This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2008, p. 2377-2380, Vol. 46, No. 7
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00230-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Optimization of a Laboratory-Developed Test Utilizing Roche Analyte-Specific Reagents for Detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus, and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Species{triangledown}

Maitry S. Mehta,1 Suzanne M. Paule,1 Donna M. Hacek,1 Richard B. Thomson,1,2 Karen L. Kaul,1,2 and Lance R. Peterson1,2*

Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, Illinois,1 Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois2

Received 4 February 2008/ Returned for modification 21 March 2008/ Accepted 24 April 2008


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Nasal and perianal swab specimens were tested for detection of Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE) using a laboratory-developed real-time PCR test and microbiological cultures. The real-time PCR and culture results for S. aureus were similar. PCR had adequate sensitivity, but culture was more specific for the detection of VRE.


arrow
TEXT
 
Staphylococcus aureus, especially methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE) are important pathogens associated with health care facility outbreaks worldwide (1, 2, 8, 21). It has been reported that identifying asymptomatically colonized individuals and placing them into contact isolation within a short time frame are a good management tool for reducing the spread of these pathogens and for lowering health care-associated infections (5, 11, 16, 18). Furthermore, there is rising interest in identifying all S. aureus carriers prior to surgery to decolonize them to reduce postoperative S. aureus surgical-site infections (4, 10).

Reliable surveillance requires accurate testing (17), and cultures can take from 2 to 5 days to obtain the final results (3a). PCR offers detection of S. aureus and VRE directly from swab specimens within a few hours (4, 12, 14) and can help with the rapid deployment of infection control and prevention measures (16, 18).

The purpose of our study was to develop an optimized test using Roche analyte-specific reagents (ASRs) for detection of S. aureus and VRE by real-time PCR with a single set of amplification conditions and to compare the PCR results to the results of conventional culture.

Inpatients at Evanston Northwestern Healthcare during August 2004 made up the patient population. Premoistened, double-headed swabs (culture swab; BBL, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) were used to collect paired anterior nasal specimens and paired perianal specimens as part of an infection control activity to determine colonization prevalence. There were 387 nasal specimens (for S. aureus) and 309 perianal specimens (for VRE). This investigation was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Evanston Northwestern Healthcare.

For S. aureus, one of the paired nasal swabs was plated onto Columbia colistin-nalidixic agar with 5% sheep blood (Remel, Inc., Lenexa, KS) (3a) and incubated at 35°C for 48 h. S. aureus was identified by colony morphology and Staphaurex latex agglutination testing (Remel, Inc.). Methicillin resistance was determined on colonies by using PCR as described below. For any swabs that were PCR positive only for S. aureus (n = 13), the original cultures were reexamined beyond their initial 48-hour incubation, with five additional swab samples yielding S. aureus after reexamination (two yielded MRSA).

VRE was cultured by plating one of the paired perianal swabs on bile esculin azide agar containing 6 µg of vancomycin/ml agar (Remel, Inc.) and by incubation at 35°C for 72 h. Colonies black in color (bile esculin positive) were confirmed to be Enterococcus faecium or Enterococcus faecalis by using conventional biochemical testing. Vancomycin resistance was determined via Etest in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (3). For any samples that were PCR positive only, the original swabs were placed into thioglycolate broth (BBL, Becton Dickinson) and incubated for 72 h at 35°C. The broth was then subcultured onto a colistin-nalidixic agar plate; 2 of 22 specimens grew VRE.

Although the swab processing and extraction methods were unique for each assay, we designed identical real-time PCR amplification conditions for all three assays that are presented in Table 1. This was done to facilitate the running of samples for various assay targets at the same time on the LightCycler instrument. The second swab from each surveillance specimen was broken off in a microcentrifuge tube and processed. For S. aureus, after the incubation steps, fluid surrounding the swab was aspirated and directly used for real-time PCR analysis (12). For VRE, by using the extraction protocol summarized in Table 1, a final eluate of 100 µl of purified DNA was used for real-time PCR. All ASRs were supplied by Roche Diagnostics.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Real-time PCR protocols for using the Roche ASRs to detect S. aureus and VRE on the LightCycler instrument

Each culture that grew an S. aureus isolate was tested for the presence of mecA from colonies using the Roche LightCycler Staphylococcus and LightCycler mecA ASRs in an in-house real-time PCR assay (13). For DNA extraction, two or three isolated colonies of S. aureus were touched with a sterile loop, placed into a microcentrifuge tube containing lysis buffer, and processed (Table 1). The PCR results were assessed using culture results as the reference standard. The chi-square statistic was used for determining any significant difference.

The results of our study are shown in Table 2. Eleven specimens were culture positive and PCR negative, of which two were MRSA. Six of these 11 specimens had only one to three S. aureus colonies, indicating very low density colonization, and thus those negative specimens were likely below the detection sensitivity for the PCR assay.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Results of real-time PCR testing for S. aureusa and VREb from surveillance swabs with culture used as the reference standard

Colonies from each culture that grew S. aureus were tested for the presence of mecA by using the Roche LightCycler mecA ASR and our in-house real-time PCR assay (13). The mecA colony PCR results were identical for both methods. Out of a total of 105 S. aureus specimens, 33 specimens (31%) were mecA positive (MRSA).

The laboratory-developed VRE real-time PCR assay detects vanA, vanB, and vanB2/3 genes and differentiates them by using melt curve analysis (Table 2). Melt curve analysis of the 15 culture- and PCR-positive swabs showed that 11 specimens had the vanA gene alone, one contained the vanA and vanB genes, one had the vanB2/3 gene (considered a false-positive test), and two had the vanA and vanB2/3 genes. The PCR results for the cultured colonies showed only the presence of vanA in all 15 specimens. For the four swab specimens that were culture positive and PCR negative for VRE, all four isolates were E. faecium with MICs of 8, 16, 16, and >256 µg/ml. The PCR results for these colonies found that only one harbored the vanA gene while the other three tested negative; a determinant for vancomycin resistance in these is unknown. For the 20 swab specimens that were culture negative and PCR positive, 2 had vanA, 4 had vanB, and 14 had vanB2/3, as determined by the PCR assay.

The costs per test (based on manufacturers' suggested retail price) plus operator time for processing were $4.00 to $4.50 plus 1 to 2 min for culture, $3.00 plus 2 to 3 min for in-house (S. aureus and mecA) PCR, and $21.00 (S. aureus and mecA) to $42.00 (VRE) plus 2 to 3 min for the commercial ASR tests we describe.

Both the S. aureus and VRE real-time PCR assays yielded results within 3 to 5 h, including extraction and assay run time, compared to culture, which took from 48 to over 72 h. While new chromogenic agar can detect MRSA with overnight incubation, the sensitivity of direct testing is <80%, compared to PCR (15a). The ASR reagents investigated gave reliable results for detection of S. aureus; however, confirmation of MRSA by detection of mecA required growth of S. aureus colonies. We have demonstrated that the use of such a testing strategy to detect S. aureus in presurgical patients can significantly lower their risk of postoperative S. aureus infections (4).

In our VRE testing, we found that while PCR assay of the swab detected vanA, vanB, and vanB2/3 genes, PCR confirmation using the recovered colonies only detected vanA. The 17 specimens with the vanB2/3 signal may represent a false-positive amplification test for VRE. The vanB gene is known to occur in other bacteria (21); however, vanB2/3 containing enterococci can potentially cause outbreaks (7, 9), so this result cannot be ignored. Also, we have previously shown that PCR-positive surveillance swabs for both S. aureus and VRE can indicate persons harboring these pathogens at other sites or prior times (12, 14, 15, 20), so some of the PCR-positive results may represent false-negative cultures. Based on our findings, and those of others (6), the VRE real-time PCR test in a clinical setting appears good for early detection of patients likely infected with VRE; however, it would seem prudent to culture the specimens that signal positive for vanB and vanB2/3 in order to confirm that those patients indeed harbor VRE, as without such confirmation the positive predictive value of the test is only 40%.

Sloan and colleagues (19) found better sensitivity (100%) that we did and a similar specificity when using the Roche LightCycler vanA/vanB ASRs in their laboratory. One of the reasons for higher sensitivity may be that they used a different culture method (19). Also, only PCR-positive samples were evaluated for the presence of VRE colonies.

We have optimized laboratory-developed tests that utilize commercially available ASRs that can detect S. aureus (and that can confirm MRSA after culture) and VRE directly from surveillance swab specimens by using a single set of amplification conditions. These tests can help clinicians make important infection control and surgical prophylaxis decisions. The VRE real-time PCR test using currently available ASR materials reliably detected the VanA phenotype but detected many more vanB and vanB2/3 positives than culture, suggesting that this latter result may need to be confirmed by culture.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by a research grant from Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, to Lance R. Peterson. There are no other potential conflicts of interest for this report for any of the other authors.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201. Phone: (847) 570-1637. Fax: (847) 733-5093. E-mail: lancer{at}northwestern.edu Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 30 April 2008. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Anderson, D. J., D. J. Sexton, Z. A. Kanafani, G. Auten, and K. S. Kaye. 2007. Severe surgical site infection in community hospitals: epidemiology, key procedures, and the changing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 28:1047-1053.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Biedenbach, D. J., G. J. Moet, and R. N. Jones. 2004. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance pattern comparisons among bloodstream infection isolates from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2002). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 50:59-69.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard, 7th edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    4. 3
  4. Hacek, D. M., S. Paule, M. Small, R. Gottschall, R. Thomson, and L. Peterson. 2003. Abstr. 103rd Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C-323.
    5. 4
  5. Hacek, D. M., W. J. Robb, S. M. Paule, J. C. Kudrna, V. P. Stamos, and L. R. Peterson. 2008. Staphylococcus aureus nasal decolonization in joint replacement surgery reduces infection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. [Epub ahead of print.] doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0210-y.
    6. 5
  6. Huang, S. S., D. S. Yokoe, V. L. Hinrichsen, L. S. Spurchise, R. Datta, I. Miroshnik, and R. Platt. 2006. Impact of routine intensive care unit surveillance cultures and resultant barrier precautions on hospital-wide methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43:971-978.[CrossRef][Medline]
    7. 6
  7. Koh, T. H., R. N. Deepak, S. Y. Se-Thoe, R. V. T. P. Lin, and E. S. C. Koay. 2007. Experience with the Roche LightCycler VRE detection kit during a large outbreak of vanB2/B3 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:182-183.[Free Full Text]
    8. 7
  8. Koh, T. H., L. Y. Hsu, L. L. Chiu, and R. V. Lin. 2006. Emergence of epidemic clones of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Singapore. J. Hosp. Infect. 63:234-236.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 8
  9. Livermore, D. M. 2000. Antibiotic resistance in staphylococci. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 16(Suppl. 1):S3-S10.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 9
  10. Nebreda, T., J. Oteo, C. Aldea, C. García-Estébanez, J. Gastelu-Iturri, V. Bautista, S. García-Cobos, and J. Campos. 2007. Hospital dissemination of a clonal complex 17 vanB2-containing Enterococcus faecium. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59:806-807.[Free Full Text]
    11. 10
  11. Noskin, G. A., R. J. Rubin, J. J. Schentag, J. Kluytmans, E. C. Hedblom, C. Jacobson, M. Smulders, E. Gemmen, and M. Bharmal. 2008. Budget impact analysis of rapid screening for Staphylococcus aureus colonization among patients undergoing elective surgery in US hospitals. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 29:16-24.[CrossRef][Medline]
    12. 11
  12. Ostrowsky, B. E., W. E. Trick, A. H. Sohn, S. B. Quirk, S. Holt, L. A. Carson, B. C. Hill, M. J. Arduino, M. J. Kuehnert, and W. R. Jarvis. 2001. Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in health care facilities in a region. N. Engl. J. Med. 344:1427-1433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 12
  13. Paule, S. M., A. C. Pasquariello, D. M. Hacek, A. G. Fisher, R. B. Thomson, Jr., K. L. Kaul, and L. R. Peterson. 2004. Direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus from adult and neonate nasal swab specimens using real-time polymerase chain reaction. J. Mol. Diagn. 6:191-196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 13
  14. Paule, S. M., A. C. Pasquariello, R. B. Thomson, Jr., K. L. Kaul, and L. R. Peterson. 2005. Real-time PCR can rapidly detect methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from positive blood culture bottles. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 124:404-407.[CrossRef][Medline]
    15. 14
  15. Paule, S. M., W. E. Trick, F. C. Tenover, M. Lankford, S. Cunningham, V. Stosor, R. L. Cordell, and L. R. Peterson. 2003. Comparison of PCR assay to culture for surveillance detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4805-4807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 15
  16. Paule, S. M., D. M. Hacek, B. Kufner, K. Truchon, R. B. Thomson, Jr., K. L. Kaul, A. Robicsek, and L. R. Peterson. 2007. Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2993-2998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 15
  17. Paule, S. M., M. Mehta, D. Hacek, T. Gonzalzles, A. Robicsek, and L. R. Peterson. 2008. Abstr. 1st Meet. Emerg. Technol. Med. Import. Diagn. Infect. Dis. Detect. Pathog. Microbes, abstr. 50B.
    18. 16
  18. Peterson, L. R., D. M. Hacek, and A. Robicsek. 2007. Case study: an MRSA intervention at Evanston Northwestern Healthcare. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 33:732-738.[Medline]
    19. 17
  19. Raboud, J., R. Saskin, A. Simor, M. Loeb, K. Green, D. E. Low, and A. McGeer. 2005. Modeling transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among patients admitted to a hospital. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 26:607-615.[CrossRef][Medline]
    20. 18
  20. Robicsek, A., J. L. Beaumont, S. M. Paule, D. M. Hacek, R. B. Thomson, Jr., K. L. Kaul, P. King, and L. R. Peterson. 2008. Impact of universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at a large United States healthcare organization. Ann. Intern. Med. 148:409-418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    21. 19
  21. Sloan, L. M., J. R. Uhl, E. A. Vetter, C. D. Schleck, W. S. Harmsen, J. Manahan, R. L. Thompson, J. E. Rosenblatt, and F. R. Cockerill III. 2004. Comparison of the Roche LightCycler vanA/vanB detection assay and culture for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from perianal swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2636-2643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 20
  22. Trick, W. E., S. M. Paule, S. Cunningham, R. L. Cordell, M. Lankford, V. Stosor, S. L. Solomon, and L. R. Peterson. 2004. Detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci before and after antimicrobial therapy: use of conventional culture and polymerase chain reaction. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:780-786.[CrossRef][Medline]
    23. 21
  23. Willems, R. J., J. Top, M. van Santen, D. A. Robinson, T. M. Coque, F. Baquero, H. Grundmann, and M. J. Bonten. 2005. Global spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from distinct nosocomial genetic complex. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:821-828.[Medline]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2008, p. 2377-2380, Vol. 46, No. 7
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00230-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mehta, M. S., Paule, S. M., Thomson, R. B., Kaul, K. L., Peterson, L. R. (2009). Identification of Staphylococcus Species Directly from Positive Blood Culture Broth by Use of Molecular and Conventional Methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1082-1086 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. R.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»