JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.02348-07v1
46/4/1561    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khare, S.
Right arrow Articles by David, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khare, S.
Right arrow Articles by David, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2008, p. 1561-1562, Vol. 46, No. 4
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02348-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Effects of Shipping and Storage Conditions of Fecal Samples on Viability of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis{triangledown}


   LETTER
Top
 LETTER
REFERENCES
 
Johne's disease is characterized by chronic granulomatous enteritis of ruminants caused by Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection. Early diagnosis of infected animals is necessary to reduce contamination of the environment and to control disease spread through feces (3, 6). About 75% of positive animals are either low or very low shedders (7, 8). Diagnostic samples for M. paratuberculosis identification are generally collected, shipped, and stored under various conditions that may influence the viability of M. paratuberculosis (2, 4, 5), thus changing the true status of the infected animal; in fact, the culture status especially of individual low or very low shedder animals could change from positive to negative.

The aim of the present study was to mimic the most relevant conditions of shipment and storage of clinical samples obtained from naturally infected cattle and to study the effects of these conditions on the detection of M. paratuberculosis by standard bacteriological culture and real-time PCR. Fecal samples were collected from 11 cows confirmed to have Johne's disease; samples were transported on ice and stored as described in Table 1. Fecal samples were tested for colony counts on Herrold's egg yolk agar slant (three tubes each for three dilutions with mycobactin J and one without mycobactin J) (9) and by immunomagnetic bead capture of M. paratuberculosis from feces and extraction of genomic DNA from captured M. paratuberculosis, followed by PCR (1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Pairwise comparison of treatment group transport and storage conditions of clinical fecal specimens

 
Several of the first- and second-dilution tubes had an M. tuberculosis organism too-numerous-to-count status; thus, data analyses were restricted to dilution 3. The mean colony counts at week 16 were compared across treatments, using analysis of variance (ANOVA) (SPSS version 13.0 software for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Pairwise comparisons of treatment means between treatment groups were performed with the Tukey correction for multiple comparisons. Results for each tube were dichotomized into positive or negative, based on the presence of at least one colony. Fisher's exact test (intercooled STATA version 9.2; STATA, College Station, TX) was used to compare the proportions for positive tubes and cattle. Significance was defined as a P value of <0.05 for all analyses.

Pairwise comparisons (ANOVA) between treatment means identified a significantly higher number of colonies with treatment 5 than with treatment 3 (P = 0.04). Treatments 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 had a significantly higher proportion of positive tubes than treatment 3. At the individual animal level, significantly larger proportions of cattle were classified as positive for treatments 1, 5, and 6 than for treatment 3. All of the real-time PCR results were positive for the presence of M. paratuberculosis under all of the conditions tested (treatments 1, 3, and 6). While samples from treatments 1 and 6 were found to be positive using both of the detection methods, only 5 of 11 tubes were positive for fecal culture for treatment 3, and all samples were found to be positive by using real-time PCR.

Our study indicates that the storage of the samples at –20°C had adverse effects on the viability of M. paratuberculosis (5 of 11 samples were culture positive in treatment 3). Although all samples were positive by real-time PCR, the higher cycle threshold value in treatment 3 indicates the loss of viable bacteria and/or DNA quality. Treatment 3 may often be used by producers or veterinarians when they are sampling small populations or in individual suspected cases of Johne's disease. Thus, DNA-based PCR could be an alternative for situations where intermediate or long-term storage is necessary. Short-term storage of fecal samples at 4°C and longer term storage at –70°C appear to have no deleterious effects on M. paratuberculosis viability, but short-term storage at –20°C should be avoided as it substantially reduces the viability of the bacteria in the sample.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Mario Villarino, Extension Veterinary Science Specialist, Texas Cooperative Extension, Texas A&M University system, for providing the samples for the study.

The study was supported by funds from the Texas Johne's Working Group.


   FOOTNOTES
 
{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 30 January 2008. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 LETTER
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Khare, S., T. A. Ficht, R. L. Santos, J. Romano, A. R. Ficht, S. Zhang, I. R. Grant, M. Libal, D. Hunter, and L. G. Adams. 2004. Rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine milk and feces by a combination of immunomagnetic bead separation-conventional PCR and real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1075-1081.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kim, T. H., and G. P. Kubica. 1973. Preservation of mycobacteria: 100 percent viability of suspensions stored at –70°C. Appl. Microbiol. 25:956-960.[Medline]
  3. Manning, E. J., and M. T. Collins. 2001. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: pathogen, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Rev. Sci. Tech. 20:133-150.[Medline]
  4. Richards, W. D. 1981. Effects of physiological and chemical factors on the viability of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 14:587-588.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Richards, W. D., and C. O. Thoen. 1977. Effect of freezing on the viability of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in bovine feces. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6:392-395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Tiwari, A., J. A. VanLeeuwen, S. L. McKenna, G. P. Keefe, and H. W. Barkema. 2006. Johne's disease in Canada. Part I: Clinical symptoms, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and prevalence in dairy herds. Can. Vet. J. 47:874-882.[Medline]
  7. USDA, APHIS, VS, and CEAH. 2005. National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) dairy 2002: Johne's disease on U.S. dairy operations. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services National Animal Health Monitoring System, Washington, DC.
  8. van Schaik, G., S. M. Stehman, Y. H. Schukken, C. R. Rossiter, and S. J. Shin. 2003. Pooled fecal culture sampling for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis at different herd sizes and prevalence. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 15:233-241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wells, S. J., R. H. Whitlock, C. J. Lindeman, and T. Fyock. 2002. Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 63:1207-1211.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sangeeta Khare
L. Garry Adams*
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology
College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
Texas A&M University
College Station, Texas 77843

Jason Osterstock
Allen Roussel
Laetitia David
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences
College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
Texas A&M University
College Station, Texas 77843

* Phone: (979) 845-5092 Fax: (979) 845-5088 E-mail: gadams{at}cvm.tamu.edu

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2008, p. 1561-1562, Vol. 46, No. 4
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02348-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.02348-07v1
46/4/1561    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khare, S.
Right arrow Articles by David, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khare, S.
Right arrow Articles by David, L.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS