JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.01610-07v1
46/1/311    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delmas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnet, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delmas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnet, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2008, p. 311-313, Vol. 46, No. 1
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01610-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of the Vitek 2 System with a Variety of Staphylococcus Species{triangledown}

Julien Delmas,1,2 Jean Paul Chacornac,3 Frédéric Robin,1,2 Philippe Giammarinaro,3 Régine Talon,3 and Richard Bonnet1,2*

CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Centre de Biologie, Laboratoire de Bactériologie Clinique, Clermont-Ferrand F-63003, France,1 Université Clermont 1, UFR Médecine, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, EA3844, Clermont-Ferrand F-63001, France,2 INRA, Centre de Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, UR 454, Microbiologie, 63122 Saint-Genes Champanelle, France3

Received 13 August 2007/ Returned for modification 2 October 2007/ Accepted 15 October 2007


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
The Vitek 2 gram-positive (GP) card was compared with an oligonucleotide array approach for the identification of 190 Staphylococcus strains, including 35 species, isolated from clinical and environmental specimens. The GP card provided a rapid and reliable identification of most species, whatever their origin.


   TEXT
Top
 ABSTRACT
 TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Staphylococci are widespread in nature and can be isolated from humans and animals and from various food products (4, 5, 11, 13, 15). Some staphylococcal strains are associated with diseases in humans or animals, and others are used for technological purposes (4, 14, 15). Staphylococcus aureus is a well documented pathogen. Of the non-S. aureus staphylococci, S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and S. saprophyticus are those most frequently implicated in disease in humans (4, 9, 15). Other staphylococcal species, such as S. hominis and S. warneri, can be found as contaminants of blood cultures but can also be associated with a variety of infections. In food, particularly in fermented meat products, staphylococci such as S. xylosus, S. carnosus, S. simulans, S. warneri, S. epidermidis, and S. saprophyticus may be found (1). S. xylosus and S. carnosus strains are used as starter cultures in fermented meat products because they contribute to their color and flavor (14). However, the presence of S. aureus in food is a potential public health hazard, since many strains of S. aureus produce enterotoxins (7, 10). Accurate identification of the Staphylococcus species is therefore of great importance in microbiological laboratories.

The Vitek 2 system used with the gram-positive (GP) identification card (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) is an automated machine designed to provide rapid and accurate phenotypic identifications for most clinical staphylococci (2, 6, 8, 16). The colorimetric GP card contains 43 tests. The database of the GP card particularly includes the environmental species S. caprae, S. carnosus, S. equorum, S. gallinarum, and S. vitulinus. However, there has been no documented assessment of this identification card for any collection of Staphylococcus strains, including environmental isolates. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of the Vitek 2 GP card to identify Staphylococcus species of clinical and environmental origins.

A total of 190 Staphylococcus strains, including 38 type strains representing 35 species (Table 1) and 152 strains from our collection, were studied (Table 2). The latter 152 strains were isolated from clinical samples (n = 60) and from food and plant samples (n = 92). The GP card was used in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturer. The results were compared with those of the oligonucleotide "Staph array," a method, which is based on the hybridization of the internal part of the sodA gene (3). The strain was retested with the GP card if the identification results differed between the two methods. In case of a persistent discrepancy, the Staph array identifications were confirmed by DNA sequencing of the sodA gene (12). Results from the GP card were separated into four groups: (i) the "one-choice identification" group corresponded to identical identifications for the GP card and Staph array; (ii) the "low level of discrimination" group corresponded to results for which the GP card indicated the possibility of two or three species, including the result of Staph array and proposed supplementary tests (pigmentation, hemolysis, or novobiocin resistance) to determine the correct identification; (iii) the "misidentification" group corresponded to different identifications for the GP card and Staph array; and (iv) the "no identification" group corresponded to strains for which the GP card gave no result. Correct identification was defined as the association of the first two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Identifications obtained with the GP card for 38 Staphylococcus reference strains

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. GP card identification of staphylococci in the laboratory collection

 
Twenty-four reference strains out of 38 (63%) were correctly identified by the GP card (Table 1). Of the 14 misidentified reference strains, 10 were species not included in the database of the GP card. The four other strains were S. capitis subsp. capitis, identified as S. equorum; S. equorum subsp. equorum, identified as S. xylosus; S. haemolyticus, identified as S. warneri/S. pasteuri; and S. vitulinus, identified as S. sciuri. In a study by Layer et al. (6), 70% (20 out of 27) of reference strains were correctly identified. However, the misidentified strains belonged to different species.

Fifty-six of the 60 clinical strains (93.3%), belonging to 14 different species, were identified from the collection. Complementary tests were necessary for three strains. These results were in agreement with those reported by Layer et al. (6). Two other studies found higher identification accuracy (98.2 to 99.3%) (2, 16). In those studies, the numbers of taxa tested and their proportions were different; 66 and 74% of clinical strains belonged to the three species S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. hominis, versus only 37% in our study. Three strains belonging to the species S. saprophyticus, S. simulans, and S. delphini were misidentified, and one strain of S. capitis was not identified.

The GP card also correctly identified 67 of the 92 environmental strains (73%). Complementary tests were necessary for 10 strains. Twenty-three strains (25%), belonging to five species, were misidentified (Table 2). Nine misidentified strains belonged to S. fleurettii (n = 1) and S. succinus (n = 8), which were absent in the database of the GP card. Eleven of the 14 remaining misidentified strains were S. equorum strains, which were frequently reported as S. xylosus (n = 10). The last three misidentified strains belonged to S. carnosus and S. vitulinus. One strain each of S. fleurettii and S. succinus were not identified as expected. Except for S. equorum (n = 13) and S. succinus (n = 9), 65 of the 70 environmental strains were correctly identified (92.9%). The misidentifications of S. equorum as S. xylosus were suspected with the vibriostatic O129 test of the GP card. Indeed, all the strains identified as S. xylosus which had a negative test with the vibriostatic compound were misidentified strains. According to our data, the identifications of S. xylosus, S. sciuri, and S. auricularis provided by the GP card required complementary tests for confirmation (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Routinely collected laboratory strains misidentified with the GP card

 
In conclusion, the Vitek 2 GP card allowed the identification of 123 (93.2%; n = 132) Staphylococcus strains belonging to the species which are included in the database. The results obtained in this study highlight the interesting performance of the colorimetric Vitek 2 GP card, which can be used in clinical, agrochemical, and food laboratories. However, the GP card demonstrated low accuracy in identification of the species S. equorum and misidentified S. succinus, which is not included in the current Vitek 2 GP database.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
bioMérieux, La-Balme les Grottes, France, provided the study materials. We thank Sonia Chatellier for support and helpful critical comments.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Bactériologie, 28 place H. Dunant, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France. Phone: 33 4 73 75 49 20. Fax: 33 4 73 75 49 22. E-mail: rbonnet{at}chu-clermontferrand.fr Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 24 October 2007. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 TEXT
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Blaiotta, G., C. Pennacchia, F. Villani, A. Ricciardi, R. Tofalo, and E. Parente. 2004. Diversity and dynamics of communities of coagulase-negative staphylococci in traditional fermented sausages. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97:271-284.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Funke, G., and P. Funke-Kissling. 2005. Performance of the new VITEK 2 GP card for identification of medically relevant gram-positive cocci in a routine clinical laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:84-88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Giammarinaro, P., S. Leroy, J. P. Chacornac, J. Delmas, and R. Talon. 2005. Development of a new oligonucleotide array to identify staphylococcal strains at species level. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3673-3680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Huebner, J., and D. A. Goldmann. 1999. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: role as pathogens. Annu. Rev. Med. 50:223-236.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Jousson, O., D. Di Bello, M. Vanni, G. Cardini, G. Soldani, C. Pretti, and L. Intorre. 2007. Genotypic versus phenotypic identification of staphylococcal species of canine origin with special reference to Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans. Vet. Microbiol. 123:238-244.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Layer, F., B. Ghebremedhin, K. A. Moder, W. Konig, and B. Konig. 2006. Comparative study using various methods for identification of Staphylococcus species in clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:2824-2830.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Le Loir, Y., F. Baron, and M. Gautier. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genet. Mol. Res. 2:63-76.[Medline]
  8. Ligozzi, M., C. Bernini, M. G. Bonora, M. De Fatima, J. Zuliani, and R. Fontana. 2002. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of medically relevant gram-positive cocci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1681-1686.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Martineau, F., F. J. Picard, D. Ke, S. Paradis, P. H. Roy, M. Ouellette, and M. G. Bergeron. 2001. Development of a PCR assay for identification of staphylococci at genus and species levels. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2541-2547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Palavecino, E. 2004. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin. Lab. Med. 24:403-418.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Papamanoli, E., P. Kotzekidou, N. Tzanetakis, and E. Litopoulou-Tzanetaki. 2002. Characterization of Micrococcaceae isolated from dry fermented sausage. Food Microbiol. 19:441-449.[CrossRef]
  12. Poyart, C., G. Quesne, C. Boumaila, and P. Trieu-Cuot. 2001. Rapid and accurate species-level identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci by using the sodA gene as a target. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4296-4301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Rich, M. 2005. Staphylococci in animals: prevalence, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility, with an emphasis on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 62:98-105.[Medline]
  14. Talon, R., S. Leroy-Sétrin, and S. Fadda. 2002. Bacterial starters involved in the quality of fermented meat products, p. 175-191. In F. Toldrá (ed.), Research advances in quality of meat and meat products. Research Signpost, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
  15. von Eiff, C., G. Peters, and C. Heilmann. 2002. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2:677-685.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Wallet, F., C. Loiez, E. Renaux, N. Lemaitre, and R. J. Courcol. 2005. Performances of VITEK 2 colorimetric cards for identification of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4402-4406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2008, p. 311-313, Vol. 46, No. 1
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01610-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.01610-07v1
46/1/311    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delmas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnet, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delmas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnet, R.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS