JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Widmer, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Widmer, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, R.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2008, p. 835, Vol. 46, No. 2
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02276-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Necessity of Screening of both the Nose and the Throat To Detect Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Patients upon Admission to an Intensive Care Unit


    LETTER
 Top
 LETTER
 REFERENCES
 
We read with great interest the article by Marshall and Spelman (1). Similar to findings from our study with mainly methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), they found the throat to be an important site of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (2). Our findings from a setting with a low prevalence for MRSA (0.74% MRSA colonization; 37/5,041 individuals) are confirmed by this study of a setting with a high prevalence (19%; 224/1,181 individuals) for MRSA: the colonization patterns of MRSA and MSSA are very similar in these studies. However, our study results indicate that throat cultures increase sensitivity to the detection of carriers by 12.8%, compared to the additional 15.3% (28/183 patients) stated in the study by Marshall and Spelman (1), ignoring the patients who had only positive groin and axillary swabs. Therefore, we do not agree with the conclusions that "either throat or nose swabs are essential." Both sites are important, and the costs of cultures of the nose and throat can be minimized by pooling the samples in the laboratory, which is applicable for both conventional cultures and PCR techniques. Screening of additional sites may increase the sensitivity in an intensive care setting but may not be feasible in a routine setting such as an emergency room (3).

In conclusion, screening of the nares only should be replaced by screening of the nares and the throat, in any setting. Pooling samples in the microbiology laboratory is a reasonable option to avoid additional expense.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Ed. Note: The authors of the published article did not respond.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 LETTER
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Marshall, C., and D. Spelman. 2007. Is throat screening necessary to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in patients upon admission to an intensive care unit? J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:3855.[Free Full Text]
  2. Mertz, D., R. Frei, B. Jaussi, et al. 2007. Throat swabs are necessary to reliably detect carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45:475-477.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Moran, G. J., A. Krishnadasan, R. J. Gorwitz, et al. 2006. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N. Engl. J. Med. 355:666-674.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Andreas F. Widmer*
Dominik Mertz

Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology
University Hospital Basel
Petersgraben 4, CH-4031
Basel, Switzerland

R. Frei
Microbiology Laboratory
University Hospital Basel
Basel, Switzerland

* Phone: 41 61 265 25 25 Fax: 41 61 265 38 54 E-mail: awidmer{at}uhbs.ch


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2008, p. 835, Vol. 46, No. 2
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02276-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Widmer, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Widmer, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, R.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS