Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2007, p. 2787-2792, Vol. 45, No. 9
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00716-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida,1 North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida,2 Shands Teaching Hospital Department of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida,3 MiraVista Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana4
Received 2 April 2007/ Returned for modification 22 May 2007/ Accepted 14 June 2007
|
|
|---|
1.18. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) for a BAL GM level of
1.0 were 100%, 88.1%, and 100%, respectively. Notably, the positive predictive value (PPV) was only 42.9%, likely reflecting the low prevalence of pulmonary aspergillosis among nonimmunosuppressed patients. The combination of BAL microscopy and culture had a sensitivity and NPV similar to those of BAL GM detection but a higher specificity and PPV (92.5% and 54.6%, respectively). Moreover, a BAL GM test did not identify any cases that were not diagnosed by conventional methods like microscopy and culture. In conclusion, there was no conclusive benefit of determining BAL GM levels in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis among nonimmunocompromised hosts. Given the likelihood of false-positive results, a BAL GM test should not be ordered routinely in this population. |
|
|---|
A commercially available double-sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that detects galactomannan (GM), a cell wall polysaccharide of Aspergillus (Platelia ELISA; Bio-Rad), has been introduced to improve the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (5). The sensitivity of a serum GM test is 61% to 71% among HSCT recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies (14) and 30 to 56% among SOT recipients (3, 7, 9). A few studies have assessed the diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) GM testing. Among HSCT recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies, BAL GM testing added to the sensitivity of both BAL culture and serum GM testing (12, 15-18). We recently found similar results among SOT recipients, although false-positive tests due to airway colonization with Aspergillus were common among patients with lung transplants (2).
Over the past decade, invasive aspergillosis has been increasingly recognized in nonimmunosuppressed patients. In these patients, the types of pulmonary aspergillosis include acute invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), a rapidly progressive infection similar to that of profoundly immunosuppressed hosts (2, 11), chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis (CNPA), a slowly progressive infection often seen among patients with underlying lung disease (8, 19), and mycetoma or fungus ball. The diagnosis of IPA or CNPA is particularly difficult since the presence of Aspergillus in culture or by microscopy cannot differentiate colonization from invasive disease. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of the BAL GM test in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis among nonimmunosuppressed patients.
|
|
|---|
BAL GM determination. A BAL GM test was ordered at the discretion of physicians caring for the patients. The BAL fluid was sent on dry ice via overnight mail to MiraVista Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN) for GM assay using a Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Redmond, WA). The BAL GM results were made available to the patients physicians. Decisions about the institution of antifungal therapy were made by the patients physicians and required approval by the infectious disease consultation team.
Case definitions. The classification of invasive aspergillosis into categories of proven, probable, and possible IPA using modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Mycoses Study Group criteria cannot be applied to our patient population due to the lack of "host factors." We designed definitions based on the types of pulmonary aspergillosis that are most commonly encountered in the nonimmunosuppressed host.
Mycetoma was defined as a mobile mass lesion within a preexisting pulmonary cavity visualized on a chest X-ray or computed tomography (CT) scan. If Aspergillus spp. were isolated from the sputum or BAL fluid, the diagnosis was proven aspergilloma. In the absence of Aspergillus upon culture, the diagnosis was mycetoma, presumably aspergilloma.
Proven CNPA was defined as a subacute infection associated with the demonstration of septated hyphae invading lung parenchyma on biopsy specimens and accompanied by the growth of Aspergillus in culture. For our purposes, subacute was defined as a duration of pulmonary symptoms of >1 month. The diagnosis was presumed CNPA when invasive hyphae were not demonstrated within the tissue specimen; in this setting, other infectious or noninfectious causes that might account for the pulmonary findings had to be ruled out by the treating physicians using standard diagnostic approaches such as BAL cultures and microscopy with or without transbronchial biopsy, other respiratory cultures, blood cultures or cultures from other sites, and treatment and response to nonfungal therapy. Alternative diagnoses to pulmonary aspergillosis were based on the consensus opinions of the physicians managing the patients as well as the two investigators independently reviewing the cases.
Proven acute IPA was defined as a pulmonary infection (duration of
1 month) associated with the demonstration of septated hyphae invading lung parenchyma on biopsy specimens and accompanied by Aspergillus culture growth. The diagnosis was presumed acute IPA when invasive hyphae were not demonstrated within the tissue specimen; in this setting, other infectious or noninfectious causes that might account for the pulmonary findings had to be ruled out.
Data analysis.
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated on a per-patient basis for BAL GM testing, serum GM testing, BAL microscopy, and culture. The optimal cutoff for BAL GM testing was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Factors associated with pulmonary aspergillosis were determined using Fisher's exact test and expressed in two-by-two contingency tables; P values of
0.05 were considered to be significant.
|
|
|---|
Six patients had pulmonary aspergillosis (Table 1); two of these patients had acute IPA, two patients had CNPA, and two patients had aspergilloma.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Description of patients with pulmonary aspergillosisa
|
0.5, and 15 patients had BAL GM levels of
1.0. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of BAL GM testing at various interpretive cutoffs are presented in Table 2. All six patients with pulmonary aspergillosis had BAL GM levels of
1.18 (range, 1.18 to 8.89) (Table 1). For three patients, BAL was collected from multiple lung segments, and the GM level was
1.15 for each sample. Increasing the cutoff from 0.5 to 1.0 improved the specificity and PPV of the BAL GM test without influencing the sensitivity or NPV. Based on the ROC, the optimal cutoff for positivity was 1.18 (Fig. 1). Excluding the two cases of aspergilloma, which were evident as fungus balls by CT scanning prior to bronchoscopy, the PPV was reduced from 43% to 33% (cutoff,
1.0). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Performance of tests for diagnosing pulmonary aspergillosis
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. ROC curve for BAL GM test results.
|
0.5. Overall, the combination of microscopy and culture had a sensitivity and NPV similar to those of BAL GM testing but had a higher specificity and PPV.
Impact of a BAL GM test on the management of patients with BAL GM levels of
1.0 but no evidence of pulmonary aspergillosis.
Nine patients had at least one sample with a BAL GM level of
1.0 but did not fulfill diagnostic criteria for pulmonary aspergillosis (Table 3). BAL fluid was collected from multiple lung segments of five patients, but only one patient had more than one sample that revealed a GM level of >1.0. Seven patients did not receive antifungal agents; none subsequently developed pulmonary aspergillosis. The other two patients were started on antifungal therapy. The first patient was admitted with signs, symptoms, and radiographic findings that were suggestive of pulmonary tuberculosis. Due to a positive BAL GM test, the treatment for tuberculosis was delayed for 4 days, until the transbronchial biopsy yielded caseating granulomas. This patient subsequently died from disseminated tuberculosis. The second patient was diagnosed with advanced metastatic lung cancer that was deemed untreatable. The patient's physician elected to institute "palliative voriconazole" in response to BAL GM detection since this was the only diagnostic test that was positive for a "treatable disease."
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Description of patients with BAL GM levels of 1 but with no evidence of pulmonary aspergillosisa
|
|
|
|---|
1.0), with a good specificity (88.1%) and excellent NPV (100%). The test was limited, however, by a PPV of 43%, which reflects the low prevalence of pulmonary aspergillosis in this population. BAL GM testing was no more sensitive than the combination of BAL microscopy and culture and exhibited a lower PPV than these tests. Moreover, BAL GM testing did not identify any cases of IPA or CNPA that were not diagnosed by conventional methods like microscopy and culture and only increased the likelihood of obtaining false-positive results. Our findings differ from those of previous reports of BAL GM testing among hematologic malignancy, HSCT, and SOT patients, for whom the test generally added to the sensitivity of microscopy and culture and identified cases of pulmonary aspergillosis that were not diagnosed by these methods (2, 12, 15, 16, 18).
This review reiterates that pulmonary aspergillosis is a rare but often unrecognized cause of serious lung disease outside of high-risk groups (1). It is notable that both patients with IPA in our series had serum GM levels of >0.5 concomitantly with a BAL GM level of
1.18. These findings suggest that the combination of BAL and serum GM might be useful in subsets of nonimmunocompromised patients for whom IPA is a serious diagnostic consideration. We reported two nonimmunocompromised patients, for example, who developed biopsy-proven IPA following acute pneumonia due to influenza virus (2) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (this report). It is difficult to make definitive recommendations about specific patients who might benefit from the use of the BAL GM test. Nevertheless, clinicians might consider judicious GM testing among certain patients who have ongoing pneumonias of unclear etiology that have not responded to standard therapies.
Unlike IPA and CNPA, the cases of aspergilloma in our series were readily evident upon CT scan and BAL culture. Clearly, BAL GM testing does not have a diagnostic role in routine cases of mycetoma. Moreover, we did not demonstrate an association between elevated BAL GM levels and invasion from mycetomas into local parenchyma, as a tissue biopsy was not performed in one case and failed to demonstrate invasive hyphal elements in the second.
In conclusion, physicians should exercise restraint in ordering and interpreting BAL GM tests for nonimmunocompromised hosts in order to avoid overdiagnosing pulmonary aspergillosis and subjecting patients to unnecessary treatment. The observations from this study should be corroborated in prospective studies.
L. J. Wheat is the President and Director of MiraVista Diagnostics, which performs BAL GM testing as a commercial reference service. The remaining authors do not report any conflict of interest.
Published ahead of print on 27 June 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»