Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1199-1201, Vol. 47, No. 4
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01934-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Identification of Spirochetes Associated with Contagious Ovine Digital Dermatitis
G. Sayers,1
P. X. Marques,1
N. J. Evans,3
L. O'Grady,1
M. L. Doherty,1
S. D. Carter,3 and
J. E. Nally1,2*
Veterinary Sciences Centre, UCD School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine,1
UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research,2
University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, and Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom3
Received 7 October 2008/
Returned for modification 3 January 2009/
Accepted 30 January 2009

ABSTRACT
Spirochetes of the genus
Treponema were cultured from 7 of 10
cases of digital dermatitis in sheep. Two cultures comprised
Treponema phagedenis-like and
Treponema medium/Treponema vincentii-like
spirochetes, respectively, while the remaining cultures comprised
mixed populations of
Treponema medium/Treponema vincentii-like,
Treponema phagedenis-like, and
Treponema denticola/Treponema putidum-like organisms.

TEXT
Contagious ovine digital dermatitis (CODD) is a disease of the
ovine hoof which results in acute, severe lameness (Fig.
1).
In contrast to virulent footrot, which is characterized clinically
by lesions involving the heel and the interdigital area, CODD
is characterized by ulcerative lesions of the coronary band
which progress and result in disruption of the abaxial wall
lining the hoof and loss of the horn case in untreated cases
(
1,
9,
11). The causative agent of CODD is unknown; however,
spirochetes have been associated with clinical cases of CODD
(
2,
3,
9). While evidence of CODD in Ireland is sparse, with
only one documented case (
3), anecdotal evidence from shepherds
highlighting persistent "incurable" footrot and ineffective
vaccine strategies suggest that CODD may be prevalent and being
incorrectly diagnosed as virulent footrot.
Two geographically distinct lowland sheep farms with persistent
flock lameness problems were identified. Charcoal anaerobic
swabs were used to take samples from 10 crossbred sheep with
acute lesions of the coronary band. Swab buds were buried deep
in the lesion within the broken skin-horn junction and transported
immediately to the laboratory. Samples were dipped vigorously
in 10 ml fastidious anaerobic broth (Lab M Limited, United Kingdom)
containing 20% fetal calf serum (Sigma, United Kingdom) and
10 µg/ml each rifampin (rifampicin), enrofloxacin, and
marbofloxacin (Sigma, United Kingdom) and incubated at 37°C
in anaerobic conditions.
Following 12 days of incubation, dark-field microscopy confirmed spirochetes in 7 of the 10 cultures from clinical cases of CODD. Contamination from other bacterial sources was confirmed negative in all cases by aerobic incubation on blood agar. Further morphological analysis was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission EM (TEM) (Fig. 2 A, B, and C). For SEM, an aliquot of spirochetes containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Sorensen phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) was incubated at room temperature for 1 h and centrifuged and the pellet postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M Sorensen phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 1 h at room temperature and washed twice. The pellet was dispersed in water and applied to a poly-L-lysine-coated glass microscope slide (Menzel-Glaser, Germany), air dried, and coated in gold (SEM coating unit Polaron E5100). Samples were examined by using a JEOL JSM 5410LV (JEOL, United Kingdom) SEM at 15 kV. For TEM, an aliquot of spirochetes containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Sorensen phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) was incubated at room temperature for 1 h, centrifuged, and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M Sorensen phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were embedded in Epon resin using standard methods, and ultrathin (80 nm) sections were cut using a diamond knife and a Leica UC6 ultramicrotome, picked up on 200-mesh copper grids, and contrasted with uranyl acetate (20 min) and leaf citrate (10 min). Sections were examined in a Tecnai 12 BioTwin TEM (FEI Electron Optics, The Netherlands) using an acceleration voltage of 120 kV and an objective aperture of 20 µm. Digital images at various magnifications were acquired with a MegaView 3 camera (Soft Imaging Systems, Germany). The basic defining features of treponemes were evident: a helical shape, outer and inner membranes, and approximately five flagellar filaments located in the periplasmic space (Fig. 2A, B, and C) (7).
Cultured spirochete species were also typed at the molecular
level. Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from 250 µl
of cultured broth using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen,
United Kingdom) and stored at –20°C until use. The
16S rRNA genes and 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer region
2 region were amplified, sequenced, and analyzed for species
identification (
10). Typing of mixed cultures was implemented
with a PCR method used to identify the association of
Treponema medium/Treponema vincentii-like,
Treponema phagedenis-like,
and
Treponema denticola/Treponema putidum-like DD treponemes
with bovine DD lesions, which uses species-specific primers
located within the 16S rRNA gene (
6,
6a). All seven cultures
of spirochetes were typed within the genus
Treponema (Table
1). Two of seven samples were pure cultures of
T. phagedenis-like
(100% homology to the sequence deposited in GenBank under accession
number EF057411) and
T. medium/
T. vincentii-like (99.4% homology
to the sequence deposited in GenBank under accession number
EF061252) DD treponemes (data not shown). Mixed cultures included
various permutations of the
T. medium/
T. vincentii-like,
T. phagedenis-like, and
T. denticola/
T. putidum-like DD treponemes,
as shown in Table
1.
In this study, treponemes were identified in 70% of CODD lesions,
similar to the results of a study by Moore et al. (
8). Negative
culture results should be interpreted carefully in light of
the fastidious nature of treponemes in culture and the variability
in swab sampling techniques, leading to potential false-negative
results.
T. phagedenis-like and
T. medium/T. vincentii-like
species have also been previously associated with DD in cattle
(
4,
10; N. J. Evans et al., submitted). This suggests that these
treponemes are associated with DD in both cattle and sheep,
highlighting the potential for interspecies transmission, as
noted in previous studies (
2,
5). This transmission potential
raises specific disease control and biosecurity issues for multienterprise
farming and may account for the inability of some enterprises
to achieve lameness-free status in cases where alternate housing
units and grazing of paddocks were used for sheep and cattle
as a means of disease control. The two farms investigated in
this study were combined cattle and sheep enterprises.
This study has identified spirochetes in clinical cases of DD in sheep and has characterized these spirochetes as belonging to the genus Treponema. A definitive population of culturable spirochetes from DD lesions in cattle and sheep is emerging, and an immune response to spirochete infection in sheep has been observed (5). In order to develop potential immunoprophylactic control measures for DD, the nature, extent, and specificity of this immune response will need to be determined in both cattle and sheep.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences for isolates designated Mayo A and Wicklow 8 (Table 1) have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers FM210038 and FM210039, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded by the UCD School of Agriculture, Food
Science, and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin.
We are grateful to Märit Pringle for advice on culturing techniques, David Cottell for assistance with EM, Jacques Izard for guidance on interpretation of electron micrographs, and Yvonne Abbot of the UCD Veterinary Hospital bacteriology laboratory for technical assistance.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Veterinary Sciences Centre, School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Phone: 353-1-7166182. Fax: 353-1-7166185. E-mail:
jarlath.nally{at}ucd.ie 
Published ahead of print on 9 February 2009. 

REFERENCES
1 - Abbott, K. A., and C. J. Lewis. 2005. Current approaches to the management of ovine footrot. Vet. J. 169:28-41.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Collighan, R. J., R. D. Naylor, P. K. Martin, B. A. Cooley, N. Buller, and M. J. Woodward. 2000. A spirochete isolated from a case of severe virulent ovine foot disease is closely related to a treponeme isolated from human periodontitis and bovine digital dermatitis. Vet. Microbiol. 74:249-257.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Demirkan, I., S. D. Carter, C. Winstanley, K. D. Bruce, N. M. McNair, M. Woodside, and C. A. Hart. 2001. Isolation and characterisation of a novel spirochaete from severe virulent ovine foot rot. J. Med. Microbiol. 50:1061-1068.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Demirkan, I., H. F. Williams, A. Dhawi, S. D. Carter, C. Winstanley, K. D. Bruce, and C. A. Hart. 2006. Characterization of a spirochaete isolated from a case of bovine digital dermatitis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 101:948-955.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Dhawi, A., C. A. Hart, I. Demirkan, I. H. Davies, and S. D. Carter. 2005. Bovine digital dermatitis and severe virulent ovine foot rot: a common spirochaetal pathogenesis. Vet. J. 169:232-241.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Evans, N. J., J. M. Brown, I. Demirkan, R. D. Murray, W. D. Vink, R. W. Blowey, C. A. Hart, and S. D. Carter. 2008. Three unique groups of spirochetes isolated from digital dermatitis lesions in UK cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 130:141-150.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Evans, N. J., J. M. Brown, I. Demirkan, P. Singh, B. Getty, D. Timofte, W. D. Vink, R. D. Murray, R. W. Blowey, R. J. Birtles, C. A. Hart, and S. D. Carter. 2009. Association of unique, isolated treponemes with bovine digital dermatitis lesions. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:689-696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Izard, J., and A. Limberger. 2006. Structural and genomic features of treponemal architecture, p. 39-60. In J. D. Radolf and S. A. Lukehart (ed.), Pathogenic treponema: molecular and cellular biology, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
8 - Moore, L. J., M. J. Woodward, and R. Grogono-Thomas. 2005. The occurrence of treponemes in contagious ovine digital dermatitis and the characterisation of associated Dichelobacter nodosus. Vet. Microbiol. 111:199-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Naylor, R. D., P. K. Martin, J. R. Jones, and M. C. Burnell. 1998. Isolation of spirochaetes from an incident of severe virulent ovine footrot. Vet. Rec. 143:690-691.[Free Full Text]
10 - Stamm, L. V., H. L. Bergen, and R. L. Walker. 2002. Molecular typing of papillomatous digital dermatitis-associated Treponema isolates based on analysis of 16S-23S ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer regions. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3463-3469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Winter, A. 1997. Virulent foot rot in sheep. Vet. Rec. 141:27.[Medline]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1199-1201, Vol. 47, No. 4
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01934-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.