This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lau, A.
Right arrow Articles by Halliday, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lau, A.
Right arrow Articles by Halliday, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2008, p. 4058-4060, Vol. 46, No. 12
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01411-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Colony Multiplex-Tandem PCR for Rapid, Accurate Identification of Fungal Cultures{triangledown}

Anna Lau,1,2 Tania C. Sorrell,1,2 OkCha Lee,3 Keith Stanley,4 and Catriona Halliday1,3*

Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology,1 Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney,2 Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Sydney West Area Health Service,3 AusDiagnostics Pty. Ltd., 3/36 O'Riordan St., Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia4

Received 23 July 2008/ Returned for modification 21 August 2008/ Accepted 12 October 2008


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
We developed a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the rapid identification of 16 fungi directly from culture. MT-PCR results were concordant with phenotypic identification for all cultures studied (n = 183). The colony MT-PCR assay was rapid (<2 h), sensitive, and specific in identifying fungal pathogens directly from primary isolation plates.


arrow
TEXT
 
The isolation of pathogenic fungi from clinical specimens has increased in recent years as a result of medical advances and the rising number of patients at risk, especially the immunocompromised. Rapid and accurate identification of fungi is important for patient management, given the increase in incidences of antifungal-resistant yeasts and molds, including Candida glabrata, Aspergillus spp. that are not Aspergillus fumigatus, and the Zygomycetes.

Current "gold standard" methods for the identification of yeasts involve a combination of histopathology, culture, and carbohydrate assimilation and fermentation reactions (8). These can be time consuming and expensive. Commercial phenotypic identification systems such as Vitek 2 (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France) and/or API ID 32C (bioMerieux) are widely used in larger diagnostic laboratories, but they require a pure culture before testing can be performed. Misidentifications or ambiguous results are not uncommon (6), as these kits cannot differentiate between closely related species, such as Candida inconspicua and Candida norvegensis (16) and Candida guilliermondii and Candida famata (18, 19) or between members of the Candida glabrata complex (including Candida nivariensis [1] and Candida bracarensis [7]). For the API ID 32C system, identification is further dependent upon individual interpretation and expertise (6). While growth on second-generation chromogenic agar is useful, only three Candida species (C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis) can be identified with confidence. Identification of molds such as Fusarium and Scedosporium species is time consuming, and considerable expertise is required for correct identification when characteristic features are not well defined.

The past decade has seen numerous groups adopt a variety of molecular identification approaches (2-5, 9-11, 13-15, 20) to improve the speed and accuracy of the identification of fungi from culture. However, routine implementation of these tests has not been established due to difficulties in performing the assay or the need for sophisticated, expensive equipment (as in the case of microarray platforms). Moreover, DNA isolation and purification, a key step for many published assays (3, 6, 9-11, 13, 14), prolongs turnaround time. The technique of applying PCR directly to fungal cells without any DNA extraction (colony PCR) (4, 15, 17) allows for quicker identification and reduction in labor time and costs, but it has not been widely applied in the clinical setting.

Recently, multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) was shown to be a simple, rapid, real-time PCR assay that allowed for the simultaneous detection and identification of numerous pathogens (up to 72 targets) (12, 21). In this study, we developed and evaluated a colony MT-PCR assay to identify 10 Candida species (C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. famata, C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, C. kefyr, C. krusei, C. lusitaniae, the C. parapsilosis complex, and C. tropicalis), Yarrowia lipolytica, the Cryptococcus neoformans complex, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Fusarium solani, Fusarium sp., and Scedosporium prolificans directly from primary isolation culture plates. Molecular targets included the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and ITS2 regions of the rDNA gene cluster, beta-tubulin, and elongation factor 1-{alpha}. Results were correlated with phenotypic tests.

A total of 183 culture plates containing presumptive fungal growth from clinical specimens were studied (Table 1). Phenotypic identification via the RapID Yeast Plus system (Remel Products, Lenexa, KS) and/or API ID 32C (bioMeriuex) and colony MT-PCR were performed in parallel. For colony MT-PCR, a sweep of microbial growth was resuspended in 500 µl distilled water. MT-PCR was performed on 2 µl of this suspension with no further purification as previously described (12). Primer sequences were designed as previously published (12). The presence of an organism was determined by analysis software (AusDiagnostics) which compared the observed melt temperature with the expected melt temperature within a range of ±1°C. An internal positive control was included for each specimen to monitor for PCR inhibition. The detection limit of the assay was determined by seeding distilled water with serial dilutions (a 2 McFarland standard to 104 CFU per ml) of C. albicans cells and Fusarium conidia, in triplicate. The concentration of the suspensions was confirmed by spreading 100 µl of the 102 dilution onto Sabouraud dextrose agar plates in duplicate and counting the colonies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Results of culture and colony MT-PCR identifications

Specificity was confirmed, as outlined previously (12), by testing DNA from 49 clinically relevant organisms, including fungi, bacteria, and parasites. No cross-reaction with nontargeted microorganisms was observed. The detection limit of the assay (without nucleic acid extraction) was 105 CFU/ml for both C. albicans and Fusarium sp. All 183 culture plates tested returned an MT-PCR result that matched the phenotypic identification (Table 1). However, MT-PCR detected extra fungal pathogens from five (2.7%) samples (specimens 26, 27, 54, 121, and 122) that were not identified phenotypically. The presence of these extra species was confirmed by (i) reinoculating the suspensions onto CHROMagar Candida medium (CHROMagar, Paris, France) to identify C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei and using the RapID Yeast Plus kit to identify other yeast species and (ii) subjecting the suspensions to panfungal PCR, amplifying the entire ITS1, 5.8S rRNA, and ITS2 regions, followed by DNA sequencing. Both methods confirmed the presence of multiple fungal species not identified on the original culture plate. Possible explanations for this include the various expertises of the laboratory staff that may overlook the presence of minute or hidden colonies and the lack of distinct morphological characteristics on general-purpose mycological media. Furthermore, negative PCR controls proved that the detection of extra species by MT-PCR was not due to contamination.

This study is the first to combine MT-PCR with colony PCR for the rapid identification of fungi directly from culture. Fungal pathogens were easily detected and correctly identified, even in mixed fungal cultures, without the need for DNA extraction. Although the release and purity of DNA were compromised by omitting an extraction procedure (105 CFU/ml detection limit for both yeasts and molds), adequate template was still available for detection by colony MT-PCR. Use of colony PCR reduced the time for identification to <2 h. This is considerably faster than biochemical identification, which requires a pure culture and an additional 4 to 48 h to reach biochemical endpoints. Furthermore, colony MT-PCR resulted in unambiguous species identification. Costs for MT-PCR are similar to those for current routine laboratory tests (AU$18, US$14.69, or {euro}10.39 for consumables plus 30 min labor costs), and a robot for automated operation is available for laboratories whose staff have little or no molecular or mycology experience.

With the growing number of organisms being "genetically" reclassified and the limitations of traditional phenotypic tests, fungal identification using molecular methods has become increasingly important. We are currently implementing colony MT-PCR into our routine laboratory tests. Work on expanding the number of fungal targets is under way.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Sharon Chen for critical review of the manuscript.

This work was supported in part by a Centre of Clinical Research Excellence grant (no. 264625) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. A.L. is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia. Phone: 61-2-9845 6255. Fax: 61-2-9891 5317. E-mail: Catriona.Halliday{at}swahs.health.nsw.gov.au Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 22 October 2008. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Alcoba-Florez, J., S. Mendez-Alvarez, J. Cano, J. Guarro, E. Perez-Roth, and M. del Pilar Arevalo. 2005. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Candida nivariensis sp. nov., a possible new opportunistic fungus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4107-4111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Bergman, A., V. Fernandez, K. O. Holmstrom, B. E. Claesson, and H. Enroth. 2007. Rapid identification of pathogenic yeast isolates by real-time PCR and two-dimensional melting-point analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 26:813-818.[CrossRef][Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Campa, D., A. Tavanti, F. Gemignani, C. S. Mogavero, I. Bellini, F. Bottari, R. Barale, S. Landi, and S. Senesi. 2008. DNA microarray based on arrayed-primer extension technique for identification of pathogenic fungi responsible for invasive and superficial mycoses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:909-915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Carvalho, A., S. Costa-De-Oliveira, M. L. Martins, C. Pina-Vaz, A. G. Rodrigues, P. Ludovico, and F. Rodrigues. 2007. Multiplex PCR identification of eight clinically relevant Candida species. Med. Mycol. 45:619-627.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Chen, Y. C., J. D. Eisner, M. M. Kattar, S. L. Rassoulian-Barrett, K. Lafe, U. Bui, A. P. Limaye, and B. T. Cookson. 2001. Polymorphic internal transcribed spacer region 1 DNA sequences identify medically important yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4042-4051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Ciardo, D. E., G. Schar, E. C. Bottger, M. Altwegg, and P. P. Bosshard. 2006. Internal transcribed spacer sequencing versus biochemical profiling for identification of medically important yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:77-84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Correia, A., P. Sampaio, S. James, and C. Pais. 2006. Candida bracarensis sp. nov., a novel anamorphic yeast species phenotypically similar to Candida glabrata. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56:313-317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. de Hoog, G. S., J. Guarro, J. Gene, and M. J. Figueras. 2000. Atlas of clinical fungi, 2nd ed. Centraalburearu voor Schimmelcultures / Universitat Rovia i Virgili, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
    9. 9
  9. Fujita, S. I., Y. Senda, S. Nakaguchi, and T. Hashimoto. 2001. Multiplex PCR using internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 regions for rapid detection and identification of yeast strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3617-3622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Hsu, M. C., K. W. Chen, H. J. Lo, Y. C. Chen, M. H. Liao, Y. H. Lin, and S. Y. Li. 2003. Species identification of medically important fungi by use of real-time LightCycler PCR. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:1071-1076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Huang, A., J. W. Li, Z. Q. Shen, X. W. Wang, and M. Jin. 2006. High-throughput identification of clinical pathogenic fungi by hybridization to an oligonucleotide microarray. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:3299-3305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Lau, A., T. C. Sorrell, S. Chen, K. Stanley, J. Iredell, and C. Halliday. 2008. Multiplex tandem PCR: a novel platform for rapid detection and identification of fungal pathogens from blood culture specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:3021-3027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Leaw, S. N., H. C. Chang, H. F. Sun, R. Barton, J. P. Bouchara, and T. C. Chang. 2006. Identification of medically important yeast species by sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer regions. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:693-699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Leinberger, D. M., U. Schumacher, I. B. Autenrieth, and T. T. Bachmann. 2005. Development of a DNA microarray for detection and identification of fungal pathogens involved in invasive mycoses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4943-4953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Luo, G., and T. G. Mitchell. 2002. Rapid identification of pathogenic fungi directly from cultures by using multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2860-2865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Majoros, L., G. Kardos, A. Belak, A. Maraz, L. Asztalos, E. Csanky, Z. Barta, and B. Szabo. 2003. Restriction enzyme analysis of ribosomal DNA shows that Candida inconspicua clinical isolates can be misidentified as Candida norvegensis with traditional diagnostic procedures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5250-5253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Mirhendi, H., K. Diba, A. Rezaei, N. Jalalizand, L. Hosseinpur, and H. Khodadadi. 2007. Colony-PCR is a rapid and sensitive method for DNA amplification in yeasts. Iran. J. Public Health 36:40-44.[Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Nishikawa, A., T. Sugita, and T. Shinoda. 1997. Differentiation between Debaryomyces hansenii/Candida famata complex and Candida guilliermondii by polymerase chain reaction. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 19:125-129.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Nishikawa, A., H. Tomomatsu, T. Sugita, R. Ikeda, and T. Shinoda. 1996. Taxonomic position of clinical isolates of Candida famata. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 34:411-419.[Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Pryce, T. M., S. Palladino, I. D. Kay, and G. W. Coombs. 2003. Rapid identification of fungi by sequencing the ITS1 and ITS2 regions using an automated capillary electrophoresis system. Med. Mycol. 41:369-381.[CrossRef][Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Stanley, K. K., and E. Szewczuk. 2005. Multiplexed tandem PCR: gene profiling from small amounts of RNA using Sybr green detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:e180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2008, p. 4058-4060, Vol. 46, No. 12
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01411-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lau, A.
Right arrow Articles by Halliday, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lau, A.
Right arrow Articles by Halliday, C.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»