Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2008, p. 393-394, Vol. 46, No. 1
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01066-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| LETTER TO THE EDITOR |

|
|
|---|
Recently, a new version of the test, the Genotype MTBDRplus (GT-MTBDRplus) assay, has been developed in order to improve the assay's sensitivity for isoniazid resistance and direct detection of drug resistance in clinical specimens. It targets all the genes included in the previous test with the addition of codons 505 to 510 in the hot-spot region of rpoB, to improve the detection of rifampin resistance, and the promoter region of the inhA gene (nucleotides –8, –15, and –16) for isoniazid resistance.
We tested with the GT-MTBDRplus assay 173 isoniazid-resistant isolates (Table 1) and 78 clinical specimens (Fig. 1) that had been previously analyzed with the GT-MTBDR version and compared the results with those of sequence analysis. DNA extraction from isolates and clinical specimens was performed as previously described (1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Detection of isoniazid resistance in clinical isolates by the G-MTBDR and the G-MTBDRplus assays compared with sequencing data
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Comparison of the performance of the Genotype MTBDR assay with the Genotype MTBDRplus assay on clinical specimens. "Double pattern" refers to samples showing mutated and wild-type patterns simultaneously. DST, drug susceptibility testing; INH-R, isoniazid resistance.
|
The two tests were also evaluated side by side (Fig. 1) on a panel of 78 respiratory samples that were positive by M. tuberculosis Direct test (MTD; bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Among the 78 clinical specimens analyzed, 31 were smear negative (25 fully susceptible, 4 isoniazid resistant, and 2 MDR) and 47 smear positive (41 fully susceptible, 5 isoniazid resistant, and 1 MDR). With the GT-MTBDR assay, we obtained a valid test for 18/31 (58.1%) smear-negative and 45/47 (95.7%) smear-positive samples and an indeterminate result defined as absence of positive amplification control in 15 cases (13 smear negative, 2 smear positive). In 12 cases (6 smear negative, 6 smear positive), despite the presence of a positive amplification control, the interpretation of the test was difficult due to the faint staining of some hybridization bands. The number of valid tests obtained by the new assay was 100% (47/47) for smear-positive and 70.9% (22/31) for smear-negative samples, with no ambiguity in the hybridization pattern. With smear-negative samples, the GT-MTBDRplus assay allowed the reduction of indeterminate results from 41.9% to 29.0% and improved the concordance rate with culture-based drug susceptibility testing from 29.0% to 64.5%. With the smear-positive clinical specimens, the GT-MTBDRplus assay increased the rate of concordance with the drug susceptibility testing results from 72.3% to 91.5%, without any indeterminate results. Results for all of the four samples showing simultaneously mutated and wild-type patterns with the first version of the assay were confirmed by the GT-MTBDRplus assay (Fig. 1).
The increased sensitivity of GT-MTBDRplus is due to the introduction of new targeted genes for isoniazid resistance coupled with better primer and probe design, allowing improved sensitivity with direct clinical specimens to provide rapid direct detection of drug resistance, essential to improve case management and, consequently, tuberculosis control.
Published ahead of print on 31 October 2007. |
|
|---|
|
Paolo Miotto Federica Piana Daniela Maria Cirillo* Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit San Raffaele Scientific Institute Via Stamira d'Ancona 20 20127 Milan, Italy
Giovanni Battista Migliori
| ||||||
| * Phone: 39 02 26437947, Fax: 39 02 26437989, E-mail: cirillo.daniela{at}hsr.it |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»