Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Dijk, S. Articles by Ruijs, G. J. H. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Dijk, S. Articles by Ruijs, G. J. H. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2009, p. 456-458, Vol. 47, No. 2
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01643-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation and Implementation of a Chromogenic Agar Medium for Salmonella Detection in Stool in Routine Laboratory Diagnostics

Saskia van Dijk,^* Marjan J. Bruins, and Gijs J. H. M. Ruijs

Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Isala klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands

Received 24 August 2008/ Returned for modification 30 September 2008/ Accepted 7 December 2008

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
We evaluated which chromogenic agar medium for Salmonella detection in stool would be most sensitive and specific in our culture protocol. The use of BBL CHROMagar Salmonella chromogenic medium combined with xylose-lysine-deoxycholate agar yielded a sensitivity of 100% and also reduced workload and costs.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
Salmonella detection in stool using conventional media, such as Salmonella-Shigella agar (SS), is based on lactose fermentation and H₂S production. The number of false-positive results with these media necessitates time-consuming and expensive additional testing. Recently, many chromogenic media with sensitivities and specificities higher than those of conventional media have been developed for the isolation of Salmonella (1, 6, 7).

We evaluated which of three chromogenic media would be an appropriate substitute for the traditional agar media in our culture protocol by using (i) stock isolates and (ii) clinical stool samples. We compared the sensitivities, specificities, and costs of the old and new methods, while safeguarding Shigella detection.

First, we evaluated three chromogenic media with 53 stock isolates stored frozen at –85°C, including 34 Salmonella strains (Table 1). We tested BBL CHROMagar Salmonella medium (BBL; BD Diagnostics, Erembodegem-Aalst, Belgium), Oxoid Salmonella chromogenic medium (OX; Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom), and SM ID2 medium (SM; bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Specific chromogenic enzyme substrates make most Salmonella isolates appear with mauve (BBL), magenta (OX), or pale-pink to mauve (SM) colonies. Isolates other than Salmonella spp. have different colors or are inhibited. All media were supplied as ready-to-use agar plates. From overnight cultures on sheep blood agar, 10-µl suspensions equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard were plated onto BBL, OX, and SM by use of a three-streak dilution method. The media were read after 24 and 48 h of incubation at 35°C.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Stock isolates used for testing three chromogenic Salmonella agar media

On BBL, all stock salmonellae produced mauve or blue-violet (Salmonella enterica subsp. arizonae and S. enterica subsp. diarizonae) colonies after 24 and 48 h of incubation. No strain was inhibited. On OX, after 24 h, Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A had pale-pink colonies and was strongly inhibited. After 48 h, Salmonella serovar Paratyphi A was still inhibited but showed the correct magenta color. S. enterica subsp. arizonae and S. enterica subsp. diarizonae produced blue colonies similar to those of other Enterobacteriaceae. On SM, both lactose-positive S. enterica subsp. arizonae strains produced lilac to pale-blue colonies.

Isolates other than Salmonella spp. with Salmonella-like colonies on BBL after 24 h of incubation were Aeromonas hydrophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. After 48 h, other organisms that gave false-positive results were Acinetobacter baumannii, Citrobacter freundii, Shigella dysenteriae, and Candida tropicalis. On OX, organisms that gave false-positive results after 24 h were A. baumannii, A. hydrophila, P. aeruginosa, S. dysenteriae, and Candida albicans. After 48 h, Citrobacter koseri, Morganella morganii, Proteus mirabilis, and Shigella boydii gave false-positive results as well. On SM, organisms that gave false-positive results after 24 h were A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, and after 48 h A. hydrophila, C. albicans, and C. tropicalis also gave false-positive results. Overgrowth of coliforms other than Salmonella spp. was lowest on BBL. Table 2 shows the sensitivities and the specificities of the chromogenic media calculated after stock isolate testing. Based on these findings, we continued the study with BBL and SM.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Sensitivities and specificities of the tested media after stock isolate testing

Second, stool samples from general-practice patients with gastroenteritis submitted to our laboratory and to the Laboratory for Infectious Diseases (LvI), Groningen, The Netherlands, were cultured according to the current protocol. Approximately 50 µl of a stool suspension (1.5 g in 6 ml 0.85% NaCl) was plated onto SS, xylose-lysine-deoxycholate agar (XLD), and Hektoen enteric agar (Oxoid). Additionally, a gram-negative broth (Difco GN broth; BD) was inoculated and subcultured onto the same media after overnight incubation at 35°C. BBL and SM were inoculated together with the traditional media, directly and after enrichment. Direct cultures and subcultures were evaluated for colonies suspected of being Salmonella and for inhibition of normal fecal flora after 24 and 48 h of incubation at 35°C.

Suspect colony types, which tested oxidase negative, were biochemically screened using test media, including triple sugar iron agar, urea agar, and lysine decarboxylase medium. Presumptive Salmonella isolates were confirmed by using a Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux) and by seroagglutination.

For calculating the sensitivities and the specificities of the media, McNemar's test was used. We compared the levels of inhibition of normal flora by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Of the 1,339 cultured stool samples, 32 (2.4%) were Salmonella positive on at least one medium, which is consistent with isolation rates from previous Dutch reports (3, 8). Table 3 shows the sensitivities and specificities of the tested media. The sensitivity of each medium was highest after reading the direct plate after 48 h and including enrichment subcultures. The results did not change after reading the subcultures after 48 h. Thirty-one Salmonella isolates were detected on XLD, and the one strain missed on XLD was found solely on BBL. XLD and BBL combined would therefore yield a sensitivity of 100%.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Sensitivities and specificities of the tested media calculated from culture results after 48 h and including enrichment

As expected, the traditional media yielded the most false-positive strains. Specificities of the chromogenic media were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Organisms that gave false-positive results with BBL and SM were Escherichia coli, M. morganii, Hafnia alvei, and Pseudomonas spp.

SM showed significantly more growth of normal fecal flora than BBL (P < 0.001).

Eigner et al. tested BBL with stool samples and found a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 99% after 48 h of incubation of direct plates (5). In two other studies, BBL and SM were compared using stock isolates and stool samples, respectively (2, 4). In both studies, after 48 h BBL had a lower sensitivity but a higher specificity than SM. Still, the sensitivity rates of BBL were 90 and 98.1%, respectively. Delorme et al. determined a lower selectivity for SM than for BBL (2), which is consistent with the larger amount of fecal overgrowth we saw on SM.

In our revised protocol, we plate stool samples directly and after enrichment in GN broth onto BBL and XLD, striving for a high sensitivity of Salmonella detection and optimal Shigella isolation. For the approximately 4,600 stool samples we process each year, we calculated that prices for inoculation, subcultures, screening, and confirmation using traditional media would be 24,150, 42, 5,015, and 6,181, respectively (total of 35,388), with the current protocol, versus 23,414, 104, 1,133, and 3,646 (total of 28,297), respectively, with the new protocol. Adding the saving of technician time, we estimate a total yearly cost reduction of 27% (12,364).

 
We thank BD Diagnostics, bioMérieux, Oxoid, and the LvI for contributing to this study.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Isala klinieken, Stilobadstraat 3, 8021 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-38-424-3111. Fax: 31-38-424-3146. E-mail: s.van.dijk{at}isala.nl

Published ahead of print on 17 December 2008.

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 

1
1. Cassar, R., and P. Cuschieri. 2003. Comparison of Salmonella chromogenic medium with DCLS agar for isolation of Salmonella species from stool specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:3229-3232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Delorme, S., A. Senta-Loÿs, V. Sauvonnet, S. Orenga, D. Robichon, and C. Roger-Dalbert. 2003. SM ID2, a new chromogenic medium for isolation, detection and presumptive identification of Salmonella: comparison with SM ID, Hektoen and four commercially available chromogenic media. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 9(Suppl. 1):214.
3
3. de Wit, M. A., M. P. Koopmans, L. M. Kortbeek, N. J. van Leeuwen, A. I. Bartelds, and Y. T. van Duynhoven. 2001. Gastroenteritis in sentinel general practices, The Netherlands. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:82-91.[Medline]
4
4. Dusseau, J. Y., P. Gérôme, J. Bougère, S. Orenga, D. Robichon, and C. Roger-Dalbert. 2004. Evaluation of the SM ID 2 medium: comparison to the SM ID, BBL CHROMagar Salmonella and Hektoën media. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10(Suppl. 3):347.
5
5. Eigner, U., R. Reissbrodt, R. Hammann, and A. M. Fahr. 2001. Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium for the isolation and presumptive identification of Salmonella species from stool specimens. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:558-565.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Maddocks, S., T. Olma, and S. Chen. 2002. Comparison of CHROMagar Salmonella medium and xylose-lysine-desoxycholate and Salmonella-Shigella agars for isolation of Salmonella strains from stool samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2999-3003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Perez, J. M., P. Cavalli, C. Roure, R. Renac, Y. Gille, and A. M. Freydiere. 2003. Comparison of four chromogenic media and Hektoen agar for detection and presumptive identification of Salmonella strains in human stools. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1130-1134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. van Pelt, P. W., M. A. de Wit, W. J. Wannet, E. J. Ligtvoet, M. A. Widdowson, and Y. T. van Duynhoven. 2003. Laboratory surveillance of bacterial gastroenteric pathogens in The Netherlands, 1991-2001. Epidemiol. Infect. 130:431-441.[Medline]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2009, p. 456-458, Vol. 47, No. 2
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01643-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Dijk, S. Articles by Ruijs, G. J. H. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Dijk, S. Articles by Ruijs, G. J. H. M.