Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2009, p. 322-326, Vol. 47, No. 2
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01550-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Audrey N. Schuetz,
Charles E. Hill, and
Frederick S. Nolte*
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Received 11 August 2008/ Returned for modification 8 October 2008/ Accepted 19 November 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, beginning with the initial description of a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) called KPC-1 from an isolate of K. pneumoniae in 2001 (28), carbapenem resistance in Klebsiella has been rapidly increasing. KPC enzymes have become endemic in the Northeastern/Mid-Atlantic region of the United States, with surveillance cultures of hospitals in the New York City area reporting rates of carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae isolates ranging up to 24% (6). KPCs have now been reported throughout many regions of North America, as well as in South America (23), Greece (7), Israel (13), France (16), and China (24). The rapid spread of KPC-positive K. pneumoniae strains throughout North America poses a serious problem for clinicians and laboratory investigators alike. Clinically, these organisms tend to be highly resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics, and, not surprisingly, previously reported outbreaks of KPCs have been associated with extremely high mortality rates (5, 26).
In addition, KPCs have been found in bacteria other than K. pneumonia, including Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Serratia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Salmonella (9, 11, 15, 17, 20, 22, 29). As several studies have demonstrated blaKPC genes to be flanked by transposable elements, dissemination to other gram-negative rods remains an ongoing, significant concern (4, 15, 23, 24).
There are three well-characterized isoenzymes of KPC; KPC-2 was reported to differ from KPC-1 by a single nucleotide change leading to a single amino acid change, and KPC-3 was described to differ from KPC-2 by yet another single nucleotide/amino acid substitution (15, 21, 26). Although this nomenclature has recently been revised with the published correction of the initial KPC-1 sequence, which reveals that KPC-1 and KPC-2, in fact, have identical sequences (28), the terminology prevalent in the literature has been used here (see below). Recently, sequences for four additional putative blaKPC genes, blaKPC-4, blaKPC-5, blaKPC-6, and blaKPC-7, have been entered into the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GenBank/index.html). Kinetic studies performed on KPCs demonstrate that they hydrolyze penicillins, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and carbapenems (28, 29). Although KPC-3 has a slightly higher catalytic efficiency against carbapenems than KPC-1 and KPC-2, the clinical significance of this is uncertain (1). Similar to ESBLs, KPC enzymes do not hydrolyze cephamycins and can be inhibited by the common β-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid.
Bacteria producing KPC enzymes are typically resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics and are a major public health concern. In addition, several groups have reported that KPC-producing organisms can be incorrectly identified as susceptible to carbapenems by automated antimicrobial susceptibility test systems (2, 6). Because of the frequent use of carbapenems to treat drug-resistant isolates of K. pneumoniae, this error can have serious clinical consequences. Other laboratory methods to screen for, or confirm, carbapenemase production include the modified Hodge test (14), CHROMagar KPC medium (20), and PCR for blaKPC genes (10). In this paper, we describe the development and verification of a novel real-time assay to detect and differentiate blaKPC genes and the use of this assay to test clinical isolates of Klebsiella spp. for the presence of these genes in our patient population.
|
|
|---|
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Susceptibility to meropenem and imipenem was determined with overnight breakpoint MIC panels (MicroScan; Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). Full-range ESBL confirmation panels were used for isolates with ceftazidime MICs of >1 µg/ml (MicroScan).
KPC real-time PCR assay.
A TaqMan real-time PCR assay was developed to amplify a 399-bp product from all KPC isoenzymes. A schematic of the assay design is shown in Fig. 1. The amplicon was selected so that the blaKPC-1, blaKPC-2, and blaKPC-3 could be easily distinguished by subsequent restriction digestion with the enzymes BstNI and RsaI. In brief, bacterial plasmid DNA was isolated from 2-ml cultures using QIAprep miniprep kits (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Real-time PCR amplification and detection were performed on a LightCycler instrument (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) using the following primers and probe: forward primer, 5'-TCTGGACCGCTGGGAGCTGG-3' (500 nM final concentration); reverse primer, 5'-TGCCCGTTGACGCCCAATCC-3' (500 nM final concentration); probe, 5'-FAM-CGCGCGCCGTGACGGAAAGC-TAMRA-3' (final concentration, 250 nM; FAM is 6-carboxyfluorescein and TAMRA is 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine). The 5' base of the forward and reverse primers corresponds to the nucleotide positions 610 and 1008, respectively, of blaKPC-1 (GenBank accession no. AF297554). Amplification was performed using recombinant Taq Polymerase (Qiagen) at a final magnesium concentration of 2 mM. The following cycling conditions were used: 95o for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 2 s, 62°C for 10 s, and 72°C for 15 s. The amplicons from KPC-positive samples were then digested at 48°C for 1 h in RsaI and BstNI (New England Biolabs, Ipswitch, MA) using NEB buffer 2 (New England Biolabs) and electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel to differentiate blaKPC-1, blaKPC-2, and blaKPC-3. The restriction endonucleases were selected based on the published sequences for these genes (21, 26, 28, 29). The nucleotide sequence for KPC-2 differed from KPC-1 by a single nucleotide at position 650 (A
G), and the sequence for KPC-3 differed from KPC-2 by a single nucleotide at position 944 (C
T) according to the literature at the time the assay was designed.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Real-time PCR assay for blaKPC. Real-time PCR using a TaqMan probe generates a 399-bp amplicon for all blaKPC genes. Amplicons from positive samples can be digested with BstNI and RsaI to detect the nucleotide polymorphisms in the PCR amplicon reported for blaKPC-1, blaKPC-2, and blaKPC-3 at positions 650 and 944 corresponding to GenBank accession no. AF297554. Based on the above sequence polymorphisms, restriction endonuclease digestion of the PCR amplicons should yield fragments of 359 bp and 40 bp for KPC-2 and 295 bp, 64 bp, and 40 bp for KPC-3. The KPC-1 amplicon is not cleaved by BstNI and RsaI.
|
|
|
|---|
8 µg/ml), and eight were resistant (MIC > 8 µg/ml). Of 63 isolates negative for the blaKPC gene, 62 were meropenem susceptible, and 1 (a K. oxytoca clinical isolate) was resistant. Overall, there was 98.5% concordance between the phenotypic resistance to meropenem and the real-time KPC PCR assay results. Seven isolates from four different patients were resistant to meropenem (five K. pneumoniae and two K. oxytoca isolates), and all but one isolate of K. oxytoca contained a KPC gene, as determined by PCR. All of the meropenem-susceptible clinical isolates were negative in the KPC PCR assay. However, the reference strain identified as KPC-1 was susceptible to meropenem, as determined with the MicroScan instrument. Following assay verification, we used our real-time KPC PCR assay both to confirm that carbapenem resistance in Klebsiella spp. was due to production of a KPC and to monitor the presence and spread of KPC-carrying organisms within the Emory University Healthcare System (EUHCS). From October 2006 to November 2007, we confirmed the presence of blaKPC genes in 26 isolates of Klebsiella spp. from 19 patients in all three hospitals that comprise EUHCS. Other than a single isolate of K. oxytoca, all blaKPC-containing isolates belonged to K. pneumoniae. The KPC-producing strains were isolated from nine urine, five wound, two blood, four respiratory, three bile, and three catheter tip cultures. We could confirm the presence of an ESBL in 19 of 26 (73%) of the KPC isolates.
Restriction endonuclease digestion of the PCR amplicons identified two blaKPC gene variants in our patient population: 9 isolates with C and 17 with T at nucleotide 944, consistent with blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-3, respectively. Nucleic acid sequencing of five blaKPC-2 amplicons confirmed the nucleotide substitution predicted by the restriction endonuclease digestion fragment length polymorphism (data not shown). Strains containing the variant consistent with KPC-2 were obtained exclusively from patients at Emory University Hospital while strains containing the variant consistent with KPC-3 were isolated only from patients at Wesley Woods and Emory Crawford Long hospitals.
|
|
|---|
In this study, we describe a real-time PCR designed to detect and characterize genes encoding the different KPC isoenzymes. Using this assay, we documented for the first time the presence of isolates producing KPCs in the Atlanta, GA, area and demonstrated the spread of these strains throughout EUHCS. Although KPC-producing strains of Klebsiella are endemic in the New York City area, strains are being increasingly recognized throughout the United States. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of KPC-producing Klebsiella isolated from patients in our area.
Recently, Hindiyeh et al. (10) described the development and verification of a real-time PCR assay for detection of blaKPC genes directly in perianal swabs. Carbapenem-resistant organisms, all belonging to K. pneumoniae, were isolated from 25.1% of 187 perianal samples, while PCR assays detected blaKPC-3 genes in 28.9% of the samples. Although direct detection of blaKPC by PCR may shorten the time to identify patients colonized or infected with carbapenem-resistant organisms and may be more sensitive than culture, it does not allow identification of the bacterial host of the resistance gene or detect other mechanisms of carbapenem resistance.
Our initial verification study was performed using only ESBL-positive organisms since this is the phenotype most often described for Klebsiella with blaKPC genes. However, with further experience, we identified several KPC isolates with high levels of extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance that were not confirmed as ESBLs. The presence of multiple β-lactamases can obscure ESBLs, and this observation highlights the need to test any isolate with resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins for carbapenemases.
We found a single meropenem-resistant isolate of K. oxytoca that was blaKPC negative in our assay. Although we did not determine the mechanism of resistance in this isolate, the most likely alternative mechanism of resistance is the combination of an ESBL enzyme with a porin loss (2).
In our verification study, meropenem screening on the MicroScan failed to detect meropenem resistance in one out of nine KPC-positive isolates. Although our sample size was small, the sensitivity of meropenem as an indicator of KPC-mediated resistance in our study (89%) was similar to the value (84%) reported by Anderson et al. (2). With more experience, we identified two additional patients with blaKPC-positive K. pneumoniae isolates that were called meropenem susceptible by the MicroScan. The presence of the blaKPC genes in isolates in the absence of phenotypic resistance to meropenem could be due to a lack of gene expression but more likely is due to problems associated with meropenem broth dilution MIC determinations. The reason for false susceptibility to meropenem is not completely understood; however, there is a pronounced inoculum effect on MIC determinations for meropenem and imipenem with some KPC-producing Klebsiella spp. (6). No inoculum-dependent effect has been reported for ertapenem, and it is now the preferred agent for detection of KPC-producing isolates. The limitations of routine susceptibility tests to detect KPCs may have significant clinical consequences due to the common use of carbapenems to treat infections due to ESBL-producing Klebsiella spp.
Molecular detection of blaKPC genes by PCR provides laboratories with a means to quickly identify the presence of this important resistance determinant. Considering the demonstrated potential for rapid horizontal and vertical transmission of these genes, prompt recognition is important to controlling their spread.
After this study was completed, sequences for additional blaKPC genes (KPC-4, KPC-5, KPC-6, and KPC-7) were deposited in the GenBank database. To our knowledge, descriptions of these new isoenzymes have not been published, and the sequences have not been confirmed. In addition, the geographic distribution of isolates with these newly described carbapenemases has not been defined. Based on analysis of the GenBank sequences, our primers and probes should amplify and detect all of the described blaKPC genes since no polymorphic bases were found at the primer and probe binding sites.
However, the informative single nucleotide polymorphism at position 944 (C
T) that we thought would differentiate blaKPC-2 from blaKPC-3 is shared with the other recently described variants. The nucleotide at position 944 is C for KPC-2, -4, -5, and -6, and it is T for KPC-3 and -7. Additional polymorphisms are reported to occur at positions 237, 438, and 846 for KPC-4, KPC-5, KPC-6, and KPC-7. All of the described nucleotide changes result in amino acid substitutions in the protein. As a consequence, we are unable to say with certainty that the genes detected in our isolates were blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-3. Although we were unable to unequivocally identify which of the blaKPC genes were detected in our isolates, the restriction fragment length polymorphism of the PCR amplicon did reveal the introduction and spread of two distinct blaKPC gene variants in our hospital system. These variants are most likely blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-3 since these are the most common in the United States.
Identifying carbapenem resistance due to production of KPCs remains a challenge for clinical laboratories using conventional and automated susceptibility test systems. The real-time PCR assay described here provides a useful tool to rapidly and accurately detect blaKPC genes and the emergence of KPC-mediated resistance. Accurate and timely identification of this resistance gene is an important first step in controlling its spread.
Published ahead of print on 26 November 2008. ![]()
Present address: University of Washington, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109. ![]()
Present address: The New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»