Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2008, p. 2568-2572, Vol. 46, No. 8
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00535-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Departments of Pathology,1 Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine,3 Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 522422
Received 19 March 2008/ Returned for modification 4 April 2008/ Accepted 12 June 2008
|
|
|---|
1 µg/ml. When all 771 isolates were examined, there were statistically significant correlations for all six triazole-triazole pairs. For A. fumigatus, the strongest correlations seen were those between VOR and RAV MICs (r = 0.7) and ITR and POS MICs (r = 0.4). Similarly, for A. flavus, only VOR and RAV MICs and ITR and POS MICs demonstrated statistically significant positive correlations. We have demonstrated correlations among triazole MICs for Aspergillus, which for the most common species (A. fumigatus and A. flavus) were strongest between VOR and RAV MICs and ITR and POS MICs. However, Aspergillus species for which MICs of VOR or POS were >2 µg/ml remain extremely rare (<1% of isolates). |
|
|---|
4 µg/ml) of 4.2% for Aspergillus spp. and 2.1% for A. fumigatus (6, 15). These findings are supported by those of Verweij et al. (21) and Diekema et al. (8). Clinical and in vivo resistance to itraconazole (5, 6) and elevated voriconazole MICs (20) for A. fumigatus clinical isolates have been described previously, and clear advances in defining the mechanisms of azole resistance in this species have been made (1, 2, 6, 9, 11-16, 22). However, no study has investigated azole cross-resistance in more than a handful of clinical Aspergillus isolates (15). As part of our global antifungal resistance surveillance programs, we collected hundreds of clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. from medical centers worldwide between 2000 and 2006. We used this large collection of clinical Aspergillus isolates to describe the patterns of in vitro activity of four azoles (itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole) against Aspergillus spp.
|
|
|---|
2 µg/ml were tested for growth at 50°C. All isolates screened grew at 50°C, confirmation that they were A. fumigatus rather than another species within the complex. Susceptibility testing. Posaconazole (Schering-Plough), voriconazole (Pfizer), ravuconazole (Bristol-Myers Squibb), and itraconazole (Janssen) were all obtained as reagent-grade powders from their respective manufacturers. The broth microdilution method was performed according to the CLSI M38-A standard (3). Trays containing a 0.1-ml aliquot of the appropriate drug solution (2x final drug concentration) in each well were sealed and stored at –70°C until being used in the study. The stock conidial suspension (106 spores/ml) was diluted to a final inoculum concentration of 0.4 x 104 to 5 x 104 CFU/ml and dispensed into the microdilution wells. The final concentrations of drugs in the wells ranged from 0.008 to 8.0 µg/ml. The inoculated microdilution trays were incubated at 35°C and read at 48 h. The MIC end point for the azoles was defined as the lowest concentration that produced the complete inhibition of growth.
In the absence of azole breakpoints for the filamentous fungi, we used the following provisional breakpoints for all agents tested: susceptible, MIC
1 µg/ml; intermediate, MIC = 2 µg/ml; and resistant, MIC
4 µg/ml.
Quality control. Quality control was ensured by testing the following strains recommended in the CLSI M38-A document: A. flavus ATCC 204304, Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019, and Candida krusei ATCC 6258.
Statistical methods. We examined correlations between the MICs of each azole-azole combination by using the Pearson correlation coefficient. SPSS software version 13 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyses.
|
|
|---|
1 µg/ml, while itraconazole was the least active, with 88% of isolates inhibited at an MIC of
1 µg/ml. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. In vitro susceptibilities of 771 isolates of Aspergillus spp. to four azole antifungal agents
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. In vitro susceptibilities of 771 isolates of Aspergillus spp. to posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole with respect to itraconazole susceptibility
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Scatterplots of posaconazole (a), ravuconazole (b), and voriconazole (c) MICs versus itraconazole MICs for 771 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Strongest species-specific correlations between MICs of four azoles, by species
|
1 µg/ml. By contrast, the MIC of ravuconazole was
1 µg/ml for only 1 (6%) of 17 itraconazole-resistant isolates.
Resistance to the triazole antifungal agents is uncommon among clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. (6, 15). Most studies concerning mechanisms of azole resistance in Aspergillus have been performed with A. fumigatus and have demonstrated that resistance was associated with the modification of the 14-
sterol demethylase target enzyme (CYP51), specifically, modification corresponding to mutations in the gene cyp51A (1, 2, 6, 9, 11-16). Importantly, mutations resulting in resistance to posaconazole and itraconazole appear to differ from those conferring resistance to voriconazole and ravuconazole (12, 14, 17, 22). Cross-resistance to itraconazole and posaconazole has been associated with amino acid substitutions at glycine 54 (G54) (7, 12, 16, 17), whereas cross-resistance to voriconazole and ravuconazole has been associated with amino acid substitutions at G448 (13, 22). It has been postulated previously, based on results from molecular modeling studies, that a substitution at G54 in the
helix of A. fumigatus CYP51A (AfCYP51A) confers resistance to posaconazole and itraconazole by perturbing the binding of the long side chain in the hydrophobic channel (channel 2) of the enzyme (22). Given that voriconazole and ravuconazole lack a long side chain, substitutions at G54 would be predicted to have no effect on the binding of these compact triazoles to the target. Conversely, substitution near the heme cofactor (e.g., at G448) would disturb the binding of voriconazole and ravuconazole to a greater extent than that of posaconazole and itraconazole due to the stabilizing influence of the side chain present in the latter two agents (22).
Recently, a third pattern of azole resistance in A. fumigatus was reported (7, 12, 16). This new pattern is characterized by high MICs of itraconazole, voriconazole, ravuconazole, and posaconazole. The majority of strains with this phenotype harbor amino acid substitutions at methionine 220 (M220) (13, 17). The role of the M220 substitutions in multiazole resistance was confirmed by Mellado et al., who introduced mutated cyp51A genes into an A. fumigatus wild-type strain, with resulting resistance to all triazole agents (13). They also detected M220 substitutions in five clinical isolates of A. fumigatus that exhibited the multiazole-resistant phenotype. Thus, it appears that the ways in which the various mutations in AfCYP51A impact the susceptibility to specific azoles reflect differences in the ways the azoles interact with the target protein.
An additional mechanism of resistance to azoles in A. fumigatus is reduced intracellular accumulation of the drugs. This mechanism was first demonstrated in laboratory-derived itraconazole-resistant mutants of A. fumigatus in which the reduced accumulation of itraconazole was postulated to be due to either diminished permeability or defects in an energy-dependent uptake process (11). More recently, Nascimento et al. found that in addition to a mutation at G54 in the AfCYP51A target, itraconazole-resistant isolates of A. fumigatus exhibited high-level expression of two genes, AfMDR3 and AfMDR4, which encode drug efflux pumps (16). As in other fungi, it appears that multiple resistance mechanisms in A. fumigatus are involved in resistance to the triazole antifungal agents.
Few studies have investigated azole cross-resistance in more than a handful of clinical Aspergillus isolates (15). A large in vitro survey that included 6,423 clinical isolates and 10 species of Aspergillus demonstrated superior potencies of both posaconazole and voriconazole over that of itraconazole; however, no analysis of cross-resistance was provided (18). In a study of 338 Spanish clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp., Gomez-Lopez et al. (10) demonstrated comparable in vitro activities of itraconazole and voriconazole. Among the 12 isolates for which the itraconazole MIC was
4 µg/ml, the voriconazole MIC was
2 µg/ml for 8 isolates (MIC range, 2 to 8 µg/ml), suggesting some degree of cross-resistance. Likewise, Cuenca-Estrella et al. (4) compared the activities of itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole against 697 isolates of Aspergillus spp. (seven species) and found all three azoles to be quite active, with posaconazole showing slightly greater potency (geometric mean [GM] MIC = 0.1 µg/ml) than either itraconazole (GM MIC = 0.33 µg/ml) or voriconazole (GM MIC = 0.48 µg/ml). Among nine itraconazole-resistant isolates, posaconazole was active (MIC < 1 µg/ml) against five isolates (55%). Cross-resistance involving all three azoles was observed for isolates of A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. nidulans, and other Aspergillus species. Mosquera and Denning (15) studied 11 isolates of A. fumigatus defined as resistant to itraconazole (MIC > 4 µg/ml) in vitro. They found that elevated itraconazole MICs were uniformly associated with elevations in posaconazole MICs of 4- to 256-fold but that elevated itraconazole MICs were not usually associated with elevated MICs of ravuconazole or voriconazole. The patterns of susceptibilities of the isolates to voriconazole and ravuconazole were similar, suggesting similar modes of action and mechanisms of resistance. These findings suggest considerable heterogeneity in azole susceptibility among isolates of A. fumigatus (15). Most recently, Rodriguez-Tudela et al. examined cross-resistance among 393 A. fumigatus isolates, including 32 that were itraconazole resistant (MIC, >4 µg/ml by the method of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) (17). Their findings confirmed that the cross-resistance pattern depends upon the specific mutation present, with G54 mutants displaying cross-resistance to itraconazole and posaconazole while M220 mutants display cross-resistance to all four azoles tested (17).
Our findings confirm the in vitro potencies of the new and investigational azoles (voriconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole) against Aspergillus spp. The excellent in vitro activities of these agents limited our ability to examine the true patterns of cross-resistance. The patterns of in vitro susceptibilities we describe correspond to isolates for which azole MICs span a wide spectrum, with the MICs for most organisms (>98%) falling into a range (
1 µg/ml) that most would consider to indicate susceptibility to the tested agent. Despite this limitation, we have demonstrated that there is significant correlation among the MICs of all four azoles examined. In addition, we found that the azoles whose MICs for the two most common species groups correlated most strongly were ravuconazole and voriconazole and itraconazole and posaconazole. However, when we examined only those isolates for which the MICs of itraconazole were highest (
4 µg/ml), we did not find that they were predictably resistant to posaconazole or voriconazole; in fact, the MICs of posaconazole and voriconazole for most of these isolates were
1 µg/ml.
Unfortunately, there are no data available to assess the clinical impact of different in vitro resistance profiles among Aspergillus spp. However, the available data on resistance mechanisms and MIC correlations suggest not only that one may see correlations between voriconazole and ravuconazole MICs and itraconazole and posaconazole MICs but also that some resistance mutations may result in resistance to all four agents. At this time, given the fact that individual variations in MICs are not predictable, in vitro testing of the susceptibilities of clinical isolates to each of the triazoles is likely to be useful and may allow one to select the most active agent (15).
We thank all the participating centers who contributed isolates to this study, a list of which can be found at the following URL: http://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/pathology/site/faculty/pfaller/artemis_participants.pdf.
Published ahead of print on 18 June 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-sterol demethylase gene cyp51A contributes to itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1120-1124.
sterol demethylase gene (cyp51A) of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2119-2121.
-demethylase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:577-581.
-sterol demethylase (Cyp51A) of Aspergillus fumigatus are responsible for resistance in vitro to azole antifungal drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2747-2750.
sterol demethylase (cyp51A) in Aspergillus fumigatus and its role in azole drug susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2536-2538.
-sterol demethylases from Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans provide insights into posaconazole binding. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:568-574.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»