subclone in Denmark (18). The repertoire of erythrogenic toxin genes analyzed in the present study was limited to the most often investigated speA and speC toxin gene profile, but no evident change in their prevalence among either the invasive emm1 or emm3 strains isolated was noted. In particular, emm1 strains always carried the speA gene, rarely carried the speC gene, and had the T1 pattern; moreover, those strains isolated during the Strep-EURO study were all of sequence type 28 (M. van Linden, personal communication). These findings are suggestive of the closeness of our emm1 strains to the globally disseminated clonal M1T1 strain, which is responsible for cases of highly invasive human disease and which has peculiar characteristics, such as three prophages, one of which carries the speA superantigen gene, and the ability to modulate the expression of selected virulence factors by phage-dependent speB proteolytic activity (2, 12, 14).

A more interesting finding during the recent Strep-EURO survey was the isolation of two emm1 strains that were macrolide resistant as a result of the acquisition of the mef(A) gene.

Comparison of the data from the present study with those from our previous studies indicated that over the 11-year period of observation an emm type presented the same subtype and repertoire of spe macrolide resistance genes, regardless of whether they were isolated from invasive infections or throat swab samples and regardless of whether they were responsible for either no symptoms or severe disease (16), indicating their broad spread in the community and the clonal nature of GAS strains in Italy.

The nonrandom and M phenotype-type-specific distributions of streptococcal exotoxins (in this study of speA) are already known, as is the lack of compelling evidence for the specific factors associated with the more severe spectrum of GAS disease (3, 4, 23, 31).

The present data confirmed the high rate of erythromycin resistance among GAS strains circulating in Italy (6, 16). Even if a slight decrease in the rate of macrolide resistance has been noted among invasive GAS strains collected in the last enhanced surveillance program, the Strep-EURO project data confirmed the higher rate of macrolide-resistant isolates in France and Italy compared with that in the Northern European countries participating in the project (20).

Besides different national antibiotic treatment practices, the clonal nature of the circulating strains may be the basis for the fluctuations observed among invasive GAS isolates in Italy. The epidemic emm89 clone always carried the erm(B) gene; very few other strains isolated in those years contributed to the dissemination of macrolide resistance in GAS strains from patients with invasive diseases. The dramatic reduction in the number of emm89-erm(B) isolates after 1999 and the lack of other emm types that successfully expressed the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance phenotype and that have taken its place may have contributed to the currently observed macrolide resistance rate and the prevalence of resistance mediated by mef(A). Indeed, the emergence of a limited number of strains possessing the mef(A) gene among previously susceptible emm types like emm1 and emm44/61 has been observed in the last 3 years.

A multivalent recombinant vaccine containing amino-terminal M-protein fragments from different serotypes of GAS plus the amino-terminal peptide fragment of Spa (surface protein antigen) has been developed and has undergone the first phase I study for its safety and immunogenicity (24). Such a vaccine would have covered 79.6% of invasive infections during the enhanced surveillance in the period from 1994 to 1996 and 75.5% of invasive infections during the Strep-EURO study.

In particular, the composition of this vaccine does not include the emm4 and emm44/61 types that, in Italy, were responsible for 3.8% and 1.3% of invasive infections in the years from 1994 to 1996, respectively, and that were responsible for an increased proportion of 9% and 4.5% of invasive infections in the more recent Strep-EURO survey, respectively. Another emerging emm type in our study was emm9, which was never detected in the past surveillance efforts and which accounted for 3.3% of invasive infections in the years from 2003 to 2005. This indicates how the continuous monitoring of the molecular epidemiology of circulating invasive GAS strains and comparison of these strains on a large scale are of crucial importance for any intervention policy and control efforts.

 
This work was supported by an EU grant (Strep-EURO grant QLK2.CT.2002.01398) to G.O.

We thank the medical staff of the Italian hospitals who adhered to the Strep-EURO initiative and provided strains and case descriptions of GAS invasive diseases, particularly C. Bonetti and R. Sfogliarini (Crema, CR), P. Catalanotti (Naples), L. Drago (Milan), A. Giammanco (Palermo), S. Cresti and L. Migliorini (Siena), G. Amato (Naples), E. Muresu, A. Palmieri (Sassari), C. Sturla (Varese), A. Toniolo (Varese), F. Alborino and C. Bonello (Dolo, VE), L. Bartolini (Florence), G. Fortina (Novara), B. Gianfranco (L'Aquila), A. Goglio (Bergamo), P. Gualdi (Rovereto, TN), N. Manca (Brescia), R. Mattei (Lucca), M. T. Montagna (Bari), P. G. Montanera (Aosta), P. L. Nicoletti (Florence), R. Oneglio (Rivoli, TO), L. Pacciani (Rome), G. Palù (Padua), P. Pecile (Florence), M. Pedroni (Manerbio, BS), C. Perazzi (Domodossola, VB), P. Marone (Pavia), R. Rescaldani (Erba, CO), R. Sartori (Trento), and M. Vassallo (Sanremo, IM). We are also indebted to the reference coordinators of the National Surveillance Program on Nosocomial Infections: E. A. Debbia, G. C. Schito, F. Cavallini, and M. Nicolosi.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Reparto di Malattie Batteriche Respiratorie e Sistemiche, Dipartimento di Malattie Infettive, Parassitarie ed Immunomediate, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy. Phone: 39-06-49902116. Fax: 39-06-49902886. E-mail: roberta.creti{at}iss.it

Published ahead of print on 9 May 2007.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Anonymous. 1993. Defining the group A streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Rationale and consensus definition. JAMA 269:390-391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Aziz, R. K., R. A. Edwards, W. W. Taylor, D. E. Low, A. McGeer, and M. Kotb. 2005. Mosaic prophages with horizontally acquired genes account for the emergence and diversification of the globally disseminated M1T1 clone of Streptococcus pyogenes. J. Bacteriol. 187:3311-3318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Baldassarri, L., R. Creti, S. Recchia, M. Imperi, B. Facinelli, E. Giovanetti, M. Pataracchia, G. Alfarone, and G. Orefici 2006. Therapeutic failures of antibiotics used to treat macrolide-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes infections may be due to biofilm formation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:2721-2727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Baldassarri, L., R. Creti, M. Imperi, S. Recchia, M. Pataracchia, and G. Orefici. 2007. Detection of genes encoding internalization-associated proteins in Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from patient with invasive diseases and asymptomatic carriers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1284-1287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Banks, D. J., S. B. Beres, and J. M. Musser. 2002. The fundamental contribution of phages to GAS evolution, genome diversification and strain emergence. Trends Microbiol. 10:515-521.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Bassetti, M., G. Manno, A. Collida, A. Ferrando, G. Gatti, E. Ugolotti, M. Cruciani, and D. Bassetti. 2000. Erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 6:180-183.[Medline]
7
7. Beall, B., R. Facklam, and T. Thompson. 1996. Sequence emm-specific PCR products for routine and accurate typing of group A streptococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:953-958.[Abstract]
8
8. Beres, S. B., E. W. Richter, M. J. Nagiec, P. Sumby, S. F. Porcella, F. R. DeLeo, and J. M. Musser. 2004. Genome-wide molecular dissection of serotype M3 group A Streptococcus strains causing two epidemics of invasive infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:11833-11838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Brussow, H., C. Canchaya, and W. D. Hardt. 2004. Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68:560-602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Carapetis, J. R., A. C. Steer, E. K. Mulholland, and M. Weber. 2005. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect. Dis. 5:685-694.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
11. Cartwright, K., M. Logan, C. McNulty, S. Harrison, R. George, A. Efstratiou, M. McEvoy, and N. Begg. 1995. A cluster of cases of streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis in Gloucestershire. Epidemiol. Infect. 115:387-397.[Medline]
12
12. G. S. Chhatwal and D. J. McMillan. 2005. Uncovering the mysteries of invasive streptococcal diseases. Trends Mol. Med. 11:152-155.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Document M2-A9, vol. 26. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
14
14. Cole, J. N., J. D. McArthur, F. C. McKay, M. L. Sanderson-Smith, A. J. Cork, M. Ranson, M. Rohde, A. Itzek, H. Sun, D. Ginsburg, M. Kotb, V. Nizet, G. S. Chhatwal, and M. J. Walker. 2006. Trigger for group A streptococcal M1T1 invasive disease. FASEB J. 20:1745-1747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Creti, R., F. Cardona, M. Pataracchia, C. V. Hunolstein, G. Cundari, A. Romano, and G. Orefici. 2004. Characterisation of group A streptococcal (GAS) isolates from children with tic disorders. Indian J. Med. Res. 119(Suppl.):174-178.[Medline]
16
16. Creti, R., G. Gherardi, M. Imperi, C. von Hunolstein, L. Baldassarri, M. Pataracchia, G. Alfarone, F. Cardona, G. Dicuonzo, and G. Orefici. 2005. Association of Group A streptococcal emm types with virulence traits and macrolide resistance genes is independent from the source of isolation. J. Med. Microbiol. 54:913-917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Ekelund, K., J. Darenberg, A. Norrby-Tegklund, S. Hoffmann, D. Bang, P. Skinhoj, and H. B. Konradsen. 2005. Variations in emm type among group A streptococcal isolates causing invasive or noninvasive infections in a nationwide survey. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3101-3109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Ekelund, K., P. Skinhoj, J. Madsen, and H. B. Konradsen. 2005. Reemergence of emm1 and a changed superantigen profile for group A streptococci causing invasive infections: results from a nationwide study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:1789-1796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Giovannetti, E., M. P. Montanari, M. Mingoia, and P. E. Varaldo. 1999. Phenotypes and genotypes of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes strains in Italy and heterogeneity of inducibly resistant strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1935-1940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Jasir, A., C. Schalen, and Strep-EURO Study Group. 2005. Strep-EURO: progress in analysis and research into severe streptococcal disease in Europe, 2003-2004. Euro Surveill. 10:60-61.
21
21. Lamagni, T. L., A. Efstratiou, J. Vuopo-Varkila, A. Jasir, C. Schalen, and Strep-EURO. 2005. The epidemiology of severe Streptococcus pyogenes associated disease in Europe. Euro Surveill. 10:179-184.[Medline]
22
22. Martin, M. J., and M. G. Green. 2006. Group A Streptococcus. Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 17:140-148.[CrossRef][Medline]
23
23. McMillan, D. J., R. G. Beiko, R. Geffers, J. Bauer, L. M. Schouls, B. J. M. Vlaminckx, J. B. Wannet, K. S. Sriprakash, and G. S. Chhatwal. 2006. Genes for the majority of group A streptococcal virulence factors and extracellular surface proteins do not confer an increased propensity to cause invasive disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43:884-891.[CrossRef][Medline]
24
24. McNeil, S. A., S. A. Halperin, J. M. Langley, B. Smith, A. Warren, G. P. Sharratt, D. M. Baxendale, M. A. Reddish, M. C. Hu, S. D. Stroop, J. Linden, L. F. Fries, P. E. Vink, and J. B. Dale. 2005. Safety and immunogenicity of 26-valent group A streptococcus vaccine in healthy adult volunteers. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41:1114-1122.[CrossRef][Medline]
25
25. Mencarelli, M., R. Corbisiero, B. Marzocchi, A. Gistri, R. Signori, A. Rossolini, and C. Cellesi. 1998. M genotyping and DNA fingerprinting of Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from an area of central Italy. Epidemiol. Infect. 121:77-84.[CrossRef][Medline]
26
26. Mencarelli, M., R. Corbisiero, M. G. Padula, I. Galgani, L. Stolzuoli, and C. Cellesi. 2005. Group A streptococcal infections: trend and strain emm typing in an area of central Italy, 1985-2002. Epidemiol. Infect. 133:1107-1111.[CrossRef][Medline]
27
27. Montanari, M. P., M. Mingoia, I. Cochetti, and P. E. Varaldo. 2003. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of tetracycline- and erythromycin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2236-2241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28
28. Moses, A. E., S. Goldberg, Z. Korenman, M. Ravins, E. Hanski, and M. Shapiro. 2002. Invasive group A streptococcal infections, Israel. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:421-426.[Medline]
29
29. Nir-Paz, R., C. Block, D. Shasha, Z. Korenman, Z. Gorodnitzky, J. Jaffe, M. Ron, A. Michael-Gayego, R. Cohen-Poradosu, M. Shapiro, and A. E. Moses. 2006. Macrolide, lincosamide and tetracycline susceptibility and emm characterisation of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates in Israel. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 28:313-319.[CrossRef][Medline]
30
30. Roberts, M. C., Y. Pang, D. E. Riley, S. L. Hillier, R. C. Berger, and J. N. Krieger. 1993. Detection of tetM and tetO tetracycline resistance genes by polymerase chain reaction. Mol. Cell. Probes 7:387-393.[CrossRef][Medline]
31
31. Schmitz, F. J., A. Beyer, E. Charpentier, B. H. Normark, M. Schade, A. C. Fuit, D. Hafner, and R. Novak. 2003. Toxin-gene heterogeneity among endemic invasive European group A streptococcal isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 188:1578-1586.[CrossRef][Medline]
32
32. Siljander, T., M. Toropainen, A. Muotiala, N. P. Hoe, J. M. Musser, and J. Vuopo-Varkila. 2006. Emm typing of invasive T28 group A streptococci, 1995-2004, Finland. J. Med. Microbiol. 55:1701-1706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33
33. Stevens, D. L. 1996. Invasive group A streptococcal disease. Infect. Agents Dis. 5:157-166.[Medline]
34
34. Suligoi, B., C. von Hunolstein, G. Orefici, F. Scopetti, M. Pataracchia, and D. Greco. 1998. Surveillance of systemic invasive disease caused by group A Streptococcus in Italy 1994-1996. Eurosurveill. 3:11-14.
35
35. Tanna, A., M. Emery, C. Dhami, E. Arnold, and A. Efstratiou. 2006. Molecular characterization of clinical isolates of M non-typable group A streptococci from invasive disease cases. J. Med. Microbiol. 55:1419-1423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36
36. Tyrrell, G. J., M. Lovgren, B. Kress, and K. Grimsrud. 2005. Invasive group A streptococcal disease in Alberta, Canada (2000 to 2002). J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:1678-1683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37
37. Vlaminckx, B. J., W. van Pelt, and J. F. Schellekens. 2005. Epidemiological considerations following long-term surveillance of invasive group A streptococcal disease in The Netherlands, 1992-2003. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11:564-568.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2007, p. 2249-2256, Vol. 45, No. 7
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00513-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Luca-Harari, B., Darenberg, J., Neal, S., Siljander, T., Strakova, L., Tanna, A., Creti, R., Ekelund, K., Koliou, M., Tassios, P. T., van der Linden, M., Straut, M., Vuopio-Varkila, J., Bouvet, A., Efstratiou, A., Schalen, C., Henriques-Normark, B., the Strep-EURO Study Group, , Jasir, A. (2009). Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Severe Streptococcus pyogenes Disease in Europe. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1155-1165 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Luca-Harari, B., Straut, M., Cretoiu, S., Surdeanu, M., Ungureanu, V., van der Linden, M., Jasir, A. (2008). Molecular characterization of invasive and non-invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from Romania. J Med Microbiol 57: 1354-1363 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Commons, R., Rogers, S., Gooding, T., Danchin, M., Carapetis, J., Robins-Browne, R., Curtis, N. (2008). Superantigen genes in group A streptococcal isolates and their relationship with emm types. J Med Microbiol 57: 1238-1246 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lamagni, T. L., Darenberg, J., Luca-Harari, B., Siljander, T., Efstratiou, A., Henriques-Normark, B., Vuopio-Varkila, J., Bouvet, A., Creti, R., Ekelund, K., Koliou, M., Reinert, R. R., Stathi, A., Strakova, L., Ungureanu, V., Schalen, C., the Strep-EURO Study Group, , Jasir, A. (2008). Epidemiology of Severe Streptococcus pyogenes Disease in Europe. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2359-2367 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Meisal, R., Hoiby, E. A., Aaberge, I. S., Caugant, D. A. (2008). Sequence Type and emm Type Diversity in Streptococcus pyogenes Isolates Causing Invasive Disease in Norway between 1988 and 2003. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2102-2105 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Creti, R. Articles by Orefici, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Creti, R. Articles by Orefici, G.