Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2008, p. 1259-1267, Vol. 46, No. 4
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.02231-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Richard C. Huard,1,2,
Nicolaas C. Gey van Pittius,3
Luiz Claudio Oliveira Lazzarini,1,4
Jeffrey Driscoll,5
Natalia Kurepina,6
Thierry Zozio,7
Christophe Sola,7,8
Silvana Miranda Spindola,9
Afrânio L. Kritski,4
Daniel Fitzgerald,1,10
Kristin Kremer,11
Helmi Mardassi,12
Poonam Chitale,1
Jessica Brinkworth,1,13
Dario Garcia de Viedma,14,15
Brigitte Gicquel,8
Jean W. Pape,10
Dick van Soolingen,11
Barry N. Kreiswirth,6
Robin M. Warren,3
Paul D. van Helden,3
Nalin Rastogi,7
Philip N. Suffys,16
Jose Lapa e Silva,4 and
John L. Ho1*
Department of Medicine, Division of International Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York,1 Clinical Microbiology Service and the Department of Pathology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York,2 DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, US/MRC Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa,3 Institute of Thoracic Diseases, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,4 Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York,5 Public Health Research Institute, Newark, New Jersey,6 Unité de la Tuberculose et des Mycobactéries, Institut Pasteur de Guadeloupe, Guadeloupe,7 Unité de Génétique Mycobactérienne, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France,8 Departamento de Clínica Médica/Pneumologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil,9 GHESKIO Centers, Port-au-Prince, Haiti,10 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands,11 Laboratoire des Mycobactéries, Institut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunisia,12 Department of Anthropology, Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York/New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, New York,13 Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain,14 CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain,15 Laboratory of Molecular Biology Applied to Mycobacteria, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,16
Received 19 November 2007/ Returned for modification 27 December 2007/ Accepted 9 January 2008
|
|
|---|
15% of tuberculosis cases worldwide. Previously, we defined a prevalent sublineage of the LAM family in Brazil by a single characteristic genomic deletion designated RDRio. Using the Brazilian strains, we pinpoint an Ag85C103 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (screened by restriction fragment length polymorphism [RFLP] analysis) that correctly identified all LAM family strains. Importantly, all RDRio strains concomitantly possessed the RD174 deletion. These genetic signatures, along with a newly developed multiplex PCR for rapid differentiation between "wild-type" and RDRio strains, were then used to analyze an international collection of M. tuberculosis strains. RDRio M. tuberculosis was identified from four continents involving 11 countries. Phylogenetic analysis of the IS6110-RFLP patterns from representative RDRio and LAM strains from Brazil, along with all representative clusters from a South African database, confirmed their genetic relatedness and transcontinental transmission. The Ag85C103 SNP RFLP, as compared to results obtained using a PCR method targeting a LAM-restricted IS6110 element, correctly identified 99.8% of LAM spoligotype strains. Together, these tests were more accurate than spoligotyping at categorizing strains with indefinable spoligotypes and segregated true LAM strains from those with convergent spoligotypes. The fact that RDRio strains were identified worldwide highlights the importance of this LAM family sublineage and suggests that this strain is a global threat that should be specifically targeted by public health resources. Our provision of simple and robust molecular methods will assist the evaluation of the LAM family and the RDRio sublineage. |
|
|---|
Molecular typing, based on genetic markers, permits the rapid identification and species level identification of mycobacteria within the M. tuberculosis complex (MTC), as well as providing useful tools for examining the transmission and evolution of these microorganisms (6, 10, 15, 24, 33). One such technique, based on the amplification of several frequently observed deletion loci, can differentiate between the members of the MTC (20, 21). A study using this MTC PCR typing panel for the analysis of M. tuberculosis strains from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, found that 30% of isolates would not amplify from the IS1561' locus (25). These strains, designated RDRio, were found to contain a chromosomal deletion of more than 26 kb. Further analysis of RDRio strains with the molecular technique spoligotyping found that all RDRio strains belonged to the Latin American-Mediterranean (LAM) spoligotype family (25).
Spoligotyping is based on the analysis of the direct repeat locus, which is comprised of directly repeated sequences interspersed with nonrepetitive spacer DNA (23). This rapid PCR-based method allows the classification of strains into spoligotype families based on the presence or absence of spacer regions (31). The evolution of the direct repeat locus is believed to be unidirectional, i.e., spacers are lost rather than gained (37). Mechanisms thought to be responsible for this loss are the transposition of the insertion element IS6110 and the deletion of single or stretches of contiguous direct variant repeats through homologous recombination between neighboring or distant direct repeats (37). The independent loss of similar spacer sets can lead to the convergent evolution of spoligotypes (40), since spoligotype families are defined predominantly by specific spacer patterns. This is therefore problematic since not all strains may truly represent their designated spoligotype family. Recently, other molecular markers have been utilized to define specific spoligotype families, such as the LAM-restricted IS6110 element (26) and an SNP in mgtC which can differentiate between Haarlem and non-Haarlem strains (1).
Genotyping using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has been applied to phylogenetically map the evolution of M. tuberculosis (2, 13, 17, 18, 34). SNPs frequently observed in the genes katG and gyrA permit the classification of MTC members into one of three principal genetic groups (PGG). The identification of SNPs at multiple loci within the M. tuberculosis genome provided enough variation to subdivide M. tuberculosis into several phylogenetic groups (2, 13, 17, 18). These phylogenetic groupings proved to be concordant with the three PGG, as well as IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) data and spoligotyping families (3, 12, 38). The LAM family, to which RDRio strains belong, is found within PGG2 and in phylogenetic cluster VI according to Gutacker et al. (17, 18).
In the present study, we validated a multiplex PCR method for the classification of RDRio and "wild-type" non-RDRio (WT) strains using a collection of previously characterized clinical M. tuberculosis isolates from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (25). This collection was then analyzed for the presence of an SNP previously identified at codon 103 of the gene encoding Ag85C (Rv0129c) (29). The Ag85C103 SNP was found to be LAM lineage specific. A global collection of M. tuberculosis isolates was also examined to determine the worldwide distribution of RDRio and the Ag85C103 SNP. Supplemental to this, these isolates were examined for the presence or absence of the LAM-restricted IS6110 element as well as that of the region-of-difference (RD) loci within the pks15/1 gene (27) and RD174, which are markers for, respectively, the purported major Euro-American lineage of M. tuberculosis defined by Gagneux et al. and its West African sublineage (15). Each of these phylogenetically informative markers was identified in M. tuberculosis strains from multiple worldwide locales linking them all to a common progenitor in the MTC evolutionary tree.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Proportion of RDRio M. tuberculosis isolates observed in sample sets from each countrya
|
Ag85C PCR analysis and restriction enzyme digest of Ag85C amplicons. A region of the Ag85C gene previously found to contain a silent SNP (GAG to GAA) at codon 103 (29) was targeted. Primers were designed by using the Lasergene program (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI), and are detailed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. The PCR mix and cycle conditions used for the multiplex PCR were also used to amplify the Ag85C region. The amplified products (519 bp) were also visualized as described above. All Ag85C amplicons were digested by using the restriction enzyme MnlI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The digested products were then separated on a 4% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualized over UV light. Each gel also contained a 100-bp ladder to measure the size of the digested products. The presence of the SNP results in the loss of one of three restriction enzyme digestion sites and is visualized by the presence of a 461-bp band and a second band of 58 bp (which was not always detected using the gel method). An absence of the SNP is seen as three bands of 365, 96, and 58 bp (which also was not always visible on the gel). The protocol was therefore internally controlled for product digestion of the 519-bp amplicon.
Sequence analysis. DNA sequencing was performed by the Cornell University BioResource Center (Ithaca, NY [http://www.brc.cornell.edu]), using a BigDye terminator kit (PE Applied Biosystems) and analyzed by using an ABI 3700 DNA sequencer. The primers used for PCR amplification were also used for the sequencing reaction, with the exception of the reverse RDRio sequencing primer, where an internal reverse primer closer to the site of deletion was used (detailed in Table S1 in the supplemental material).
Analysis of pks15/1 and RD174. A 7-bp deletion in the pks15/1 gene (27) and RD174 are markers that have been previously reported (15). Detailed in Table S1 in the supplemental material are the primers used to amplify pks15/1 region and the RD174 (forward flanking, internal forward [internal to RD174], and reverse flanking primers). The PCR conditions used to amplify both loci were the same as given above. Once the specific pks15/1 site was amplified, sequence analysis (detailed above) was performed to determine whether the 7-bp deletion common to PGG2 and PGG3 strains was present. For RD174 analysis, the amplified products were analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel. A 300-bp band indicated an intact locus, whereas a 500-bp band indicated the locus was deleted.
Analysis of the LAM-restricted IS6110 element. PCR primers that identify the presence or absence of an IS6110 insertion element unique to all LAM strains (26) were used to amplify all discrepant isolates (Table S1 in the supplemental material). Briefly, a 205-bp band indicates a LAM strain by the presence of an IS6110 element, whereas a 141-bp band indicates a non-LAM strain lacking the IS6110 element.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed by using Prism 4 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Categorical variables were compared by a two-tailed Fisher exact test. A P value of
0.05 was considered significant.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) RDRio multiplex PCR. The presence of a 530-bp band indicates a WT strain, while the presence of an 1,175-bp band indicates an RDRio strain. Lanes: 1, 100-bp ladder; 2, M. tuberculosis H37Rv; 3 and 4, WT LAM strains; 5 and 6, RDRio LAM strains; 7, WT non-LAM strain (Haarlem 1); 8, a mixed (WT/RDRio) isolate. (B) Ag85C103 SNP digest analysis. The presence of a 461-bp band indicates that the SNP is present, while 365- and 96-bp bands indicate the SNP is absent. Lanes 1 to 7 are described as in panel A. (C) RD174 PCR analysis. A 300-bp band is indicative of an intact region, while a 500-bp band indicates that RD174 has been deleted. Lanes 1 to 7 are as described in panel B.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Division of LAM and non-LAM isolates (designated by spoligotyping) by the presence or absence of Ag85C103 according to country of origin
|
RDRio genotype evaluation of global LAM strains. An international collection of M. tuberculosis strains (total of 851 isolates [see Materials and Methods]) was analyzed by multiplex PCR to determine whether RDRio M. tuberculosis has disseminated outside of Rio de Janeiro. Overall, the RDRio genotype was identified in isolates from 11 of the 20 countries represented, showing that RDRio strains are circulating internationally and are not restricted to Brazil. Table 1 shows the classification of isolates by genotype for each geographical area. As well as identifying RDRio M. tuberculosis in a second state of Brazil (Minas Gerais, where 36% of the provided strains were RDRio), RDRio was also identified in Ecuador and French Guiana, both South American countries, and in North America (i.e., the United States). Moreover, RDRio M. tuberculosis was observed in all three Caribbean islands studied (Guadeloupe, Haiti, and Martinique). Of great importance was the fact that RDRio strains were also identified outside of the Americas, in Europe (The Netherlands and Spain) and in Africa (South Africa and the Republic of Djibouti). These results clearly demonstrate that RDRio M. tuberculosis has indeed disseminated globally. To provide additional support that the RDRio and LAM strains from Brazil were related to those found elsewhere, we performed IS6110 RFLP phylogenetic analysis of isolates from the Rio de Janeiro collection previously studied by IS6110 RFLP together with one isolate from each cluster (strain/RFLP signature) from a South African database (data not shown). The genetic relatedness of LAM strains and specifically RDRio strains from Rio de Janeiro with their counterparts from South Africa were confirmed by IS6110 RFLP phylogenetic analysis (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).
Ag85C103 SNP correlates with LAM-restricted IS6110 insertion PCR in analysis of global LAM strains.
The M. tuberculosis isolates from each country were examined for the Ag85C103 SNP, and the results were compared to their spoligotypes (Table 2; the spoligopatterns and spoligotypes designation assigned by SpolDB4 are presented in Table S2 in the supplemental material). In almost all cases, LAM strains contained the Ag85C103 SNP (540 of 547 [98.7%]), while the majority of non-LAM strains did not contain this SNP (212 of 240 [88.3%]) (P
0.0001; two-tailed Fisher exact test). As previously observed in the Rio de Janeiro cohort, all RDRio strains contained the SNP. At first, this suggested that the Ag85C103 SNP was not as sensitive or specific as previously seen in the Rio de Janeiro cohort. Overall, 7 LAM strains without the Ag85C103 SNP and 28 non-LAM strains with the SNP were observed. Possible explanations for these two scenarios may be the convergent evolution of spoligotypes and/or the presence of SNP-containing ancestral progenitor strains. To further explore these discrepant strains, we analyzed them for a site-specific IS6110-element that is unique to LAM strains (26). Interestingly, 27 of 28 non-LAM strains (according to spoligotyping) with the Ag85C103 SNP were found to be LAM when analyzed with the LAM-specific IS6110 PCR, indicating that these strains are of the LAM lineage. Of the seven LAM strains (according to spoligotyping) without the Ag85C103 SNP, six strains were PCR amplified as non-LAM, indicating that the spoligotypes of these strains were the result of convergence. Therefore, this left only two discrepant strains, a LAM strain without the Ag85C103 SNP and a non-LAM strain with the SNP, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity rate for the Ag85C103 SNP of 99.8 and 99.6%, respectively.
From the international collection, an additional 37 M. tuberculosis isolates had spoligotypes that could not be segregated into LAM or non-LAM groups (Table 3). Although these strains had spacers 21 to 24 and spacers 33 to 36 deleted, some of the surrounding spacers were also missing, thus preventing accurate clade designation. To confirm whether these isolates belonged to the LAM lineage, all were analyzed for the LAM-specific IS6110 PCR and segregated into LAM/non-LAM groups according to the presence or absence of this element (Table 3). The Ag85C103 SNP results were 100% concordant to the IS6110 PCR results. Importantly, this shows that the Ag85C103 SNP is an accurate marker for the differentiation of LAM/non-LAM strains and particularly useful when a spoligotype pattern is indistinguishable.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Indistinguishable spoligotype patternsa
|
RDRio deletion correlates with RD174. The international strain collection was also analyzed for RD174 by PCR to confirm that this polymorphism was indeed a marker for RDRio strains. All RDRio strains had RD174 deleted, and all WT strains had this region intact (n = 848). Of note, the data indicated that four patients had mixed strain M. tuberculosis infections that included an RDRio M. tuberculosis strain, as has been noted previously (25). One isolate from Minas Gerais and one from South Africa that were found to be mixed by the multiplex PCR and also had a double band corresponding to both an intact and a deleted RD174 region. The remaining two mixed isolates (according to the multiplex PCR), one from South Africa and one from Minas Gerais, were not mixed by RD174, suggesting that the multiplex RDRio PCR may be more sensitive at identifying mixed infections that include these strains than the use of RD174. Since only one sample from each of the above mixed isolates was evaluated, the possibility of laboratory cross-contamination could not be excluded.
|
|
|---|
We identified a synonymous SNP in the gene for Ag85C that was linked to LAM strains. Initially, the Ag85C103 SNP did not appear to be a particularly accurate marker for LAM strains compared to spoligotyping. Initially, the sensitivity of this marker by comparison to spoligotyping was 98.7%, while the specificity was 88.3% in our global collection. However, further analysis of the discrepant isolates based on the presence or absence of an IS6110 element unique to LAM strains proved that the sole use of spoligotype patterns are not altogether reliable. As previously observed, the loss of these spacers can lead to the convergent evolution of strains (40), since spoligotype families are mainly defined by specific spacer patterns. We observed this phenomenon in seven strains that had "LAM" spoligotypes but did not contain Ag85C103. All but one strain lacked the LAM-specific IS6110 element, proving that these strains were not true LAM strains. Conversely, the 28 "non-LAM" discrepant strains containing Ag85C103 could not be explained by convergent evolution, considering that spacers are lost rather than gained. IS6110 PCR analysis found that these apparent "non-LAM" strains were in fact true LAM lineage strains since 27 of 28 possessed the LAM-specific IS6110 element. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of the Ag85C103 SNP were 99.8 and 99.6%, respectively. Although an isolate with a LAM spoligotype but without Ag85C103 could be considered as an example of convergent evolution, i.e., not a true LAM strain, the single discrepant isolate was confirmed as a LAM strain by the presence of the LAM-specific IS6110 element. Conceptually, the insertion of this IS6110 element and the Ag85C103 mutation are unlikely to have occurred simultaneously, and so it is reasonable to conclude that one polymorphism predates the other. In this case one could argue that the IS6110 insertion occurred first; however, one Ag85C103-positive non-LAM strain (confirmed by IS6110 PCR) was observed, which would argue the converse. We cannot at present be certain in what order these polymorphisms arose, but hopefully further genetic analyses of these strains will settle the issue. Interestingly, to date there has been scant evidence of horizontal genetic exchange in M. tuberculosis, although data support that it has occurred in the MTC progenitor species "Mycobacterium canettii" (prototuberculosis) (5, 36). Given that mixed strain infections appear to be more common than previously assumed, one or the other of the above discordant stains may well represent a rare example of just such a genomic homogenizing event in M. tuberculosis.
In some instances the spoligotype pattern was indefinable and could not be designated as a LAM or a non-LAM strain. Both the Ag85C103 SNP and the LAM-specific IS6110 PCR were able to differentiate these isolates into LAM and non-LAM strains, proving that spoligotyping alone is not always the best method for defining LAM strains. As we have demonstrated, Ag85C103 SNP analysis can also define LAM family strains that are misclassified by spoligotyping (i.e., have a non-LAM spoligotype pattern). Ag85C103 SNP analysis is not a replacement for spoligotyping, since the latter can both define and differentiate between LAM family strains. However, it is relatively cheap compared to spoligotyping and does not require any specialized equipment. The Ag85C103 SNP PCR assay could therefore serve as a handy postspoligotyping confirmatory tool in epidemiological studies and/or in resource poor settings as a screening method for LAM strains to limit the number of isolates requiring full characterization with spoligotyping.
Specific SNPs have been linked to each of the MTC species and various tubercle bacilli, as well as many of the M. tuberculosis lineages (1, 2, 13, 16, 21, 34, 39), thereby providing consistent phylogenetic markers and allowing inter- and intraspecies segregation with relative ease. For example, the "M. canettii" hsp65631 SNP differentiates it from the rest of the MTC (21). Within M. tuberculosis lineages, a single SNP in mgtC was found to differentiate between Haarlem and non-Haarlem strains of M. tuberculosis (1), while an SNP in rrs491 was specifically associated with the F11 (LAM3) clade, a dominant M. tuberculosis lineage in the Western Cape of South Africa (39). Genome SNP analysis has previously been used to classify M. tuberculosis into phylogenetic lineages (2, 13, 17). One such tree divided M. tuberculosis into nine distinct lineages; LAM strains and a subset of T strains segregated into SNP cluster VI (17). The Ag85C103 SNP was not specific to all strains in cluster VI since several "T" strains from our USA collection that were known to belong to cluster VI did not contain the Ag85C103 SNP (data not shown). Nonetheless, the identification of a single SNP that is specifically associated with the LAM family lineage (LAM strains comprise
80% of cluster VI isolates) could potentially be utilized as an indicator to identify cluster VI strains. As such, this test would reduce the amount of SNP analysis required to characterize this major phylogenetic lineage. In addition, since we provide a restriction digest approach for the Ag85C103 SNP, the need for more costly DNA sequence analysis would be eliminated.
LSPs have also been used to define both MTC members and M. tuberculosis lineages (6, 15, 19, 21). Gagneux et al. (15) developed a global phylogenetic tree based on several LSPs, identified through whole-genome screening, and found that geographical regions are associated with certain lineages. Using markers from this tree we linked RDRio M. tuberculosis to the West African sublineage of the major Euro-American lineage (15). Our study demonstrated that RD174 was specific for RDRio M. tuberculosis and not observed in any other LAM strains. In addition, the major branch of the Euro-American lineage is defined by a 7-bp deletion in a polyketide synthase gene (pks15/1). Interestingly, the pks15/1 deletion was previously found to be synonymous with the SNP at katG463 CGG; therefore, the Euro-American lineage consists of PGG2 and PGG3 M. tuberculosis strains (21, 27) and not PGG1/ancestral strains. Our data concurred with this observation.
Surprisingly, there are a limited number of studies focusing solely on LAM strains. Many studies have investigated W/Beijing strains predominantly since these strains are prevalent across Asia and also contributed greatly to the TB resurgence in the United States in the early 1990s (4, 42). In comparison to LAM strains, which are responsible for ca. 15% of the world's TB cases (SpolDB4 [7]), W/Beijing strains account for just
10% of M. tuberculosis strains worldwide. Therefore, there is a need for more research efforts geared toward the LAM family. The development of a multiplex PCR enabled the rapid segregation of M. tuberculosis strains into WT and RDRio genotypes. We found that TB caused by RDRio M. tuberculosis is not restricted to Brazil or even the Americas but is found in four of the five continents examined. Although RDRio was not identified in Asia, only two isolates in the present study were examined from this continent, and so further studies are needed to assess whether RDRio M. tuberculosis is circulating in Asia as well. Studies have shown that W/Beijing and LAM strains are the major cause of TB in Russian prisons (11, 22, 32). Of the LAM strains, both LAM9 and LAM1 strains were major contributors. Our previous study found that these two LAM types were associated with the RDRio genotype (25) and that LAM1 strains were exclusively found to be RDRio M. tuberculosis. Although we did identify one WT LAM1 strain and two mixed infections with LAM1 spoligotypes, 48 of 51 (94.1%) of LAM1 strains in this study were nonetheless RDRio M. tuberculosis. These data thus indirectly suggest that RDRio may well be a significant cause of TB in Northern Asia, as well by virtue of the LAM1 prevalence in this region. This hypothesis, however, remains to be substantiated by evaluating Russian LAM strains.
Interestingly, two of the RDRio M. tuberculosis strains isolated in Madrid, Spain, were from the most prevalent cluster of M. tuberculosis reported in that city, namely, strain 5 (28). Strain 5 (ST20 or LAM1) has an identical mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit (MIRU) pattern to a hypothetical progenitor MIRU-type for RDRio strains and a very similar RFLP pattern (25). These Spanish RDRio strains were isolated in 2002 and 2003, but strain 5 has remained the predominant strain in Madrid for the last 13 years, whereas other others strain types have declined. This suggests that RDRio M. tuberculosis was circulating in Madrid in 1993 and possibly earlier. As previously hypothesized (25), the persistence of the RDRio sublineage may be attributed to either intrinsic genetic factors affording biological advantage for the tubercle bacilli or risk factors of the host population that sustain dissemination.
Taking into account that RDRio has disseminated outside of the Americas and the fact that it is part of the LAM family, RDRio strains could indeed be a significant global problem. Complementary to the presented genetic data, IS6110 RFLP phylogenetic analysis of isolates from the Rio de Janeiro collection (25), along with one isolate from each cluster (strain/RFLP signature) from a South African database (data not shown), confirmed genetic relatedness; their all of the LAM strains from Rio de Janeiro fall within one of the RFLP families previously described in South Africa (30) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Moreover, the RDRio strains from Rio de Janeiro grouped with the South African F9 and F13 families (LAM11 and LAM1, respectively) (35), which in the present study were shown to be of the RDRio genotype. Recently, Chihota et al. (8) identified a group of strains (named the Southern Africa 1 or SAF1 family) that made up a predominant proportion of strains isolated in Zimbabwe (47.2%) and Zambia (65%) and which were shown to fall into the South African F9 family (and thus the RDRio lineage). These findings further support the present genetic data and highlight the fact that RDRio indeed appears to be a significant cause of TB worldwide. Our rapid PCR technique may be useful in the epidemiological tracking of the RDRio genotype and in ascertaining the level of RDRio M. tuberculosis circulating in a population. It is of great importance, when developing public health control strategies for TB, to understand the strains circulating not only on a regional scale but globally as well.
Recently, Flores et al. (14) assigned strains to the W/Beijing lineage based upon possession of the prototypic W/Beijing RD105 deletion, despite the absence of typical W/Beijing family spoligotype patterns. Likewise, in the present study, we identified several genetic signatures of the LAM family and its major RDRio sublineage that allow us to propose to extend the genetic definition for a LAM lineage strain (as distinguished from the defining characteristics of a LAM spoligotype family strain). We classify the LAM lineage by (i) being PGG2, as well as possessing (ii) the 7-bp pks15/1 deletion, (iii) the SNP at Ag85C103, and (iv) the restricted site-specific IS6110 insertion element. On the other hand, LAM spoligotype family strains (within the LAM lineage, as defined by the above markers) exhibit prototypic spoligotype patterns with an absence of spacers 21 to 24 and spacers 33 to 36 (7). LAM RDRio M. tuberculosis can be further characterized by the RDRio and RD174 deletions. Now that we have highlighted the global problem of the LAM family and its prominent RDRio sublineage and developed a series of simple genetic signatures for their characterization, we hope that research interests will focus on this highly prevalent M. tuberculosis lineage and provide much-needed information regarding the bases of their success.
In conclusion, our finding that RDRio strains were identified worldwide highlights the importance of this LAM family sublineage. Limited IS6110 RFLP analysis confirms the genetic relatedness of LAM and RDRio strains and cross-transmission between continents. The findings from this report furthermore demonstrate that the RDRio strain is a global threat and should be specifically targeted by public health resources. Our provision in this report of simple and robust molecular methods should assist in the evaluation of the LAM family and the RDRio sublineage.
Funding for this project was provided by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R21 AI063147 and R21 AI063147 (to J.L.H.), NIH Fogarty International Center training grant (FICTG) (D43 TW00018), Innovative Approaches for TB Control in Brazil (Rio-ICOHRTA)-U2R TW006885 NIH, FIC (J.R.L.E.S., R. Chaisson, and J.L.H.), Haiti AIDS Research Training: Models to Implementation (Haiti-ICOHRTA)-U2R TW006901 (W. D. Johnson), a grant from the Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (Ministry of Education of Brazil) from the Brazilian Ministry of Health (024/94 DST/AIDS), Fundação Universitária José Bonifácio/FUJB, the Brazilian Research Council/CNPq, the Brazilian Research Council/World Bank Millennium Institute of Science, the Programa de Apoio a Núcleos de Excelência, and PAPES IV/FIOCRUZ (P.N.S. and J.R.L.E.S.), and a grant from the Laura Cook Hull Trust Fund (LCHTF) (W. D. Johnson). A.L.G. was supported in part by the LCHTF, and L.C.O.L was a FICTG and is now a Rio-ICOHRTA and a CNPq trainee. The study performed in N.R.'s laboratory was partially funded by the European Regional Development Fund, European Commission (ERDF/FEDER, A34-05). T.Z. received a Ph.D. fellowship awarded by the European Union and the Regional Council of Guadeloupe and the International Network of Pasteur Institutes. Funding for the Spanish isolates was from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS030654; FIS060882) and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias CIBERES; CB06/06/0058).
A.L.G. performed the majority of the laboratory work, codeveloped the restriction digest of Ag85C SNP analysis (with R.C.H.), posed and tested the hypotheses (with J.L.H. and R.C.H.), and wrote the manuscript. R.C.H. initiated the multiplex assays and Ag85C SNP evaluation and, together with J.L.H., gathered the international M. tuberculosis collection, as well as guided the presentation, provided input during preparation, and edited the manuscript. N.C.G.V.P. made the suggestion to cross-compare LAM-specific IS6110 PCR with the Ag85C SNP, provided critical input in the evaluation of strains with certain spoligopatterns, and performed the phylogenetic analysis of the IS6110 RFLP pattern for the present study. N.C.G.V.P., together with R.M.W. and P.D.V.H., provided the samples with spoligopattern and RFLP data from South Africa. L.C.O.L. assisted in some of the earlier genetic analysis, assisted in generating more DNA lysates from Rio de Janeiro needed for the present study, coordinated shipment of these samples to Cornell, provided input in some of the data interpretation, and edited the manuscript for reference order and format. J.D. performed spoligotyping on samples without data and repeated the spoligotyping on select strains. N.K. contributed to the phylogenetic analysis of the IS6110 RFLP pattern for this study and, together with B.N.K., provided strains with spoligotyped data from North America. T.Z., C.S., and N.R. provided samples with spoligotyped data from French Caribbean countries, and C.S. provided suggestions to improve the manuscript. S.M.S. provided the samples with spoligotyped data from Belo Horizonte, Brazil, which was performed by S.M.S. in France in the laboratory of B.G. A.L.K. assisted S.M.S. in organizing the data file of the Belo Horizonte collection. D.F. and J.W.P. provided samples from Haiti. K.K. and D.V.S. provided samples with spoligotyped data from The Netherlands. H.M. provided samples with spoligotyped data from Tunisia. P.C. and J.B. assisted in some of the genotyping. D.G.D.V. provided samples from Spain and perspective on the prevalent strains in the epidemiology of TB in Spain. P.N.S. supervised the spoligotyping of the Rio de Janeiro samples. J.R.L.S., together with J.L.H., supervised the laboratory and clinical studies in Rio de Janeiro and shipment of the DNA lysates to United States. J.L.H. posed the hypotheses, coordinated the international collaborations, provided the overall management of the project, guided data analyses and interpretation, provided input for presentation and discussions during manuscript preparation. and edited the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 30 January 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm.asm.org/. ![]()
A.L.G. and R.C.H. contributed equally to this study. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»