Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2008, p. 1811-1817, Vol. 46, No. 5
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01612-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Teramo, Italy,1 Department of Public Health and Zootechny, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Valenzano, Bari, Italy2
Received 13 August 2007/ Returned for modification 5 February 2008/ Accepted 16 March 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The disease in cats is clinically relevant, as the parasite's eggs and larvae induce damage of the lung parenchyma (4, 23), inducing pulmonary effects ranging from minimal respiratory signs (e.g., occasional cough) to bronchopneumonia, open-mouthed abdominal breathing, intense and chronic coughing, sneezing, mucopurulent discharge, dyspnea, and hydrothorax; also, the disease can be fatal due to respiratory failure (13, 20, 26).
Infection by A. abstrusus has a worldwide distribution and in the past few years has been increasingly reported in America (10, 11) and Europe (7, 12, 18, 21), with a prevalence of up to about 20% in areas of endemicity (15).
Although the infection appears to be emerging and severe, there are still significant gaps in the knowledge of cat aelurostrongylosis, mainly due to the difficulties in its diagnosis in living animals. Indeed, the disease poses a significant diagnostic challenge, since the clinical presentation is hard to differentiate from those of other feline respiratory diseases. Furthermore, inapparent or subclinical infections may occur, thus impairing a reliable diagnosis by parasitological and collateral imaging approaches. More specifically, many cases of infection are not diagnosed, since cat feces are not routinely examined by the Baermann migration method, which is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of infections, although its sensitivity is 90% or less (31). Other coprological methods, i.e., direct fecal smear and fecal flotation, are less accurate due to the irregularity of larval presence and sample size. Furthermore, the flotation approaches show inherent limits, depending on the time of flotation and on the dehydration of the larvae with certain salt solutions (23).
The characterization of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and ITS2 of nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) recently defined the basis for the molecular identification of a huge range of parasites of veterinary importance, including lungworms (6). Moreover, highly sensitive two-step PCR-based assays using genetic markers within the ITSs have allowed researchers to overcome some constraints of the conventional diagnosis for a range of parasitic nematodes, e.g., human nodule worm and hookworm infections (22, 29), filariasis (9), and equine habronemiasis (27).
Given the limits of the classical diagnosis of aelurostrongylosis, there is a significant interest in molecular studies of A. abstrusus instrumentally leading to a PCR-based detection of the pathogen. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to validate a molecular assay for the diagnosis of cat aelurostrongylosis in different biological samples by using genetic markers within the ribosomal ITS2 of A. abstrusus.
|
|
|---|
Genomic DNA was individually extracted from each of the 30 A. abstrusus larval samples by using a commercial kit (i.e., Qiagen stool minikit; Qiagen Gmbh, Germany). The ITS2 plus 5.8S and 28S rRNA flanking regions of A. abstrusus were individually PCR amplified from all DNA extracts. PCR mixtures were prepared in 50-µl reaction mixtures containing 100 pmol of each of the two rDNA conserved oligonucleotide primers, NC1 (5'ACGTCTGGTTCAGGGTTGTT3'; designed within the ribosomal 5.8S flanking region of Caenorhabditis elegans; GenBank accession number X03680) (forward) and NC2 (5'TTAGTTTCTTTTCCTCCGCT3'; designed within the ribosomal 28S flanking region of C. elegans, GenBank accession number X03680) (reverse) (6), 5 µl of template, and 25 µl of Red Taq ready mix (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Reactions were performed on an Applied Biosystems 2700 thermocycler as follows: 94°C for 7 min and 40 cycles at 94°C for 45 s, 50°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 45 s, followed by a final extension for 10 min at 72°C.
Amplicons were electrophoresed in a 1.6% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (10 mg/ml), and photographed using a documentation system (Gel Doc 2000; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). All PCR products were further purified by using Ultrafree-DA columns (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and then sequenced using the Taq DyeDeoxy Terminator cycle sequencing kit (version 2; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in the automated sequencer ABI Prism 377. The ITS2 sequences obtained were determined in both directions, and the electropherograms were verified by eye with the software Chromas Lite (version 2.01). The sequences were aligned using the computer software program DAMBE (version 4.5.55) (32), and the 5' and 3' ends were determined by comparisons with those of C. elegans (GenBank accession number X03680) and other Metastrongyloidea nematodes. In particular, the ITS2 sequences obtained were compared with those of the rDNA of other metastrongylid nematodes available in the GenBank by using the nucleotide-nucleotide BLAST (1). Then the A. abstrusus ITS2 sequences were further compared with one another, and the software MEGA (version 3.1) (16) was used to calculate the nucleotide pairwise distance with the Kimura two-parameter model among the A. abstrusus ITS2 sequence and the same sequences of other Metastrongyloidea.
Establishing a diagnostic PCR assay for the specific detection of A. abstrusus rDNA. The primer set AabFor (forward 5'GTAACAACGATATTGGTACTATG3'; ITS2 oligonucleotidic residues 62 to 84) and AabRev (reverse 5'GAACTCCTTCACGTGCTACTCG3'; ITS2 oligonucleotidic residues 273 to 294) was designed by following general criteria (24) for the consensus ITS2 sequences of A. abstrusus in regions without intraspecific polymorphisms which also displayed the greatest interspecific difference with the three most common parasitic nematodes of cats, i.e., Toxocara cati (GenBank accession number Y09493), Ancylostoma tubaeforme (GenBank accession number AJ001592), and Uncinaria stenocephala (GenBank accession number AF194145).
The ability of a nested-PCR protocol to achieve specific amplification of an ITS2 internal segment (i.e., 233 bp) from A. abstrusus was evaluated with a set of biological samples (i.e., direct fecal sample, flotation supernatant sample, Baermann sediment sample, and pharyngeal swab) collected from each of the 30 cats affected by aelurostrongylosis (see the previous section). In particular, primer sets NC1-NC2 and AabFor-AabRev were used in the first and second rounds, respectively. Genomic DNA was extracted from samples of fecal origin, as described above, and from pharyngeal swabs, as described previously (28). Common endoparasites of cats collected by the authors or provided by colleagues (see Acknowledgments) and from cat blood and lung tissue (Table 1) were subjected to DNA extraction by the Qiagen DNeasy tissue kit (Qiagen Gmbh, Germany). The protocol of the nested PCR was optimized by consequent trials (i.e., different titrations of primer concentrations and various annealing times, temperatures, and cycle numbers) to achieve the highest number of PCR amplicons from each kind of biological sample. The optimal conditions of the PCR mixtures of the first round were the same as those for the protocol described above for the amplification of the ITS2 from A. abstrusus L1s. The optimized mixture conditions of the second round were as follows: 50-µl reaction mixture containing 200 pmol of each AabFor and AabRev primer, 3 µl of a 1/20 dilution of each NC1-NC2 amplicon as the template, and 25 µl of Red Taq ready mix (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The cycling protocol used in both rounds was the same as that used for the ITS2 characterization, and all AabFor-AabRev amplicons produced in the second round were electrophoresed and sequenced as described above.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. DNA samples used to verify the specificity of the nested PCR assay for the specific identification of A. abstrusus rDNAa
|
Application of nested PCR in a clinical setting. To verify the applicability of nested PCR for diagnosis of aelurostrongylosis, individual fecal samples and pharyngeal swabs were collected from 50 cats that were admitted to private veterinary clinics; the cats were suspected of having lungworm infections based on histories of respiratory signs and anamneses, i.e., all 50 animals (younger than 1.5 years) were free roaming and came from an area of endemicity for A. abstrusus in central Italy.
All fecal samples were subjected to routine coprological diagnosis, i.e., direct smear, flotation procedures by using both a sugar and a zinc sulfate solution, with specific gravities of 1,200 and of 1,350, respectively, and the Baermann technique.
The direct smear was performed by using
0.5 g of feces mixed with a drop of saline solution on a microscope slide to produce a thin layer that was examined under a microscope (Axioskop 40; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at a magnification of x20. Approximately 3 g of feces was added to 20 ml of flotation solution and centrifuged at 600 x g for 5 min. A supernatant aliquot of
100 µl was aspirated with a Pasteur pipette, transferred to a glass slide, and examined using a light microscope at a magnification of x20. The Baermann technique was performed by using 5 to 10 g from each sample (8).
All parasites retrieved at the coprological examination were identified according to morphological keys, and A. abstrusus L1s were recognized by their characteristic notched and S-shaped caudal ends (23, 25).
Genomic DNA was extracted from the 50 pharyngeal swabs as described previously (28), and all the DNA extracts were subjected to the nested-PCR assay specific for the 233-bp-long fragment internal to the A. abstrusus ITS2 (described above). A positive control (larval A. abstrusus DNA) and a negative control (sterile water) were included in every run, and all amplicons produced in the second round were electrophoresed and sequenced as described above. All the molecular procedures were performed in separate rooms (i.e., DNA preparation and pre-PCR steps were carried out in a room different than that used for post-PCR manipulation) to avoid PCR contamination. All procedures were validated twice.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. Nucleotide sequence data for ITS2 of the ribosomal DNA plus partial flanking regions of the 5.8S and 28S ribosomal rRNA genes of A. abstrusus have been registered in the GenBank database under accession number EU034168.
|
|
|---|
500 bp from A. abstrusus L1s recovered from the 30 infected cats. ITS2 sequences showed no variation in length (321 bp), a G+C content of 39.5%, and two polymorphic nucleotidic positions (i.e., two C
T transitions at ITS2 residues 183 and 219), with an intraspecific difference of 0.6%. The ITS2 sequence of A. abstrusus showed consistency with ribosomal sequences of 20 other metastrongylid nematodes, with a nucleotide pairwise distance ranging from 0.631 (A. abstrusus versus Umingmakstrongylus pallikuukensis) to 1.823 (A. abstrusus versus Torynurus convolutus) (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Distance matrix showing the nucleotide pairwise distane calculated by MEGA 3.1 among ITS2 sequences
|
200 bp) was detected.
![]() View larger version (66K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Example of an agarose gel showing results from the nested PCR of fecal and pharyngeal samples. Lane M, size marker; lane 1, negative fecal sample; lanes 2 and 3, positive samples from flotation supernatants and Baermann sediment, respectively; lane 4, negative flotation sample; lanes 5 and 6, positive pharyngeal samples; lane 7, negative control (no-DNA sample); lane 8, positive control (A. abstrusus DNA).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Cats with clinical respiratory signs determined to be infected or not infected with Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, coccidia, ascarids, tapeworms, and hookworms at examination by direct smear, flotation, Baermann method, and nested PCR on pharyngeal swabsa
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Example of an agarose gel showing results from the nested PCR of pharyngeal samples collected from symptomatic animals negative at the microscopic fecal examination. Lane M, size marker; lanes 1 to 3, positive samples from animals 13, 33, and 39 (Table 2); lane 4, negative sample from animal 50; lane 5, positive control (A. abstrusus DNA); lane 6, negative control (no-DNA sample).
|
|
|
|---|
200 bp), regardless of coinfections with other endoparasites (i.e., coccidia, tapeworms, ascarids, and hookworms). The 100% specificity of the assay was also confirmed by the sequencing of all amplicons produced by the second round of the nested PCR and by the absence of control sample amplification (Table 1). Conversely, failure to detect A. abstrusus DNA in one Baermann and one pharyngeal sample, coming from 1 of the 30 animals with a history of aelurostrongylosis, might be due to the concentration or the quality of parasitic DNA. The value of diagnostic sensitivity (i.e.,
97%) is in accordance with those previously recorded for other parasites by using two-step PCR approaches on fecal or pharyngeal samples (27, 28, 30), and it is higher than that recorded by employing classical diagnostic methodologies. The higher percentage of sensitivity shown by the two-step PCR over the conventional diagnostic methods is likely due to the specific amplification of the parasites' water-soluble DNA molecules present in feces and in pharyngeal swabs. Accordingly, when the molecular approach was employed for the pharyngeal swab samples from 50 symptomatic animals from the field, 5 animals that were negative by classical coprological examination were positive by PCR (Table 3; Fig. 2). Six animals were positive by both coprology and nested PCR, while 39 were negative. Even though no confirmation at necropsy was possible, it is arguable that those 39 cats testing negative were actually not infected by feline lungworms. Indeed, the same animals were later diagnosed ex juvantibus with upper respiratory tract disease complex (i.e., 35 animals received this diagnosis) or with nasopharyngeal polyps (i.e., 4 animals received this diagnosis).
The validation of the nested PCR on the set of samples collected from the 30 cats with known histories of aelurostrongylosis demonstrated that the pharyngeal swab has an overall sensitivity similar to that of Baermann sediment for detecting A. abstrusus DNA. Nonetheless, the present experiment demonstrates that the pharyngeal swab is the most suitable sample instrumental to the molecular diagnosis of feline lungworm infection for a range of practical considerations (i.e., difficulties in collecting adequate stool samples in the field and long parasite prepatent and migration periods), which may lead to a lack of DNA readily available for PCR amplification. Moreover, DNA extraction from feces is more laborious than that from pharyngeal mucus and may imply the presence of PCR inhibitors.
From a clinical standpoint, the assay presented herein can be used as a reliable tool for detecting A. abstrusus DNA in pharyngeal swabs from clinically infected cats, thus having implications for diagnosis. The difficulties inherited with a reliable clinical diagnosis of cat aelurostrongylosis is worthy of note, as this disease may share symptoms with other respiratory feline diseases (e.g., nematode infections by Dirofilaria immitis and Eucoleus aerophilus), presenting with similar respiratory distress and signs and abnormal radiographic and hematologic findings (5, 10, 11, 19, 31). Also, the feline respiratory tract may be infected by several viruses and bacteria causing infections with aelurostrongylosis-like symptoms (10, 11). Hence, as a consequence, several cases of aelurostrongylosis may not be clinically included in differential diagnosis and, thus, cats are often not subjected to coprology.
It is also known that the fecal examinations used routinely (i.e., direct fecal smear and fecal flotation) may be inaccurate, since L1s may not be present and/or the feces amount used is inadequate (Table 3). The coprological procedure of flotation with sugar solution was confirmed to be less sensitive than that with salt solution (Table 3) (15). Nonetheless, flotation with concentrated salt solutions implies limits inherent to L1 sink and dehydration, leading to morphological alteration (3, 23). An unequivocal diagnosis of A. abstrusus infection is of crucial importance to the timeliness of treatments, thus resulting in a positive prognosis for the infected animals.
Based on the present results, the nested PCR validated herein is the most reliable method for the diagnosis of feline aelurostrongylosis in a clinical setting and it represents a new tool for the evaluation of the efficacies of anthelmintic compounds against feline lungworm under laboratory and field conditions. The ethical implications of using such a method to monitor the decline/absence of parasite-specific DNA in feces or pharyngeal mucus in treated animals is of relevance, since it allows us to circumvent the need to sacrifice infected cats.
Other implications of the molecular assay for epidemiological studies of cat aelurostrongylosis are related to better understanding of the ecology, epidemiology, seasonal occurrence, and transmission patterns of A. abstrusus. For instance, this nested assay could be employed in studies to identify mollusks acting as intermediate hosts of A. abstrusus in those geographical regions where their identities are still unknown.
Published ahead of print on 26 March 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»