Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2008, p. 1090-1097, Vol. 46, No. 3
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.02015-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Ching-Ping Tseng,2,3,
Yen-Ju Chen,4
Chy-Yung Lin,5
Shy-Shin Chang,6,7
Ho-Sheng Wu,1 and
Ju-Chien Cheng4*
Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China,1 Graduate Institute of Medical Biotechnology,2 Clinical Medical Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan 333, Republic of China,6 Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Pathology,3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan 333, Republic of China,7 Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan 404, Republic of China,4 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Changhua Christian Medical Center, Changhua, Taiwan 500, Republic of China5
Received 14 October 2007/ Returned for modification 28 November 2007/ Accepted 20 December 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the clinical virology laboratory, the diagnosis of influenza A virus infection is typically performed by culturing of clinical specimens, followed by HA analysis and the hemagglutination inhibition assay. Molecular approaches such as multiplex reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (1, 3), real-time RT-PCR (8), microarray analysis (7, 28), and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (23) have been developed for the rapid detection and differentiation of influenza A virus subtypes. Due to the high costs of the machines and the complicated procedures associated with microarray analysis and mass spectrometric analysis, RT-PCR-based methods are apparently the most popular methods suitable for use in the clinical laboratory.
In addition to viral subtyping, analysis of the PCR product by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (16), single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis (2), and heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA) (9, 38) has been used for the genetic screening of influenza A virus variants. Recently, high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis of the PCR amplicon has been used for genotyping and variation scanning, as well as for microbial detection and species determination (4, 10, 12, 13, 15). This technique does not require fluorescently labeled probes or separation steps (33). It differs from LightCycler SYBR green I melting curve analysis by the incorporation of a novel saturation fluorescent dye, such as LCGreen I; high-resolution instrumentation with a high rate of data acquisition; ideal optics and tight temperature control; and adequate analysis software. Consequently, HRM analysis with the HR-1 instrument reliably detects single-base differences in homozygous and heterozygous sequences (11). In certain nucleotide compositions, homozygous sequences may not be readily detectable by HRM analysis. In this scenario, mixing of the test sample amplicon and a standard PCR amplicon, which results in heteroduplex formation, can be performed to reveal the sequence variant (4). When the amplicon sequence of a test sample differs from the standard PCR amplicon sequence, the melting plot should be changed following heteroduplex formation. No change to the melting plot occurs when the amplicon sequence of a test sample matches the standard PCR amplicon sequence. Hence, HRM analysis is cost-effective, has a high sensitivity and a high specificity, and can be completed with minimal post-PCR handling.
In this study, we report on a novel scheme that combines LightCycler real-time RT-PCR and HRM analysis for the rapid differentiation of influenza A virus subtypes and for the genetic screening of virus variants in clinical specimens. Due to the highly conserved nature of circulating influenza A virus strains and its association with the determination of species specificity and HA subtypes (24, 32), the viral matrix (M) gene was selected as the target for PCR amplification. Without multiplexing or hybridization probes, influenza A virus subtyping and genetic screening can be completed with one PCR within 4 h from the time of viral RNA isolation.
|
|
|---|
Viral specimen and isolation of viral RNA. Clinical influenza A virus strains were isolated from combined nose and/or throat swabs from selected patients who presented to physicians in sentinel practices with influenza-like illnesses. Briefly, the swabs and transportation medium were thoroughly mixed and the medium was filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter. The specimen (100 µl) was inoculated into Madin-Darby canine kidney cells for 7 to 14 days. A positive cytopathic effect was confirmed by indirect immunofluorescence assay (Chemicon Inc. Temecula, CA) and RT-PCR with HA-specific primer sets. The supernatants from positive cultures were harvested and stored at –80°C until future analysis. The QIAamp viral RNA mini kit was used to isolate viral RNA.
LightCycler real-time RT-PCR for amplification of viral M gene. A two-step real-time RT-PCR was performed to amplify the viral M-gene fragment. For the RT reaction, viral RNA (2 µl) was added to a reaction mixture (20 µl) containing 125 nM primer IFU-F (5'-GCGAGGACTGCAGCGTAGAC-3'), 1 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 20 U RNaseOUT, and 200 U (final concentration, 10 U/µl) Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. The reaction was then carried out at 42°C for 1 h. After cleanup with the QIAquick PCR purification kit, real-time PCR was then performed with the LightCycler thermal cycler and the primer pair IFU-F and IFU-R (5'-TGAGACCCATGCAACTGGCAAG-3'). Briefly, viral cDNA (2 µl) was added to a reaction mixture containing 250 nM of each primer, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 250 mg/liter bovine serum albumin, 1x LCGreen I dye, and 2.5 U of TEMPase Hot Start Taq DNA polymerase in 10 µl. The cycling conditions were 1 cycle of 95°C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 55°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 30 s, with a transition rate of 20°C/s.
Construction of standard plasmids for influenza A virus subtypes. The viral RNAs of reference isolates A/Taiwan/421/2006 (H1N1), A/Taiwan/482/2005 (H3N2), and A/HongKong/156/1997 (H5N1) were reversed transcribed in the presence of primer IFU-F. PCR was then performed with primer pair IFU-F and IFU-R. The PCR product was subcloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector. For H7N3 and H9N2, synthetic oligonucleotides (Table 1) corresponding to both strands of nucleotides (nt) 238 to 416 of the M gene of A/Canada/rv504/2004 (GenBank accession no. CY015007) and A/HongKong/2108/2003 (GenBank accession no. DQ226095) were annealed and subcloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector, as described by the manufacturer (Promega).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide sequences for generation of H7N3 and H9N2 M-gene fragment
|
HRM curve acquisition and analysis. Glass capillaries containing the amplification products were transferred directly from the LightCycler instrument to the HR-1 HRM instrument. The fragments were melted from 70 to 90°C at a rate of 0.1°C/s. The melting profiles were assessed with HR-1 software with fluorescence normalization and temperature overlay to superimpose the curves at 5 to 20% fluorescence.
Heteroduplex formation. Heteroduplex formation was achieved by mixing equal amounts of the PCR products from the viral strains to be tested and the reference viral strain. The value of the fluorescence intensity after the final run of the PCR was used as a basis to calculate the volume of PCR products required to be mixed. To induce heteroduplex formation, the DNA mixtures were subjected to heating at 95°C for 1 s and cooling to 40°C for 10 s at a rate of 20°C/s.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Sequence alignments, real-time RT-PCR, and gel electrophoresis analysis of the M-gene PCR amplicons. (A) Sequence alignments of the PCR amplicons corresponding to nt 238 to 416 of the M genes for the indicated influenza A virus strains. Only parts of the sequences showing differences from the first sequence are shown. Nucleotides identical to the nucleotide in the first sequence are indicated by dots. The underlined sequences were used for the design of primers IFU-F and IFU-R. (B and C) Serial dilution of the in vitro-transcribed H3N2 RNA harboring the M-gene fragment, which was used as the template for real-time RT-PCR with primer pair IFU-F and IFU-R. (B) A typical LightCycler amplification plot and an agarose gel of the PCR product. (C) The crossing points plotted against the RNA concentration. The data represent the means ± standard deviations (n = 5). NTC, no-template control.
|
To simplify the scheme for HRM analysis for the differentiation of the influenza A virus subtypes, five plasmids containing the M-gene PCR amplicon of the individual reference isolates were generated. All these constructs were amplifiable by our real-time PCR and had a PCR product length of 179 bp (Fig. 2A). We then used the HR-1 instrument to perform HRM analysis. The melting and derivative plots were not distinguishable, with closely overlapping patterns for the five reference isolates and minimal interassay variability (Fig. 2B and C). The melting plot for the no-template control reaction was eliminated automatically by the HR-1 analytical software when the comment of "delete some bad samples" was executed during fluorescence normalization.
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Real-time PCR and HRM analysis of five clinically important influenza A virus subtypes. (A) Standard plasmids (1 pg) with the M-gene fragments of the indicated subtypes were subjected to real-time PCR, as described in the Materials and Methods. A typical LightCycler amplification plot and the typical results of agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of the PCR product are presented. Melting (B) and derivative (C) plots for the indicated influenza A virus subtypes were obtained by HRM analysis of the real-time PCR amplicon. Fluorescence normalization and temperature overlay were performed with HR-1 software. For each influenza A virus subtype, the data represent three measurements obtained with the plasmid DNA from the indicated reference isolates.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. HRM plots and derivative plots for influenza A virus subtyping. (A to C) High-resolution melting and derivative plots were obtained by heteroduplex formation (HD) between the PCR products of the indicated influenza A virus subtype and the reference strain of H1N1 (A/Taiwan/421/2006) or H5N1 (A/HongKong/156/97). The melting (A) and derivative (A and C) plots reveal the HRM profile for each virus subtype. The derivative plots for five to six measurements of each influenza A virus subtype reveal the minimal interassay variability (B). Note the consistent derivative plot pattern for each virus subtype. (D) Tenfold serial dilutions of H3N2 plasmid DNAs (from 2.8 x 108 to 28 copies) were subjected to real-time PCR amplification. After heteroduplex formation with the reference H1N1 PCR amplicon, HRM analysis was performed, and the derivative plots are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Work flow for rapid detection and differentiation of five clinically important influenza A virus subtypes. An unknown influenza virus isolate was subjected to M-gene real-time RT-PCR and HRM analysis. According to the melting and derivative plots, all five influenza A virus subtypes can be identified by heteroduplex formation (HD) between the PCR products of the virus isolate tested and the indicated reference influenza A virus isolate. Potential mistyping and new variants can be resolved further by confirmatory testing by HRM analysis of the mixed PCR amplicon between the test sample and a standard strain of the putative subtype.
|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Validation assay with 21 clinical influenza A virus isolates obtained from a clinical virology laboratory. (A and B) The derivative plots were obtained by heteroduplex formation (HD) between the PCR products of the indicated influenza A virus subtypes and the reference strains of H1N1 (A) or H3N2 (B). The clinical strains that did not have derivative plots typical of those in our HRM database are marked. (C and D) Sequence alignment of the PCR amplicons corresponding to nt 238 to 416 of the M genes of the indicated influenza A virus strains. Only parts of the sequences showing differences from the first sequence are shown. Nucleotides that were identical to the nucleotide in the first sequence are indicated by dots.
|
|
|
|---|
Most of the methods currently available for influenza A virus subtyping use subtype-specific primers to amplify the HA or the NA gene, which allows the detection of only one specific pathogen at a time (36). For sample screening and subtype identification in an outbreak, multiplexing or multiple reactions followed by post-PCR electrophoresis to separate amplicons of different sizes are usually required. Although real-time RT-PCR has successfully been applied to the detection of influenza A virus, a TaqMan probe or a hybridization probe is usually needed, and the use of these probes can increase the expense on a cost-per-sample basis (8, 25). Alternatively, analysis of M-gene sequence variants forms a basis for HA subtyping. The principle of this type of assay is based on phylogenetic analysis, which reveals the preferential association between the influenza A virus HA and M genes and the coevolution of these genes (24, 32). This notion allows the design of an assay for analysis of the M-gene nucleotide components and the differentiation of influenza A virus HA subtypes. For instance, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the M-gene PCR product has been applied to the subtyping of human influenza A viruses (6, 17). A real-time LightCycler hybridization probe-based assay targeting subtype-specific sequences in the M gene combined with melting temperature analysis was developed for the differentiation of H1N1 and H3N2 (25). Combined PCR-HMA of the M-gene PCR amplicon has also been described for the detection and partial characterization of influenza A viruses from different animal species (9). Although heteroduplex analysis is ideally suited for the differentiation of rapidly evolving RNA viruses (14, 27, 38, 39), post-PCR analysis by electrophoresis on polyacrylamide gels is required. Therefore, it is usually time-consuming, carries an increased risk of carryover contamination, and may not be suitable for use in a routine clinical virology laboratory.
Recent trends in the application of HRM analysis for microorganism identification (4, 12, 21) led us to explore a new avenue for influenza A virus subtyping. This novel approach is based on the same concept used for HMA and has been applied to mutation scanning and genotyping (30, 37). We demonstrate in this study that influenza A virus can be differentiated simply through the use of one PCR primer pair for real-time RT-PCR, followed by HRM analysis of the M-gene PCR amplicon. Through bioinformatic analysis, we revealed that the 136-bp interprimer region is relatively conserved within isolates of the same subtype, whereas nucleotide divergence is present among different influenza A virus subtypes. Therefore, the PCR amplicon likely contains information for at least partial phylogenetic characterization and subtyping of clinically important influenza A viruses. Compared to the amplicons obtained by other subtyping methods, the PCR amplicon obtained in this study is relatively small (179 bp), which further gives HRM analysis-based subtyping a superior resolution power. When it is combined with rapid-cycle PCR, HRM analysis requires minimal time, and the material cost is usually less than $2. The time required for the differentiation of influenza A virus subtypes is considerably shorter when PCR is performed directly with clinical specimens.
Notably, this method is ideally suited not only for the subtyping of current circulating strains but also for the identification of newly emerging strains. Consistent with the findings of previous studies on the application of HRM analysis for genotyping and the identification of genetic variants (13, 20), HRM analysis identified four clinical isolates (A/Taiwan/286/2004, A/Taiwan/284/2004, A/Taiwan/21/2004, and A/Taiwan/57/2007) with changes in the nucleotide components of the M gene during our validation assay. Although only one to two nucleotides are different compared to the sequence of the reference strain, they are readily detectable by HRM analysis. Such clinical variants may not be unveiled by conventional real-time RT-PCR methods with the TaqMan probe or a hybridization probe. Hence, HRM analysis of viral isolates may also be useful for the early detection of genetic changes that can occur during virus evolution or interspecies transmission between animal and human hosts. The novel or unusual influenza A virus isolates identified by HRM analysis can be more extensively characterized by direct sequencing and typing by the hemagglutination inhibition assay.
Because influenza A virus continues to experience nucleotide mutations through the mechanism of antigenic drift and antigenic shift, the HRM profile of a specific viral subtype may not be the same when the virus strains are isolated from different outbreak areas. Because of this, we compared the HRM profiles of two H5N1 strains, A/Hong Kong/156/1997, which was isolated from the tracheal aspirate from a 3-year-old child in Hong Kong with a fatal illness consistent with influenza (26), and A/Vietnam/1203/2004, which showed evidence of antigenic drift and which was distinct from the AIV circulating before the end of 2003 (34). We found that both isolates had unique HRM profiles that reflected the divergence of nucleotide components between the two strains (data not shown). Hence, the use of a recently circulating strain, if one is available, as the reference isolate for HRM analysis-based subtyping is recommended. With an appropriate HRM profile database, this method should allow the cost-effective differentiation of influenza A virus subtypes and the early detection of newly emerging clinical variants in an influenza surveillance program.
Published ahead of print on 3 January 2008. ![]()
J.-H. Lin and C.-P. Tseng contributed equally to this work and are considered co-first authors. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»