Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2009, p. 142-152, Vol. 47, No. 1
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01668-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Hsin Yi Hsieh,3,
Sabine Croquefer,1
Richard Barton,4
Veronique Marchais,1
Marc Pihet,1 and
Tsung Chain Chang3*
Host-Pathogen Interaction Study Group, UPRES-EA 3142, Angers University,1 Laboratory of Parasitology and Mycology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France,2 Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China,3 Mycology Reference Centre, Department of Microbiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX, United Kingdom4
Received 27 August 2008/ Returned for modification 19 October 2008/ Accepted 12 November 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Opportunistic molds are the most common agents of fungal colonization and/or infection of the airways of CF patients. Among them, Aspergillus fumigatus has been reported with a prevalence ranging from 16 to 45.7% in CF patients (2, 3, 7, 8, 18). This fungus is well known to clinicians involved in the follow-up of these patients since it may cause various diseases, the most common being allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (3, 12, 26, 43). In addition, other Aspergillus species, including Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus niger, may be present as transient colonizers of the airways, usually without any associated clinical signs (28, 38).
More intriguing is the relatively high frequency of the Pseudallescheria boydii/Scedosporium apiospermum complex and Aspergillus terreus, which rank second and the third, respectively, among filamentous fungi associated with CF. In a longitudinal 5-year study, prevalence rates of 8.6% and 6.3%, respectively, were reported for S. apiospermum and A. terreus in CF patients (7, 10). More recently, a similar prevalence rate of 10% was reported for the S. apiospermum complex in another study conducted in Australia (48). However, the fungal biota colonizing the airways of CF patients could be even more complex, as suggested by the recent description of two strictly thermophilic fungi, Penicillium emersonii (anamorph state of Talaromyces emersonii) and Acrophialophora fusispora, in these patients (9, 11). Additionally, other fungal species seem to be more common in some geographic areas, such as Scedosporium prolificans, which has mainly been reported for CF patients in Spain (14, 17, 35), and Exophiala dermatitidis, which has been isolated from CF patients in Germany (4, 15, 25, 29, 31). Due to the propensity of some of these molds to disseminate in an immunocompromised host and to their usually low susceptibility to current systemic antifungals, it may be important to detect and identify mold species which colonize the respiratory tract of the patients.
The variations in the prevalence of the different fungal species between studies may reflect variations in the geographic distribution of these fungi and/or the lack of standardization of the mycological examination methods, such as the number and nature of culture media, incubation times, and temperatures. Furthermore, identification of molds usually relies exclusively on morphological features, and misidentifications of some species associated with CF have been reported (23, 42). Molecular tools allowing both identification and direct detection of the different fungi in specimens from CF patients may constitute a valuable alternative to culture. Here we report on the development and validation of an oligonucleotide array that can identify 20 species of fungi, followed by using this array to directly detect fungi in the sputum samples of CF patients.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Fungal strains used for sensitivity test of the array
|
Design of oligonucleotide probes and fabrication of arrays. Species-specific oligonucleotide probes (19- to 30-mers) were designed from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 or ITS 2 regions according to sequence data in the GenBank database. The designed probes were checked for melting temperature, internal repeat, secondary structure, and GC content by using the software Vector NTI Advance 9 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and checked for potential cross-reactivities with other fungal species by using the BLASTN program (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). A total of 24 probes (final concentration, 10 µM), including some previously described probes (30, 33), were used to fabricate the arrays by using nylon membranes (Table 2). In addition, a positive-control probe was designed from a conserved region in the 5.8S rRNA gene. Five to 15 bases of thymine were added to the 3' end of probes that exhibited weak hybridization signals after preliminary testing (5). Oligonucleotide probes were synthesized by MDBio Inc. (Taipei, Taiwan). Arrays were prepared with an automatic arrayer (Ezspot, Taipei, Taiwan) by using a 400-µm-diameter solid pin as described previously (33). The array (0.5 by 0.5 cm) contained 36 dots (6 x 6 dots); among them, 23 dots were used for identification of the fungal species listed in Table 2, one dot was a positive control (code PC), two dots were negative controls (code NC, tracking dye only), and 10 dots were position markers (code M, a digoxigenin-labeled ITS4 primer). The layout of different probes on the array is shown in Fig. 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Oligonucleotide probes used to identify 20 fungal species
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Layout of oligonucleotide probes on the array (0.5 by 0.5 cm). The positive-control probe PC located at the lower right corner was designed from a conserved region of the fungal 5.8S rRNA gene. Probe NC was a negative control (tracking dye only). Probe M was a digoxigenin-labeled universal fungal primer (ITS4) and was used as a position marker. The corresponding sequences of all probes are listed in Table 2.
|
Hybridization procedures. The procedures for prehybridization, hybridization (55°C for 90 min), and color development after hybridization by using antidigoxigenin antibodies were described previously (30). The hybridized spot (400 µm in diameter) could be read with the naked eye. A strain was identified as one of the species listed in Table 1 when both the positive-control probe and the species-specific probe (or any one of the multiple probes designed for a species) were hybridized (Fig. 2). The image of a hybridized array was captured by a scanner (Powerlook 3000; Umax, Taipei, Taiwan).
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Hybridization results for 20 fungal species that may colonize the airways of CF patients. The chips are alphabetically arranged according to the species names. The corresponding probes hybridized on the arrays are indicated in Fig. 1, and the corresponding sequences of the hybridized probes are shown in Table 2.
|
|
|
|---|
Performance of the array for identification of pure cultures. A total of 182 target strains, including 133 reference strains and 49 clinical isolates, were tested by the array (Table 1). Of these strains, 181 were correctly identified to the species level by the array. One clinical isolate (Exophiala dermatitidis LMA 40502454) was not identified by the array. Sequencing of the ITS regions of LMA 40502454 revealed that both ITS 1 and ITS 2 sequences had 100% similarity with those of Exophiala oligosperma (GenBank accession no. DQ836797), a nontarget species in this study. Therefore, E. dermatitidis LMA 40502454 was a misidentification of E. oligosperma by the conventional identification method, and the sensitivity of the array for identification of the 20 fungal species was 100% (181/181) if isolate LMA 40502454 was excluded.
Of the 141 nontarget strains (135 species) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), only one was misidentified by the array. Aspergillus oryzae BCRC 30102 was misidentified as Aspergillus flavus (data not shown). BLAST searching revealed that the ITS 1 and ITS 2 sequences of A. oryzae BCRC 30102 displayed sequence similarities of 97% and 95%, respectively, with A. flavus as described in a previous study (30). As one nontarget strain was misidentified, a specificity of 99.2% (140/141) was obtained by the array.
Detection limit of the array. Serial 10-fold dilutions of DNAs extracted from two strains (Aspergillus fumigatus BCRC 30502 and Paecilomyces variotii CBS 370.70) were used to determine the detection limit of the array. The array was able to detect genomic DNA of both species at a concentration of 1 pg per assay by PCR or at a concentration of 10 fg per assay by nested PCR.
Direct detection of fungi in sputum samples of CF patients. Once the array was established, it was used to analyze 57 sputum samples (from 39 CF patients) for direct detection of fungi in these specimens (Table 3). The hybridization patterns of several sputum specimens are shown in Fig. 3. Among the 57 samples, 16 produced concordant results between culture and the array. For example, three species (Aspergillus fumigatus, A. terreus, and Candida albicans) were detected in specimens 1126 (patient 2) and 1821 (patient 5) by both methods (Table 3). Interestingly, A. fumigatus and C. albicans were detected by the array in four specimens (2582, 2732, 3502, and 5896) collected from a patient (patient 20) during a period of more than 4 months, and the same results were obtained by culture.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Fungal species detected in sputum samples from CF patients by means of culture, array hybridization, and cloning of the ITS regions
|
|
View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Hybridization results for several sputum samples from CF patients. The corresponding probes hybridized on each array are shown in Fig. 1. The fungi detected by each array were as follows: specimen 1305 (patient 3), Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, and C. parapsilosis; specimen 1644 (patient 6), A. fumigatus, C. albicans, and Scedosporium prolificans; specimen 1679 (patient 6), A. fumigatus, C. albicans, and S. prolificans; specimen 1717 (patient 2), A. fumigatus, A. terreus, and C. albicans; specimen 3674 (patient 25), A. fumigatus and C. albicans; specimen 3942 (patient 27), an unidentified fungus; specimen 3540 (patient 24), A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. terreus, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis.
|
No fungus was recovered from 12 of the 57 sputum samples, but the array detected one to seven fungal species in these specimens (Table 3). The detection of different fungi in some of these specimens was confirmed by cloning and resequencing of the ITS fragments. For example, the detection of A. fumigatus in specimen 2097 (patient 13), of C. albicans in specimen 2098 (patient 14), and of C. glabrata in specimen 6070 (patient 30) was confirmed by the cloning experiments (Table 3), but the detection of Scedosporium prolificans in specimen 6070 (patient 30) was not confirmed by the cloning experiment (Table 3). Surprisingly, no fungus was recovered from specimen 2027 (patient 10) by culture, but as many as seven species (A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. terreus, C. albicans, Scedosporium apiospermum, and S. prolificans) were detected by the array (Table 3). However, only three (A. flavus, A. niger, and S. prolificans) of the seven fungi were confirmed in specimen 2027 by the cloning experiment (Table 3). It should be noted that only partially discordant samples were used for the confirmation test. No fungus was isolated from specimens 2443 (patient 16), 2710 (patient 21), and 3942 (patient 27) (Fig. 3) by culture. However, the positive-control probe was hybridized in each of the three cases (Table 3). The results indicated the presence of other fungi not included in Table 1 in these sputum samples.
Conversely, the array detected fewer microorganisms than did the culture methods in eight sputum samples. For example, Aspergillus fumigatus, A. terreus, Candida albicans, and Scedosporium apiospermum were recovered from specimen 1717 (patient 2) by culture, while S. apiospermum was not detected by the array (Table 3 and Fig. 3). A. fumigatus, C. albicans, Scedosporium prolificans, and A. terreus were isolated from specimen 1644 (patient 6), but the array failed to detect A. terreus in this sample (Table 3 and Fig. 3). However, A. terreus was not isolated in a specimen collected from the same patient just 1 day after specimen 1644 (data not shown), suggesting a transient colonization of the airways with a very low fungal load of the fungus. In brief, among the 57 sputum samples obtained from 39 CF patients, 16 produced concordant results between the array and culture. The array detected more fungal species than culture did in 33 samples, while the reverse was found for eight samples (Table 3).
|
|
|---|
The most common fungi recovered from CF patients are Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans (2, 7, 36). In this study, A. fumigatus was detected from 21 CF patients (53.8%) by the array (Table 3); this incidence rate is similar to that (45.7%) reported by Bakare et al. (2). Aspergillus fumigatus is an important fungus responsible for various diseases in CF patients, the most common being allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (43). Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis occurs in 1 to 15% of CF patients depending on the studies, and a prevalence rate of about 2% was reported by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation in the United States (22). Although the prevalence of non-A. fumigatus Aspergillus species is not well documented in the literature, our array results revealed that eight CF patients (20.5%) were colonized by A. flavus and the same number of patients (20.5%) were colonized by A. terreus. The role of A. flavus and A. terreus in the progression of pulmonary disease in CF patients is not clear, and their clinical role in CF needs further investigation.
In addition to C. albicans, C. krusei was isolated from specimen 9023 (patient 38), but the array detected C. glabrata (Table 3). C. krusei was not included in the list of the target species (Table 2) since the yeast was rarely found in sputum samples from CF patients (22). In our previous study, the probe (code CGL1, Table 2) used to identify C. glabrata was found to have no cross-hybridization with C. krusei (33). Therefore, it was highly probable that the yeast was misidentified as C. krusei. Several plates were inoculated for specimen 9023, and only two yeast colonies were detected on Sabouraud dextrose agar. The colonies were identified as C. krusei by using a latex-based agglutination kit (Fumouze Diagnostics, Asnières, France). However, a search in the Medline database revealed a report dealing with the evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the kit (16). Although sensitivity was evaluated as 100%, the specificity of the latex kit was only 95%, and false-positive results were reported for yeast species including C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, and several other Candida species. Unfortunately, colonization by this yeast species was quantitatively very low and transient, since two additional samples (one collected before and another collected after the specimen analyzed in this paper) revealed C. albicans exclusively. To confirm the presence of either C. krusei or C. glabrata in specimen 9023, the PCR-amplified ITS fragments were cloned and sequenced. However, the result revealed the exclusive presence of C. albicans, again indicating the very low level of ITS amplicons of other yeast species in specimen 9023 (Table 3).
In the clinical settings, besides cultures, the follow-up of CF patients also comprises a serological examination, usually restricted to searching for anti-Aspergillus fumigatus serum antibodies, and a respiratory infection is suggested by the detection of a humoral immune response. In this context, a better knowledge of the fungal species colonizing the airways of a patient may help the laboratory in the selection of the most appropriate antigens to be used in this serological examination (a search for serum antibodies directed toward the fungal species detected by the array). Additionally, apart from a true respiratory infection, it may be important to detect an early colonization by some fungal species like Scedosporium apiospermum. Diabetes is a common complication of CF, and lung transplantation remains the ultimate treatment of CF patients; both situations are associated with a defective immune response and a risk for a disseminated fungal infection. Considering the low susceptibility of S. apiospermum and the tendency of this fungus to disseminate in immunocompromised patients (24, 44), it may be important to detect airway colonization by this fungus as early as possible and to initiate rapidly an appropriate antifungal therapy in order to eradicate it before chronic colonization can develop.
Candida albicans was detected in 31 patients (79.5%) by the array, a value which was in agreement with the high frequency of colonization of the airways of CF patients already reported for this microorganism (2, 29). Scedosporium apiospermum was recovered from sputum samples in 8.6% of CF patients and was considered the most frequent filamentous fungus after A. fumigatus (10). In addition, 21.1% of CF patients were serologically positive for S. apiospermum, and allergic bronchopulmonary disease was observed in some patients chronically colonized by this fungus (10). In this study, a high frequency of S. apiospermum was observed (detected in 30.7% of the patients by the array method) (Table 3), suggesting that colonization by this fungus is underestimated and that, as it may trigger an inflammatory response, the fungus may have a greater pathogenic role in CF patients. The occurrence of S. prolificans in CF patients has been reported mainly in Spain (14, 17, 35). Scedosporium prolificans was detected in seven patients (17.9%) by the array, while the microorganism was recovered from only one patient (patient 6, specimen 1644) by culture (Table 3). This reflects the difficulty of recovering S. prolificans from sputum by culture. Consequently, as with S. apiospermum, the role of S. prolificans in disease progression in CF patients may be underestimated.
The black yeast Exophiala dermatitidis was detected in two patients (patients 11 and 12) by the array, but the fungus was not recovered from any of the 57 sputum samples by culture (Table 3), even though a semiselective isolation medium (erythritol-chloramphenicol agar) was used as recommended (29). In Germany, the prevalence rate of E. dermatitidis was reported in a prospective study to be 6% in CF patients (29). Moreover, clinical deterioration in a CF patient has been found to coincide with isolation of this fungus, and it was suggested that E. dermatitidis may be an etiologic agent of invasive pulmonary disease in the CF patient population (15).
Currently, culture is the gold standard for the detection of fungi in sputum specimens. At the most, four fungal species were recovered from sputum samples by culture in this study, while as many as seven fungi (for example, specimens 1603 [patient 5] and 2027 [patient 10]) were detected by the array (Table 3), suggesting the inadequacy of culture in detecting the fungal diversity in these specimens. This inadequacy might be caused by differences in the growth rates of fungal species, low fungal loads in the specimens, or the administration of antifungals that may have adverse effects on the recovery of some fungi. The development of more-selective culture media is also necessary for the isolation of uncommon fungi from respiratory secretions of CF patients. However, it is also obvious that different volumes of the samples were analyzed by culture and the array method, which may account for some of the discrepancies observed in the current study. However, one cannot disregard the possible detection of nonviable fungal elements by the DNA array, but this seems to be difficult to assess. The detection of nonviable microorganisms is a common problem of PCR-based molecular methods.
In this study, 12 of the 57 sputum samples were culture negative, but the array detected one to several fungal species in each of these specimens (Table 3). In general, fewer species were detected by the array in culture-negative specimens than in culture-positive samples. For example, only a single species was detected by the array in specimens 2097 (patient 13), 2098 (patient 14), 2099 (patient 15), 2444 (patient 17), and 8902 (patient 37). Multiple species were detected in other culture-negative samples by array hybridization, such as specimens 2027 (patient 10) and 2096 (patient 12); six to seven species were detected in the two samples by the array. The presence of fungal DNA in several selected culture-negative samples was confirmed by cloning and resequencing of the ITS fragments amplified by PCR (Table 3). The failure of the cloning experiments to confirm the presence of some fungi detected by the array might be caused by variation in the amounts of different fungal DNAs in the sputum extracts. It should be noted that only 10 sputum samples producing discrepant results between culture and the array methods were selected for the cloning experiments.
For those specimens (patients 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 35) in which the array detected fewer microorganisms than did the culture methods (Table 3), the follow-up data for these patients demonstrated a low and transient colonization of the airways by the fungal species that were not detected by the array (patients 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 35). For patient 1, Aspergillus flavus was not detected by the array from specimen 1102 (collected on 14 February 2006). However, only one plate was positive for this fungus, yielding a unique colony, and the fungus was not recovered from five additional samples collected from 23 May 2006 to 26 February 2008. For patient 2, the detection of Scedosporium apiospermum from specimen 1717 (collected on 9 March 2006) by culture exclusively corresponded to a very low and transient colonization, since only two out of eight samples collected from 15 February 2006 to 21 February 2007 were culture positive for this fungus, with only one colony recovered from a specimen collected on 9 June 2006 and four colonies recovered from a specimen collected on 9 March 2006. For patient 4, Candida parapsilosis was not detected by the array method from specimen 1440 (collected on 28 February 2006), whereas the yeast was detected by culture. Four additional sputum samples were collected from this patient from 13 September 2006 to 29 February 2008, and C. parapsilosis was recovered from only one of these specimens, collected on 14 March 2007 (only three colonies). Similar situations were found for patients 6 and 8 (data not shown).
Another situation might be the eradication of a fungus (perhaps because of the use of antifungal treatment). For example, in patient 5, two samples, collected on 13 March 2006 (specimen 1821) and 8 September 2006 (specimen 6071), were culture positive for Aspergillus fumigatus, while this fungus was detected by the array method only from the first specimen (Table 3). For this patient, a previous specimen (collected on 6 March 2006) revealed a total number of 18 colonies distributed on four plates. However, only two plates were positive, with a total number of three colonies for two specimens collected on 13 March (specimen 1821) and 11 August 2006, and the last specimen available for this patient, collected on 5 December 2006, was culture negative for A. fumigatus.
The situation was a bit more complex for patient 35. For this patient, two samples were analyzed, collected on 15 November (specimen 7931) and 20 December (specimen 9098) 2006. Both samples revealed the presence of Scedosporium apiospermum by culture, but this fungus was not detected by the array method. For this patient, 10 other specimens, collected from 19 April to 20 October 2006, were analyzed, and all these samples showed the presence of S. apiospermum. Likewise, six additional samples from 2007 and five samples from 2008 were analyzed, and they were all culture positive for this fungus. An explanation for this false-negative result obtained by the array may be that a recent revision of this species (19, 20) revealed that S. apiospermum is a complex of several distinct species, and at least three of these species (undistinguishable morphologically) have been detected from respiratory specimens of CF patients. It was possible that the probe designed for S. apiospermum could not detect all these species, and further studies are needed to optimize the array.
The airways of CF patients represent a surprisingly complex ecosystem. The precise contributions of the different fungal species to patient morbidity and the interspecies interactions are largely unelucidated. Understanding the microbial flora of the CF respiratory tract is of considerable importance, as patient morbidity and mortality are primarily caused by chronic respiratory infections (21, 22, 27). Here, we have developed an array to identify 20 fungal species that can be recovered from CF patients. The whole procedure for fungal detection in sputum specimens by the array can be finished within a working day, starting from extracted DNA samples. Compared with the array method, the culture method is easier to use and requires only basic equipment. However, with the development of automated DNA extraction systems, the array method may become easier to use in the near future, especially for large CF centers. The array method may constitute a valuable tool in clinical research to determine the optimal culture conditions (number and nature of the culture media to be used and temperature and duration of incubation) for detecting the whole fungal biota that may be associated with CF and to define guidelines for the mycological examination of respiratory secretions in this particular clinical context. The current method may avoid the need for knowledge of the morphological features of filamentous fungi which are necessary for their identification and permits a shorter time to achieve results as well as the correct identification of morphologically indistinguishable species.
In conclusion, the current method can be used as a potential alternative to culture or to complement culture for detection of the fungal biota colonizing the airways of CF patients.
All authors are members of the ISHAM working group on filamentous fungi and respiratory infections in CF.
Published ahead of print on 19 November 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm.asm.org/. ![]()
Jean-Phillippe Bouchara and Hsin Yi Hsieh contributed equally to this study. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»