Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2008, p. 177-184, Vol. 46, No. 1
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00428-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Laboratory of Hematology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon,1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 2109 Adelbert Rd., Cleveland, Ohio 44195,2 Department of Viral Infection and International Health, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan3
Received 24 February 2007/ Returned for modification 14 August 2007/ Accepted 3 September 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In countries with multiple antiretrovirals (ARVs) readily available, the prevalence of drug-resistant variants has ranged from 10 to 20% among drug-naïve patients (33), while in resource-constrained areas, resistance in the untreated HIV-infected population is rarely reported (23, 31). Recent interventions through such programs as the World Health Organization (WHO)'s 3 by 5 plan to treat 3 million people by the end of 2005 (33a) and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief have promoted significant access to ART in low- and middle-income countries. As of June 2005, about 500,000 people in sub-Saharan Africa were receiving ART, although the regional coverage rate was still 11% of the estimated number of patients with CD4 cell counts of
300/ml (2% of all HIV-infected patients in this region) (33a). Developing countries, including Cameroon, are moving towards universal access to HIV prevention, care, and treatment for those in need and at high risk of infection. This has led to the widespread use of antiretroviral drugs through structured national ART scale-up plans. Because of the complexity and open-ended duration of HIV treatments and the need to begin programs to treat many patients quickly, fears have been raised that emergence of ARV resistance may become a serious public health concern and render anti-HIV drugs useless. To assist ART programs and to minimize the emergence and transmission of HIV drug resistance strains and their public health consequences, WHO has developed a minimum-resource strategy for the surveillance and monitoring of HIV drug resistance in resource-limited countries. In Kenya, for example, where ART has been provided for 12 to 17% of the estimated need, the prevalence of resistant strains among drug-naïve patients has recently risen from 1% (2002) to more than 5% (2003) (WHO, personal communication). In Botswana, where treatment is available to all patients with <300 CD4 cells/ml, the prevalence of major mutations conferring PI resistance was estimated to be 4% among drug-naïve patients (4).
Unlike the case in southern and eastern African countries, where one or two HIV-1 subtypes dominate (22), all major groups and subtypes of HIV-1 cocirculate in Cameroon (1, 6, 14-19, 21, 22, 24, 28, 34-38). According to WHO/UNAIDS, as of the end of 2004, the prevalence of HIV-1 infection was estimated to be 4.8% overall and 9.8% for adults. To date, there have been several reports on the prevalence of ARV resistance mutations in the drug-naïve HIV-1-infected population of Cameroon (1, 6, 14-16, 19, 31). Baseline information on the frequency and types of ARV resistance mutations in Cameroon will help to inform optimal ART and enable the government to monitor the success of the national AIDS treatment program.
ART in Cameroon is based on the WHO guidelines, i.e., the combination of two NRTIs and one NNRTI. With the rapid introduction of ART and with limited health care infrastructure for care and monitoring, this country may face similar emergence rates of ARV resistance to those described for other developing countries (29, 30). With a higher prevalence of ARV resistance in the drug-naïve population (18, 32), resistance may emerge at an even higher rate.
In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of drug-resistant HIV-1 strains in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected individuals in a resource-limited country where ART is being scaled up rapidly to determine whether standard first-line regimens will continue to be effective. Samples were obtained prior to the rollout of significant ART programs in Yaoundé, the capital city of Cameroon. We examined the prevalence of ARV resistance mutations in 79 patient samples and found a low rate of major drug resistance mutations to RTIs and PIs.
|
|
|---|
PCR and sequencing. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from HIV-seroreactive blood donors were obtained by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation. Proviral DNA was extracted from uncultured PBMCs with a DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Nested PCR amplification was performed using AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ). A segment of the PR-RT region of the pol gene was first PCR amplified using the universal external primers univ-PS1 (TTTTTTAGGGAAAATTTGGCCTTC) and univ-RTA4 (CTGTATATCATTGACAGTCCAGCT), resulting in a 1.2-kbp product. Nested PCR was then performed with the universal primers univ-PS2 (5'-TCCCTCAAATCACTCTTTGGCAAC-3') and univ-RTA3 (5'-TTCATAACCCATCCAAAGAAATGG-3') to generate a fragment of 1.0 kbp. The PCR products were then purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and sequenced in the sense and antisense directions with a set of nested primers (25). All sequencing reactions were performed using an ABI Prism Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and an ABI 3730 DNA sequencer by Davis Sequencing, Inc. The chromatogram files were read using the Chromas 1.6 program (Helensvale, Australia). All sequences were edited with the BioEdit program.
Phylogenetic analysis and subtyping. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees including reference pol sequences were constructed using Clustal W and then drawn using Treeview PPC, version 1.6.6 (Institute of Biochemical and Life Sciences, Scotland, United Kingdom). Bootstrap resampling (1,000 data sets) of multiple alignments was performed to test the statistical robustness of the trees. Kimura-2 parameters were calculated with the DNADIST program in the PHYLIP package (13, 27).
Genotypic resistance analysis. Genotypic resistance was defined as the presence of one or more resistance-related mutations, as specified by the consensus mutation figures of the International AIDS Society—USA (11). The emergence of amino acid substitutions associated with resistance to RTIs and PIs has been characterized extensively, and these substitutions can be classified into major and accessory/minor (modifying) mutations. Major mutations lead to severalfold decreases in sensitivity to one or more ART drug. Accessory mutations may not result in a significant decrease in sensitivity but are associated with an increase in viral fitness (replication capacity) (9). Although resistance testing was performed retrospectively, for ethical reasons these results were fed back to the clinicians at the study site regarding the relative merits of change in therapy.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The DNA sequences of HIV-1 pol PR-RT regions determined as part of this study were submitted to GenBank under the following accession numbers: DQ990400 to DQ990455.
|
|
|---|
![]() ![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Phylogenetic tree of HIV-1 PR-RT sequences from 78 HIV-1 group M and O isolates. "CMY" refers to PR-RT sequences from the cross-sectional analysis and indicates the country (Cameroon) and location (Yaoundé) of sample collection. The bootstrap value at each node represents the number among 1,000 bootstrap replicates that supported the branching order. Bootstrap resampling values of 70% or higher are shown. Brackets on the right represent the major group M subtypes. Newly derived sequences are marked with filled squares, and the novel unique recombinant form CRF02_AG/F2 is shown by an arrow. A 950-nt segment of the PR-RT coding region was used to construct this tree by the neighbor-joining method. PR-RT genetic subtypes A, D, F, G, H, and K and recombinants CRF02_AG, CRF11.cpx, and CRF13.cpx, as well as HIV-1 group O, are indicated. GenBank accession numbers for the reference sequences are as follows: A1.KE.93.Q23-17, AF004885; A1.UG.85.U455, M62320; A1.UG.92.92UG037, U51190; D.CD.83.ELI, K03454; D.CD.83.NDK, M27323; DCD.84.84ZR085, U88822; F2.CM.95.MP257, AJ249237; G.NG.92.92NG083, U88826; G.SE.93.SE6165, AF061642; G.BE.96.DRCBL, AF084936; H.BE.93.VI991, AF190127; J.SE.93SE7887, AF082394; J.SE.94.SE7022, AF082395; K.CM.96.MP535, AJ249239; K.CD.97.EQTB11C, AJ249234; 01_AE.TH.90.90CM240, U54771; 01_AE.CF.90.90CF4071, AF197341; 02_AG.NG.-.IBNG, L39106; 02_AG.FR91.DJ264, AF063224; 02_AG.SE.94.SE7812, AF107770; 02_AG.CM.97.97CM.MP807, AJ251056; 11_CPX.CM.97.MP818, AJ291718; 13 CPX.CM.96.1849, AF460972; 13 CPX.CM.96.4164, AF460974; O.CM.-.ANT70, L20587; O.CM.91.MVP5180, L20571; and CPZ.GA.-.CPZGAB, X52154. (B and C) SimPlot analyses of unclassifiable Cameroonian PR-RT (approximately 1,000 nt) sequences 04CMY-32 (B) and 04CMY-55 (C), showing the recombination between subtype F2 and CRF02_AG (A). The bootscan analysis was performed against reference strains from clades A (strain A1.UG.85.U455), B (strain B.US.83.RF), D (strain D,CD.84.84ZR085), F1 (strain F1.FI.93.FIN9363), F2 (strain F2.CM.95,MP255), G (strain G.SE.93.SE6155), and 02_AG (strain AG.NG.-.IBNG). (D) Segments derived from an IBNG-like strain and subtype F2 are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic trees based on gag-p17/p24 gene (1,900 bp) of HIV-2 (510-03/04CMYD-100) subtype B/A recombinant strain (A) and the pol-IN (1,500 bp) gene (B) and env-C2V3 (500 bp) gene (C) from the Cameroonian HIV-2 strain. The bootstrap value at each node represents the number among 1,000 replicates that supported the branching order. Bootstrap values of >70% are shown. The brackets on the right represent the major HIV-2 subtypes. The newly analyzed sequence (510-03) is marked with a filled square.
|
Primary PI resistance-associated mutations were found in 2 of 75 cases (2.6%). These two patients harbored a CRF02_AG or CRF13_cpx HIV-1 isolate with an M46L amino acid substitution in the protease coding region. The M46L mutation in subtype B is associated with resistance to amprenavir, atazanavir (ATV), indinavir, and nelfinavir. The CRF02_AG-infected patient CMY-72 also contained a G48R mutation linked to the M46L mutation in the protease gene. The G48V mutation in subtype B is responsible for saquinavir, ritonavir, and ATV resistance (9). A V82I mutation was detected in the protease sequences of three patients, but the V82I mutation is a minor/accessory mutation and confers only minimal resistance to ATV and ritonavir (10). An alanine, threonine, phenylalanine, or serine at this position, however, is responsible for resistance to all PIs. Isoleucine at position 82 is also a naturally occurring polymorphism in subtype strains (9, 23) and was observed in 3 of 12 (25%; CI, 5.5 to 57.2%) of our G isolates. Minor or accessory PI resistance mutations were also found as wild-type sequences in Cameroonian isolates at the following positions, in order of decreasing frequency: M36I (74/75 isolates; 98.7%), K20I/M/R (67/75 isolates; 89.3%), L10V (5/75 isolates; 6.7%), L63P (4/75 isolates; 5.3%), and D60E (4/75 isolates; 5.3%).
RTI resistance-associated mutations. Based on subtype B consensus sequences, mutations leading to resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs are well defined and differ between the two classes of inhibitors. The most common major RT mutations leading to NRTI resistance occur at positions 41, 62, 65, 67, 69, 70, 74, 75, 77, 115, 116, 151, 184, 210, 215, and 219 (16 in total), and major mutations leading to NNRTI resistance are known to occur at positions 100, 103, 106, 108, 181, 188, 190, 225, (11), and 236 (9 in total).
Of the 79 cases analyzed, 7 (9.3%) showed major mutations associated with resistance to RTIs (zidovudine [ZDV], nevirapine [NVP], delavirdine [DLV], and efavirenz [EFV]). A V108I mutation was found in a CRF02_AG-infected patient, a Y181C mutation was found in a CRF13_cpx-infected patient, and V118C and V179E mutations were found in subtype G isolates. The subtype B mutations V118C and V179E result in moderate NNRTI resistance, whereas Y181C and V108I mutations are responsible for high-level NNRTI resistance (DLV, EFV, and NVP resistance and EFV and NVP resistance, respectively). The L210W mutation in subtype B (ZDV resistance) and the Y181C mutation (in subtype B [NNRTI resistance]) are found as the wild-type sequences in most HIV-1 group O isolates, including the three group O samples from this cohort, i.e., CMYD-97, -98, and -99 (5, 19, 26). Possible accessory amino acid mutations R211K and G333E in subtype B isolates were also observed in the RT genes of viruses from 54 patients (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Overview of epidemiologic and genetic information for acutely HIV-1-infected subjects in central Cameroon
|
|
|
|---|
Three major NRTI resistance mutations were observed as wild-type sequences in three CRF02_AG (T215Y/F) and one CRF13_cpx (Y118C) virus. The T215Y/F mutation confers resistance to ZDV in nearly all HIV-1 isolates, whereas Y118C is a mutation related to native versus nucleoside analog discrimination but confers only low-level resistance (10, 11, 30). Limited studies on ART drug resistance in Africa, especially for non-B subtypes in Europe, have shown a strong correlation between the presence of major mutations and phenotypic resistance, similar to the case for mutations seen in subtype B infections with similar treatment regimens (31, 33). However, studies have also documented some salient differences among patients infected with non-B subtypes. A study of single-dose NVP to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1, conducted in Uganda, showed that selection of genotypic mutations associated with resistance to NVP occurred more frequently in women infected with subtype D than in women infected with subtype A viruses (23, 24). In addition, there has been identification of new mutational patterns conferring high-level drug resistance, previously not characterized for subtype B isolates (3, 23, 25, 26). For example, the V106M mutation in subtype C, as opposed to the V106A mutation of subtype B, is generally selected and confers resistance to EFV (3, 4). In addition, a combination of three mutations (I135L, T139V, and V245T) found as "wild-type" sequences in a subtype D HIV-1 isolate in Uganda conferred over 1,000-fold resistance to NVP and DLV and some cross-resistance to EFV (8). We are currently examining the phenotypic resistance of the PR-RT coding regions of Cameroonian HIV-1 isolates with or without any ARV resistance sequences. Although resistance testing was performed on PBMCs, this is a more sensitive method for detection of archived resistant mutants in persons lacking evidence of resistance by conventional assays.
This study provides the most recent data on molecular characterization of HIV-1 isolates in treatment-naïve individuals in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Overall, there is clear documentation of cocirculating HIV-1 group M and O strains as well as evidence for HIV-2 B/A recombinants, which are the subject of further investigation. At least six genetic subtypes (A, D, F2, G, H, and K) and three CRFs (CRF02_AG, CRF11_cpx, and CRF13_cpx) have been identified in HIV-1-infected patients in Yaoundé. Subtype CRF02_AG was responsible for 51.89% of the infections and was previously identified as predominant in west and west-central Africa (1, 6, 14-19, 21, 22, 24, 28). HIV-2 has been observed with a very low prevalence (0.06% of total HIV infections) in Douala but at a higher frequency in Yaoundé (0.2% to 1.2% of total HIV infections), based on independent epidemiological surveys (28, 36). A higher prevalence of HIV-2 infections was observed in commercial sex workers and tuberculosis patients, with no apparent link to other West African countries (36). However, the origin of the HIV-2 infection in our study was not available (7).
An obvious challenge in resource-limited settings such as Yaoundé, Cameroon, is maintaining a balance between rapid introduction of ART and continual surveillance of drug resistance to prevent treatment failures and to avoid a public health crisis. Expansion of molecular characterization on a nationwide basis would be useful to scientists developing prevention strategies based on vaccines and microbicides. Although there may be a cost factor involved, ART should be accompanied by testing for resistance before the choice of a particular ART regimen is made. This will reduce the selection pressure of resistance types, thus making first-line therapy more effective.
N.N. was supported by funds from the Ministry of Education of Japan. E.J.A. was supported by an NIAID/NIH grant (AI-49170). Additional support was provided by a Case University Center for AIDS research grant (AI36219).
Published ahead of print on 12 September 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»