Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2008, p. 225-234, Vol. 46, No. 1
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01551-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

*
Sónia Nunes,1,
António Brito-Avô,2
Carla R. Alves,1
João A. Carriço,3,4
Joana Saldanha,5
Jonas S. Almeida,3,6
Ilda Santos-Sanches,1,7 and
Hermíniade de Lencastre1,8
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal,1 Centro de Saúde de Oeiras, Oeiras, Portugal,2 Biomathematics Group, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal,3 KDBIO, Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores—Investigação e Desenvolvimento, Lisboa, Portugal,4 Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal,5 Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,6 Centro de Recursos Microbiológicos, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Monte da Caparica, Portugal,7 Laboratory of Microbiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York8
Received 3 August 2007/ Returned for modification 9 October 2007/ Accepted 1 November 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
While point prevalence studies in DCCs to study colonization by these bacteria have been conducted in several countries (reviewed in reference 7), longitudinal studies are less frequent and have often focused on the individual host and not on a particular epidemiological setting (9, 14, 16). By looking at the DCC as a unit, one would expect to obtain additional information on the fitness capacities (for transmission and persistence) of individual clones, as they would be exposed to the same pool of hosts (the attendees). To our best knowledge, extended longitudinal studies that have systematically applied genotyping techniques to study pneumococci and H. influenzae in DCCs with such objectives in mind are very scarce. Trottier et al. studied H. influenzae colonization among 38 DCC attendees for 4 months (29), and Yagupsy et al. conducted a 7-month study focusing on the transmission of drug-resistant pneumococci among 48 children from two DCCs (30). A third study by Raymond et al. followed 53 children in an orphanage over 1 year and described the colonization patterns of pneumococci and H. influenzae (19, 20). However, as one might expect, this latter setting was more isolated than the DCC, and thus its dynamics were peculiar.
In Portugal, according to the National Statistics Institute, more than 70% of preschool children attend DCCs (15). Previous point prevalence studies conducted among Portuguese DCC attendees have found high pneumococcal and H. influenzae colonization rates (over 70%) (5, 12) with abundant representation of international clones (22).
To understand the dynamics of colonization that led to such high colonization rates, we conducted a 1-year longitudinal study among a group of 47 children attending a single DCC where all pneumococci and H. influenzae isolates were genotyped.
|
|
|---|
Approval for the study was obtained from the Ministry of Education and the DCC director. Signed informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of all children.
Questionnaires. Information on the children's illnesses and antimicrobial consumption in the month preceding each sampling was obtained through questionnaires filled in by the parents. Children's physicians were not interviewed, nor were the children observed by the pediatricians of our team. Therefore, the information obtained was used only as an indicator of the health status of the group.
Sampling period and sampling. Nasopharyngeal samples were taken 11 times, 3 to 9 weeks apart from February 1998 through February 1999 (i.e., in the pre-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era). Sampling occurred in weeks 1, 5, 11, 15, 20, 29, 33, 38, 42, 47, and 50. The longer interruption between weeks 20 and 29 was due to summer holidays, during which this DCC was closed. Samples were taken by a pediatric nurse using calcium alginate swabs, as previously described (17).
Isolation of pneumococci and H. influenzae.
Swabs were inoculated into culture medium within 4 h. Pneumococci and H. influenzae were selectively cultured in blood agar with gentamicin and chocolate blood agar containing Iso-Vitalex and bacitracin, respectively (21). Pneumococcal presumptive identification was based on
-hemolysis and optochin susceptibility; H. influenzae isolates were identified based on the requirement of X and V factors for growth. Routinely, a single colony of each species was isolated, cultured, and frozen.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The Kirby-Bauer technique was used according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations and definitions (2). Susceptibility to erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT) was determined for isolates of S. pneumoniae, and susceptibility to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, erythromycin, azithromycin, and SXT was determined for isolates of H. influenzae. Antibiotic discs were purchased from Oxoid (Hampshire, England). In addition, the MIC of penicillin G was measured for pneumococci using Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), and H. influenzae isolates were tested for the presence of β-lactamase (DrySlide; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI).
Serotyping. Pneumococcal strains were serotyped by the quellung reaction using commercially available antiserum (Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark). H. influenzae strains were not serotyped.
PFGE. Pneumococcal and H. influenzae total DNA were prepared as previously described (22). After restriction with SmaI, DNA fragments were separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (22). Patterns were assigned by visual inspection of the profiles, using currently accepted criteria (28).
Duration of carriage and reacquisition. Duration of carriage was calculated from the date of the first isolation of a strain to the date of its last isolation, provided that it was not detected in the next two consecutive samples. Reacquisition of a strain was defined as its reisolation (from a child previously known to carry it) after being undetected for at least two consecutive samples. The ratio of the number of isolates of a clone to the number of children colonized (I/CC) was used as an indirect measure of the capacity to induce persistent colonization.
|
|
|---|
For the reasons explained above, questionnaires were used only as an indicator of the global health status of the population under study and should be interpreted with caution. Fifty-five percent of the questionnaires indicated that the child had been healthy within the month preceding the sampling and had not taken any medicine; the remaining questionnaires indicated that within that period the child had at least once taken some medication. The symptoms leading to medication most often reported resembled, in the vast majority, respiratory tract infections of viral origin. Otitis media was reported in 8% of the questionnaires, and sore throat was reported in 5%. An outbreak of chickenpox occurred in May 1998. Antimicrobial use was reported in 18% of the questionnaires and was mainly associated with diagnosis of otitis media, sore throat, and respiratory tract infections.
Nasopharyngeal colonization and antimicrobial resistance. A total of 61.4% of the samples contained pneumococci, with rates ranging from 38% to 77% according to the sampling period. Similarly, 87.0% were positive for H. influenzae (range, 74% to 97%). Overall, 56.7% of the samples contained both microorganisms, and 8.3% had none.
Simultaneous colonization by two or more strains of the same species was not thoroughly investigated but was detected in three samples that contained two pneumococcal strains.
Out of the 257 pneumococcal isolates, 35% were susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested, and 24.5% had decreased susceptibility to penicillin. Other resistance rates were 52% to erythromycin, 49% to clindamycin, 35% to tetracycline, 24% to SXT, and 8% to chloramphenicol. Over time, resistance rates to penicillin and macrolides ranged from 0% to 53% and from 39% to 58%, respectively. Rates of resistance to one or more of the antimicrobials tested ranged from 48% to 100%.
Out of the 360 H. influenzae isolates, 80% were susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested, 12% were resistant to ampicillin due to β-lactamase production, and 8% were resistant to SXT. β-Lactamase nonproducing ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae strains were not detected. Resistance rates to ampicillin ranged from 0 to 47%, according to the sampling period.
Pneumococcal serotypes. Thirteen serotypes were identified which were, in decreasing order of abundance, 19F (34.2%), 23F (15.2%), 6B (11.3%), 14 (8.6%), 10A (7.8%), 19A (5.4%), 9V (3.1%), 11A (1.9%), 16F (1.9%), 18F (1.9%), 15A (0.8%), 8 (0.4%), and 23B (0.4%). Seven percent of the isolates were nontypeable (NT).
Patterns of pneumococcal colonization. All but one child was colonized by pneumococci at least once during the study (the number of positive samples per child ranged from 1 to 10): 6% (children I-h, I-l, and II-i) were always colonized (all samples were positive), and 91% were intermittently colonized (Table 1). Among the latter group, four children (I-e, II-m, III-e, and III-l) were very frequently colonized, and four children (I-c, I-d, III-b, and III-p) were rarely colonized. A single child (III-h) who was never positive for pneumococcus infection was sampled eight times and was found to have H. influenzae on seven occasions, suggesting that incorrect sampling did not occur.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summary of colonization patterns
|
Among the 45 children who had two or more pneumococcus-positive samples, 93% were colonized by more than one clone (Table 1). The number of pneumococcal serotypes and clones detected per child ranged from one to five and from one to six, respectively. Globally, 135 child-clones (defined as the total sum of the number of clones isolated from each individual child) were obtained among the 414 samples (80% of the total anticipated number of samples), which led us to calculate that the 47 children were colonized by a mean of 3.6 pneumococcal clones during the 1-year study. Similarly, 129 child-serotypes were obtained, which led us to estimate that children were colonized by a mean of 3.4 serotypes.
Prolonged colonization was observed in 23% of the children: children I-f and III-c were colonized by the same strain for more than 9 months, and nine other children were also colonized by periods of time that ranged from 5 to 7 months (Tables 1 and 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Detailed genotypes of S. pneumoniae per child
|
Patterns of H. influenzae colonization. All 47 children were colonized by H. influenzae at some time during the study (the number of positive samples per child ranged from 4 to 11), and 34% of the children were persistently colonized.
Based on PFGE analysis, we observed that colonization by H. influenzae was quite dynamic: for any pair of two consecutive samples from the same child, the majority (59.9%, or 215 of 359 pairs) contained two different clones, and in 21.2% of the cases a transition between colonization and no colonization (or vice versa) seemed to have occurred. In a minority of the cases, the consecutive isolation of the same clone occurred (16.4%), and in 2.5% of the cases, the two consecutive samples did not contain H. influenzae.
A high strain turnover rate was observed in seven children (15%) from whom all positive H. influenzae samples contained different clones (e.g., children I-a, II-o, and III-h) (Tables 1 and 3). By contrast, long colonization periods of 4 to 6 months were observed for seven children (e.g., children II-b, III-b, and III-d).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Detailed genotypes of H. influenzae per child
|
Pneumococcal clones. Twenty-one pneumococcal clones were detected (Tables 2 and 4; Fig. 1), of which three were detected all year and among children from all three rooms: 19F-Pn3 (i.e., a serotype 19F clone with pneumococcus [Pn] PFGE pattern 3; named Portugal19F ST177 by the Pneumococcal Molecular Epidemiology Network [13]), 23F-Pn1 (Spain23F ST81), and NT-Pn5 (NorwayNT ST344). Clone 19F-Pn3 was by far the most successful of all pneumococcal clones: 68% of the children were colonized by it at least once, and several had it for long periods, resulting in 34.2% of all pneumococcal isolates. In particular, two children (I-f and III-c) carried this clone for more than 42 weeks, and nine of the 13 putative clone reacquisitions were due to it. Clone 23F-Pn1 colonized 11 children only but was isolated on as many as 25 occasions (I/CC of 2.3), suggesting that it had a high capacity for prolonged colonization. By contrast, clone 10A-Pn7 colonized 16 children but was mostly isolated from each child on a single occasion (I/CC of 1.3), suggesting a high degree of transmissibility but low capacity for persistence in the host.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Pneumococcal clones in circulation during the longitudinal study
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Temporal patterns of dissemination of pneumococcal clones. The sizes of the circles are proportional to the number of isolates obtained. Unique clones refer to single PFGE patterns.
|
The introduction and subsequent dissemination of several clones were detected: clone 6B-Pn6, first detected in week 29, and 6B-Pn9, first detected in week 5, were in circulation through the end of the study and colonized five and eight children, respectively. Clone 10A-Pn7 colonized 16 children from the three rooms and circulated between weeks 5 and 38, and clone 19A-Pn11 colonized nine children and circulated between weeks 15 and 47.
H. influenzae clones. PFGE profiles were obtained for 355 of the 360 H. influenzae isolates, and 47 clones were detected (Table 5 and Fig. 2). Three clones (H. influenzae clone with PFGE pattern 9 [Hi-9], Hi-10, and Hi-13) were present throughout the study period. Each was isolated in 9 of the 11 sampling periods and colonized children from all three rooms.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. H. influenzae clones in circulation during the longitudinal study
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Temporal patterns of dissemination of H. influenzae clones. The sizes of the circles are proportional to the number of isolates obtained. Unique clones refer to single PFGE patterns.
|
Among the seven most abundant clones, which accounted for 54.8% of the isolates, three (clones Hi-3, Hi-5, and Hi-7) emerged only late in the study and became very abundant in the winter, suggesting that they transmitted well.
The maximum colonization period detected for the same clone of H. influenzae, i.e., 28 weeks for clones Hi-10 and Hi-13, was substantially lower than the periods observed for some pneumococci.
Of interest, clone Hi-12 was detected in 33% of children sampled in week 1 but in only two children in week 5 and was not detected afterwards. However, most clones were in circulation for several weeks.
|
|
|---|
This study gave us the opportunity to thoroughly dissect and follow the dynamics of colonization, persistence, and transmission of these two important bacterial pathogens in the DCC setting. It is the first longitudinal study of this nature to be carried out in Portugal. By targeting a homogeneous group, we were able to focus on identifying pathogens with diverse fitness capacities and hosts with diverse colonization patterns (which were unlikely to be due to age differences) and to understand the dynamics of colonization in the DCC.
We observed high levels of cross-transmission as 15 of the 21 genotypes detected among pneumococci and 32 of the 47 genotypes detected among H. influenzae isolates were shared between children. The full extent of this phenomenon becomes even more obvious when absolute numbers of isolates are taken into account: 98% of the pneumococci and 96% of the H. influenzae isolates belonged to clones that were shared. In other words, all children were overwhelmingly colonized by clones that were also detected among other attendees.
Although one could postulate that the high degree of sharing results from lack of exposure to a large pool of genetically diverse strains, as observed by Raymond et al. in the orphanage (19, 20), our observations suggest the opposite. In fact, a large number of genetic backgrounds were identified for each pathogen, and novel clones emerged throughout the entire study. In contrast to the children at the orphanage, the DCC attendees were likely to be exposed to other strains from their contacts outside and often introduced these strains into the DCC. Therefore, the most plausible explanation for the high degree of sharing lies in the fact that a significant part of the children's lives was spent in day care (5 days a week, often for 8 h per day or more), providing ample opportunities for cross-transmission.
Focusing on the host revealed that most children appeared to be intermittently colonized, and sequential colonization with as many as six different pneumococcal strains (and five different serotypes) and nine different H. influenzae strains was detected. Overall, we estimated that each child was colonized by a mean of 3.6 pneumococcal clones (or 3.4 pneumococcal serotypes) and 7.1 H. influenzae clones during the 11 sampling periods spread throughout 1 year. Raymond et al. found that children were colonized by a mean of three pneumococcal and three H. influenzae strains per year (19, 20). These observations suggest that the more genetically diverse bacterial pool observed in the DCC contributed to a more dynamic colonization pattern with a greater turnover of strains.
Still, two children carried the same pneumococcal strain for more than 9 months, and another eight children were colonized by the same strain for 5 to 7 months. Such long durations of carriage have also been reported by Gratten et al. in a study in Papua New Guinea (8). Prolonged colonization has been inversely correlated with age but also depends on the host's genetic susceptibility and on the genetic background of the bacteria (7). Of particular interest, 8 of the 10 prolonged colonization episodes were due to the same pneumococcal clone, 19F-Pn3, suggesting that this strain induces a weak immune response and/or out-competes its peers when cocolonization occurs.
Only one child (2%) was never colonized by pneumococci. Raymond et al. found similar "resistance" to pneumococcal colonization in 4% of the children (20). Whether these children have genetic polymorphisms which confer immunity to pneumococcal colonization is unknown although that may well happen as mutations that confer protection against pneumococcal disease have been described previously (11).
Colonization periods of 4 to 6 months with the same H. influenzae strain were detected in seven children. Gratten et al. reported long colonization periods of up to 7 months (8). Similar to what was observed for pneumococci, prolonged colonization by H. influenzae strains was due to a restricted number of clones: Hi-5, Hi-10, and Hi-13.
Putative reacquisition events were detected for both pneumococci and H. influenzae strains in 28% and 19% of the children, respectively. The majority of these events were due to the most abundant clone detected for each species, 19F-Pn3 and Hi-13, both in circulation at the time of redetection. However, the possibility of prolonged undetected colonization should not be discounted and, in fact, has been favored by other investigators (25). As we did not investigate simultaneous colonization by multiple strains, the data should be interpreted cautiously. Other studies have reported that more than 50% of H. influenzae-positive samples may contain two or more strains (16, 26), and multiple strains of pneumococci have been observed in 10 to 40% of positive samples (16, 24). Still, true reacquisition of the same pneumococcal serotype but of a different genotype was detected on five occasions.
To focus on the pathogens, we used genotyping to characterize the diversity of the bacterial population in circulation and to detect successful clones that appeared to have increased capacities to persist in the host due to prolonged colonization and/or to rapidly transmit and colonize large numbers of children.
In particular, we identified a pneumococcal clone, 19F-Pn3 (or Portugal19F ST177 [13]), which was extremely successful both in transmission and persistence by all numbers analyzed: it was endemic all year, it was the most abundant clone, it colonized 68% of the children, and it had the highest I/CC (2.7). Whether this success was mainly the result of the serotype expressed or due to the specific genetic background (or a combination of both) is not possible to determine as there were no other serotype 19F clones or capsular variants of this lineage detected.
Interestingly, our study suggested that persistence and transmission can result from independent fitness properties: for example, clone 23F-Pn1 (Spain23F ST81) was prone to induce prolonged colonization, and clones 10A-Pn7 and 19A-Pn11 were successful transmitters. Other clones, although introduced in the day care setting, were never able to transmit to many children.
Among H. influenzae isolates, we observed a high degree of genetic diversity and an apparently greater turnover of strains than for pneumococci. Other investigators have also reported a very high degree of diversity of H. influenzae genotypes colonizing DCC children (3, 27). Contrary to what was observed for pneumococci, no single dominant clone was identified, but clones with different fitness properties were observed. Clones Hi-9, Hi-10, and Hi-13 were transmitted throughout the year but had different host persistence properties, with Hi-13 the most successful and Hi-9 the least successful. Clone Hi-13 appeared to be the fittest of all H. influenzae clones, and indeed most prolonged colonization and reacquisition events were due to it. Of interest, clone Hi-27 appeared to be very fit in transmission but not in inducing prolonged colonization.
It will be of interest to repeat this type of study in the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era to determine changes in the patterns of colonization not only by pneumococci but also by H. influenzae as interference between these two species has been proposed (18) and replacement disease, in otitis media, has occurred (6).
In conclusion, we observed that novel clones of pneumococci and H. influenzae strains were frequently introduced in the DCC and generated a pool of genetically diverse bacteria to which the children were exposed. The DCC attendees represented a pool of hosts in close contact that favored selection of the fittest clones through cross-transmission, with the result that all children were primarily colonized by shared clones. Pneumococcal and H. influenzae clones with high propensities for transmission and/or persistence were identified. The further characterization of these clones on a genomic level will be of interest in understanding the bacterial factors leading to successful colonization.
We thank the director and staff of the DCC and the parents and children that collaborated in the study and acknowledge the excellent skills of the pediatric nurse Anabela Gonçalves, who collected the samples.
Published ahead of print on 14 November 2007. ![]()
R.S.-L. and S.N. contributed equally to this article. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»