Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2009, p. 245-246, Vol. 47, No. 1
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01452-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Controlled Evaluation of Bactec Peds Plus/F and Bactec Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F Media for Isolation of Salmonella enterica Serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A from Blood
Megan E. Reller,1*
Anita K. M. Zaidi,2
Shazia Sultana,2
Shazia Azeem,2
Beenish Hanif,2
Shahida Qureshi,2
Rumina Hasan,2
Zulfiqar Bhutta,2
Rehana Akhter,3 and
Donald A. Goldmann1
Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts,1
Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan,2
National Institute for Child Health, Karachi, Pakistan3
Received 29 July 2008/
Returned for modification 2 September 2008/
Accepted 6 November 2008

ABSTRACT
We compared anaerobic lytic (AL) and pediatric aerobic resin-containing
(Peds Plus/F) blood culture media for the isolation of
Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi or Paratyphi A from children. The yields
from AL and Peds Plus/F media were the same with equal volumes
of blood, but recovery was faster from AL medium than Peds Plus/F
medium (10.7 and 16.4 h, respectively) (
P < 0.001).

TEXT
Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi causes an estimated 16 million
illnesses per year with 600,000 deaths globally (
9).
S. enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A are the most-common causes of
community-acquired bacteremia in South Asia; children are affected
disproportionately, with high mortality under age 5 years (
1,
7,
11). Enteric (typhoid) fever cannot be clinically distinguished
from other causes of acute febrile illness in areas of endemicity
(
9). Accurate microbiological diagnosis currently depends on
culture of blood, since culture of bone marrow is rarely done
now and most children are treated as outpatients. The Bactec
Peds Plus/F (PP; BD Diagnostics-Diagnostic Systems, Sparks,
MD) bottle, an aerobic blood culture medium with resins, is
a commercial pediatric bottle commonly used worldwide. The standard
recommendation for culturing blood in a single PP bottle is
based on its demonstrated superior recovery of pathogens such
as
Streptococcus
pneumoniae and the infrequency of anaerobic
pathogens in children in North America (
14).
We hypothesized that the optimal pediatric bottle for North America might not be best for South Asia and that an anaerobic lytic bottle might theoretically be better for the recovery of S. enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A in areas of the world where Salmonella organisms are the most-common pathogens recovered from blood. Although Salmonella bacteria are facultative anaerobes, isolates requiring strict anaerobic conditions for growth have been reported (6). Furthermore, the historic superiority of culture of bone marrow (sensitivity, 80% to 95%) over culture of blood (sensitivity, 60% to 80%) has been attributed to recovery of intracellular bacilli from mononuclear phagocytes (5, 9, 12). Recent studies from Vietnam suggest that
66% of bacteria in blood are also harbored within phagocytes, and thus, lysis of circulating macrophages in blood might improve the yield of blood cultures (9). Because inadequate blood sampling is frequent in pediatrics and could confound the comparison of media, we undertook a volume-controlled evaluation of PP versus Bactec lytic/10 anaerobic/F (AL) (BD Diagnostics-Diagnostic Systems) media to assess the yield and time to detection of Salmonella from the blood of children. For our study site, we chose Karachi, Pakistan, since S. enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A are the most-common causes of pediatric bacteremia in Pakistan (2) and the presence of a state-of-the-art clinical microbiology laboratory at Aga Khan University Hospital enabled the comparison of these media. The study was approved by ethical review boards at both the Children's Hospital Boston and Aga Khan University.
(This work was presented in part as abstract 48 at the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Atlanta, GA, 13 November 2006 [10a].)
Children from
1 to 15 years of age with suspected enteric fever (history of
3 days of undifferentiated fever, no hospitalization in the previous 3 days, and a documented temperature of
38°C) presenting to the Aga Khan University Hospital, a primary care clinic in a low-income community, or to Karachi's large public sector referral children's hospital (National Institute for Child Health) were eligible if assessed by usual providers to require a blood culture and if consent could be obtained during daytime hours by the study doctor. Age-appropriate volumes of blood (3 ml for 1- to 3-year-olds and 4.5 ml for >3- to 15-year-olds) were obtained by a single aseptic venipuncture. Equal volumes of blood were inoculated into each of paired, preweighed PP and AL bottles. When bone marrow cultures were indicated clinically, aspirated bone marrow was divided between a second set of PP and AL bottles.
Paired bottles were transported within 3 h of collection to the Aga Khan Hospital's clinical microbiology laboratory, where they were weighed to the nearest 0.01 g before being loaded into a Bactec 9240 series automated blood culture instrument. Contaminants were assessed according to published criteria (13). Paired volumes were considered to be equal if within 50% of each other for volumes of <5 ml and within 20% of each other for volumes of
5 ml (10) The gold standard for diagnosis of enteric fever was isolation of S. enterica serotype Typhi or Paratyphi A from either bottle or both, since Salmonella bacteria are always pathogenic when recovered from blood. Salmonella isolates were identified biochemically and were typed with specific antisera (2). Statistical analyses were performed with STATA 9 statistical software; McNemar's modified chi-square test was used to assess yield and the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for time to detection.
Of 817 paired blood cultures submitted from 817 patients over 12 months, 46 (5.6%) grew pathogens (39 S. enterica serotype Typhi and 7 S. enterica serotype Paratyphi A) and 36 (4.4%) grew contaminants (including coagulase-negative staphylococci and gram-positive rods). No isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae or Haemophilus influenzae were found. The two media were comparable for the recovery of S. enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A (Table 1). The median volume of blood cultured in the PP and AL bottles was 1.86 ml (intraquartile range, 1.53 to 2.33) and 1.96 ml (intraquartile range, 1.67 to 2.45), respectively. All isolates were recovered from <5 ml of blood (maximum of 4.90 ml in the PP and 4.12 ml in the AL), so Table 1 represents comparable volumes within 50%. If only sets that are within 20% are considered to be equal volumes, 17 isolates grew in both bottles and 2 each in PP or AL only. When recovered from both bottles, the median times to detection of S. enterica serotype Typhi and S. enterica serotype Paratyphi A were 16.4 h (interquartile range, 11.8 to 22 h) for PP and 10.7 h (interquartile range, 8.8 to 16 h) for AL, respectively (P < 0.001). Of the 10 patients who had both bone marrow and blood cultures, 2 had S. enterica serotype Typhi isolated only from bone marrow and not from blood in either PP or AL bottles; the other 8 were negative. Multidrug (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and co-trimoxazole) resistance was found in 15 of 39 (38.5%) isolates of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi and none of the 7 isolates of S. enterica serotype Paratyphi A. All isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin by current CLSI interpretive criteria (3), although resistance to nalidixic acid was found in 18 (46.2%) S. enterica serotype Typhi isolates and 2 (28.6%) S. enterica serotype Paratyphi A isolates.
In conclusion, we found that
S. enterica serotypes Typhi and
Paratyphi A were the most frequent isolates from blood in Pakistani
children with suspected enteric fever, which suggests that our
clinical criteria for enrollment were specific for enteric fever
in this population. We found that the AL bottle was not superior
to PP for the recovery of
S. enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi
A, although it achieved results faster. Because we enriched
our sample with those suspected clinically to have enteric fever
and enrolled at two hospitals during 12 months, our sample size
for
S. enterica serotype Typhi was larger than is usually reported
for any one organism in a study designed to compare two different
media (
15). One must choose a medium formulation based on the
total spectrum of pediatric bloodstream pathogens in a population.
Since the anaerobic lytic medium and other lytic media that
contain saponin have been shown to have reduced recovery of
S. pneumoniae (
4), and pneumococci do cause pediatric bacteremia
in Pakistan (
8), we conclude that PP would be a better overall
choice for the evaluation of pediatric bacteremia in Pakistan,
as it is in North America.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was made possible by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund-The
Ellison Medical Foundation-American Society of Tropical Medicine
and Hygiene Postdoctoral Fellowship in Tropical Infectious Diseases
and a Glaser Foundation Glaser Pediatric Research Scholar Award
(M.E.R.).
We thank BD Diagnostics-Diagnostic Systems for donating blood culture bottles and the microbiology staff at the Aga Khan University Hospital for their assistance.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Present address: Medical Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology, Meyer B1-193, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287-7093. Phone: (410) 955-5077. Fax: (410) 614-8087. E-mail:
mreller1{at}jhmi.edu 
Published ahead of print on 12 November 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Bhutta, Z. A. 1996. Impact of age and drug resistance on mortality in typhoid fever. Arch. Dis. Child. 75:214-217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Bhutta, Z. A., S. H. Naqvi, R. A. Razzaq, and B. J. Farooqui. 1991. Multidrug-resistant typhoid in children: presentation and clinical features. Rev. Infect. Dis. 13:832-836.[Medline]
3 - CLSI. 2006. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 16th informational supplement. M100-S16. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
4 - Cockerill, F. R., J. W. Wilson, E. A. Vetter, K. M. Goodman, C. A. Torgerson, W. S. Harmsen, C. D. Schleck, D. M. Ilstrup, J. A. Washington, and W. R. Wilson. 2004. Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1724-1730.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Gilman, R. H., M. Terminel, M. M. Levine, P. Hernandez-Mendoza, and R. B. Hornick. 1975. Relative efficacy of blood, urine, rectal swab, bone-marrow, and rose-spot cultures for recovery of Salmonella typhi in typhoid fever. Lancet i:1211-1213.
6 - Huber, T. W., E. G. Macias, P. Holmes, and H. D. Bredthauer. 1975. A clinical isolate of Salmonella typhi requiring anaerobic conditions for primary isolation. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 63:117-119.[Medline]
7 - Lin, F. Y., A. H. Vo, V. B. Phan, T. T. Nguyen, D. Bryla, C. T. Tran, B. K. Ha, D. T. Dang, and J. B. Robbins. 2000. The epidemiology of typhoid fever in the Dong Thap Province, Mekong Delta region of Vietnam. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 62:644-648.[Abstract]
8 - Nizami, S. Q., Z. A. Bhutta, and R. Hasan. 2006. Incidence of acute respiratory infections in children 2 months to 5 years of age in periurban communities in Karachi, Pakistan. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 56:163-167.[Medline]
9 - Parry, C. M., T. T. Hien, G. Dougan, N. J. White, and J. J. Farrar. 2002. Typhoid fever. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:1770-1782.[Free Full Text]
10 - Petti, C. A., S. Mirrett, C. W. Woods, and L. B. Reller. 2005. Controlled clinical comparison of plastic versus glass bottles of BacT/ALERT PF medium for culturing blood from children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:445-447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Reller, M. E., A. K. Zaidi, Z. A. Bhutta, S. Sultana, B. Hanif, S. Qureshi, R. Hasan, and D. A. Goldman. 2006. Optimal diagnosis of enteric fever in children in Pakistan. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 75(Suppl.5):14-15.
11 - Sinha, A., S. Sazawal, R. Kumar, S. Sood, V. P. Reddaiah, B. Singh, M. Rao, A. Naficy, J. D. Clemens, and M. K. Bhan. 1999. Typhoid fever in children aged less than 5 years. Lancet 354:734-737.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Vallenas, C., H. Hernandez, B. Kay, R. Black, and E. Gotuzzo. 1985. Efficacy of bone marrow, blood, stool and duodenal contents cultures for bacteriologic confirmation of typhoid fever in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 4:496-498.[Medline]
13 - Weinstein, M. P., M. L. Towns, S. M. Quartey, S. Mirrett, L. G. Reimer, G. Parmigiani, and L. B. Reller. 1997. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:584-602.[Medline]
14 - Zaidi, A. K., A. L. Knaut, S. Mirrett, and L. B. Reller. 1995. Value of routine anaerobic blood cultures for pediatric patients. J. Pediatr. 127:263-268.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Zaidi, A. K., S. Mirrett, J. C. McDonald, E. E. Rubin, L. C. McDonald, M. P. Weinstein, M. Gupta, and L. B. Reller. 1997. Controlled comparison of bioMerieux VITAL and BACTEC NR-660 systems for detection of bacteremia and fungemia in pediatric patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2007-2012.[Abstract]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2009, p. 245-246, Vol. 47, No. 1
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01452-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.