Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2009, p. 496-498, Vol. 47, No. 2
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01429-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |

Department of Respiratory Disease,1 Department of Microbiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Fukuoka, Japan2
Received 25 July 2008/ Returned for modification 23 September 2008/ Accepted 22 November 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Upon admission to our hospital, inspiratory coarse crackles were audible from the left anterior and posterior thorax. No dental caries and no decayed teeth were seen. His chest X ray and computed tomography showed consolidations surrounded by ground-glass opacities, thickening of interlobular septa in the left lung (Fig. 1A), bilateral pleural effusions, and a pericardial effusion with thickened pericardium (Fig. 1B). Laboratory data showed mild leukocytosis (8,600 white blood cells/µl) without atypical cells including blast cells and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (19.4 mg/dl). The partial pressure of arterial oxygen was 64.0 Torr while breathing 4 liters of oxygen per minute by a nasal cannula. Tests for antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, human immunodeficiency virus, and human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 were negative. Urinary antigens of Legionella pneumophila (BinaxNOW Legionella antigen immunochromatographic test; Binax Inc.) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (BinaxNOW streptococcal antigen immunochromatographic test; Binax Inc.) were not detected. On the day of admission, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was obtained from the left S5 by using fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The recovered fluid contained many neutrophils with numerous gram-negative long rods (approximately 10 µm in length) and some gram-negative and -positive cocci (Fig. 2A). Giemsa staining revealed that the gram-negative long rods had many granules along the long axis (Fig. 2B). However, aerobic cultivation revealed only Enterococcus faecalis. In order to identify the gram-negative rods, the bacterial composition in his BALF was analyzed using a method for clone library sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene.
![]() View larger version (121K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Computed tomography scan of the chest of the subject on admission day illustrating consolidations surrounded by ground-glass opacities and thickening of interlobular septa in the left lung (A) and revealing bilateral pleural effusions and a pericardial effusion with thickened pericardium (B).
|
![]() View larger version (70K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (A) Gram staining of the BALF obtained from the left S5 using fiberoptic bronchoscopy on admission day revealing gram-negative long rods (arrows) and gram-negative and gram-positive cocci (arrowheads). (B) Giemsa staining of the same specimen showing the long rods with granules along its long axis (arrows).
|
The bacterial composition of the BALF can be found in Table 1. Twenty-eight of 58 clones (48.3%) were the most similar to the Leptotrichia wadei sequence reported under GenBank accession number AY029802 (97 to 96% homology). Ten clones (17.2%) were Veillonella spp. (five clones were the most similar to V. parvula sequence reported under GenBank accession number X84005 [99 to 97% homology], three were the most similar to the V. atypica sequence reported under accession number X84007 [99% homology], and two were the most similar to the V. dispar sequence reported under accession number X84006 [99% homology]). Seven clones (12.1%) were Enterococcus spp. (six clones were the most similar to the E. casseliflavus sequence reported under GenBank accession number Y18161 [99 to 92% homology], and one clone was the most similar to the E. faecalis sequence reported under accession number AB012212 [99% homology]). Five clones (8.6%) were Prevotella nanceiensis (GenBank accession number EF405529) (100 to 98% homology). These results indicated that Leptotrichia sp. was dominant in the BALF. Typical morphological descriptions of the genus Leptotrichia were compatible with those of the outnumbering bacteria observed in the Gram and Giemsa stainings. Veillonella spp. and Enterococcus sp. were also microscopically observed as gram-negative and -positive cocci, respectively. Overall, the bacterial composition analyzed by the molecular method was highly compatible with the microscopic findings. These findings suggested that Leptotrichia played relevant roles in this pneumonia together with mixed oral bacteria.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial composition of the clone library from the BALF specimen
|
To determine whether Leptotrichia spp. were in his mouth or not, bacterial flora of gargled water was also analyzed. The sample was obtained just after the antimicrobiotic treatments were discontinued. The analysis revealed a total of 75 clones. Forty-five clones (60.0%), 9 clones (12.0%), 8 clones (10.7%), and 7 clones (8.6%) were the most similar to Staphylococcus sp., Enterococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp., and Acidaminococcus sp., respectively. We could not find any DNA sequences similar to those of Leptotrichia species by analysis of the gargled water.
This is the first report of pneumonia potentially caused by Leptotrichia sp. as being a major responsible agent in a healthy subject. Leptotrichia spp. are anaerobic rods and a constituent of the normal flora of the oral cavity (4), and they have rarely been reported to cause serious infectious diseases (8, 10, 11). In the past, some serious infectious diseases due to Leptotrichia spp. have been reported, such as bacteremia, endocarditis, hepatic abscess, and genital tract infection in immunocompromised patients or those with poor oral hygiene, during the perinatal period, or with cardiovascular abnormalities (1, 7-11).
We think that there are two explanations for the rarity of Leptotrichia infection. First, it is difficult to cultivate anaerobes. The anaerobic cultivation method is complicated and time-consuming (approximately 1 week or more). Second, we sometimes pass over Leptotrichia species as a real causative agent because it is a member of oral bacterial flora. In cases of mixed infection by indigenous or less virulent bacteria, it is critical to distinguish whether they are only contaminants or actual causative agents. These two problems may sometimes delay accurate diagnosis and adequate treatment.
In this case, we found the indigenous oral bacteria to be a possible responsible pathogen by microscopic findings and molecular analysis of the BALF sample. There is a small possibility that the specimen was contaminated by the bacteria of the oropharyngeal flora. However, it was previously reported that oral bacterial flora rarely affects or contaminates BALF specimens obtained by fiberoptic bronchoscopy (6). Because BALF specimens are obtained directly from the infected area of pneumonia, it is highly possible that the bacteria derived from BALF are the responsible agents. In the present case, the bacterial composition of gargled water that was obtained (just after discontinuation of antibiotic administration following successful treatments) did not contain Leptotrichia sp. These results strongly suggest that the bacterium was not just a contaminant from normal oral flora but played significant roles in this infection.
Some molecular methods using broad-range PCRs of the 16S rRNA gene have been applied to clinical practice to detect causative agents of infectious diseases (2, 3). Theoretically, they are designed to detect almost any causative bacteria. This may help clinicians to detect uncultivable bacteria due to fastidious cultural conditions or prior empirical antibiotic treatments. In addition, they may be able to identify pathogens that have never been recognized as a real etiological agent. In this case, Leptotrichia sp. as a potentially major responsible bacterium for severe pneumonia was detected by cultivation-independent methods. Based on these findings, the patient in the present case was successfully treated by monotherapy of clindamycin.
In conclusion, clinicians should be aware of (i) the possibility that Leptotrichia spp. may be related to serious pneumonia in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients and (ii) the potential of 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis in a clinical setting.
Published ahead of print on 3 December 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»