Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2008, p. 1708-1715, Vol. 46, No. 5
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01200-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Advanced Research Institute for the Sciences and Humanities, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan,1 Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,2 Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan,3 Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University Nerima-Hikarigaoka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan,4 Department of Public Health, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan5
Received 14 June 2007/ Returned for modification 11 October 2007/ Accepted 27 February 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, to reliably detect M. tuberculosis DNA in CSF samples with a wider detection range, we attempted to improve on the OR-QNRT-PCR technique; therefore, a new internal control for use as a "calibrator" was prepared. We named this improved assay technique wide-range QNRT-PCR (WR-QNRT-PCR) and examined its ability to quantitatively detect M. tuberculosis DNA in samples. In this paper, the development and methodology of the WR-QNRT-PCR assay are stated.
|
|
|---|
Preparation of the new internal control (plasmid) for use as a calibrator. For the WR-QNRT-PCR assay, two types of the original plasmid, wild plasmids (W-plasmids) and new-mutation plasmids (NM-plasmids), were prepared for a quantitative detection of M. tuberculosis DNA, and this was done as well for the OR-QNRT-PCR assay (22, 23).
W-plasmid, which was inserted into a 239-bp DNA fragment of the gene sequence encoding the MPB64 protein of M. tuberculosis (MPT64; GenBank accession no. NC_000962) (22, 23) into pCR 2.1 vector (Invitrogen Corp., San Diego, CA) was constructed for use as the standard template by the previously reported procedure (22, 23).
NM-plasmid was developed based on the previously reported M-plasmid (22, 23) for use as a new internal-control "calibrator" in the WR-QNRT-PCR assay. In NM-plasmid, a total of four regions, where two pairs of (outer and inner) forward and reverse primers annealed, were replaced with the artificial random nucleotides added to the TaqMan probe annealing region in the M-plasmid (Fig. 1). The sequences of the artificial random nucleotides were set to have the same nucleotide composition as MPT64 of wild M. tuberculosis. Replacing procedures were gradually performed by two steps (forward and reverse primer blocks) using the following four pairs of primers: Avr2-F1 and Avr2-R1, Avr2-F2 and Avr2-R2, Mlu1-F and Sal1-R, and Sal1-F and Mlu1-R (Fig. 1). The sequences and positions of these primers are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. These four pairs of primers were also specific for MPT64 and contained additional artificial random nucleotides including one restriction enzyme site at the 5' end. Since each restriction enzyme site (Avr2, Mlu1, and Sal1) in these primers was not contained within pCR2.1 vector, it was possible to accurately digest both ends of each PCR product. In respective replacing steps, each PCR product was digested by restriction enzymes and then ligated (Fig. 1). The final ligation product, i.e., NM-plasmid, was cloned using a TA cloning kit (Invitrogen Corp.) (Fig. 1). The 103 copies of NM-plasmid were adopted as a new internal-control "calibrator." This copy number was determined by the preliminary experiments (described below).
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Position of primers and probes in the MPB64 protein encoding gene (MPT64), and the procedure for the development of the NM-plasmid for use as a new internal control. TAMRA, 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Sequences of primers and TaqMan probes for PCR assays
|
Primers and probes for WR-QNRT-PCR. For use in the WR-QNRT-PCR assay, four pairs of new specific primers and two types of specific (TaqMan) probes were prepared. The sequences and positions of these new primers and probes are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. In the first step of WR-QNRT-PCR assay, two pairs of outer forward and reverse primers, WF1 and WR1, as well as MF1 and MR1, were used. WF1 and WR1 were specific for MRT64 of wild M. tuberculosis or W-plasmid, whereas MF1 and MR1 were specific for the artificial random nucleotides in the NM-plasmid for use as a new internal-control "calibrator." In the second step, two pairs of inner forward and reverse primers, TqMn-WF2 and TqMn-WR2, as well as TqMn-MF2 and TqMn-MR2, were used. TqMn-WF2 and TqMn-WR2 were specific for wild MPT64. TqMn-MF2 and TqMn-MR2 were specific for the artificial random nucleotides in the NM-plasmid. In addition, two types of probes, TqMn-W-VIC and TqMn-M-FAM, were used. TqMn-W-VIC was labeled with fluorescent reporter dye VIC and specifically annealed to wild MPT64. While TqMn-M-FAM was labeled with fluorescent reporter dye 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) and specifically annealed to the artificial random nucleotides in the NM-plasmid. These primers and probes were set to have the same nucleotide composition but a different and random sequence (Table 1). Therefore, the annealing efficiencies of these primers and probes to wild MPT64 or NM-plasmid as a template can be regarded as the same.
In the OR-QNRT-PCR assay, two consecutive PCR amplification steps were performed by using the common two pairs of primers WF1 and WR1 at the first step and TqMn-WF2 and TqMn-WR2 at the second step for both M. tuberculosis DNA and M-plasmid as the old internal control (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Two types of probes, TqMn-W-VIC and TqMn-M-FAM, were also used to specifically detect each M. tuberculosis DNA or M-plasmid (Table 1 and Fig. 1).
Extraction and purification of DNA from CSF samples. A 500-µl aliquot of original lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 0.8% (vol/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 0.5 mg of proteinase K was prepared. This lysis buffer was added to 500 µl of the CSF sample, followed by incubation in a water bath at 65°C overnight. After incubation, the total 1,000-µl suspension was divided into two 500-µl aliquots for use in the WR-QNRT-PCR assay.
In advance, the 103 copies of NM-plasmid as a new internal-control "calibrator" were added to one of the 500-µl aliquot containing 250 µl each of CSF and lysis buffer. The DNA specimens including M. tuberculosis DNA and NM-plasmid were extracted and purified from these 500-µl aliquots by a previously reported conventional phenol-chloroform method and ethanol precipitation (7, 8, 22). To efficiently extract a small amount of DNA, a high-molecular-weight carrier, Ethachinmate (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan), was used as a coprecipitating agent for the nucleotides in the ethanol precipitation. After complete vacuum desiccation, the extracted DNA specimen was resuspended in 20 µl of pure water and then stored at –20°C until use.
Assay condition of WR-QNRT-PCR. Both WR and OR-QNRT-PCR assays consist of two consecutive PCR amplification steps, which were conventional PCR at the first step and real-time (TaqMan) PCR at the second step. M. tuberculosis DNA and NM-plasmid were amplified and detected in separate tubes and wells. However, the entire procedure was performed simultaneously under the same assay conditions.
In the first-step PCR, 18-µl conventional PCR solution mixtures containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 400 µM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate mix, 20 pM each of outer primers WF1 and WR1 or MF1 and MR2, and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase were prepared. As a template, 2 µl of the extracted DNA specimen, including M. tuberculosis DNA and the new internal control (NM-plasmid), was added to the PCR solution mixture (each total reaction volume was 20 µl). This preparation was subjected to the protocol shown in Table 2 at 25 amplification cycles, using the GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT). The assay protocol of OR-QNRT-PCR is additionally described in Table 2. The first-step PCR in the OR-QNRT-PCR assay was set at 35 amplification cycles (22).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. PCR assay conditions
|
Quantitative detection of M. tuberculosis DNA.
In the WR-QNRT-PCR assay, the procedures of extraction, amplification, and detection for both M. tuberculosis DNA and the new internal control were performed simultaneously by using two pairs of primers and two probes that had annealing efficiencies equivalent to those of the templates. Therefore, the initial copy number of M. tuberculosis DNA in CSF samples was able to be calculated based on the amplification ratio against the new internal control (103 copies of NM-plasmid) as a "calibrator." Therefore, we adopted equation 1 as well as the OR-QNRT-PCR assay (22, 23).
![]() | (1) |
Statistical analysis. The statistical analysis was calculated using data analysis software program SPSS 13.0 for Windows. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
|
|
|---|
![]() ![]() View larger version (85K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Statistical evaluation of CT value data in preliminary experiments. (A) Specific standard curve for use in the quantitative detection of M. tuberculosis DNA or W-plasmid. VIC (TqMn-W-VIC) was used for analysis. (B) Specific standard curve for use in the quantitative detection of the NM-plasmid as a new internal control. FAM (TqMn-M-FAM) was used for analysis. (C) Amplification curves for W-plasmids after first-step PCR at 25 cycles. (D) Result of simple regression analysis between CT values (y axis) and the log of the starting copy numbers of W-plasmids (x axis) in setting first-step PCR at 25 cycles. (E) Result of simple regression analysis between CT values (y axis) and the log of the starting copy numbers of W-plasmids (x axis) in setting first-step PCR at 35 cycles (OR-QNRT-PCR assay). (F) Amplification curves for 103 copies of NM-plasmids as the new internal control. (G) Comparative results of one-way ANOVA against CT values for 103 copies of NM-plasmid (WR-QNRT-PCR assay) or M-plasmid (OR-QNRT-PCR assay) as an internal control.
|
(i) Optimal amplification cycle number for first-step PCR. To determine the optimal amplification cycle number for the first-step PCR, cycle numbers were set at 5-cycle intervals in the range from 20 to 35 cycles. When the first-step PCR was set at 25 cycles, the most constantly isolated amplification curves were demonstrated in all starting copy numbers of W-plasmids (Fig. 2C). The CT value data (means ± standard deviations) at 25 cycles in first-step PCR are shown in Table 3. Reflecting Fig. 2C, a significant linear relationship (R2 = 0.996) was demonstrated between CT values (y axis) and the log of the starting copy numbers of W-plasmids (x axis) by simple regression analysis (Fig. 2D). The slope of this linear regression curve (–3.33) was completely consistent with that of the standard curve shown in Fig. 2A. Therefore, 25 cycles was adopted as the optimal cycle number in the first-step PCR. Whereas, when the first-step PCR was set at the previously reported 35 cycles in the OR-QNRT-PCR assay (22), a significant linear relationship (R2 = 0.991) was also demonstrated by simple regression analysis for the CT value data (Table 3 and Fig. 2E). However, the slope of this linear regression curve (–1.46) indicated overamplification (PCR-Eff = 384.1%).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. CT value data collected under different assay conditions in the WR- and OR-QNRT-PCR assays
|
|
|
|---|
For the accurate quantitative detection of a small amount of M. tuberculosis DNA in CSF samples by WR-QNRT-PCR assay, it is extremely important that both M. tuberculosis DNA and the new internal control are amplified with sufficient balance. Therefore, the precision of the two specific standard curves was strictly examined by statistical evaluation in a series of preliminary experiments. Previously, many investigators have reported that the precision of the standard curve is the principal factor for quantitative detection in real-time (TaqMan) PCR assays (1-6, 9, 10, 13, 15-17, 20, 24, 26, 27). In this study, the two specific standard curves demonstrated statistically significant precision (R2 > 0.99, F = 1.007 or 1.015) (Fig. 2A and B). Therefore, we consider that any overall errors relating to the dilution procedure or within each experiment can be disregarded. In addition, the PCR-Eff values of two standard curves calculated by the slopes (–3.33 and –3.28) were 99.7 and 101.8%, respectively. These results indicated that the efficiency of amplification and detection for both M. tuberculosis DNA and the new internal control was almost equivalent in the WR-QNRT-PCR assay. Therefore, our hypothesis was proved experimentally by these results.
The optimal assay conditions were examined in detail by statistical analysis for CT value data collected from the preliminary experiments. In setting 25 cycles as the optimal cycle number for the first-step PCR, the primary concentration gradient for all starting copy numbers of W-plasmid was completely preserved (Fig. 2C and D). Moreover, in setting 103 copies of NM-plasmid as the optimal copy number of the new internal control, extremely uniform amplifications were demonstrated for all starting copy numbers of W-plasmids (Fig. 2F and G). These results indicate that there is no interference between M. tuberculosis DNA and the new internal control in the entire PCR amplification procedure. Therefore, the new internal control could be regarded as appropriate for use as a "calibrator" in the WR-QNRT-PSR assay.
In the OR-QNRT-PCR assay, both M. tuberculosis DNA and the old internal control (M-plasmid) were simultaneously amplified using two pairs of common primers (22). This system is the most serious weak point of the OR-QNRT-PCR assay because the amplification for a small copy number of template (M. tuberculosis DNA or M-plasmid) was poor owing to the interference by a high copy number of template. In order to obtain sufficient amplification for a small amount of M. tuberculosis DNA (<100 copies), the first-step PCR cycle number need to be set at a large number (35 cycles) in the OR-QNRT-PCR assay (22). This led to the problems of overamplification (Fig. 2E) and the instability of the M-plasmid for a large copy number (>1,000) of M. tuberculosis DNA (Fig. 2G). Therefore, the OR-QNRT-PCR assay was limited necessarily to being within a narrow detection range (22). Due to the development of NM-plasmid as the new internal control, the stable and accurate quantitative detection of M. tuberculosis DNA was possible in a detection range wider than that for the OR-QNRT-PCR assay.
In this study, we attempted to improve the OR-QNRT-PCR assay and developed NM-plasmid for use as a new internal control. Due to the development of NM-plasmid, significantly improved quantitative accuracy and a wider detection range were realized with the WR-QNRT-PCR assay. In the clinical application of the WR-QNRT-PCR assay, the advantages of this method would be powerful tool for rapid and accurate diagnosis in the difficult cases in which it is impossible to detect M. tuberculosis by conventional assay methods. In our next study, we plan to examine and evaluate the clinical usefulness of the WR-QNRT-PCR assay for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of TBM and for assessing the clinical course of TBM.
This work was supported by "Academic Frontier" Project for Private Universities: matching fund subsidy from MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology), 2006-2010.
Published ahead of print on 12 March 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»