Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roisin, S. Articles by Struelens, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roisin, S. Articles by Struelens, M. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2008, p. 2525-2528, Vol. 46, No. 8
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00291-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of New Vitek 2 Card and Disk Diffusion Method for Determining Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to Oxacillin

Sandrine Roisin,^* Claire Nonhoff, Olivier Denis, and Marc J. Struelens

Laboratoire de Référence MRSA-Staphylocoques, Department of Microbiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

Received 12 February 2008/ Returned for modification 13 May 2008/ Accepted 3 June 2008

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus is a challenge, especially low-level resistance, which is often misdiagnosed. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of the automated Vitek 2 system and disk diffusion tests, using cefoxitin and moxalactam, for the detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus strains. Four sets of genotypically diverse isolates were selected from a national reference collection, including mecA-negative S. aureus isolates (n = 56), hospital-acquired (n = 88) and community-acquired (n = 40) S. aureus isolates, and heterogeneous methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates (n = 29). Oxacillin susceptibility was tested by the Vitek 2 system with the AST P549 card and by disk diffusion methods using 10, 30, and 60 µg cefoxitin and 30 µg moxalactam. Oxacillin resistance was confirmed by PCR for the mecA gene. The overall sensitivities for oxacillin resistance detection were 97.5% for the Vitek 2 automated system, 98.7% for 60-µg cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion, and 99.6% for 10- and 30-µg cefoxitin disks, respectively. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates were correctly reported as susceptible by all methods. The median times for methicillin testing were 7 h for the Vitek 2 system versus 24 h for disk diffusion methods. In conclusion, the cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion methods and the Vitek 2 automated system are highly accurate methods for methicillin resistance detection, including a range of representative Belgian methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains and unusual strains exhibiting cryptic or low-level oxacillin resistance.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Staphylococcus aureus causes serious community-acquired (CA) and nosocomial infections and is a major pathogen implicated in various infections, such as bacteremia, pneumonia, skin infections, and soft tissue and osteoarticular infections (11). Another potential issue is the development of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The prevalence of MRSA has increased and has become a worldwide problem inside and outside the hospital. Furthermore, MRSA strains cause further therapeutic problems because of their ability to develop resistance to other classes of antibiotics, including glycopeptides (6).

In MRSA strains, the mecA gene encodes the low-affinity penicillin-binding protein PBP2a, which confers resistance to all beta-lactams. MRSA strains differ in their levels of expression of methicillin resistance, which allows their categorization into four phenotypic classes described by Tomasz et al. based on population analysis of growth at increasing methicillin MICs (20). Strains belonging to classes 1 to 3 are heterogeneously resistant to methicillin, showing subpopulation MICs ranging from 1.5 to 200 mg/liter, respectively. Strains belonging to class 4 are homogeneous and composed of uniformly and highly resistant strains (MIC 800 mg/liter) (20).

Previously, phenotypic tests used oxacillin to identify methicillin resistance in S. aureus. Unfortunately, oxacillin susceptibility tests often failed to detect low-level-heterogeneous MRSA populations. Cefoxitin, a cephamycin antibiotic that is a strong inducer of the mecA regulatory system, was shown to be superior to oxacillin for detection of methicillin resistance, especially in low-level-resistant S. aureus strains. For this reason, the method has been recommended by the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) since 2005 (9, 14-19).

Automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems are widely used in clinical laboratories and provide results with shorter incubation times than disk diffusion testing (8).

Recently, a new antimicrobial susceptibility testing card, AST-P549 (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), has been developed for staphylococcus testing by Vitek 2. In this card, the oxacillin screen has been replaced by a cefoxitin screen. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the performance of the new Vitek 2 AST-P549 card and the disk diffusion methods using cefoxitin Neo-Sensitabs (10 µg, 30 µg, and 60 µg) and paper disks of cefoxitin (30 µg) and moxalactam (30 µg) to detect methicillin resistance using a well-defined collection of MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Bacterial collection. S. aureus strains were selected from a national reference collection composed of systematic survey samples and atypical strains, including a borderline beta-lactam resistance phenotype.

All strains were previously categorized by triplex PCR for 16S rRNA, mecA, and nuc genes (12) and genotyped by SmaI macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Genotypes were classified as previously described into (i) a PFGE group, designated by a capital letter, that included patterns showing a 6-DNA-fragment difference, equivalent to 65% similarity, and (ii) a PFGE type, designated by the group letter followed by an Arabic numeral suffix, that included PFGE patterns showing a 3-DNA-fragment difference, equivalent to 80% similarity (4).

The MIC for oxacillin was determined by the agar dilution method using Mueller-Hinton II agar (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) according to CLSI recommendations (2).

Four sets of S. aureus strains (n = 213) were included in this study.

(i) Belgian health care-associated (HA) MRSA strains. The HA-MRSA strains (n = 88) were selected to represent the major epidemic genotypes found in a national MRSA survey conducted in 2003 in Belgian hospitals. They included the genotypes (number of isolates) PFGE type B2-sequence type (ST) 45-staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (45-SCCmec) type IV (n = 11), A20-ST8-SCCmec type IV (n = 12), A21-ST8-SCCmec type IV (n = 7), G10-ST5-SCCmec type II (n = 7), A1-ST247-SCCmec type I (n = 8), C3-ST5-SCCmec type IV (n = 5), D8-ST228-SCCmec type I (n = 2), and L1-ST22-SCCmec type IV (n = 7), as well as sporadic PFGE types (n = 27) and the reference strains S. aureus ATCC 33592 and S. aureus ATCC 43300 (10). For HA-MRSA strains, the oxacillin MIC ranged from 8 to >256 mg/liter, with a median of 64 mg/liter.

(ii) Low-level-resistant MRSA strains (n = 29). Low-level-resistant MRSA strains were referred to the reference laboratory between 1995 and 2005 to confirm oxacillin resistance. They were all mecA positive and exhibited low-level MICs to oxacillin ranging from 0.5 to 16 mg/liter, with a median of 8 mg/liter, by the agar dilution method (4, 5, 7). Of the last strains, five mecA-positive isolates were phenotypically categorized as oxacillin susceptible by CLSI breakpoints, with oxacillin MICs of 2 mg/liter and were therefore defined as "cryptic MRSA strains."

(iii) Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive CA-MRSA strains (n = 40). The Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive MRSA strains were collected in Belgium from 2002 to 2005 (3). They belonged by molecular typing to PFGE type X-ST80-SCCmec IV (n = 26), PFGE type A23-ST8-SCCmec IV (n = 3), and PFGE type J-ST30-SCCmec IV (n = 5) and to other sporadic genotypes (n = 6). For CA-MRSA, the oxacillin MICs ranged from 4 to >256 mg/liter, with a median of 16 mg/liter.

(iv) Nonduplicate MSSA isolates (n = 56). Nonduplicate MSSA isolates were collected from patients admitted to Belgian hospitals during the national survey conducted in 2003 (10). The oxacillin MICs for these mecA-negative strains ranged between 0.25 and 1 mg/liter, with a median of 0.5 mg/liter.

Susceptibility testing. All strains stored at –80°C were subcultured on two consecutive days on Columbia blood agar before blind testing.

A bacterial suspension equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared with isolated colonies after 18 to 24 h of incubation on a Columbia blood plate. Vitek 2 AST-P549 cards (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) were inoculated according to the manufacturer's instructions. In parallel, Mueller-Hinton II agar plates (Becton-Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) were streaked with the same bacterial suspension, and the following disks were applied on the surface: 10-µg, 30-µg, and 60-µg cefoxitin tablets (CFOX-10, CFOX-30, and CFOX-60) (Neo-Sensitabs; Rosco, Taastrup, Danemark); 30 µg cefoxitin (FOX-30); and 30 µg moxalactam (MOX-30) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). The agar plates were incubated for 18 to 24 h in ambient air at 35°C. The reference strains S. aureus ATCC 29213 and ATCC 25922 (oxacillin susceptible) and ATCC 43300 and ATCC 33592 (oxacillin resistant) were included in each run.

Interpretation criteria. The inhibition zone diameters were measured with a ruler after 24 h of incubation. Crude and appraised (Advanced Expert System [AES]) susceptibility results with the AST-P549 Vitek card were recorded.

According to the CLSI guidelines, the following zone diameter interpretative criteria were used: CFOX-60, resistant (R), 24 mm, and susceptible (S), 25 mm; CFOX-30 and FOX-30, R, 19 mm, and S, 20 mm; MOX-30, R, 14 mm, and S, 23 mm. For CFOX-10, we used the interpretative criteria proposed by Skov et al.: R, 16 mm, and S, 17 mm (16).

In case of discrepancy, the disk diffusion method and Vitek 2 susceptibility testing were repeated. The gold standard test used for categorization as MRSA was detection of the mecA gene by PCR (12).

Statistical method. Statistical differences between methods were analyzed by McNemar's test for paired samples, with a P value of <0.05 considered significant.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Disk diffusion tests. MRSA and MSSA isolates showed distinct distributions of inhibition zone diameters with all disks included in the study (Table 1). Only a few MRSA and MSSA isolates showed inhibition zone diameters near the cutoff (Table 1). All MSSA isolates were correctly categorized irrespective of antimicrobial and disk contents, thereby demonstrating 100% specificity of the disk diffusion assays. Only two "cryptic MRSA" strains (MIC = 0.5 mg/liter) were incorrectly classified as susceptible by some disk diffusion tests (a very major error) (Table 1). One "cryptic MRSA" strain was classified as oxacillin susceptible by all disks, whereas another "cryptic MRSA" strain was not detected with CFOX-60, FOX-30, and MOX-30 but was correctly categorized as MRSA by CFOX-10 and CFOX-30. Thus, the sensitivity of the disk diffusion method ranged from 98.7% for CFOX-60, FOX-30, and MOX-30 to 99.6% for CFOX-10 and CFOX-30, respectively (P > 0.05) (Table 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Distribution of cefoxitin and moxalactam inhibition zone diameters by disk diffusion testing of 213 isolates of S. aureus by resistance genotype (mecA PCR results)

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Sensitivities and specificities of disk diffusion and Vitek 2 susceptibility testing methods for detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus by category of phenotypic resistance expression

Vitek 2 automated system. All MSSA isolates were cefoxitin screen negative and showed oxacillin MICs of 1 mg/liter with the Vitek 2 system. Four (2.5%) MRSA strains were misclassified as oxacillin susceptible. These strains had both a negative cefoxitin screen and Vitek-based oxacillin MICs of 2 mg/liter. The same results were obtained after repeat testing. These strains were two cryptic MRSA strains with MICs of 0.5 and 1 mg/liter, one low-level MRSA strain with a MIC of 4 mg/liter, and one CA-MRSA strain with a MIC of 32 mg/liter by the agar dilution method. Five other MRSA strains were accurately categorized by the AES, including four strains showing Vitek-based oxacillin MICs of 2 mg/liter but a positive cefoxitin screen test and one strain (a sporadic clone) showing a negative cefoxitin screen test but an oxacillin MIC of 4 mg/liter. These strains were three cryptic or low-level MRSA strains with MICs of 0.5, 2, and 8 mg/liter; one CA-MRSA strain with a MIC of 8 mg/liter; and one MRSA sporadic clone with a MIC of 128 mg/liter by the agar dilution method. The overall sensitivities and specificities of the Vitek 2 system were 97.5% and 100%, respectively (Table 2). The cefoxitin screen showed higher sensitivity (96.8%) than the oxacillin MIC test (94.9%) (P > 0.05). The diagnostic performance for oxacillin resistance detection showed a nonsignificant difference from the disk diffusion method (P > 0.05).

The median time to final susceptibility reporting based on the Vitek 2 system was 7 h (range, 6 h 15 min to 12 h 30 min) and showed no difference between MSSA strains (median time, 6 h 45 min) and MRSA strains (median time, 7 h).

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The gold standard method for determination of methicillin resistance in S. aureus is mecA detection by PCR assay (1, 12). Detection of PBP2a by latex agglutination is a valid alternative method. However, PCR testing requires a trained staff and special equipment, and the latex test is relatively costly, thereby limiting the use of these assays in routine testing by clinical microbiology laboratories. Previously recommended phenotypic MRSA detection methods based on oxacillin disk diffusion or oxacillin screen agar testing were found to fail to detect MRSA isolates with very heterogeneous subpopulations (1, 9). Because cefoxitin is a strong inducer of the mecA gene that appears to be less affected than oxacillin by penicillinase-hyperproducing isolates, it is more reliable for MRSA detection and is currently recommended in the CLSI guidelines (9, 18, 19).

In our evaluation, the different assays, antimicrobials, and concentrations tested showed accurate and comparable performances for categorization of MRSA and MSSA isolates. MRSA strains belonging to endemic CA and hospital-acquired genotypes were accurately detected by both the disk diffusion methods and the Vitek 2 automated system. MRSA strains misclassified as susceptible were restricted to atypical strains that contained the mecA gene but that were categorized as oxacillin susceptible by the reference MIC level ("cryptic MRSA" strains) of 0.5 mg/liter. Interestingly, CFOX-10 and CFOX-30 disks were able to correctly identify one of these challenge strains. We also confirmed the results obtained by Skov et al. concerning the excellent sensitivity of the 10-µg cefoxitin disk (17). With these low-content disks (10 and 30 µg), the interpretative zone diameters for S (17 mm) and R (16 mm) better discriminate between MRSA and MSSA isolates than with higher-content disks. The smaller inhibition zones observed with both concentrations also interfered less with the inhibition zones of other antimicrobials. As reported by Felten et al., the moxalactam disk test also performed well for routine detection of MRSA, showing a sensitivity of 98.7% and a specificity of 100% with our test collection (9).

The Vitek 2 system combines an oxacillin screen and MICs to detect methicillin resistance in staphylococci. A previous study of a first-generation test card conducted in our laboratory showed a sensitivity of 87.8% for all MRSA strains and a sensitivity of 73.1% for the heteroresistant strains (13). The new card tested in the present study, which included a cefoxitin screen (6 µg/liter) in addition to oxacillin MIC testing, performed better, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 97.5% and 100%, respectively. Comparable results were found by Swenson et al. using the Phoenix automated system (18). The Vitek 2 AES failed to detect one CA-MRSA isolate and three low-level-resistant strains. Amplification of the mecA gene and detection of PBP2a were the only reliable techniques to detect MRSA isolates with oxacillin MICs of 0.5 mg/liter. Five other MRSA strains were accurately categorized by the AES but showed discrepant results between cefoxitin screening and oxacillin MIC values. One MRSA (a sporadic clone) was cefoxitin screen negative with an oxacillin MIC of 4 mg/liter, whereas four other isolates were only cefoxitin screen positive and oxacillin susceptible (2 mg/liter). One of these MRSA isolates was a CA-MRSA isolate, and the other three were low-level MRSA isolates. The cefoxitin screen was marginally more sensitive (96.9%) than the Vitek 2 oxacillin MIC (94.9%) for detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus isolates, and the combination of the cefoxitin screen and oxacillin testing results increased the sensitivity to 97.5% for the new card.

Vitek 2 results showed no difference in time to response between MSSA strains and MRSA strains. The Vitek 2 system allowed a response within working hours (8 h) for 88.7% of S. aureus isolates, whereas the disk diffusion method required 24 h of incubation, as recommended by the CLSI (2).

In conclusion, as described previously, this study confirmed the reliability and the robustness of cefoxitin and moxalactam disk testing for detection of MRSA, including atypical strains showing cryptic or low-level-heterogeneous resistance. Its use also enhances the performance of MRSA detection in automated systems, such as Vitek 2 (16).

 
Vitek 2 AST-P549 cards were kindly provided by bioMérieux (Marcy l'Etoile, France). We thank Ariane Deplano and Raf De Ryck for molecular typing and Ayaba Bremer, Nathalie Legros, and Christine Thiroux for assistance in phenotypic testing.

 
* Corresponding author. Present address: PATH, 1455 NW Leary Way, Seattle, WA 98107. Phone: (206) 788-2413. Fax: (206) 285-6619. E-mail: jjeronimo{at}path.org

Published ahead of print on 11 June 2008.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Bignardi, G. E., N. Woodford, A. Chapman, A. P. Johnson, and D. C. Speller. 1996. Detection of the mec-A gene and phenotypic detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline or low-level methicillin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37:53-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 16th informational supplement M100-S16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
3
3. Denis, O., A. Deplano, H. De Beenhouwer, M. Hallin, G. Huysmans, M. G. Garrino, Y. Glupczynski, X. Malaviolle, A. Vergison, and M. J. Struelens. 2005. Polyclonal emergence and importation of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains harbouring Panton-Valentine leucocidin genes in Belgium. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 56:1103-1106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Denis, O., A. Deplano, R. De Ryck, C. Nonhoff, and M. J. Struelens. 2003. Emergence and spread of gentamicin-susceptible strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Belgian hospitals. Microb. Drug Resist. 9:61-71.[Medline]
5
5. Denis, O., A. Deplano, C. Nonhoff, R. De Ryck, R. De Mendonca, S. Rottiers, R. Vanhoof, and M. J. Struelens. 2004. National surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Belgian hospitals indicates rapid diversification of epidemic clones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:3625-3629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Denis, O., A. Deplano, C. Nonhoff, M. Hallin, R. De Ryck, R. Vanhoof, R. De Mendonca, and M. J. Struelens. 2006. In vitro activities of ceftobiprole, tigecycline, daptomycin, and 19 other antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from a national survey of Belgian hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2680-2685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Deplano, A., A. Schuermans, J. Van Eldere, W. Witte, H. Meugnier, J. Etienne, H. Grundmann, D. Jonas, G. T. Noordhoek, J. Dijkstra, A. van Belkum, W. van Leeuwen, P. T. Tassios, N. J. Legakis, A. van der Zee, A. Bergmans, D. S. Blanc, F. C. Tenover, B. C. Cookson, G. O'Neil, M. J. Struelens, et al. 2000. Multicenter evaluation of epidemiological typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains by repetitive-element PCR analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3527-3533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Eigner, U., A. Schmid, U. Wild, D. Bertsch, and A. M. Fahr. 2005. Analysis of the comparative workflow and performance characteristics of the VITEK 2 and Phoenix systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3829-3834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Felten, A., B. Grandry, P. H. Lagrange, and I. Casin. 2002. Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2766-2771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Hallin, M., O. Denis, A. Deplano, R. De Mendonca, R. De Ryck, S. Rottiers, and M. J. Struelens. 2007. Genetic relatedness between methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: results of a national survey. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59:465-472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Karchmer, A. W. 2000. Nosocomial bloodstream infections: organisms, risk factors, and implications. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31(Suppl. 4):S139-S143.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Maes, N., J. Magdalena, S. Rottiers, Y. De Gheldre, and M. J. Struelens. 2002. Evaluation of a triplex PCR assay to discriminate Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci and determine methicillin resistance from blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1514-1517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Nonhoff, C., G. Mascart M. J. Struelens C. Van Den Borre and O. Denis. 2004. Detection of hetero-resistant MRSA: controlled comparison of oxacillin/cefoxitin susceptibility testing by disk diffusion, agar screen, Vitek-2 and BD Phoenix automated systems, abstr. P-1630, p. 460. Abstr. 14th Eur. Congr. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., Prague, Czech Republic.
14
14. Pottumarthy, S., T. R. Fritsche, and R. N. Jones. 2005. Evaluation of alternative disk diffusion methods for detecting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in an international collection of staphylococci: validation report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 51:57-62.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
15. Skov, R., R. Smyth, M. Clausen, A. R. Larsen, N. Frimodt-Moller, B. Olsson-Liljequist, and G. Kahlmeter. 2003. Evaluation of a cefoxitin 30 microg disc on Iso-Sensitest agar for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:204-207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Skov, R., R. Smyth, A. R. Larsen, A. Bolmstrom, A. Karlsson, K. Mills, N. Frimodt-Moller, and G. Kahlmeter. 2006. Phenotypic detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by disk diffusion testing and Etest on Mueller-Hinton agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4395-4399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Skov, R., R. Smyth, A. R. Larsen, N. Frimodt-Moller, and G. Kahlmeter. 2005. Evaluation of cefoxitin 5 and 10 microg discs for the detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55:157-161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Swenson, J. M., D. Lonsway, S. McAllister, A. Thompson, L. Jevitt, W. Zhu, and J. B. Patel. 2007. Detection of mecA-mediated resistance using reference and commercial testing methods in a collection of Staphylococcus aureus expressing borderline oxacillin MICs. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 58:33-39.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
19. Swenson, J. M., and F. C. Tenover. 2005. Results of disk diffusion testing with cefoxitin correlate with presence of mecA in Staphylococcus spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3818-3823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Tomasz, A., S. Nachman, and H. Leaf. 1991. Stable classes of phenotypic expression in methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:124-129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2008, p. 2525-2528, Vol. 46, No. 8
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00291-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Junkins, A. D., Lockhart, S. R., Heilmann, K. P., Dohrn, C. L., Von Stein, D. L., Winokur, P. L., Doern, G. V., Richter, S. S. (2009). BD Phoenix and Vitek 2 Detection of mecA-Mediated Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus with Cefoxitin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2879-2882 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kaase, M., Baars, B., Friedrich, S., Szabados, F., Gatermann, S. G. (2009). Performance of MicroScan WalkAway and Vitek 2 for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in a Set of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Diverse Genetic Backgrounds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2623-2625 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Torres, E., Perez, S., Villanueva, R., Bou, G. (2008). Evaluation of the Vitek 2 AST-P559 Card for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 4114-4115 [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roisin, S. Articles by Struelens, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roisin, S. Articles by Struelens, M. J.