Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2008, p. 3330-3337, Vol. 46, No. 10
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00432-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences and Medical Biotechnology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University,1 Department of Laboratory Medicine,2 Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China,4 Department of Virology and Parasitology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan,3 Center for Disease Control, Department of Health, The Executive Yuan, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China5
Received 4 March 2008/ Returned for modification 22 April 2008/ Accepted 22 July 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
VP6, a trimeric protein, encoded by gene 6, forms the middle-layer capsid and interacts with both outer capsid proteins VP4 and VP7 and the core protein VP2 (26). According to the antigenic epitopes present on VP6, rotaviruses can be classified into groups (A to G) and subgroups (5). Group A rotaviruses can be differentiated into subgroups I, II, I+II, and non-I non-II, depending on the presence or absence of two distinct epitopes which react with one, both, or neither of the monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 255/60 and 631/9 (7, 11). Previous studies have mapped amino acid position 305 and the region from positions 296 to 299 to subgroup I specificity, and amino acid position 315 to subgroup II specificity (30), and showed that subgroup epitopes are conformational and appear to be located on the trimeric but not monomeric structures (9). At present, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) incorporating subgroup-specific MAbs is widely used as an epidemiological tool to monitor rotavirus strains. However, antigenic drift through the accumulation of point mutations may result in poor reactivity in ELISA subgrouping. In the study by Iturriza-Gomara et al. (18), based on nucleotide sequencing and phylogenetic analysis, it was found that samples were clustered into two genogroups—genogroup I and genogroup II. Genogroup I comprised samples serologically determined as subgroup I, and genogroup II comprised samples serologically determined as subgroup II, subgroup I+II, and subgroup non-I non-II. These authors suggested that there were no true human subgroup I+II or subgroup non-I non-II strains, but this misclassification might have been due to the poor reactivity between subgroup II strains and the MAb used (18). In addition, subgroup-specific MAbs are not easily available for most laboratories. For these reasons, a convenient molecular genogrouping method is still needed.
In the present study, a molecular method, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), for the determination of the rotavirus VP6 genogroup was established. This method was evaluated by comparison with sequence analysis of the VP6 gene. The subgroups of some of the rotavirus strains were determined by ELISA. The associations of the VP6 genes with VP4, VP7, and NSP4 genes were also analyzed.
|
|
|---|
Subgroup analysis by ELISA. An ELISA with MAbs was carried out as described previously (31), with some modifications. The following MAbs (ascitic fluids) were used: group A-common YO-156 (directed to VP6), subgroup I-specific S2-37, and subgroup II-specific YO-5. The wells of a polystyrene microplate (Nunc, Denmark) were coated with a 1:10,000 dilution of S2-37 and YO-156 or a 1:3,000 dilution of YO-5 at 4°C overnight. Bovine serum albumin (3%) in PBS was added and kept at 4°C overnight. After a washing step with PBS-Tween 20, test samples were added, followed by incubation at 4°C overnight. After washing, rabbit anti-human rotavirus serum was added. The dilutions of anti-human rotavirus serum were 1:1,000 for the wells coated with YO-5 and YO-156 and 1:10,000 for the wells coated with S2-37. After 1 h of incubation at 37°C and washing, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G was added, and the plate was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After a final washing step, 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine was added, and the plate incubated for 5 min at room temperature, 1 N H2SO4 was added, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm. The ratio, the absorbance obtained from reactivity with YO-5 divided by the absorbance obtained from reactivity with S2-37, was calculated. Samples with a ratio of <0.4 were considered indicative of subgroup I specificity, while samples with a ratio of >2.5 were indicative of subgroup II specificity (31).
Extraction and purification of viral RNA. Rotavirus RNA was extracted and purified as follows. Rotavirus was concentrated and precipitated by adding ammonium sulfate (at a final concentration of 35% [wt/vol]) to clarified 10% stool suspension. After a thorough mixing, the precipitated rotavirus was spun down at 10,000 x g for 15 min. The supernatant was aspirated, and the pellet was suspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0] and 1 mM EDTA). Rotavirus particles were lysed with extraction buffer (at a final concentration of 0.02 M Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 0.15 M NaCl, 0.01 M MgCl2, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 2% [wt/vol] Ficoll). The mixture was treated two or three times with phenol-chloroform. The RNA for RT-PCR was further purified with guanidine thiocyanate-silicon dioxide to remove inhibitors (25).
Design of the oligonucleotide primers for VP6 genogrouping. VP6 gene sequences of the subgroup I reference strains DS-1 (accession no. DQ870507), S2 (Y00437), IS2 (X94617), 1076 (D00325), SA11 (L33365), and US1205 (AF079357) and the subgroup II reference strains Wa (K02086), KU (AB022768), E210 (U36240), YO (DQ870500), and 116E (U85998), as well as 80 rotavirus strains recovered in Taiwan with various genotypes and 24 electropherotypes between 2000 and 2002, were used to design oligonucleotide primers. Oligonucleotide 6BEG.303 (5'-AAY GTR TGT ATG GAT GAR ATG-3'; nucleotides 303 to 323) was designed as the forward primer for the first and second amplification, since it is conserved among all sequences. Sequences of the region for genogroup-specific primers of the 80 Taiwanese rotavirus strains and reference strains used to design genogroup specific primers are shown in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Genogroup I-specific primer 6END.682c (5'-GTM GTT AAM ACY CTD CGG-3'; nucleotides 682 to 665) and genogroup II-specific primer 6END.1082c (5'-ATA YTC TTG ACG YAC TGC G-3'; nucleotides 1082 to 1064) were selected from the region that was divergent between strains in different genogroups and relatively conserved in strains within the same genogroup (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. The scheme shows the position and direction of primers and the sizes of the amplicons for VP6 genogrouping by RT-PCR. The double-stranded RNAs were reverse transcribed and amplified with 6BEG.303 and VP6-R primer pairs. After 1:10 to 1:100 dilution, the RT-PCR products were further amplified with 6BEG.303, 6END.682c, and 6END.1082c primers. VP6 genogroup I and genogroup II could be distinguished by the sizes: 380 and 780 bp, respectively.
|
VP6 genogroup assignment by RT-PCR. The 824-bp RT-PCR products of the VP6 gene were used for genogrouping. The primer mixture contained 6BEG.303, 6END.682c, and 6END.1082c. The PCR mixture contained 0.5 µl of 1:10 to 1:100 diluted RT-PCR product, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 10 mM KCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 mg of bovine serum albumin (BSA)/ml, 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 500 nM primers, and 0.5 U Taq-Plus (Taq polymerase with Pfu; Bio Basic, Inc., Canada). The mixture was incubated in a thermal cycler (GeneAmp PCR system 9700; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 10 cycles of PCR, each consisting of 94°C for 1 min, 46°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and 10 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 48°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and finally by 15 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 1 min. The final extension was allowed to continue for 10 min and kept at 4°C. The VP6 genogroup was defined by the sizes of the amplified products.
TA cloning. The RT-PCR products of the VP6 gene, 379 bp in length, were purified directly or through agarose gel electrophoresis with GFX PCR DNA and a gel band purification kit (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) and cloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector using the pGEM-T Easy Vector system (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The plasmids with the VP6 gene fragment, selected based on antibiotic resistance and lacZ disruption, were isolated by using a high-speed plasmid minikit (Geneaid, Taipei, Taiwan).
Determination of VP7, VP4, and NSP4 genotypes. The G type and P type were determined as described previously (8, 10). The NSP4 genotype was determined by phylogenetic analysis of the NSP4 genes (4).
Sequencing. The PCR products were purified directly or through agarose gel electrophoresis with GFX PCR DNA and the gel band purification kit. Nucleic acid sequencing was performed with a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (v3.1; Applied Biosystems). The primers used for VP6 gene sequencing are VP6-F and VP6-R; for NSP4 gene sequencing, 10BEG.16, 10END.722c, 10.374, and 10.394c (24) were used; for the plasmid with VP6 gene insert sequencing, T7 (5'-TAA TAC GAC TCA CTA TAG GG-3') was used. The labeled products were purified by ethanol precipitation. The pellet was resuspended in the Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems) and then run on an autosequencer (3100-Avant Genetic Analyzer; Applied Biosystems).
Analysis of sequences. The sequence data were analyzed by using GeneWorks software (IntelliGenetics, Mountain View, CA). The phylogenetic relationships among strains were analyzed by the neighbor-joining method and the Tamura-Nei distance matrix listed in the MEGA analytical package (23). The robustness of the neighbor-joining trees was statistically evaluated by bootstrap analysis.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences of the partial VP6 genes of the Taiwanese genogroups I and II strains have been submitted to the GenBank sequence database. Accession numbers EU487535 to EU487561 were assigned for P[8]G1 strains with genogroup II specificity in the following order: 81TW5, 85TW516, 86TW569, 87TW914, 88TW1201, 89TW1495, 92TW3580, 92TW3672, 94TW36a, 94TW1164, 94TW1213, 95TW35, 95TW182, 95TW203a, 95TW418, 95TW481, 95TW511, 95TW803, 95TW859, 00TW124, 01TW588, 01TW863, 03TW269, 03TW1284, 04TW577, 04TW628, and 05TW2483. EU487562 was used for strain 01TW564 with P[4]G1 and genogroup I specificity. Accession numbers EU487563 to EU487575 were assigned for P[4]G2 strains with genogroup I specificity in the following order: 81TW6, 83TW278, 92TW59, 93TW111, 93TW114, 94TW133, 00TW3, 00TW469, 00TW532, 01TW499, 02TW376, 04TW360, and 05TW395. EU487576 was used for strain 01TW557 with P[8]G2 and genogroup II specificity. Accession numbers EU487577 to EU487587 were assigned for P[8]G3 strains with genogroup II specificity in the following order: 86TW606, 89TW1532, 00TW668, 01TW1274, 02TW63, 03TW270, 03TW277, 03TW596, 04TW13, 04TW151, and 05TW1320. EU487588 was used for strain 03TW322 with P[4]G3 and genogroup I specificity. Accession numbers EU833479, EU833480, DQ898131, and EU833481 were assigned for P[8]G4 strains with genogroup II specificity in the following order: 85TW425, 85TW432, 01TW964, and 03TW1902. Accession numbers DQ898123 and EU487589 to EU487594 were assigned for P[8]G9 strains with genogroup II specificity in the following order: 99TW1866, 00TW470, 01TW1306, 02TW140, 02TW240, 02TW431, and 02TW641. Additional partial VP6 sequences were assigned accession numbers EU487595 to EU487600 for reference strains in the following order: AU32 (P[8]G9, genogroup II), 95H115 (P[8]G9, genogroup II), P (P[8]G3, genogroup II), ST3 (P[8]G4, genogroup II), WI61 (P[8]G9, genogroup II), and RotaTeq. For each Taiwanese (TW) strain, the first two digits represent the year in which the sample was collected, and the last up to four digits indicate the sample number in the corresponding year.
|
|
|---|
Comparison of RT-PCR, sequencing, and ELISA for determination of VP6 genogroup or subgroup specificity. In order to understand the performance of the RT-PCR method for the determination of VP6 genogroup, 80 rotavirus strains with 24 different RNA patterns, including G1 to G4 and G9 strains recovered between 2000 and 2002 were tested, and they were also tested by nucleotide sequence analysis of the partial VP6 gene. The results obtained by these two methods were identical and 100% in agreement. Sixteen of the 80 strains belonged to genogroup I, and 64 strains belonged to genogroup II (Table 1). The correlation of VP6 genogroup determined by RT-PCR with subgroup determined by ELISA was also analyzed. Using ELISA, we found that 16 of the strains tested belonged to subgroup I and 57 of the strains belonged to subgroup II, although 7 of the strains could not be assigned to either subgroup (Table 1). The subgroup specificity correlated well with VP6 genogroup for 73 of the strains (91.3% agreement).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Determination of the subgroup and VP6 genogroup by ELISA, RT-PCR, or sequence analysis for rotavirus strains with different G types and electropherotypes recovered between 2000 and 2002a
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Comparison of the VP6 genogroup determined by RT-PCR and sequence analysis of the rotavirus strains with different G types and electropherotypes recovered from 1981 to 1999 and from 2003 to 2005a
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences of the partial VP6 gene (nucleotides 766 to 1106). The 341-bp fragments of the VP6 gene were sequenced and a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the neighbor-joining method within the MEGA package. Percentage bootstrap values above 70% are shown at branch nodes. Branch length for a 2% nucleotide difference is indicated at the bottom. VP6 genogroup was determined by the clustering with genogroup I or genogroup II reference strains. For each strain, the P and G genotypes are shown. Taiwanese strains are indicated by italic type.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. VP6 genogroups of rotavirus strains with common G and P type combinationsa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. VP6 genogroups and NSP4 genotypes of the rotavirus strains with uncommon G and P type combinationsa
|
|
|
|---|
The seven strains for which the subgroup could not be determined by ELISA were assigned to genogroup II by both sequence analysis and RT-PCR. There is no statistical significance (P = 0.167) to the finding that the seven strains whose subgroup could not be determined by ELISA belonged to genogroup II by RT-PCR and sequencing. The absorbances of these seven strains obtained from reactivity with subgroup I MAb S2-37 were near to that of a nonreactive control; however, the low absorbances were obtained either from reactivity with group A-common MAb YO-156 or with subgroup II-specific MAb YO-5. Although the reactivity was greater than that of the nonreactive control, a definite subgroup could not be assigned. These results revealed that containing a higher amount of viral particles in the sample is required for efficient determination of subgroup by ELISA compared to that for the determination of VP6 genogroup by RT-PCR. A relatively high level (4 of 22) of disagreement between ELISA and RT-PCR/sequencing on G9 strains was observed. However, there was no significance (P = 0.179) to the finding that rotavirus strains whose subgroup could not be determined by ELISA mostly belonged to the G9 strain. The low absorbances were obtained from reactivity with subgroup II-specific MAb YO-5 in three of the four G9 strains, and only one strain obtained low absorbances from reactivity with both group A-common MAb YO-156 and subgroup II-specific MAb YO-5, which suggested that some G9 strains might have antigenic drift on subgroup II-specific MAb YO-5 recognition region and caused lower reactivity. This further supported that there is a need to develop a molecular method to improve the situation that VP6 subgroup could not be determined by ELISA.
Although the primer sites for RT-PCR genogrouping were not located in the regions considered to have subgroup I or subgroup II specificity, the subgroup-defining regions were included in the partial VP6 gene for sequence analysis, the same region used in the analysis of VP6 genogroups by Iturriza-Gomara et al. (18). The genogrouping results obtained by RT-PCR in the present study were confirmed by sequence analysis of the partial VP6 genes for 230 samples, and the results correlated well and were 100% in agreement, suggesting that the degenerate primers designed for RT-PCR genogrouping were genogroup specific. The genogroup-specific primers were designed based on the VP6 sequences of reference strains from GenBank and those of 80 Taiwanese rotavirus strains with G types of G1 to G4 and G9, P genotypes of P[8] and P[4], and 24 electropherotypes. In order to understand the genogroup specificity of each of the primers, the nucleotide sequence identities within and between the genogroups were analyzed. Comparison of the VP6 gene sequences of the strains listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material, including 23 genogroup I sequences and 73 genogroup II sequences, for the primer regions, revealed that the nucleotide sequence identities of the genogroup I-specific primer within genogroup I and between the two genogroups were 83.3 to 100% and 44.4 to 61.1%, respectively. The identities of the genogroup II-specific primer within genogroup II and between the two genogroups were 89.5 to 100% and 63.2 to 73.7%, respectively.
Recently, 22 VP6 full-length sequences of the U.S. strains collected from 1996 to 2002 were submitted to the GenBank database. Based on phylogenetic analysis, Kerin et al. pointed out that rotavirus VP6 genes have greater variety than was previously suspected (21). Therefore, we included the 22 strains (10 P[8]G1, 5 P[4]G2, 2 P[8]G3, 2 P[8]G4, 1 P[6]G9, and 2 P[8]G9) in the phylogenetic analysis shown in Fig. 2 and realized that the Taiwanese strains analyzed in the present study had more genetic variation. We also compared the nucleotide sequences of these 22 U.S. strains at the regions where the genogroup-specific primers are located (Table S2 in the supplemental material) and found that 4 of the 6 genogroup I strains would be bound by our genogroup I-specific primer and that 16 genogroup II strains would be bound by our genogroup II-specific primer, suggesting that the genogroup of the 20 strains could possibly be determined by the RT-PCR method. However, the two genogroup I strains would form mismatches with our genogroup I-specific primer at the 3' terminus, which might impede the PCR. A similar situation was observed for the VP6 gene of the 116E strain, which varied from the genogroup II-specific primer at the last nucleotide of the 3' terminus. In the present study, reference strains, including at least four genogroup I (two P[4]G2, one P[2]G3, and RotaTeq vaccine strains) and nine genogroup II strains (two P[8]G1, one P[4]G2, two P[8]G3, one P[8]G4, and three P[8]G9), and 754 rotavirus samples with more than 52 electropherotypes recovered from a 25-year period, representing a wide range of genetic variation, could be easily genogrouped by RT-PCR. For the rare strains, if a negative result is obtained from the RT-PCR assay, we would suggest that the VP6 genogroup be determined by sequence analysis.
The association of subgroup and other genes has been discussed previously. For the associations among the VP6, VP7, and VP4 genes, it has been noticed that G1, G3, and G4 frequently are associated with P[8] and subgroup II, and G2 frequently is associated with P[4] and subgroup I (17). The association of subgroup and RNA electropherotype has also been reported previously for human rotaviruses of group A (20). However, Svensson et al. reported that the subgroup specificity could not be predicted by the migration of gene segments 10 and 11 (29). Iturriza-Gomara et al. have demonstrated the independent segregation of the VP4, VP6, and VP7 genes (18), and these authors also found a 100% linkage of the VP6 subgroup and NSP4 genotype, association of NSP4 genotype A with subgroup I and of NSP4 genotype B with subgroup II, in common and reassortant human rotaviruses (16). In the present study, excluding the five samples characterized as containing rotaviruses with genogroup I+II, all of the rotaviruses with common G- and P-type combinations, and most of those with uncommon G- and P-type combinations, had such gene associations between VP6 genogroups and P genotypes: P[8] associated with VP6 genogroup II, and P[4] associated with VP6 genogroup I. Only two P[4] strains, one P[4]G3 strain and one P[4]G9 strain, had a VP6 gene of genogroup II. Excluding the five rotavirus samples with VP6 genogroup I+II, the associations between VP6 genogroups and NSP4 genotypes, NSP4A being associated with genogroup I and NSP4B associated with genogroup II, were observed in the 23 rotavirus strains with uncommon G and P combinations.
It has been suggested that there are no true human subgroup I+II or subgroup non-I non-II strains to be found and that all such strains are from animals (9, 14, 15). It frequently happens that human rotaviruses reassort with animal strains, and it increases the possibility that subgroup I+II or subgroup non-I non-II could be found in human strains. In the present study, five rotavirus samples were determined to be genogroup I+II. However, after cloning the PCR amplicons of the VP6 gene, we found that all of the clones analyzed belonged to either genogroup I or genogroup II. These rotavirus samples appeared more likely to be the result of coinfection with two different rotavirus strains, one with genogroup I and the other with genogroup II. We also used ELISA to confirm the results and found that these samples reacted with both subgroup I-specific and subgroup II-specific MAbs. Furthermore, we did not find any sequences possessing both primer sites specific for the genogroup I and genogroup II. Therefore, there was no true genogroup I+II in the rotavirus samples tested in the present study.
The RT-PCR assay established in the present study to determine the VP6 genogroup was successfully applied to reference rotavirus strains, including RotaTeq vaccine strains, and 754 Taiwanese rotavirus strains recovered between 1981 and 2005. The assay appears to be a reliable and convenient method for determining the VP6 genogroups of human rotaviruses with a wide range of genetic variation.
Published ahead of print on 30 July 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»