Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2008, p. 4071-4074, Vol. 46, No. 12
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01088-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Evaluation of the Disk Diffusion Method Compared to the Microdilution Method in Susceptibility Testing of Anidulafungin against Filamentous Fungi
Carmelo Massimo Maida,1
Maria Eleonora Milici,1
Laura Trovato,2
Salvatore Oliveri,2
Emanuele Amodio,1
Elisabetta Spreghini,3
Giorgio Scalise,3 and
Francesco Barchiesi3*
Dipartimento di Scienze per la Promozione della Salute-sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy,1
Dipartimento di Scienze Microbiologiche e Scienze Ginecologiche, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy,2
Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy3
Received 9 June 2008/
Returned for modification 25 July 2008/
Accepted 2 October 2008

ABSTRACT
Susceptibility testing of anidulafungin (AFG) against 32 mold
isolates showed an excellent correlation between disk diffusion
(DD) and broth microdilution methods. Based on our data, a 2-µg
disk of AFG and a 24-h reading time might represent the best
parameters for AFG DD testing against filamentous fungi.

TEXT
The number of invasive fungal infections, including systemic
infections caused by
Aspergillus species, zygomycetes, and other
species of molds (
Fusarium and
Scedosporium) (
3,
5,
11,
12,
15,
20,
23,
24,
26,
27), has risen over the last 20 years. Recently,
the novel echinocandin anidulafungin (AFG) has been licensed
and exhibits high antifungal activity (
1,
4,
6,
7,
13,
21,
22,
28). Some investigators have explored the use of disk diffusion
(DD) susceptibility testing for caspofungin and AFG against
yeasts (specifically,
Candida isolates) (
9,
10,
14,
19), but
there is not much data available for AFG DD testing against
molds (
2,
8). Therefore, in this study we compared the AFG inhibition
zones (IZs) determined via the DD assay with the minimum effective
concentrations (MECs) obtained by the broth microdilution (BD)
reference method to determine the best correlation between the
two methods. The study was conducted at two university centers,
and the intralaboratory reproducibility and interlaboratory
agreement results were evaluated. The AFG susceptibilities of
33 isolates were determined by both the BD and DD assays. All
assays were performed in duplicate on two different days by
each center. A total of 32 clinical mold isolates were tested
(
Aspergillus fumigatus,
n = 8;
Aspergillus flavus,
n = 6;
Aspergillus terreus,
n = 4;
Aspergillus niger,
n = 3;
Acremonium curvulum,
n = 1;
Acremonium strictum,
n = 1;
Fusarium oxysporum;
n = 2;
Fusarium dimerum,
n = 2;
Absidia corymbifera,
n = 2;
Rhizopus oryzae,
n = 2;
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis,
n = 1).
Candida krusei ATCC 6258 was used as a quality control (QC). AFG was provided
as a pure powder form by Pfizer, Inc., and a stock solution
was prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide.
The BD method was performed as described in the NCCLS M38-A document (16). Stock solutions for the QC yeast isolate were prepared as described in the NCCLS M27-A2 document (17). Conidial inocula and AFG were prepared by using RPMI 1640 broth medium buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinopropanesulfonic acid buffer. The final concentrations of the antifungal agent in the microdilution trays ranged from 0.03 to 16 µg/ml. Growth (drug free) and sterility controls were included for each tested isolate. Microdilution trays were incubated at 35°C, and the AFG MECs, defined as the lowest drug concentrations that produced growth of small, rounded, compact colonies compared to the hyphal growth of the control well (19), were determined at 24 h for all the tested species. Similarly, QC MICs were read at 24 h. The DD assays were performed with homemade AFG disks. Blank disks that were 6.3 mm in diameter (Becton Dickinson) were impregnated with 20 µl of AFG at final concentrations of 2, 5, 10, and 25 µg/disk and allowed to dry at room temperature. A modification of the NCCLS M44-A DD method (18) for yeast testing was performed to determine the diameters of the antifungal IZs in millimeters at each center. The mold inocula were prepared at optical densities ranging from 80 to 82% and from 68 to 70% transmittance for Aspergillus species and the other species, respectively. A suspension with a 0.5 McFarland standard was utilized for the QC strain. Inoculum quantification was performed by counting the number of CFU per milliliter of diluted inoculum on Sabouraud dextrose agar plates. For the 32 mold isolates and the one QC isolate, 94.5% of the inocula were within the range of 1 x 106 to 5.0 x 106 CFU/ml, with higher inoculum densities (6.20 x 106 to 3.57 x 108) observed for eight isolates (three isolates of A. fumigatus, two of A. niger, and two of R. oryzae). Mueller-Hinton agar plates supplemented with 2% dextrose and 0.5 µl/ml methylene blue were inoculated using sterile cotton swabs, and the antifungal disks were applied to their surfaces. The plates were incubated at 35°C, and IZs were measured at 24, 48, and 72 h. The edges of the IZs were used as the points of marked decrease in fungal density.
The comparative evaluation of the DD and BD methods was performed by calculating the medians and the ranges of the IZ diameters and MECs. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between the MECs and the DD zone diameters. The intralaboratory reproducibility and the interlaboratory agreement results were calculated as the percentages of IZs with diameters within 3 mm of each other.
Table 1 summarizes the susceptibility results of AFG against 33 fungal isolates, with MECs/MICs ranging from
0.03 to >16 µg/ml. In general, isolates of Aspergillus spp. proved to be highly susceptible to this new echinocandin, as shown by a median MEC of
0.03 µg/ml. Our data agree with those reported by Messer et al. showing that AFG MECs of 0.03 µg/ml inhibited 100% of the tested isolates (13). With the exception of S. brevicaulis, which showed a median MEC of
0.03 µg/ml, the other mold isolates tested, including R. oryzae, A. corymbifera, Fusarium spp., and Acremonium spp., showed median MECs of >16 µg/ml (range, 4 to >16 µg/ml).
The disks embedded with AFG generated measurable IZs for all
Aspergillus species and for
S. brevicaulis (Table
1). Diameter
sizes were distributed over a relatively narrow range (from
11 to 23 mm). In general, as the AFG concentrations increased,
so did the diameters of the IZs. Despite the drug concentrations,
we often observed microcolonies inside the halos. These colonies
were not considered in the diameter measurements because their
morphologies were similar to the short, stubby hyphal branching
observed at the MEC (Fig.
1). Our data are in agreement with
those reported by Arikan et al., who found consistent intrazonal
growth in the halos of caspofungin disks when tested against
78 isolates of
Aspergillus spp. (
2).
According to the NCCLS BD results, the other mold isolates belonging
to four different genera (
Rhizopus,
Absidia,
Fusarium, and
Acremonium)
did not yield any measurable zone diameters.
The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the BD and DD results was excellent, ranging from –0.928 to –0.943, regardless of either the AFG concentrations or the reading times.
We also observed reasonable intralaboratory reproducibility and interlaboratory agreement results, ranging from 92.7 to 99.2% and from 81.5 to 92.7%, respectively (Table 2).
Therefore, based on the overall data, a 2-µg disk of AFG
and a 24-h reading time might represent the best parameters
for DD testing of AFG against filamentous fungi. These testing
conditions are preferred in order to lower the quantity of drug
necessary to perform the test and to lower the time needed to
read the plates. Being less time-consuming and less labor-intensive,
the DD method could be a good alternative to the BD method.
Further studies which include a larger number of clinical filamentous
fungi are warranted to confirm our results.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti, Umberto I—G.M. Lancisi—G. Salesi, Via Conca 60020, Torrette di Ancona, Ancona, Italy. Phone: 39 0715963426. Fax: 39 071 5963468. E-mail:
f.barchiesi{at}univpm.it 
Published ahead of print on 15 October 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Arikan, S., and J. H. Rex. 2000. New agents for treatment of systemic fungal infections. Emerg. Drugs 5:135-160.[CrossRef]
2 - Arikan, S., V. Paetznick, and J. H. Rex. 2002. Comparative evaluation of disk diffusion with microdilution assay in susceptibility testing of caspofungin against Aspergillus and Fusarium isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3084-3087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Denning, D. W. 1998. Invasive aspergillosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:781-803.[Medline]
4 - Denning, D. W. 2002. Echinocandins: a novel class of antifungal. J. Clin. Chemother. 49:889-891.
5 - De Pauw, B., T. J. Walsh, J. P. Donnelly, D. A. Stevens, J. E. Edwards, T. Calandra, P. G. Pappas, J. Maertens, O. Lortholary, C. A. Kauffman, D. W. Denning, T. F. Patterson, G. Maschmeyer, J. Bille, W. E. Dismukes, R. Herbrecht, W. W. Hope, C. C. Kibbler, B. J. Kullberg, K. A. Marr, P. Muñoz, F. C. Odds, J. R. Perfect, A. Restrepo, M. Ruhnke, B. H. Segal, J. D. Sobel, T. C. Sorrell, C. Viscoli, J. R. Wingard, T. Zaoutis, J. E. Bennett, et al. 2008. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:1813-1821.
6 - Espinel-Ingroff, A. 1998. Comparison of in vitro activities of the new trizole SCH 56592 and the echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY 303366 against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2950-2956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Espinel-Ingroff, A. 2003. In vitro antifungal activities of anidulafungin and micafungin, licensed agents and the investigational triazole posaconazole as determined by NCCLS methods for 12,052 fungal isolates: review of the literature. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 20:121-136.[Medline]
8 - Espinel-Ingroff, A., B. Arthington-Skaggs, N. Iqbal, D. Ellis, M. A. Pfaller, S. Messer, M. Rinaldi, A. Fothergill, D. L. Gibbs, and A. Wang. 2007. Multicenter evaluation of a new disk agar diffusion method for susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi with voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1811-1820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Jones, R. N., J. T. Kirby, S. A. Messer, and D. J. Sheehan. 2007. Development of anidulafungin for disk diffusion susceptibility testing against Candida spp. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 58:371-374.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Lozano-Chiu, M., P. W. Nelson, V. L. Paetznick, and J. H. Rex. 1999. Disk diffusion method for determining susceptibilities of Candida spp. to MK-0991. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1625-1627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Marr, K. A., R. A. Carter, F. Crippa, A. Wald, and L. Corey. 2002. Epidemiology and outcome of mould infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:909-917.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - McNeil, M. M., S. L. Nash, R. A. Hajjeh, M. A. Phelan, L. A. Conn, B. D. Plikaytis, and D. W. Warnock. 2001. Trends in mortality due to invasive mycotic disease in the United States, 1980-1997. Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:641-647.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Messer, S. A., J. T. Kirby, H. S. Sader, T. R. Fritsche, and R. N. Jones. 2004. Initial results from a longitudinal international surveillance programme for anidulafungin (2003). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 54:1051-1056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Milici, M. E., C. M. Maida, E. Spreghini, B. Ravazzolo, S. Oliveri, G. Scalise, and F. Barchiesi. 2007. Comparison between disk diffusion and microdilution methods for determining susceptibility of clinical fungal isolates to caspofungin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:3529-3533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Morgan, J., K. A. Wannemuehler, K. A. Marr, S. Hadley, D. P. Kontoyiannis, T. J. Walsh, S. K. Fridkin, P. G. Pappas, and D. W. Warnock. 2005. Incidence of invasive aspergillosis following hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation: interim results of a prospective multicenter surveillance program. Med. Mycol. 43(Suppl. 1):S49-S58.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - NCCLS/CLSI. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Approved standard. NCCLS M38-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Wayne, Pa.
17 - NCCLS/CLSI. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard, 2nd ed. M27-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
18 - NCCLS/CLSI. 2004. Method for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved guideline. M44-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
19 - Odds, F. C., M. Motyl, R. Andrade, J. Bille, E. Cantón, M. Cuenca-Estrella, A. Davidson, C. Durussel, D. Ellis, E. Foraker, A. W. Fothergill, M. A. Ghannoum, R. A. Giacobbe, M. Gobernado, R. Handke, M. Laverdière, W. Lee-Yang, W. G. Merz, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, J. Pemán, S. Perea, J. R. Perfect, M. A. Pfaller, L. Proia, J. H. Rex, M. G. Rinaldi, J.-L. Rodriguez-Tudela, W. A. Schell, C. Shields, D. A. Sutton, P. E. Verweij, and D. W. Warnock. 2004. Interlaboratory comparison of results of susceptibility testing with caspofungin against Candida and Aspergillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3475-3482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Patterson, T. F., W. R. Kirkpatrick, M. White, J. W. Hiemenz, J. R. Wingard, B. Dupont, M. G. Rinaldi, D. A. Stevens, and J. R. Graybill. 2000. Invasive aspergillosis: disease spectrum, treatment practices and outcomes. Medicine 79:250-260.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Pfaller, M. A., F. Marco, S. A. Messer, and R. N. Jones. 1998. In vitro activity of two echinocandin derivatives, LY 303366 and MK-0991 (L-743,872), against clinical isolates of Aspergillus, Fusarium, Rhizopus and other filamentous fungi. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 30:251-255.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Pfaller, M. A., L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, S. A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, and D. J. Diekema. 2005. In vitro activities of anidulafungin against more than 2,500 clinical isolates of Candida spp., including 315 isolates resistant to fluconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5425-5427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Ribes, J. A., C. L. Vanover-Sans, and D. J. Baker. 2000. Zygomycetes in human disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13:236-301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24 - Stevens, D. A., V. L. Kan, M. A. Judson, V. A. Morrison, S. Dummer, D. W. Denning, J. E. Bennett, T. J. Walsh, T. F. Patterson, and G. A. Pankey. 2000. Practice guidelines for disease caused by Aspergillus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 30:696-709.[CrossRef][Medline]
25 - Reference deleted.
26 - Walsh, T. J., A. Groll, J. Hiemenz, R. Flemming, E. Roilides, and E. Anaissie. 2004. Infections due to emerging and uncommon medically important fungal pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10:48-66.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 - Walsh, T. J., E. J. Anaissie, D. W. Denning, R. Herbrecht, D. P. Kontoyiannis, K. A. Marr, V. A. Morrison, B. H. Segal, W. J. Steinbach, D. A. Stevens, J. A. van Burik, J. R. Wingard, and T. F. Petterson. 2008. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:327-360.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Wiederhold, N. P., L. K. Najvar, R. Bocanegra, D. Molina, M. Olivo, and J. R. Graybill. 2007. In vivo efficacy of anidulafungin and caspofungin against Candida glabrata and association with in vitro potency in the presence of sera. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1616-1620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2008, p. 4071-4074, Vol. 46, No. 12
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01088-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.