Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seki, M. Articles by Kilian, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Seki, M. Articles by Kilian, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2008, p. 1113-1115, Vol. 46, No. 3
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02107-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Novel Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Detection of the JP2 Clone of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in Subgingival Plaque

Mitsuko Seki,^1,2 Knud Poulsen,¹ Dorte Haubek,³ and Mogens Kilian^1*

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark,¹ Department of Oral Health Sciences, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan,² Department of Community Oral Health and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark³

Received 1 November 2007/ Accepted 16 December 2007

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
We developed a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method that detects the JP2 clone of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, which induces aggressive periodontitis in adolescents of North and West African descents. Being independent of special equipment, this specific and sensitive method offers significant advantages for screening of patients on a population basis and in clinical settings.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans (11) has long been suspected as an etiological factor in periodontitis in juveniles (17, 19). Members of a particular clonal lineage (JP2) of A. actinomycetemcomitans (18) show a unique 530-bp deletion (530) in the promoter region of the ltx operon resulting in enhanced production of leukotoxin, a key virulence factor (1). The JP2 clone shows marked racial tropism as it has been isolated almost exclusively from adolescent periodontitis patients of West and Northwest African descent, including both Africans and Arabs (2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Substantial evidence shows that the JP2 clone induces aggressive periodontitis in these populations and constitutes a particularly pathogenic subpopulation of A. actinomycetemcomitans (see reference 6a); reviewed in reference 8).

Because the presence of the JP2 clone has significant implications for prevention and treatment of periodontitis in juveniles, it is essential to be able to accurately determine its presence in subgingival plaque samples. Cultivation by itself does not distinguish between the JP2 clone and other genotypes of the species. PCR detection of the 530 deletion has been used to identify the JP2 clone in plaque samples and among isolates and to distinguish it from other A. actinomycetemcomitans strains (13, 15, 20). However, there is a need for a simple and low-technology method for detection of the JP2 clone. For that purpose, the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method is an attractive alternative to conventional PCR (12).

The LAMP reaction runs at a constant temperature, usually around 65°C, and uses four primers that recognize six distinct regions of the target DNA, combined with the Bst DNA polymerase large fragment, which has strand displacement activity and is heat inactivated at 80°C (12). The reaction can be accelerated by inclusion of additional loop primers (10). The resulting amplification products are a complex mixture of stem-loop DNAs with inverted repeats and cauliflower-like structures (12) and induce a white precipitate of magnesium pyrophosphate proportional to the amount of amplified DNA and visible to the naked eye (9). Usually, LAMP primers are designed to specifically recognize a target sequence that is unique to the microorganism in question. A LAMP method targeting the dam gene, which is common to all members of A. actinomycetemcomitans, was reported recently (14). We wanted to develop a method that specifically detects the JP2 clone and took advantage of the specific 530 deletion. The low percentage of G+C in the sequence around 530 made it impossible to design appropriate LAMP primers in this region, including a primer spanning the site of deletion. As an alternative, we developed a novel approach based on the differences in distance between primer regions ("spacer regions") in the JP2 clone and in other A. actinomycetemcomitans strains. The primers shown in Fig. 1 were designed on the basis of the genome sequence of the JP2 clone strain HK1651 (http://www.genome.ou.edu/act.html) by using the program PrimerExplorer V3 (https://primerexplorer.jp/lamp3.0.0/index.html). The recommended distance between the 5' ends of F2 and B2 is 120 to 180 bp for optimal amplification, and DNA of more than 500 bp amplifies very poorly (12). When the primers shown in Fig. 1 are used, this distance is 167 bp in members of the JP2 clone and 697 bp in non-JP2 clones of A. actinomycetemcomitans.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. LAMP primers used to detect 530 in the ltx promoter region of JP2 strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans. (a) Locations of the primer sequences in the promoter region of the ltx gene operon. The ATG start codon of the ltxC gene (the first gene in the ltx operon) is shown in bold and underlined. The site of 530 and the BsmI restriction site are indicated by arrows. The numbers to the left refer to positions in the A. actinomycetemcomitans strain HK1651 genome sequence (http://www.genome.ou.edu/act.html). (b) Structure and sequence of the six primers used in the LAMP reaction.

The LAMP reaction was performed with 25 µl containing 1.6 µM each of the primers FIP and BIP, 0.2 µM of primers F3 and B3, 0.4 µM of primers LF and LB, 8 U of the Bst DNA polymerase large fragment (New England Biolabs), 1.4 mM each of the four deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 0.8 M betaine (Sigma), 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 10 mM KCl, 10 mM (NH₄)₂SO₄, 8 mM MgSO₄, 0.1% Tween 20, and template DNA in a volume of up to 5 µl. The high-performance liquid chromatography-purified primers purchased from DNA Technology were dissolved in Tris-EDTA buffer. The mixture was incubated at 63°C for 60 min and then heated at 80°C for 2 min to terminate the reaction. In agreement with our hypothesis, an amplification product was obtained when DNA from A. actinomycetemcomitans strain HK921 (JP2) was the template, whereas DNA from non-JP2 strain HK975 (Y4) did not result in a product, as revealed both by visual inspection and by agarose gel electrophoresis. Throughout this study, evaluation of the LAMP reactions showed complete agreement between a white precipitate recorded by visual inspection and an amplification product detectable by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Specificity of the LAMP reaction. To evaluate the specificity of the LAMP reaction, we tested 27 A. actinomycetemcomitans strains, including 11 JP2 strains and 16 non-JP2 strains, selected to represent the different subpopulations in the species (16), and members of the three closely related species Aggregatibacter (Haemophilus) aphrophilus, Aggregatibacter (Haemophilus) segnis, and Mannheimia haemolytica, the last of which produces a repeat-in-toxin leukotoxin homologous to that of A. actinomycetemcomitans. When approximately 1 ng whole-cell DNA was used in the LAMP reaction, amplification products from all JP2 strains were observed, whereas none of the non-JP2 strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans and representatives of other species resulted in amplification products. Addition of excess DNA (25 ng) from non-JP2 strain HK975 did not result in a product (Fig. 2). To ensure that the amplification products corresponded to the selected sequence target, we took advantage of the fact that strain JP2 has a BsmI recognition site between sequences F1c and B1c (Fig. 1). In full agreement, the products demonstrated after digestion with BsmI had predicted sizes of 106 and 116 bp (Fig. 2). Their identities were further confirmed by sequencing using primers F2 and B2. Thus, the LAMP reaction is highly specific for the JP2 clone.

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Analysis of DNA fragments amplified by LAMP reactions on isolates and directly on plaque samples. (a) Visual detection of a white precipitate in positive samples. The figure shows a positive (strain JP2) and a negative (non-JP2 strain Y4) sample, together with a negative control (neg.). (b) LAMP products were separated by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide. Lane 1, molecular size marker in base pairs (GeneRuler 50-bp DNA ladder; Fermentas); lane 2, strain JP2; lane 3, strain HK1651 (JP2 clone strain); lane 4, strain HK975 (Y4, non-JP2 strain); lane 5, negative control; lane 6, clinical sample 362 M (positive for the JP2 clone and negative for non-JP2 types in PCR); lane 7, clinical sample 436I (positive for the JP2 clone and non-JP2 types in PCR); lane 8, clinical sample 507I (negative for A. actinomycetemcomitans in PCR); lane 9, clinical sample 510I (negative for the JP2 clone and positive for non-JP2 types in PCR); lanes 10 to 13, same as lanes 2, 3, 6, and 7, respectively, except with BsmI digestion; lane 14, molecular mass marker. The arrows to the right indicate the positions of fragments in bp in the molecular mass marker. In lane 4, an excess of DNA was used as described in the text, and the genomic DNA is seen as a faint band at the top of the gel. The low molecular smear in lanes 5, 8, and 9 is presumably due to primer-dimers, and it did not result in a visible white precipitate. In lanes 10 to 13, the two fragments of 106 and 116 bp migrate together in the gel. The band in lane 10 is weak because only a fraction of the sample was loaded onto the gel.

Sensitivity of the LAMP reaction. DNA from A. actinomycetemcomitans strain HK921 (JP2) was purified using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen), and the absorbencies A₂₆₀ and A₂₈₀ were used to measure the quantity of DNA. The number of genome copies was calculated on the basis of a genome size of 2.1 Mb. Serial 10-fold dilutions of the genomic DNA were tested in the LAMP reaction, and the results were compared with those of a conventional PCR test targeting the ltx promoter and performed as described previously (15). The detection limits for the LAMP assay and PCR were 10 and 100 genome copies, respectively, in a 5-µl sample. When incubation was reduced to 30 min, the detection limit for the LAMP was 100 genome copies, indicating that the reaction was very rapid.

LAMP applied to analysis of clinical specimens. Subgingival plaque samples on paper points were collected from adolescents in Morocco and sent to Denmark in 1 ml 0.9% NaCl. After vortexing, the bacteria were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in 100 µl water, and boiled for 5 min as described previously (15). The samples were stored at –20°C. A total of 72 subgingival plaque samples were tested for the presence of the JP2 clone by both the LAMP test and the PCR (Table 1). In the PCR, 23 µl of the subgingival plaque suspension was used in a 25-µl reaction mixture. In the LAMP test, 5 µl was used as described above. The two tests agreed on the presence of the JP2 clone in 42 samples and on the absence of the clone from 24 samples. For the remaining six samples (8.3%), the LAMP test demonstrated the presence of the JP2 clone while the PCR gave a negative result. Digestion of the LAMP products from the latter six samples with BsmI confirmed that these samples represented the specific target. A higher sensitivity of the LAMP test conceivably contributed to the higher detection rate. In addition, previous studies demonstrated that the LAMP reaction is more tolerant to potentially perturbing biological substances than the PCR methodology (7). In contrast to the LAMP test, the PCR test concurrently detects non-JP2 members of A. actinomycetemcomitans. The presence of non-JP2 A. actinomycetemcomitans seems not to influence detection of the JP2 clone by LAMP (Table 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Detection of A. actinomycetemcomitans with and without 530 in 72 plaque samples by PCR with primers ltx3 and ltx4 (15) compared to that by the LAMP method described in the text

In conclusion, we have developed a LAMP test using a novel principle based on differences in "spacer regions" for detection of the JP2 clone of A. actinomycetemcomitans and having a specificity equivalent to and a sensitivity exceeding those of previously described PCR methods. Because the LAMP reaction is easy to set up and does not require special equipment, it has obvious advantages in clinical settings and in population-based studies with limited access to laboratory technology.

 
This work was supported by grants from Sato Fund, Nihon University School of Dentistry, and from Ingeborg and Leo Dannin's Foundation.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Bartholin Building, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Phone: (45) 89421735. Fax: (45) 89196128. E-mail: kilian{at}microbiology.au.dk

Published ahead of print on 26 December 2007.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 

1
1. Brogan, J. M., E. T. Lally, K. Poulsen, M. Kilian, and D. R. Demuth. 1994. Regulation of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans leukotoxin expression: analysis of the promoter regions of leukotoxic and minimally leukotoxic strains. Infect. Immun. 62:501-508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Contreras, A., T. Rusitanonta, C. Chen, W. G. Wagner, B. S. Michalowicz, and J. Slots. 2000. Frequency of 530-bp deletion in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans leukotoxin promoter region. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 15:338-340.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Haraszthy, V. I., G. Hariharan, E. M. B. Tinoco, J. R. Cortelli, E. T. Lally, E. Davis, and J. J. Zambon. 2000. Evidence for the role of highly leukotoxic Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in the pathogenesis of localized juvenile and other forms of early-onset periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 71:912-922.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Haubek, D., J. M. DiRienzo, E. M. B. Tinoco, J. Westergaard, N. J. López, C.-P. Chung, K. Poulsen, and M. Kilian. 1997. Racial tropism of a highly toxic clone of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans associated with juvenile periodontitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3037-3042.[Abstract]
5
5. Haubek, D., O.-K. Ennibi, K. Poulsen, S. Poulsen, N. Benzarti, and M. Kilian. 2001. Early-onset periodontitis in Morocco is associated with the highly leukotoxic clone of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J. Dent. Res. 80:1580-1583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Haubek, D., K. Poulsen, J. Westergaard, G. Dahlén, and M. Kilian. 1996. Highly toxic clone of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in geographically widespread cases of juvenile periodontitis in adolescents of African origin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1576-1578.[Abstract]
6
7. Haubek, D., O.-K. Ennibi, K. Poulsen, M. Vaeth, S. Poulsen, and M. Kilian. 2008. Risk of aggressive periodontitis in adolescent carriers of the JP2 clone of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans in Morocco: a prospective longitudinal study. Lancet 371:237-242.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
8. Kaneko, H., T. Kawana, E. Fukushima, and T. Suzutani. 2007. Tolerance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification to a culture medium and biological substances. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 70:499-501.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
9. Kilian, M., E. V. G. Frandsen, D. Haubek, and K. Poulsen. 2006. The etiology of periodontal disease revisited by population genetic analysis. Periodontol. 2000 42:158-179.[CrossRef]
9
10. Mori, Y., M. Kitao, N. Tomita, and T. Notomi. 2004. Real-time turbidimetry of LAMP reaction for quantifying template DNA. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 59:145-157.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
11. Nagamine, K., T. Hase, and T. Notomi. 2002. Accelerated reaction by loop-mediated isothermal amplification using loop primers. Mol. Cell. Probes. 16:223-229.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
12. Nørskov-Lauritsen, N., and M. Kilian. 2006. Reclassification of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Haemophilus aphrophilus, Haemophilus paraphrophilus and Haemophilus segnis as Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans gen. nov., comb. nov., Aggregatibacter aphrophilus comb. nov. and Aggregatibacter segnis comb. nov., and emended description of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus to include V factor-dependent and V factor-independent isolates. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56:2135-2146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
13. Notomi, T., H. Okayama, H. Masubuchi, T. Yonekawa, K. Watanabe, N. Amino, and T. Hase. 2000. Loop mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:e63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
14. Orru, G., M. F. Marini, M. L. Ciusa, D. Isola, M. Cotti, M. Baldoni, V. Piras, E. Pisano, and C. Montaldo. 2006. Usefulness of real time PCR for the differentiation and quantification of 652 and JP2 Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans genotypes in dental plaque and saliva. BMC Infect. Dis. 6:98.[CrossRef][Medline]
14
15. Osawa, R., A. Yoshida, Y. Masakiyo, S. Nagashima, T. Ansai, H. Watari, T. Notomi, and T. Takehara. 2007. Rapid detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 22:252-259.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
16. Poulsen, K., E. Oum-Keltoum, and D. Haubek. 2003. Improved PCR for detection of the highly leukotoxic JP2 clone of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in subgingival plaque samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4829-4832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
17. Poulsen, K., E. Theilade, E. T. Lally, D. R. Demuth, and M. Kilian. 1994. Population structure of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: a framework for studies of disease-associated properties. Microbiology 140:2049-2060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
18. Slots, J., H. S. Reynolds, and R. J. Genco. 1980. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in human periodontal disease: a cross-sectional microbiological investigation. Infect. Immun. 29:1013-1020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
19. Tsai, C.-C., W. P. McArthur, P. C. Baehni, B. F. Hammond, and N. S. Taichman. 1979. Extraction and partial characterization of leukotoxin from a plaque-derived gram-negative microorganism. Infect. Immun. 25:427-439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
20. Zambon, J. J. 1985. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in human periodontal disease. J. Clin. Periodontol. 12:1-20.[CrossRef][Medline]
20
21. Zambon, J. J., V. I. Haraszthy, G. Hariharan, E. T. Lally, and D. R. Demuth. 1996. The microbiology of early-onset periodontitis: association of highly toxic Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans strains with localized juvenile periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 67:282-290.

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2008, p. 1113-1115, Vol. 46, No. 3
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02107-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seki, M. Articles by Kilian, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Seki, M. Articles by Kilian, M.