Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huang, Y.-T. Articles by Hsueh, P.-R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huang, Y.-T. Articles by Hsueh, P.-R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2008, p. 1132-1136, Vol. 46, No. 3
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01844-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

CASE REPORT

Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis Caused by a Non-Daptomycin-Susceptible, Vancomycin-Intermediate, and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain in Taiwan

Yu-Tsung Huang,^1,2 Cheng-Hsiang Hsiao,³ Chun-Hsing Liao,¹ Chung-Wei Lee,⁴ and Po-Ren Hsueh^2,5*

Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei County, Taiwan,¹ Departments of Internal Medicine,² Pathology,³ Radiology,⁴ Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan⁵

Received 17 September 2007/ Returned for modification 25 October 2007/ Accepted 3 January 2008

Top ABSTRACT CASE REPORT REFERENCES

 
We describe the development of nonsusceptibility to daptomycin and vancomycin during treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia associated with infective endocarditis and probable septic thrombophlebitis in a uremic patient. MRSA bacteremia persisted during glycopeptide and subsequent daptomycin treatment but cleared after 5 days' treatment with linezolid and fusidic acid.

Top ABSTRACT CASE REPORT REFERENCES

 
We describe the first reported case in Taiwan of a patient with the loss of daptomycin susceptibility after a prolonged glycopeptide treatment. The primary infections in this patient were left-side infective endocarditis and probable septic thrombophlebitis.

A 66-year-old man was admitted due to fever and extending redness around the double-lumen catheter insertion site over the right inguinal area for 2 days. The patient had hepatitis C virus-related liver cirrhosis (Child-Plugh class C), which was complicated by a previous episode of spontaneous peritonitis, and end-stage renal disease caused by type 1 membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. He received regular hemodialysis via a right-femur double-lumen catheter. An arteriovenous fistula with a vascular graft was constructed over the left forearm 10 days prior to his admission.

At admission, his body temperature was 38.2°C, his pulse rate was 117/min, and his blood pressure was 155/81 mm Hg. Redness and tenderness over the right inguinal area and swelling of the left arm were noted. Laboratory investigation showed a normal white blood cell count of 9,740 cells/mm³, with 90.8% segmentation. A vascular duplex ultrasound performed on admission revealed no fluid accumulation around the arteriovenous fistula graft. Two sets of blood culture performed on admission revealed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin (1 g every 3 days, intravenously) was given starting on hospital day 3. Fever subsided thereafter. The trough level obtained after the patient was administered 25 mg of vancomycin/kg of body weight, followed by two other doses, was 13.34 µg/ml. Vancomycin was switched to teicoplanin (300 mg every 3 days, intravenously) on hospital day 12 due to a suspected drug rash. The vascular graft was removed on hospital day 26 due to suspicion of infection. Culture of blood obtained on hospital days 22, 24, 40, and 43 still revealed MRSA, although the patient remained afebrile throughout this period (Fig. 1). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed on hospital day 44 to search for the source of persistent bacteremia, and it revealed a 1.4-cm by 1.3-cm oscillating mass over the anterior mitral valve leaflet (Fig. 2).

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Summary of the treatment course and MICs of all 11 MRSA bloodstream isolates. The blood culture results are indicated beneath the time line, with each positive result being indicated with a + and each negative result being indicated with a –. Numbers beside "Vancomycin MIC" and Daptomycin MIC" reflect the changing MICs of those drugs during the times indicated by arrows.

View larger version (96K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. (Left) Computed tomographic image generated by curved multiplanar reconstruction showing thrombosis over the left brachiocephalic vein. Arrows, thrombus; arrowheads, peripheral edema of vascular wall; @, superior vena cava; *, aorta. (Right) Transthoracic echocardiographic images. The vegetation sizes were 1.40 cm by 1.30 cm on hospital day 44, when infective endocarditis was first diagnosed (upper right, black arrow), and 2.18 cm by 1.26 cm on hospital day 72, when the blood culture became negative (lower right, white arrow).

Due to poor wound healing after vascular graft removal and the development of left-extremity swelling, chest computed tomography was performed on hospital day 44, and it revealed thrombosis with mild perivascular edema over the left brachiocephalic vein (Fig. 2). Septic phlebitis was suspected. Daptomycin (6 mg/kg every other day) was given on hospital day 47 due to suspicion of glycopeptide treatment failure after the patient suffered a new spiking fever and persistent bacteremia. However, his fever continued to fluctuate, and a follow-up blood culture on hospital day 58, 14 days after daptomycin was started, remained positive for MRSA. The vancomycin MIC of the isolate from day 50 was 4 µg/ml, and the daptomycin MIC was 4 µg/ml as determined by the broth microdilution method, with the calcium concentration adjusted to 50 µg/ml according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2). Linezolid (600 mg every 12 h, intravenously) was started on hospital day 61. Follow-up blood culture was sterile after 8 days of linezolid treatment. Fusidic acid (500 mg every 8 h, orally) was added on hospital day 69 and was discontinued on day 79 due to the deterioration of hepatic function. Follow-up blood cultures on hospital days 75, 83, and 85 revealed no vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA). However, the patient died of an episode of septic shock with multiorgan failure caused by Candida albicans on hospital day 83.

MICs of all 11 isolates were determined simultaneously (i) by the broth microdilution method with Mueller-Hinton broth (BBL, Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) and an initial inoculum of 5 x 10⁵ CFU/ml according to the CLSI guidelines and (ii) by the Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) according to the manufacturer's instructions (2). When daptomycin MICs were tested, the medium was Mueller-Hinton broth containing physiological levels of calcium (50 µg/ml), as recommended previously (6). S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used as a quality control strain in each run. S. aureus Mu3 and Mu50 strains were used in comparison with our VISA isolates. MICs were read after the incubation of microtiter plates and Mueller-Hinton agar plates in the Etest for 24 h at 37°C. The MICs for S. aureus ATCC 29213 were within CLSI control ranges (2).

All of the 11 MRSA isolates were susceptible to tigecycline (MIC, 0.25 µg/ml), fusidic acid (MIC, 0.12 µg/ml), and linezolid (MIC, 1 µg/ml) and resistant to rifampin (MIC, >32 µg/ml) by the broth microdilution method (Table 1). Ceftobiprole MICs for the 11 isolates were either 2 or 4 µg/ml. The Etest MICs of daptomycin (from 1 to 4 µg/ml) and tigecycline (from 0.094 to 0.25 µg/ml) for the 11 isolates were the same as those generated by the broth microdilution method except for those of vancomycin, which were twofold higher (from 1.5 to 8 µg/ml) (Table 1). Pulsotypes of the 11 isolates from the patient generated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis after the digestion of chromosomal DNA with XbaI were indistinguishable, suggesting that they belonged to a single clone (19). The means and standard deviations of cell wall thickness as determined by transmission electron microscopy and calculated from 30 cells for three isolates with MICs of both vancomycin and daptomycin of 1 µg/ml, 2 µg/ml, and 4 µg/ml were 22.85 ± 5.13, 25.50 ± 5.58, and 31.68 ± 10.71 nm, respectively (3). The cell wall thicknesses of the isolates were significantly increased with vancomycin and daptomycin MICs of 4 µg/ml as determined by Student's t test (P was 0.0001 in a comparison of results for isolates with MICs of 1 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml, respectively, and P was 0.0069 in a comparison of results for isolates with MICs of 2 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml, respectively) (3).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Antibiograms of the 11 isolates determined by the broth microdilution method and the Etest

Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic with rapid bactericidal activity against various gram-positive bacteria, including multidrug-resistant strains such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci, MRSA, VISA, and penicillin-resistant streptococci (7). Reduced susceptibility to daptomycin was considered rare due to its unique bactericidal activity, which occurs via calcium-dependent alternation of cytoplasmic membrane potential (7). In Taiwan, the first two clinically significant isolates of VISA were reported in 2004, although no obvious dissemination of these clones has been noted since (19).

The MRSA isolates from this patient showed a gradual elevation of vancomycin MICs during glycopeptide treatment, from 1 µg/ml, initially, to 2 µg/ml and finally 4 µg/ml soon after daptomycin treatment (Fig. 1; Table 1). We did not perform blood sampling before daptomycin use. Thus, it is not known whether the VISA isolates emerged after prolonged glycopeptide treatment or were selected soon after daptomycin exposure. The S. aureus isolates also showed increased MICs of ceftobiprole, another cell wall-inhibiting agent. From the data reported by Bogdanovich et al., two out of the five VISA isolates tested for ceftobiprole revealed higher ceftobiprole MICs; both VISA isolates showed a ceftobiprole MIC of 2 µg/ml (1). Although rarely reported, the ceftobiprole MIC might become elevated in some VISA strains. Further studies are needed to clarify this issue.

Reduced susceptibility to daptomycin by VISA has been correlated with vancomycin resistance and may be related to the increased thickness of the cell wall of S. aureus (4, 15). Electron microscopy results for our isolates also showed that increased cell wall thickness was correlated to decreased MICs of vancomycin and daptomycin, indicating susceptibility. Recently, a reduction in muramic acid O acetylation in the cell walls of non-daptomycin-susceptible VISA isolates has been demonstrated to be another possible mechanism of drug resistance (10).

Although rare, the emergence of a lack of daptomycin susceptibility during the treatment of high-grade MRSA bacteremia has been reported (8, 9, 11-13, 17) (Table 2). The prolonged use of daptomycin for deep-tissue infection or endovascular infection seems to be common in these cases (Table 1). It has been demonstrated that the accumulation of mutations over time is correlated with reduced drug susceptibility in laboratory-derived non-daptomycin-susceptible S. aureus cultured in sublethal concentrations of daptomycin (5). Daptomycin may not reach an adequate concentration in deep infected tissue or endovascular vegetations and may thus provide an environment which could promote the development of nonsusceptible S. aureus, especially when prolonged treatment is needed in these patients (18).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Summary of reported cases of MRSA bacteremia with failed daptomycin treatmenta

It has been reported that heterogeneous daptomycin susceptibility in S. aureus may be induced after vancomycin usage even without daptomycin exposure (16). Sequential point mutations in S. aureus that occur during vancomycin treatment may lead to decreased susceptibility to daptomycin despite a lack of exposure to this agent (14). The increase of the daptomycin MICs in our case might be induced by both the prolonged usage of glycopeptides and the subsequent daptomycin exposure that selected the nonsusceptible isolates from the heterogeneous daptomycin-susceptible isolates.

In conclusion, daptomycin susceptibilities should be determined especially when this agent is being used as a salvage therapy for MRSA and/or VISA bacteremia with a difficult-to-eradicate focus.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan. Phone: 886-2-23123456, ext. 5355. Fax: 886-2-23224263. E-mail: hsporen{at}ntu.edu.tw

Published ahead of print on 16 January 2008.

Top ABSTRACT CASE REPORT REFERENCES

 

1
1. Bogdanovich, T., L. M. Ednie, S. Shapiro, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2005. Antistaphylococcal activity of ceftobiprole, a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:4210-4219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A7, 7th ed. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
3
3. Cui, L., H. Murakami, K. Kuwahara-Arai, H. Hanaki, and K. Hiramatsu. 2000. Contribution of a thickened cell wall and its glutamine nonamidated component to the vancomycin resistance expressed by Staphylococcus aureus Mu50. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2276-2285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Cui, L., E. Tominaga, H.-M. Neoh, and K. Hiramatsu. 2006. Correlation between reduced daptomycin susceptibility and vancomycin resistance in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1079-1082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Friedman, L., J. D. Alder, and J. A. Silverman. 2006. Genetic changes that correlate with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2137-2145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Fuchs, P. C., A. L. Barry, and S. D. Brown. 2000. Daptomycin susceptibility tests: interpretive criteria, quality control, and effect of calcium on in vitro tests. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 38:51-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Hancock, R. E. 2005. Mechanisms of action of newer antibiotics for gram-positive pathogens. Lancet Infect. Dis. 5:209-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Hayden, M. K., K. Rezai, R. A. Hayes, K. Lolans, J. P. Quinn, and R. A. Weinstein. 2005. Development of daptomycin resistance in vivo in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5285-5287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Hirschwerk, D., C. C. Ginocchio, M. Bythrow, and S. Condon. 2006. Diminished susceptibility to daptomycin accompanied by clinical failure in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 27:315-317.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Julian, K., K. Kosowska-Shick, C. Whitener, M. Roos, H. Labischinski, A. Rubio, L. Parent, L. Ednie, L. Koeth, T. Bogdanovich, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2007. Characterization of daptomycin-nonsusceptible vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a patient with endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:3445-3448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Kaatz, G. W., T. S. Lundstrom, and S. M. Seo. 2006. Mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 28:280-287.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Mangili, A., I. Bica, D. R. Snydman, and D. H. Hamer. 2005. Daptomycin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40:1058-1060.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
13. Marty, F. M., W. W. Yeh, C. B. Wennersten, L. Venkataraman, E. Albano, E. P. Alyea, H. S. Gold, L. R. Baden, and S. K. Pillai. 2006. Emergence of a clinical daptomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate during treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and osteomyelitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:595-597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Mwangi, M. M., S. W. Wu, Y. Zhou, K. Sieradzki, H. de Lencastre, P. Richardson, D. Bruce, E. Rubin, E. Myers, E. D. Siggia, and A. Tomasz. 2007. Tracking the in vivo evolution of multidrug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by whole-genome sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:9451-9456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Patel, J. B., L. A. Jevitt, J. Hageman, L. C. McDonald, and F. C. Tenover. 2006. An association between reduced susceptibility to daptomycin and reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42:1652-1653.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
16. Sakoulas, G., J. Alder, C. Thauvin-Eliopoulos, R. C. Moellering, Jr., and G. M. Eliopoulos. 2006. Induction of daptomycin heterogeneous susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus by exposure to vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1581-1585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Skiest, D. J. 2006. Treatment failure resulting from resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to daptomycin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:655-656.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Steenbergen, J. N., J. Alder, G. M. Thorne, and F. P. Tally. 2005. Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious gram-positive infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55:283-288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Wang, J. L., S. P. Tseng, P. R. Hsueh, and K. Hiramatsu. 2004. Vancomycin heteroresistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Taiwan. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10:1702-1704.[Medline]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2008, p. 1132-1136, Vol. 46, No. 3
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01844-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Warren, R. E. (2008). Daptomycin in endocarditis and bacteraemia: a British perspective. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: iii25-iii33 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huang, Y.-T. Articles by Hsueh, P.-R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huang, Y.-T. Articles by Hsueh, P.-R.